Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

The Pamphlet Collection of Sir Robert Stout: Personal Volume

Crime in New Zealand

page break

Crime in New Zealand

By The Hon. Sir Robert Stout, C. J.

Extract from "The Colonist",

1st Dec, 1914.
page break

Crime in New Zealand.

A Gradual Decrease.

Remarks by the Chief Justice.

In his address to the Grand Jury at the Supreme Court yesterday His Honour the Chief Justice (Sir Robert Stout) gave an interesting review of the crime statistics of New Zealand. His remarks were as follows:—

I am glad that I am again able to congratulate your district on the absence of serious crime, and on the few cases of crime in your midst. When I met you in March. I pointed out that crime in New Zealand was gradually decreasing relatively to our population, which is increasing, and that there was especially no increase in juvenile crime. I am able to say that the remarks that I made in March can be repeated. I mention the matter again because I find that some of our citizens keep on repeating that crime is increasing amongst us. It is a pity that they do not take the trouble to read the official papers that contain the statistics of our criminals. Crime fluctuates from year to year, but if we take a series of years, and examine the figures, we will find good ground for congratulation on the decrease of crime.

You are no doubt aware that many in our community do not seem to know that there are three reports published annually by the Government which give accurate details of our crime and our criminals, namely, the reports of the Prisons Department, of the Police Department, and of the Government Statistician. If you examine the report for the year 1911 of the Under-Secretary of Justice on our prisons you will find at page 2 a copy of the report of the Inspector of Prisons. It contains a table showing the number of prisoners actually in prison on December 3lst every fifth year beginning in 1881 and ending in 1911; also the numbers in 1912 and 1913. I shall quote the figures of the number per 10,000 of our population. They are:—
1881 13.77
1886 10.60
1891 8.42
1896 7.70
1901 9.05
1906 9.80
1911 8.51
1912 8.22
1913 8.47

We also find in this report the figures referring to serious crime. The Inspector of Prisons' report says:—

"The decrease in the number of serious crimes as evidenced by the length of the sentences imposed, which was remarked upon in last year's report, still continues." He gives the following figures amongst others:—

The total number of prisoners received in gaol having sentences of three months of over was, in
1906 1152
1907 1129
1908 1085
1909 1152
1910 895
1911 783
1912 652
1913 711
If we were to take the number at per ten thousand of our population the number would be in
1906 12.67
1913 6.55
or a fall within seven years of nearly one-half.
page break
There has been an increase in prisoners found guilty of minor offences. The figures are:—
1911 3116
1912 3313
1913 3555
This would be at the rate per 10,000, in
1911 30.38
1912 31.49
1913 32.77
Another test in the number of distinct prisoners (somo are received more than once in a year) received into gaol per year. The numbers will be found in the Government Statistician's report on Law and Crime. The figures are:—
1909 3169
1910 3242
1911 2877
1912 3023
1913 3229
If we take the first and last of these five years according to population, that is, the numbers per 10,000 of our people, the figures would be:—
1909 32.50
1913 30.20

In juvenile crime, taking all prisoners sent to gaol whether more than once in the year or not, under twenty years of age, there has been a decrease during the last year. In 1912, the number of males was 124, in 1913 109. In 1912 the number of females was 5, and in 1913 10. If the rate per 10,000 were taken the fall would seem to be greater than the numbers quoted show.

I may now refer to the third report, that of the Commissioner of Police. I have hitherto dealt only with persons sentenced to imprisonment, but that is not always the test of the criminality of the State or a district. It may be that the police are ineffective, or that magistrates do not punish when they should, or that juries sometimes acquit when they should find a verdict of guilty. I have therefore taken another test. It is what crime has been reported to the police. The Commissioner of Police in his last annual report, dated 25th June, 1914, says:—

"The criminal statistics (Appendix A) deal with all offences reported to the police during the year ended December 31st last, and show an aggregate decrease of 566 on the figures of 1912. The proportion of offences to the population was 2.21 per cent., against 2.35 the previous year."

Of serious crimes reported the number of cases was in 1912, 617; in 1913, 614. There is this note in the report: "During the last ten years the number of serious crimes as above described"—that is, arson, assault and robbery, burglary, breaking into shops, dwellings, etc., forgery and uttering, murder, murder attempted, rape, receiving stolen property shooting with intent—"has varied from 520 tO 759, the present total, 614, being slightly below the average."

If, however the average per ten thousand of the population were taken the decrease would not be so slight. The average given was on the assumption that the population had not increased. There was during the last year, unfortunately increase in indecent and sexual offences, mainly in indecent assaults, where the increase was 36.

I have referred you to three official reports. If they carefully considered you will see that whatever else is happening in New Zealand, crime is take much comfort, for if there is no regard for human life, and no regard for the rights of others, and no regard for human liberty, in any nation that nation is on the down grade.