considerations

(i) Is language study intrinsically valuable? I expressed my attitude to this question in the following words in my letter:

"I think that the language requirement is invaluable in that it offers the student a unique reorientation With the fundamental material with which he deals: his own language."

It is entirely a matter of opinion, of course. as to whether languages are so much more important than other Arts subjects that they can be justifiably singled out for emphasis in the way they have. However, I would like to hear Logan's argument for contending that "a knowledge of simple mathematics, modern history or elementary sociology are probably all more necessary for a "rounded education" than is a language.

(ii) What about overseas requirements? It seems clear that nearly all overseas universities require post-graduate Arts students to have proficiency in a second language. This situation may be iniquitous, undemocratic, or whatever—but it exists, and must be recognised as existing.

(iii) What should the minimum standard for the B.A. be? The language requirement is like a small morsel of meat in a thin slew : it's the only solid thing there Take it away and the B.A. degree will be mean. hyperpalatable gruel. The next step would be reducing the number of units in the degree to, say, five. Make it a two-year course. The B.A. is of so low value now that it would be but a short step to its compleate devaluation. As I outlined in my suggested degree design, I would like to see more compulsory requirements, not less.