▼ About this page

Title: Students evaluate lecturers

Authors:

In: Salient. Victoria University Student Newspaper. Volume 38, Number 25. 2nd October 1975

Publication details: Victoria University of Wellington Students’ Association, 2 October 1975, Wellington

Part of: Salient : An Organ of Student Opinion at Victoria College, Wellington, N.Z.

Conditions of use

Share:

Other formats

Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)

TEI XML file

ePub eBook file

Connect

Salient. Victoria University Student Newspaper. Volume 38, Number 25. 2nd October 1975

COURSE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE. This questionaire is intended to in student opinious of POLS courses finishing at mid-year. It has three major aims: 1. to give students taking these courses in the future prior indication of what other students thoughts the course was like. 2. to give lecturer some idea of how effectively they are putting across their unless and suggess room for improvements. 3. to emphanise the importance of teaching in the University, righting what many are as the low priorit…

COURSE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE. This questionaire is intended to in student opinious of POLS courses finishing at mid-year. It has three major aims: 1. to give students taking these courses in the future prior indication of what other students thoughts the course was like. 2. to give lecturer some idea of how effectively they are putting across their unless and suggess room for improvements. 3. to emphanise the importance of teaching in the University, righting what many are as the low priority it has at the moment compared with research and publishing activities. This questionaive will of course only produce useful results if a broad number of students are willing to think about the below questions and answer them. Thank you for your time. Instructions there are two types of questions Those with boxes beside them require only a coded reply — any number from 0 to 5. 0 indicates no reply or no opinion on that question. 5 is typically a very high ("good") mark. 3 reasonable and I very poor. The second type of question is open-ended, asking you to suggest ideas for improvements If you wish to expand your comments on these please use the back of this form. COURSE. Name of course (case and little) How well organised is the course? Do students in your opinion, have sufficient say in course organisation and content? How heavy is the workload (5 very light to 1 very heavy) Would you recomend this course to other students? (2 - yes, 1- no.-o no opinion) GENERAL COMMENTS. How useful did you find the course? How do you think the course could be improved? LECTURER(S) Note if the course had more than two lecturers teaching. please assess those two you feel made most contribution to the course, If there was only one, please leave the see and row of boxes empty. Names(s) How well did the lecturer know the subject matter? How well did he/she convey information? How approachable was h/she to students GENERAL COMMENTS Are there any ways you think the teaching in this course could be improved? How useful do you think questionaires such as this are? Could you suggest any improments?