"Flamboyant, Emotional"

No, said Mr. Hamme, "Salient" has said what it liked on conscription and he upheld its right to do so. But this was "scurrilous", it was in bad taste; it was poor journalism. And he hoped that in future we would see better stuff. The motion was "a Flamboyant, emotional attack" though we ourselves were not being attacked. Legal action would be out of the question. The fine was, of course, excessive, though we had no good grounds to attack the Board on in a conflict. "A reasonable amendment', he termed it, and it was moved that the amendment be put.