"That State control of coal mines would ensure an adequate supply of coal" was a subject which brought forth an impressive array of statistics whose sources ranged from year books of assorted vintages to informal telephone conversations with the Mines Department. The number of ways in which the 1944 Year Book can be interpreted is amazing.

Mr. Ord opened the debate by enumerating the advantages of State control—more capital and co-ordination, less friction between employer and employee. The superior efficiency was indicated by the rise in production since the State had taken over certain mines. (Judge's comment: He was surprisingly restrained for a self-declared socialist.)

Mr. O'Connor presented a shattering list of names and figures to refute these arguments. The increase in the number of miners and the adoption of the open-cast system accounted for the rise in total production, while individual efficiency had decreased. (Judge's comment: Sound arguments, but he should not have spoken as if to an audience of 1,000.)

Miss Marshall produced a further version of the relevant figures and established that the private ownership system was financially incapable of continuing. State ownership would ensure improved working conditions and thus increased efficiency.

Miss Kelly detailed examples of inefficiency since certain mines had been subject to State control. Remark from floor: "Wonderful heads these girls have for figures."