SMAD. An Organ of Student Opinion. 1937. Volume 8. Number 15.
Smad Has Been Weak - Again We Say it. But Smad portrays student affairs. What is the inference?
The man Sellers states in his "letter" to Smad that "We know several students possessing some talent that have been denied expression in your columns". Can this be the cry of disappointed authorship? Or do we malign the man in thinking that he would have the energy to contribute to "Smad"?