Sir,—There has been a lot of shouting about "sexual anarchy" in recent issues of Salient. I understand, sir, that when one uses the term "sexual anarchist" one is drawing a distinction between a sexual democrat, a sexual fascist or a sexual communist. It would seem therefore that sexual democrats take a vote before going to bed; sexual fascists force their way into bed and sexual communists all go to bed together.

I take it that the sexual anarchist would reject these approaches: that is, reject the commune, reject the force and reject the mob supervision. This would leave spontaneity, responsibility, mutuality. Rare qualities.