Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

The Pamphlet Collection of Sir Robert Stout: Volume 75

Transfers

Transfers.

The late Commissioner, in his report for 1896, says, "Periodical transfers from one station or district to another are imperative for the maintenance of a thoroughly efficient police force." A similar declaration was made by the Commissioner in each annual report for seven years. In 1896 he complains that "it is easier to move any other officer of the public service than a constable." I put on record a number of cases where transfers had been ordered, and afterwards cancelled, because of political interference with the authorities. I quote from the official evidence a typical case. I asked Colonel Hume as follows:—

I think on March 7, 1897, it was publicly notified that Sergeant O'Grady was to be removed from Oamaru to Invercargill. Was there any special reason for the order other than the efficiency of the force?

Colonel Hume: No, I think he had been a long time at Oamaru.

It was just to secure the efficiency of the force?

I think so.

Was be removed?

No; he is still at Oamaru.

Can you tell me why he was not removed?

The Minister told me not to remove him.

Numerous instances similar to the one quoted could be given. The general effect upon the force of this political control may be judged by the evidence given by Inspector Broham, who said:—"The powers of inspectors have been very much curtailed of late years. Formerly, inspectors had authority to remove within their own districts all sergeants and constables from station to station. That power was taken from them. They have not been consulted of late years regarding promo- page 325 tions, nor as to the transfer of men under their charge. They know nothing whatever of the transfers until the men are told to go to different places, everything being controlled from Wellington. The constables knew that the inspectors' powers were largely curtailed; they knew that it was not by steady attention to their duty that promotion was to be obtained, or advancement given, and they sought promotion and advancement by political influence. This system directly bred insubordination and the spirit of disobedience throughout the force."

Other inspectors spoke to an exactly similar effect as to the evil results which have followed the conversion of the police force into a medium for conferring patronage in the interests of the political party, and such a system, if continued, must inevitably produce a state of corruption in this colony such as the unrestrained operation of the same causes, under Tammany, produced in New York, and which has made the New York police force the reproach of the civilised world. Pages of evidence on this point could be quoted, all of which might be summarised in the candid admission of ex-Inspector W. G. Fox, of Invercargill, who said: "I believe, on my oath, the men, from the inspectors down to the lowest rank, were afraid to do their duty."

With a force recruited without enquiry being made into their character, intelligence, or education of its members; with policemen who receive no training before being placed on the public streets; with a Commissioner who is tinder the control of the political powers of the hour, and whose helplessness is measured by his declaration, "It was not for me to think at all, I did as I was told "; with the "spirit of disobedience and insubordination in the ranks," what description of administration has been recorded?

I quote several cases briefly:—