Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Salient. Victoria University Student Newspaper. Volume 39, Number 18, July 26, 1976.

Waiting for a Superpower War

Waiting for a Superpower War

Dear Sir,

Drawing of a superhero cooking

I have viewed with concern the recent rise of the Russian menace and the threat to our way of lite. I am concerned because that menace appeared so suddenly, coinciding as it has with the ascendency of Muldoon and Fraser and a strong challenge to Ford from Reagan in the States. Why? I ask myself, has wicked old Russia assumed a threat of such proportions, almost akin to that of the '50s? I find it difficult to believe that the old villain is any more of a danger to our security than she ever was. Have we, and our leaders, since the Berlin Wall really been sleeping on a powder-keg, blissfully unaware of the mounting danger to our peace, freedom democracy etc Western style - or does the answer lie elsewhere?

A possible answer revealed itself when I recalled an American publication, 'Report from Iron Mountain', published in the U.S.A. in 1967, introduced by L.C. Lewin but the source bieng anonymous. It caused an enormous stir at the time only to be unheard of by the 1970s - 'The Pentagon Papers' will no doubt suffer a similar fate. The book purports to be the findings of a committee set up by the U.S. Government to investigate the possible effects of world peace i.e. the total absence of war, upon U.S. society. The U.S. Government quickly denied knowledge of any such committee which was understandable since the book slates that war plays an essential part in U.S. society, and the alternative, as alternative there would have to be if society were not to fall apart, would be so much more unpleasant. What right thinking, peace loving government would admit to even considering such a report?

What has this to do with the price of fish? Read the book and you'll see - I hope. Consider the following propositions:
a)

A society is only ever truly united when it faces a threat from without. We've been a bit short of enemies lately, what with long detente with Russia and almost embarrassingly good relations with China. That old bogey. Communism, a Godsend to Capitalism in providing a threat to fight against, has, over the years, lost its appeal as an enemy and needs a revival.

We've had no wars since Vietnam, stirring stuff for a while but had limited appeal and lost its magic long before it finally came to an end. Communism is O.K. but difficult to come to grips with on its own what we need is something more concrete. China's out of the question at the moment for various reasons, but our old enemy Russia, big, power full, well armed and obviously imperialistic, fits the bill beautifully - so long as it doesn't get too serious of course.

I should at this point draw attention to the relative lack of reaction from Russia, or so it would appear, to the accusations pouring in from the West - not to mention China. Could it be that another cold war with the U.S. is just what the Soviet heads of state need to reignite the fire of the 'revolutionary spirit' that has perhaps been flagging of late? For similar reasons China might welcome an intensification of feelings amongst Chinese against their neighbour. Indeed the cynic may well wonder whether the three of them, Russia, America and China, with there respective dependents, didn't jack the whole thing up between them since they all stand to gain from the situation - disregarding, of course, the man in the street.

A bit far fetched, you may say, but the Kiwis were never so united as when they were fighting the forces of the Nazis and the Japanese. Not to mention being fully employed physically and mentally with little time to consider other problems.

b)

War, or even the threat of war, is good for the economy, the Capitalist economy, at least. For reasons obvious to the economist, armament production is far more lucrative than building houses for the homeless or schools for their kids - a particularly salient point to consider when in the throes of a recession. Please note the National governments cuts in various areas of public spending, the one notable exception, perhaps, being the armed services who've been promised an increase in their allowance.

c)

The greater the perceived threat from outside the less your 'man in the street' is likely to take much notice of what is, or is not, going on at home. Recent years in Western countries have been marked by strong pressure from groups in moral and social areas such as education, women's liberation, race relations, homosexual law reform - to name a few. The presence of an aggressor lends to effectively divert attention from these internal and continuing problems which our leaders often prefer to ignore.

The constant threat of war could be seen to be the ideal stale since actual, full-scale wars such as WW 11 tend to upset the status quo and often in a way quite unpremeditated by those who allow or encourage them to happen. The relatively localised wars that were witnessed periodically since WW 11 such as Korea and, more recently, Vietnam, have helped provide the necessary economic stimulus, social unity and diversion without too much threat to the status quo - though things were never quite the same afterwards, 'Little wars', then, may be seen as a workable proposition. The problem is that they sometimes can get out of hand but then nothing's perfect.

Yours faithfully,

Barney Quaddel;