The Material Culture of the Cook Islands (Aitutaki)
Worked Stone Implements
Worked Stone Implements.
The worked stone implements seen in Aitutaki consisted of adzes, chisels, and pounders.
Adzes.
Adzes, though picked up near the old village sites when cultivating, were scarce, owing to several visitors of distinction having preceded me. Only five were obtained, but a fine hafted specimen is in the Auckland Museum, whilst Mr. H. D. Skinner sent notes and diagrams of five specimens in the Peabody Museum, Harvard. As the Aitutaki adzes seen are similar to those of Rarotonga, the opportunity was taken of examining over 50 adzes in Mr. Wix's collection in Rarotonga. With a number collected and those in the Auckland Museum over a hundred Rarotongan adzes were examined.
Terminology. Elsdon Best,3 in describing in 1912 the stone implements of the Maori, was the first to attempt a descriptive terminology of Polynesian adzes.
R. Linton,2 in his work on the Marquesas, uses poll in the same sense as Mr. Best, but outer and inner instead of face and back.
H. D. Skinner,4 in describing Moriori adzes in 1923, suggested alterations in terminology. He abandoned Best's use of the term blade, substituted front for face, and omitted butt shoulder as unnecessary. He dropped butt end and substituted grip, which he defined:—"The grip is constituted by the shaping of the front and sides to hold the binding by which the adze is attached to the haft. It is a feature, not a region, and is absent from several types of adzes." He states that Dr. H. S. Harrison wished to page 214substitute tang, but as tang already had a rather specialized meaning, he retained grip.
Linton uses the word tang in the same sense as Dr. Harrison, for he says, "The tang is formed by chipping away a portion of the upper end of the outer surface. It cannot be distinguished on the inner surface. In some of the triangular specimens the sides of the tang are also chipped away, giving the blade a slight shoulder, but this is not a common feature."
Though both Harrison and Linton seem to regard tang as a region, Skinner's contention that it is unsuitable because it has come to convey a special feature must be upheld. This feature is the extra chipping or working of the sides, and makes it comply more with the usually accepted meaning of a projecting shank or prong, such as the piece forming an extension from the blade or analogous part of a table knife or fork, file, chisel, or the like, to connect with the handle. Skinner, however, states that his grip is a feature, and not a region. Therefore neither grip nor tang are suitable terms to replace Best's butt end, which denotes a region. The butt end occurs in all adzes, and grip, denoting that the butt end has been shaped to hold the binding, does not. Tang is a still further modified grip.
Figure 187.
Terminology of Adzes, adapted from Best and Skinner.
Bv.S.—Bevel shoulder. L.L.—Left lateral. R.L.—Right lateral.
Adze. The adze is the stone implement without handle or lashings.
The adze may be regionally divided into the butt and the blade.
Butt. The butt is the upper part of the adze, which is covered by the lashing when the adze is hafted.
The butt is fitted to the foot of the handle and lashed in position. The junction between the butt and the blade may or may not be distinguished by shaping.
In Fig. 188, the parts of the adzes above the line JN are the butts and the parts below are the blades.
In A all the surfaces of the butt are ground equally and are continuous with those of the blade. The junction may be judged approximately, but cannot be defined with accuracy unless the adze is hafted.
In B, the butt is pecked to form a grip for the lashing.
In C, the butt is clearly defined by shaping the anterior and lateral surfaces to form a well-defined grip. The shaping of the anterior surface of the butt thus forms a butt shoulder across the anterior surface of the adze, and accentuates the junction between the butt and the blade.
In D the condition is similar to C, but the butt shoulder is still more accentuated by the upper margin of the anterior surface of the blade being raised into a ridge. See lateral view of D.
In E, the butt surfaces are equally ground with those of the blade, but a raised transverse ridge forms a butt shoulder to prevent the blade working up under the lashing.
Blade. The blade is the lower part of the adze which is free of the lashing to the handle.
page 216Anteriorly, the blade projects down from below the lashing, and posteriorly, from beyond the lower part of the foot of the handle, which is known as the toe.
Poll. The poll is the upper end of the butt.
The poll is really the superior surface formed by the exposed cross section of the butt. It may be rough and irregular, or it may be well defined by the clean cut edges of the adjoining surfaces. It may be chipped level or even ground level, as in some Cook Islands adzes. Examples are known to exist where the surface of the poll was ornamented with spirals.
Cutting edge. The cutting edge is the sharpened transverse lower end of the blade.
Bevel surface. The bevel surface is the surface that is ground posteriorly to form the cutting edge.
The bevel surface is regionally antipodal to the poll surface. It is the exposed section of the lower end of the adze, but the true lower cross section has been chipped and ground away to form an inclined plane, which takes its place. The bevel surface is really a postero-inferior surface as opposed to the superior surface formed by the surface of the poll. The bevel surface thus shares the general characteristics of the cross section of the adze, being quadrangular or triangular, as the case may be, Fig. 190 A and B.
In some chisels, and in Melanesian adzes, where the longitudinal edges are not defined, or are rounded off, the bevel surface will of necessity be more or less elliptical, Fig. 190C.
page 218Bevel shoulder. The bevel shoulder is the line where the bevel surface and the posterior surface meet. See Fig, 190A and 191A.
In cases where the bevel surface merges gradually into the posterior surface the bevel shoulder does not exist, Fig. 191B, and the posterior limit of the bevel surface is not defined. In adzes that are triangular in section, with an anterior surface, there can be no true bevel shoulder, as there is no posterior surface. It disappears to the point at the apex of the triangular bevel surface where the converging posterior-lateral surfaces meet at the posterior longitudinal edge. Figs. 190B and 191C. For convenience, this point may be termed the bevel apex, Bv.A.
The definitions of bevel surface and bevel shoulder apply to the true adze forms. They cannot apply to adzes that are termed axe-form by Mr. Best,3 for there is an equal anterior bevel, "thus bringing the cutting edge into the axial centre of the blade." See Fig. 191D. Here the anterior and posterior bevel surfaces merge gradually into the anterior and posterior surfaces of the blade and as Best states, there is no sharply pronounced shoulder visible on either surface, save in rare cases.
Butt shoulder. The butt shoulder is a definite line of demarcation between the butt and the blade, formed by a raised ridge on the anterior surface of the adze, by shaping the anterior surface of the butt into a grip, or by a combination of both. See Fig. 188E. C, and D.
The line is in almost all cases convex towards the butt. The term was used by Best,3 and discarded by Skinner4 as unnecessary. In the Cook Islands adzes, it is a very characteristic feature, and is more useful than bevel shoulder, which Skinner retains. In some adzes it is not present.
Grip. As defined by Skinner, p 213.
page 219Whilst not defining tang, we may say that it has come to signify a specialized grip, and should not be regarded as synonymous with butt.
Surfaces. Three different writers have used the terms face, front, and outer for the same surface. We will add a fourth, and call it anterior. For back or inner, posterior will be used, and for sides, lateral surfaces. The terms suggested may be longer, but they are capable of more exact usage. They are used in anatomy, where exact position is essential, and they have stood the test of time in spite of attempts to alter them. They are also capable of being combined.
Longitudinal edges. The longitudinal edges are the longitudinal edges formed by the meeting of two surfaces. See Figs. 187 and 189.
Thus in adzes which are quadrangular in section there are four longitudinal edges; two antero-lateral edges formed by the meeting of the anterior surface and the two lateral surfaces, and two postero-lateral edges formed by the meeting of the two lateral surfaces and the posterior surface.
page 220In adzes triangular in section there are three longitudinal edges; two antero-lateral edges formed by the meeting of the anterior surface and the two postero-lateral surfaces, and one posterior edge formed by the meeting of the two postero-lateral surfaces, or one anterior edge and two postero-lateral edges if the adze is reversed.
These edges are usually well defined on the blade, and are important in distinguishing Polynesian adzes from Melanesian. In the latter there are usually no longitudinal edges. The longitudinal edges of the blade are usually continuous with those of the butt, except in adzes with well-formed grips. Here the two antero-lateral longitudinal edges of the butt are on a different plane, owing to the shaping of the anterior surface, and they are usually rounded off in shaping the anterior part of the lateral or postero-lateral surfaces to form the grip. The postero-lateral or posterior edges are seldom modified in shaping the grip.
Section. The section of an adze is a cross section of the blade above the bevel surface, unless otherwise specified.
Adzes that are triangular in section through the blade above the bevel surface are quadrangular through the bevel surface.
Width. The width is the transverse measurement.
Thickness. The thickness is the antero-posterior measurement.
Types of Adzes.
The Aitutaki adzes, like those of the other islands of the Cook Group, are well made and pleasing to the eye. They are ground on all surfaces, and polished when the material will take a polish. The surfaces of the butt are usually ground and polished equally with these of the blade, except the parts that are shaped for a grip. In one adze, Fig. 194A, the grip was polished equally with the blade. This feature was also observed in some Rarotongan adzes. In some the surface of the poll was ground level. They form a great contrast with the rough surfaces of the Marquesan adzes figured by Linton2.
The adzes seen will be classified according to cross section, which seems the most fundamental structural condition that influenced shape.
A.—Adzes Triangular in Cross Section.
(1.) Triangular in cross section, with base anterior.
This division forms by far the commonest type in the Cook Islands. Linton says they are characteristic of the south-eastern Polynesian area. Of the six Aitutaki adzes, five were of this type, and in Skinner's five three were triangular.
In the characteristic form the base of the sectional triangle lies anteriorly. The three main surfaces of the adze are thus anterior and right and left postero-lateral.
The anterior surface is definitely divided by a well-formed butt shoulder into the lower quadrilateral blade surface and the upper butt surface, which is shaped into a grip. Posteriorly, the postero-lateral surfaces meet in a well-defined median posterior longitudinal edge in the upper part of the adze, and are separated in the lower part by a well-defined triangular bevel surface.
The above general characters can be seen in the adzes figured, which are shown with an anterior, posterior, and right lateral view. This order is observed throughout. In some of the series of three views the adze is not always of the same size, owing to its having been reproduced from photos. taken in different focus.
page 222The butt is shaped to form a grip by working the anterior surface and the adjoining parts of the posterolateral surfaces. The longitudinal edges bounding the anterior surface of the butt are thus rounded off. The posterior longitudinal edge is well defined and continuous with that of the blade. The poll may be rounded or almost pointed, but it is usually a well-defined superior triangular surface that may be chipped level, or even ground.
The butt shoulder is formed by the shaping of the anterior surface of the butt and the rounding off of the longitudinal edges. It is a characteristic feature of these adzes.
The blade has a quadrilateral anterior surface, bounded laterally by the longitudinal edges, above by the butt shoulder, and below by the cutting edge. It is usually wider at the cutting edge, but it may be of even width throughout, or even narrower at the cutting edge. The anterior surface has both a longitudinal and a transverse convexity. The former is accentuated near the cutting edge, and the latter near the longitudinal edges. The postero-lateral surfaces of the blade are continuous with those of the butt, except in the anterior parts of the latter that have shared in the shaping of the grip. The surfaces are convex antero-posteriorly.
The triangular bevel surface is another characteristic feature. The base of the triangle is formed by the cutting edge, and the sides by the oblique edges where the bevel surface meets the two postero-lateral surfaces of the blade. The apex is formed by the three surfaces meeting at the posterior longitudinal edge. This point regionally represents the bevel shoulder of quadrangular adzes. For convenience, it has been referred to as the bevel apex. The bevel surface is usually concavo-convex. It is concave transversely at and near the cutting edge, where it follows the transverse convexity of the anterior surface of the blade. It may be a marked feature that extends posteriorly on the bevel surface. It is due to extra grinding in the mesial line with a hone. See the cross sections through the bevel surface in Figs. 196 and 198. When the bevel surface is ground level transversely there is a downward convexity at the cutting edge. The convexity of the bevel surface is longitudinal and is accentuated near the cutting edge. See page 223the right lateral views in the various figures, where the bevel surface is on the left.
Variations. The above description applies to most adzes of this type, but there is great variety, not only in size, but in the proportion of the various parts to each other.
(1.) | Longitudinal axis of butt and blade.
Instead of the butt being in the same longitudinal axis as the blade, it may have a posterior inclination of varying degree. This accentuates the general anterior convexity of the adze, Fig. 194A. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2.) | Relative length of butt and blade.
The butt may be short as compared with the blade, Fig. 193. In long-bladed adzes, it is natural for the butt to appear relatively short. When the butt reaches its maximum length of utility, it is unnecessary to keep on increasing it in proportion to the increasing length of the blade. In spite of this, however, some butts are shorter with long blades than in others with blades of lesser length. The dimensions of the adze in Fig. 193B are shown in Fig. 196. The butt may even be longer than the blade, Fig. 194B and 195. It is natural that with short blades the butt should be relatively long. There must be sufficient length of butt to provide secure hafting. In many adzes the relative shortness of the blade is due to re-grinding the bevel surface, to sharpen or to get rid of gaps. An early writer states that the wood-workers in Tahiti had water and a sharpening stone beside them, and they were constantly re-sharpening their tools. Every
page 224
time an adze is sharpened the blade is shortened. The time must sooner or later arrive when the adze blade is too short to be useful. It is cast aside as a reject. Years later, when the villages of the stone age period have disappeared, it is picked up and gets into circulation, to cause conjecture amongst archaeologists. Each one has to be examined carefully before it can be decided whether it came from the refuse heap or the tool shop. Probably an occasional reject escapes the censor and enjoys the unsought honour of figuring as a new type.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3.) | Relative width of the butt shoulder and the cutting edge.
The above characteristics are shared by the long Aitutaki adzes, Fig. 19, and the unground Rarotongan adze, Fig. 197A. For comparison, the principal measurements are given as follows:—
B.S.—Butt shoulder. C.E.—Cutting edge. Bv.S.—Bevel surface. The thickness is taken just below the butt shoulder, and the length of the bevel surface from the cutting edge to the bevel apex. The other adze, Fig. 197B, is also unground and unpolished. It has a marked butt shoulder ridge, and the blade is wider at the cutting edge. page 226 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4.) | Proportion of width of blade to length of blade.
The proportion is naturally noticed best by a view of the anterior surface of the blade. The blade may be long and narrow, Fig. 193, or short and wide. Fig. 194. If the half of the added width of the blade at the butt shoulder and the cutting edge is taken as the mean width, we may get a blade width index expressing the proportion of width to length. Thus in the long narrow blade in Fig. 196 it is 34.2, whilst in the short stumpy blade in Fig. 195 it is 78. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5.) | Treatment of the butt.
A characteristic feature of the triangular adzes is the shaping of the butt to form a grip. This is done by working down the anterior surface of the butt. Whatever the primary processes may be, the surface is left roughened by grinding to give better support to the lashing, or any material that may be laid over the surface before the lashing is applied. The working of the anterior surface of the butt places it on a different plane to the anterior surface of the blade, and thus creates a butt shoulder. This assists in preventing the blade from working up under the lashing when a blow is struck. That the butt shoulder came to be regarded as more important than the roughened surface is indicated by the fact that in some triangular adzes, Fig. 194A, the anterior surface of the shaped grip is polished equally with the blade. It may be that in the method of hafting to be described, the roughening of the anterior surface of the grip was not necessary to give additional security to the lashing. In good adzes, the grinding down was primarily to provide a butt shoulder, and the surface was left rough, not to give security to the lashing, but because it was concealed by the lashing. Some more energetic craftsmen polished the surface. As the butt continues the triangular cross section of the blade and. the base of the triangle forms the anterior surface, the grinding down of the anterior surface naturally reduced its width. The reduction in width was further increased by rounding off the longitudinal edges that are formed on either aide with the postero-lateral surfaces of the butt. The shaping and grinding on these latter surfaces extended posteriorly for varying distances. It is usually just enough to round off the longitudinal edges. The posterior parts of the postero-lateral surfaces, as far as the posterior longitudinal edge, share in the polish of the page 227same surfaces of the blade. They are continuous with them. There is no ridge or shoulder to break the continuity. In polishing the upper part of these surfaces on the blade, the rubbing of necessity encroached on the butt surfaces, and the craftsman made a job of it by continuing the polishing to the poll. It is rarely that the grinding or roughening extends over the entire postero-lateral surfaces of the butt, but such occurs in the large Aitutaki adze, Fig. 193A. Variation occurs in the amount of grinding immediately above the butt shoulder. In some cases it is slight, and the surface slopes back gradually to the plane of the anterior butt surface. In other examples a groove is ground, which may extend slightly on to the postero-lateral surfaces. Again, this groove may have a downward inclination as in Figs. 195 and 196. This serves to throw out the corners formed by the butt shoulder with the longitudinal edges of the anterior surface of the blade. It is this appearance in adzes from other regions that gave rise to the term shouldered celt. The butt normally narrows towards the poll. In some cases the narrowing is more accentuated than in others. Thus in triangular adzes the butt is narrower than the blade, and suggests the use of the term tang. Attention is again drawn to the fact that this appearance is primarily due to grinding away of the anterior surface of the butt, which forms the base of a triangle. If, in the so-called tanged adzes reported from other areas, such as Cambodia, the appearance is primarily arrived at by working away the lateral surfaces, the method of manufacture must be considered in drawing comparisons. So also must the cross section of the adze. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6.) | Treatment of the butt shoulder.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7.) | The bevel surface.
The bevel surface is usually approximately straight transversely, but is generally concave at the cutting ridge. This tranverse concavity may be very well marked and extend over the bevel surface as far as possible. See cross section in Fig. 196. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8.) | Posterior longitudinal ridge. |
In the usual type of adze, the blade is longer than the bevel surface. The bevel surface thus meets the posterior longitudinal line of the blade at some point below the level of the butt shoulder. See posterior view of Fig. 196. A cross section of the blade above this point thus shows a typical triangle, with the apex formed by the posterior longitudinal edge.
In some cases, where the blade is short and thick, the bevel surface may be longer than the blade, Fig. 195. In other words, the bevel surface does not meet the posterior longitudinal edge on the blade at all, but at some point above the level of the butt shoulder, and thus on the butt. A cross section of the blade, taken even at the shoulder, passes through the bevel surface. The section, instead of being triangular, is thus quadrangular, Fig. 195. The section of the butt, however, shows the apex formed by the posterior longitudinal edge, but the other two angles of the triangle are rounded by the shaping of the grip. The adze, however, is so obviously of the triangular type that it may be treated as a variation, and not a sub-type. It is important, as it indicates what may happen to form a subtype.
The triangular adze has been described by Linton as the south-eastern type, "characterised by a triangular or subtriangular cross section, a relatively thin blade with a long bevel and a more or less distinct shoulder where the blade meets the tang."
Skinner, in his classification of adze types, has placed the triangular adze in Type V. To admit Cook Islands adzes into this type the words "undeveloped grip" as a characteristic feature would have to be altered.
Fig. 199 shows a number of well-made Rarotongan adzes that are triangular in section. The variation already alluded to is very obvious. The adze on the extreme right has no shoulder or grip, and is the only poorly-made adze of the series.
page 230A good example of a triangular adze from Mangaia is shown in Fig. 200A. It has a broad blade, and the grip shows more shaping than usual. Roughening also extends over the whole of the postero-lateral surfaces, except for a narrow strip at the posterior longitudinal edge.
Figure 200.
Mangaian Adzes. (Auckland Museum.)
A—Typical triangular type. B—Long, narrow, deep blade.
Length | Width | Thickness | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Butt | Blade | Total | B.S. | C.E. | B.S. | |
Mangaian Adze, A - | 52 | 124 | 176 | 61 | 62 | 40 |
Mangaian Adze, B - | 47 | 157 | 204 | 27 | 6 | 38 |
B.S.—Butt shoulder. C.E.—Cutting edge.
(2.) Triangular in cross section, with base posterior.
The total length of the adze is 337mm. The width at the poll is 49 and the thickness 54. At the bevel shoulder the thickness is 63mm.
When trimmed up, the adze would have probably corresponded to the Marquesan toki kouma type described by Linton2. It is probable, also, that in sharpening the cutting edge might have been rounded off, and thus corresponded to the Maori triangular adzes described by Best,3 which page 233he considered performed the functions of a heavy gouge, though hafted as an adze.
A broken specimen from the Kermadecs, now in the Auckland Museum, also shows the base of the triangle posteriorly. The grip is well formed and the anterior mesial ridge rounded off. The blade is well polished. There is an anterior projection at the poll.
B.—adzes, Quadrangular in Section.
Of the Aitutaki adzes seen, one was a distinct quadrangular type. In Rarotonga two other types were seen.
(1.) | The type implement, seen in Mr. Wix's collection of Rarotongan adzes, is shown in Fig. 202.
The butt (in this instance) is longer than the blade. It is shaped into a grip by working the anterior surface and the adjoining parts of the lateral surfaces. A distinct butt shoulder has been formed. The blade is convex longitudinally and transversely, and narrows towards the cutting edge. The posterior surface is much narrower than the anterior. It widens out towards the lower end and merges into the bevel surface there being no bevel shoulder. The bevel surface is convex longitudinally and distinctly concave transversely. See section through bevel surface, Fig. 202. The two lateral surfaces are convex transversely. The general appearance reminds one of the triangular adze, Type I. The cross section of the blade, near the butt shoulder, shows that the bevel angle made by the lateral surfaces with the anterior surface is much the same as in the triangular form. But the stone was not thick enough to allow the lateral surfaces to meet as indicated by the dotted lines in the upper section, Fig. 202. The adze was page 234only 26mm. thick, instead of being over 30mm., as in the triangular adzes of similar width. Here we have a further stage to that in Fig. 198. Not only has the posterior longitudinal edge been removed, but a considerable part of the apex of the triangle. Both adzes are 50mm. in width across the anterior surface near the butt shoulder. In the thicker adze, with a depth of 35mm., the two sides almost meet. For practical purposes it became triangular in section, in the thinner adze the lateral surfaces were shaped in the same manner for 26mm., but as they could go no further, the adze remained quadrangular. This type may be regarded as being derived from the triangular form. Type I. The adze-maker used the same methods in shaping, but he finished with a narrow posterior surface instead of a mesial posterior longitudinal edge, because his material was not thick enough. If the adze becomes thinner, the posterior surface becomes wider. The posterior surface may be further widened by making the angles of the lateral surfaces with the anterior surface greater. Then we approach more
page 235
nearly to the usual form of Maori adze that Skinner classified as Type I. One of the Aitutaki adzes seen by him was described by him as of this type.
|
(2.) | The second type of quadrangular adze was collected in Aitutaki, Figs. 203 and 204.
The adze is characterised by four well-marked longitudinal edges, separating four surfaces. There is a distinct butt shoulder, formed by a transverse ridge across the anterior surface of the adze. The ridge distinguishes the butt from the blade. The distinction would otherwise be impossible, as all the surfaces of the butt are as equally ground and polished as those of the blade. The butt narrows towards the poll, and the longitudinal edges that define the posterior surface, though distinct, become more rounded off. The blade increases slightly in width to about half-way down, and then narrows towards the cutting edge. It has both a longitudinal and transverse convexity. The bevel surface is markedly concave transversely, and merges into the posterior surface without a bevel shoulder. The posterior surface is much narrower than the anterior and it narrows towards the poll. The lateral surfaces are markedly convex transversely. The line of the cutting edge is concave posteriorly. page 236The adze is well made and well finished. It is marked by its thickness, being 44mm. immediately above and below the transverse ridge forming the butt shoulder. The ridge itself is 3mm. above the surface of the adze. This adze has no affinity with the triangular form. There was more than sufficient material to develop the triangular form had it been desired. The cross section of a typical triangular adze of the same width across the anterior surface has been superimposed upon the cross section B in Fig. 204 and dotted in. The desire to keep the extra mass of material to add weight is thus rendered obvious. It makes the adze a distinct type, with a different principle of construction to the triangular adze. It fits in best with Skinner's4 Type VII, which he rightly regards as an intermediate between Types II and III. One of Skinner's series of Aitutaki adzes suggests the above, but it is much smaller and of medium finish. |
(3.) | The third type of quadrangular adze was not seen in Aitutaki; the specimen shown in Fig. 205 was collected in Rarotonga. No other specimens were seen in the Rarotongan adzes examined, but Makea Ariki informed me that he had seen adzes of this type dug up in the new cultivations. |
This adze is more like the quadrangular type seen in New Zealand. It has four well-marked longitudinal edges. The four surfaces of the butt and blade are equally polished page 237and continuous. There is no butt shoulder, and nothing to distinguish the butt from the blade. The anterior surface is convex longitudinally and transversely. The longitudinal convexity is accentuated near the cutting edge by a ground facet, which has not been polished. The posterior surface, whilst narrower than the anterior, is relatively much wider than in the two quadrangular forms described. This factor alone makes it approach more nearly to the usual New Zealand types in general appearance. The posterior surface is fairly straight longitudinally, but convex trans-versely.
The lateral surfaces are narrow and well defined. Thus the right lateral view in Fig. 206 shows up the transverse convexity of the anterior and posterior surfaces. The bevel surface is fairly straight transversely, except for a slight convexity where it meets the lateral surfaces of the blade. It is also fairly straight longitudinally, except close to the cutting edge. There is thus a well-defined bevel shoulder for the first time in the quadrangular adzes described. Owing to the grinding of the anterior facet having removed the middle part of the anterior transverse convexity of the blade, the cutting edge is fairly straight transversely. There is however, a convexity downwards which clears the corners.
The feature of Type 3 as against 2 is its comparative thinness and the appearance of the bevel shoulder. This type of adze, from not having the butt shaped into a grip, falls in to Skinner's Type II.
C.—Transitional Forms.
(A.) | —The rough adzes from Mr. Wix's collection shown in Fig. 207 are interesting as showing the effect of the triangular adze technique on relatively thin pieces of
stone, as shown by the cross sections. The three examples have all been shaped by chipping away the lateral parts of the butt to form grips.
Anteriorly (upper row of figures), A has no distinction between butt and blade, B has been chipped and pecked in parts, whilst C has a distinct butt shoulder. In A and C the blade narrows to the cutting edge, and in B it widens. The sections are taken across the line a b in the upper row of figures. Posteriorly (lowest row of figures), A and B have bevel surfaces with shoulders, whilst in C the bevel surface is continuous with the posterior surface. The adzes are rough and not well finished, as the material was probably not worth it. They are roughly quadrangular in section, and though coming under the type of Fig. 202, the shape has been influenced by the thinness of the material. |
(B.) | An unfinished adze from Rarotonga is shown in Fig. 208. The cutting edge is much battered, as if the page 239 page 240 implement had been used for hammering. The slightest indication of a median ridge indicates the posterior aspect of the implement. Its feature is its comparative thinness. If ground down and the sides shaped inwards posteriorly the adze is too thin for them to meet in a posterior edge. The adze would then fall into the quadrangular first type, Fig. 202. |
D.—Mangaian Quadrangular Adze.
The specimen figured in Fig. 209 is in the Auckland Museum. It is hafted in a ceremonial peace-adze handle, and looks suspiciously like a Maori adze. It is made of a very black stone. It is well polished and has a fine cutting edge. The longitudinal edges are clean cut, and there is not the transverse convexity of the surfaces seen in Type 3, Fig. 205.
3 Best, Elsdon, 1912, I.
4 Skinner, H. D., 1923, I.