...mules...

In fact of this idisputablc evidence. OU, backed by CUC continued to support the motion. It was obvious that the support was not grounded on the capabilities of Rev. Sullivan. At this point it was clear, that if the original motion had been voted on then and there it would have been defeated. There followed a rapid succession of amendments, withdrawar or motions, and intricate manoeuvring, until finally AUC moved a 10-minute adjournament. When the meeting resumed. Mr. Evison, of VUC, moved that "while Rev. Sullivan had certain undoubted ability, it was unwise to accept his application without giving others interested a chance to apply, or giving other colleges a chance to consider nominations." He therefore moved that Rev. Sullivan's application be received and referred to the resident Exec, for consideration along with any other nominations which might be received within a set period.