Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Salient. Official Newspaper of the Victoria University Students' Association. Vol 44 No. 9. May 4 1981

Proposed Possible Solutions

Proposed Possible Solutions

  • Cease trading and wind up the company.
  • STB has three real assets: the ISIC agency and its other business; furniture and fittings; and the debt owed to it by NZUSA. In the case of winding up, STB would lose all these assets except the debt from NZUSA.
  • Estimated cost of winding up: between $200,000 and $250,000. (The Board of Directors of STB estimated a cost of $261,000 for this option).
  • This money would be paid over by NZUSA, without any real hope of seeing any of it again.
  • Injection of funds through increase in share capital.
  • This was the recommendation of the STB Board of Directors. They were looking for an injection of at least $150,000; $66,000 from NZUSA's debt repayment, and $100,000 in new share capital. Bank overdraft eliminated, AUSTS debt lowered to $26,000, in turn reducing debt servicing costs. (Cost estimated by VUWSA's law firm of this option: at least $160,000).
  • Objections: 1981 students paying the full amount of losses over past several years.
  • The money injected will simply pay off debts, not create value. STB's next step would have to be to approach the bank for a further overdraft.
  • STB would be over capitalised; perhaps having some $250,000 share capital with a relatively tiny value of assets.
  • No change in the present administrative structure. Difficulties between NZUSA and STB would continue unchanged.
  • The Rennie/Victoria Proposal
  • Explained in detail in the article on page 5. However, total cost of $116,000; share capital roughly equivalent to assets; and providing a base of operating capital.
  • Allows one company to get on with debt repayment, and the other to get on with providing travel services.

Note: the above figures and conclusions are, in general, drawn from a memorandum supplied by the law firm of MacAlister Mazengarb Parkin & Rose to VUWSA on 29-4-81; and a report furnished from the Board of Directors of Student Travel Bureau Ltd to NZUSA on 24-4-81.