Other formats

    TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Temperance and Prohibition in New Zealand

Introduction

Introduction

AT the beginning of the period under review (1897– 1908) we find well established the right of the people in each electorate to decide for themselves whether the open bar should go or stay.

The greater reform of National Prohibition then seemed far off, but the lesser reform of No-License was heartily welcomed. It was expected that this scheme of partial Prohibition, where carried, would be an object lesson to the Colony, inasmuch as it would demonstrate that improved social and industrial conditions naturally follow the closing of the liquor bar. It would also, it was hoped, lessen to some extent the national sum of human misery and loss arising from the drink traffic.

But while the good results of No-License, where secured, were readily recognized, it was found that there were many and great difficulties in the way of giving due effect to the expressed will of the people. The three-fifths majority handicap, the malign influence of the Trade, the open hostility of certain politicians, the bias of some magistrates, the indifference or ignorance of a section of the people, all militated against the educative work of the Alliance.

But reformers are not easily daunted. By organization, ceaseless endeavour, liberality; with courage, unquenchable faith in the righteousness page 79 of the cause, and hope for an ultimate victory, the Alliance and its many supporters worked on wisely, temperately, and effectively. The most important results achieved during the period and the most noteworthy events are here set down in their proper order.