Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Salient. Official Newspaper of the Victoria University Students' Association. Vol 44 No. 12. June 8 1981

Pawns of the Empire — Breaker Morant — Embassy

Pawns of the Empire

Breaker Morant

Embassy

Photo from the film 'Breaker Morant'

Breaker Morant is not a cinematic breakthrough. It is not the tirst great Australian movie, it is not going to set any trends in the industry or the art, it breaks no new ground for the cinema at all. So what?

I is what it is; and it is a very good example of what it is, a courtroom drama with political overtones. It is fluent, it is largely credible, it bears few signs that it is an adapted stage play. (This is important; anyone who has seen that truly dreadful Conduct Unbecoming will realise how important it is to differentiate between a filmed play and a movie.)

The acting is good; very good in patches: Edward Woodward does not make a terribly believable Australian with all these dinkum ockers around him, but his portrayal of a horse breaker and poet with all the apparent contradictions of such a character ironed out is a credit to him.

Friends of mine think that Jack Thompson as the country solicitor called on to defend three soldiers charged with murder is the pick of the actors in the film; personally I find that the transformation of him from disorganised solicitor to Stentorian barrister is a little easy, but that could well be a directorial problem. (It'd be damned hard to do it perfectly anyway.)

Gift for Detail

Director Beresford seems on the whole to be well in control, and he has a great gift for detail. This shows up particularly well in the Boer attack on the fortress where the trial is taking place. We see the cluster of troop tents in the early morning sunlight, and coming down the hills in the background a line of horsemen, all in absolute silence. We see a couple of shots of individual attackers, one sporting a cigar; later we see the same man lighting bombs with that same cigar.

The plot is clear enough, not running into the problem that most attempts at filming historical events run into, that of having too many characters. But the point that is supposed to be made by it is not so clear. Obviously there is a strong element of Aussie republicanism in it, the historical exactitude of which I doubt, but precedent says it's no sin to put modern attitudes in what purports to be a historical film.

Simply Anti-War

However, the film seems to steer clear of the whole question of South Africa and the Boer war; and ultimately seems to say that regardless of where the war was and why it was fought, the Aussies shouldn't have been in it.

Perhaps however, one should not look too closely at this, for the film has so many other strong points that it is unfair to make more of this problem than is really warranted. It is a good, strong film, with very little of that rather embarrassing stuff that makes you think "this is very good - for Australia". Breaker Morant is good for anywhere, and is recommended.

S.D.

Photo from the film 'Breaker Morant'