Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Report on the Eleventh Victoria University of Wellington Antarctic Expedition 1966-67: VUWAE 11

Elevated Beach Ridges

Elevated Beach Ridges.

During the five days spent in the Marble Point area 12 profiles were measured across the elevated marine shore lines which extend over about half the coast between Gneiss Point and Cape Bernacchi. The shorelines are partly cut in rock but are mostly defined by gravel and cobble ridges that are similar, except that the boulders are subangular and not well rounded, to those that have formed during the last few thousand years in New Zealand. The ridges appear to be wave-formed but the sea was frozen for the whole time we were in the area (early December) and we have no idea, if, and for how long, waves now beat against the coast. Because of the lack of continuity of the ridges it was not possible to trace them far but they could be correlated by reasonable certainty from the heights alone. Heights were measured from the water in tidal holes in the ice, using a staff and the horizon as a level surface, and are probably accurate to about 0.1 metre - the accuracy being greater than the irregularity in the heights of the ridges themselves. The heights are given below (with range in brackets):
  • A[unclear: R]2(0.2), B:2.2. (0.2), C 3.1 (0.2), D 3.9 (0.2), E 6.0 (1.4), F 7.2 (0.6), G 9.2 (0.5), H 10.4 (0.2), I 11.3 (?), J 13.1 (0.2), K 115.0 (0.9), L 18.1 (1.0)

In Northern Norway a similar but more numerous series of ridges that have been attributed to isostatic uplift are reasonably well dated by four radio-carbon samples. Isostatic uplift is generally assumed to be a continuous and not an intermittent process, and isostatic continuity in Finland is substantiated by tilt observed on lakes during the past 40 years. Uplift but not the formation of specific beach ridges can be attributed to the isostatic movement, and their formation must be due to some intermittent factor, either directly climatic or to some small sea-level oscillations. The radio carbon samples indicate that the time interval between the formation of the Norwegian ridges is remarkably uniform with a value of almost page 3 exactly 400 years. Because of the uniform interval, and because, the rate of isostatic uplift has been decreasing while sea level has remained substantially stationary the vertical interval between successive Norwegian beach ridges has progressively decreased with tine for the last 6,000 years.

In South Victoria Land there is no general agreement on the age of shore line features of the kind we measured near Marble Point. However, it is possible that the 400 year cycle may well operate, and this is made likely by progressive decrease in the vertical interval between successive beach ridges indicated by the values given above. The progressive decrease in vertical interval indicates that the ridges are a single series and not, for example, in part 100,000 or more years old and in part less than 6,000 years old. The distance over which the ridges were observed is too small to determine the small tilt that is likely to have taken place, and because the difficulties in correlation it is unlikely that the direction and tilting can be established anywhere in South Victoria Land. One clear relation was observed: the older and higher ridges progressively cut out towards the south. The cut-out is attributed to the southerly retreat of the Ross Ice Shelf while the beach ridges were being cut.