Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

The Pamphlet Collection of Sir Robert Stout: Volume 74

VI.—How Prohibition Works in Clutha and Elsewhere

page 16

VI.—How Prohibition Works in Clutha and Elsewhere

Prohibition in the Clutha.

A year ago the Clutha Presbytery Office-bearers' Association made extensive enquiry, and published a report on the working of Prohibition within their bounds, The points made good by the evidence were :—
1.The removing of public facilities had made drink more difficult to obtain.
2.Drinking had been reduced between a half and a fourth, and the process of diminution was still going on.
3.There was an absence of the disgraceful scenes which used to be witnessed on the streets and high-ways.
4."Shouting" and social drinking had been largely abolished.
5.Many who formerly drank had ceased to do so, the temptation having been removed.
6.Storekeepers got their accounts paid with greater regularity and less trouble.

Not bad for a beginning, as Prohibition always tends to improve with time.

The Police records in the Clutha District give the following arrests for drunkenness during the last two years of license and the first two years of Prohibition :—
Under License, June 92-4. No License, June 94-96.
At Badclutha 36 4
Tapanui 11 0
Clinton 22 1
Totals 69 5
A parliamentary return supplied by Colonel Hume, Chief Commissioner of Police, was laid upon the table of the House of Representatives just before the last session closed giving the following particulars of police offences in the Clutha since prohibition was curried, and for the corrresponding period prior thereto :—
Since Prohibition.
No. of offences Reported. No. of Cases of Drunkenness with Amount of Fines. No. of Cases of Sly Grog-Selling, with Amount of Fines. No. of Cases of Perjury.
80 7 Fines, 10s. 34* Fines, £355 1
Before Prohibition (Similar Period to Above).
137 63 Fines £17 2s 6d. 4 Fines, £8. 2

A minister's wife in the Clutha [unclear: said] us: " Sir, you can tell the people [unclear: where] yon go that those of us who were [unclear: d] before the licenses were refused [unclear: ren] can testify that the moral condition [unclear: of] whole community has been raised [unclear: by] The people attend the services [unclear: of] different churehes in larger numbers [unclear: a] there has been a remarkable [unclear: incr] readiness to receive the Gospel. [unclear: S] families that never had the means to [unclear: co] out decently clad are now happy to [unclear: ta] their places among the rest at the [unclear: seri] and the various social gatherings." [unclear: Th] is surely reason enough why Church [unclear: ma] bers should vote No License. [unclear: as] indicates the awful responsibility [unclear: t] such as are too indifferent to do so.

Mr. A. S. Adams, a well-known [unclear: Dun] solicitor, wrote to Dr. Do Lantour, [unclear: o] Tapanui, in tho Ctutha electorate, [unclear: f] information as to the working of [unclear: Prohi] tion in the Ciutha. The following is [unclear: t] doctor's reply, necessarily somewhat [unclear: abl] viated:—' Tapanui,

My Dear Mr. Adams—. . . [unclear: First] there, " Prohibition has ruined the [unclear: Clu] financially." To this I give a most [unclear: es] phatic denial. During tho nine and [unclear: a-ha] years that I have been resident in [unclear: Tap] I have never known trade to be so break [unclear: a] it is now and has been for the past [unclear: twe] months, and this is the universal [unclear: cons] of opinion. The carpenters and [unclear: bulid] have never during my residence here [unclear: been] anything like so busy as they [unclear: can] Painters, too, have more than they [unclear: can] attend to. . . . I don't say that this [unclear: is] in consequence of Prohibition, but it is [unclear: at] least a coincidence, and disproves [unclear: the] "financial ruin" statement. And [unclear: there] are more coincidences. During my [unclear: res] dence hero 1 have never known of [unclear: so] many improvements being made in [unclear: the] borough in the way of road-making, [unclear: metal] ling, &c., as have been complete [unclear: with is] the past two years, and, moreover, I [unclear: don't] know of a single storekeeper who [unclear: compa] of the state of-trade. In my own [unclear: expect] ence I have no hesitation in saying [unclear: that] receive more cash and find leas difficult is getting in accounts than ever I experienced before.

Item 2. That there is more drink [unclear: sold] than ever. This is lie writ large. [unclear: The] fruit of drink-selling is drunken[unclear: e] Where is this fruit to be found; I [unclear: am] about the town and district as many as [unclear: any] man, and I don't think I have seen [unclear: s] drunken men within the past two [unclear: years] It is true that now and then [unclear: special] occasions—such, for instance, as "[unclear: smoke] concerts given to send off some old [unclear: resi-] dent" liquor is purchased wholesale, [unclear: and] drunkenness results, but this, being [unclear: e] tirely owing to the existence of [unclear: wholesala] licenses, hardly comes within what [unclear: Me] Seddon calls the " order of references."

page 17

The day after cur last agricultural show I inquired of a traveller for a firm of agricultural implement makers what was his experience of our Prohibition show. He said it was the best show for business he had ever known in Tapanui.

I was recently vaccinating a number of infants, who chiefly hailed from Kelso and Heriot. In the course of conversation I said, "How is Prohibition getting on in Kelso!" One of the ladies, acting as spokeswoman said, "Fine You know, Doctor, I never suffered from the drink (which was strictly true), but I'll tell you something.—At the sports at Kelso on New Year's Day I met. Two lady friends with their children. I could not help saying to (them, "Well, now. I'm glad to see yon here today. Why, it's years since I saw you at a gathering like this;' and one of the the ladies said, "Yes, it is fourteen years since 1 have been at a meeting of this kind; we have never at this time of the year had decent clothes to put on our backs or on our children.'" No, at the happy New Year time the cheques were all running down the liquor sink !

I said, "There is no fear of you ladies going back on Prohibition?" Quite a chorus chimed in, " No fear; we know what it is in our homes I" And that is where the benefit is being found—in the homes of the people. I see it in many a home—more com fort, more clothes, and, I believe, more food. . . .

Now, finally, in reference to private drinking. I believe that liquor is kept in houses where it never was kept in quantities before. I believe it to be true to a limited extent But it is kept only by drinking men—men who, whenever they got opportunity, made free use of the public-house; men who probably always had a bottle in the house, but who are now compelled to obtain at least two gallons; men who don't want to risk hanging about the public-house—and I submit that this is one of the strongest proofs that such Prohibition as we have does so far prohibit.

It is quite common to hear men say that there is as much drink sold as ever. Many have said so to me after this style: " You Prohibitionists have done no good; there is as much drink sold as ever—well, not .so such as ever, but you know it is sold." Oh, yes, it is sold; but only to trusted customers—and since the prosecutions these are becoming fewer and fewer—and never to quantities which the seller judges would be sufficient to intoxicate.

To conclude, I believe there are few who do not admit that a large measure of success has attended Prohibition in the Clutha, I am afraid I have written at great length and somewhat discursively, but I have endeavoured to give you my version the question, and to under rather than overrate the amount of success which [unclear: so-license] has achieved.

Bertrand C. De Lautour.

We said to a storekeeper in Clutha, "How does Prohibition affect you?" "Well," said he, " before we had Prohibition I was not a Prohibitionist; but I am now. There are men about here that before I could not trust with a shilling, whom I can safely trust with pounds [unclear: now]."

What Prohibition does for a City.

The Alliance and Temperance News S.A., for October 1st., 1896, says:—" Where entire Prohibition is the law it may be expected that distinct financial results will follow Partisans of the trade declare that ruin will be the result, but facts prove the contrary. The city of Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A., may be quoted as a case in point. According to the assessor's books property in the municipality has increased two million dollars under prohibitory law. The loss of forty thousand dollars saloon revenue has been no obstacle to the city's commercial and industrial prosperity. Fifteen new house-furnishing stores have been started since Prohibition went into effect, and more furniture has been sold to mechanics and labouring men in the last year than in any twelve months of the city's history; the number of city banks has increased; the coming of four new railroads has been settled; the manufacturing interests have received new life, and all real estate companies have seen their stock double in value since the advent of Prohibition, two former 'liquor streets,' where once it was not considered safe for a woman to walk without an escort, are now as orderly as any other, and property on them has advanced from 10 to 25 per cent. The authority for these statements further testifies as to the diminution of crime as the result of Prohibition. 'Two weeks,' it says, ' were formerly necessary to get through with the criminal docket; during the present year it was closed in two days. The chain gang is left with almost nothing but chains and balls; it would not be large enough to work the public roads were it not augmented by supplies from other counties,' And one secret of this Prohibition success is told in the words—'The city government is in the hands of our beat citizens.

Vote for Me.

"Say, papa, how are you going to vote ?"
'Twas a child's bright word, and he could not note
How the red blood mantled his father's face,
As he clasped the wee one in close embrace;
But he prattled on in his childish glee,
"Say, papa, why won't you vote for me ?"

Out of the door strode the father fast,
And never a glance behind him cast,
As on to his place at the polls he went;
But the words the boy spoke were surely meant
By God above to follow him there,
For they haunted his steps like a mother's prayer.
"Vote for me, papa," the bells rang out;"
Vote for me," sounded the schoolboy's shout;
"Vote for me," came from the rum-seller's door
In the oaths ho had never thus heard before;
At last with a smile he whispered low,
"If I vote for my boy I can vote only No"

Katherine L. Stevenson

* A number of these were convictions of dislicensed persons who formerly sell unlawfully license and [unclear: e] conviction.—(Ed.)