Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

The Pamphlet Collection of Sir Robert Stout: Volume 70

Increase Population by Immigration

Increase Population by Immigration.

(Emigration being deducted.)

Five-year periods. Australasia. New South Wales. Victoria. Queensland.
1877 to 1881 197,264 88,231 6,998
1882 to 1886 271,146 110,158 46,148
1887 to 1891 131,906 57,637 65,614 29,349

The moat surprising thing about these figures is the extra-ordinary fluctuations they exhibit. The first period showed an aggregate average immigration of 89,453, the second period tin average rose to 54,229, whilst in the third period it dropped to 26,881, Taking the figures for the separate colonies the differences are still more marked. To give the numbers year by year for each of the seven colonies would afford interesting food for thought, but would load this article too heavily with figura It may, however, be said that the increase of population by immigration per year in New South Wales has ranged from 6633 (in 1888) to 27,278 (in 1883); in Victoria from 548 (in 1877) to 26,757 (in 1888); in Queensland from 2678 (in 1879) to 33,656 (in 1883); in South Australia from 186 (in 1882) to 11,622 (in 1831); in Western Australia from 38 (in 1882) to 4208 (in 1886); in Tasmania from 386 (in 1880) to 4016 (in 1891); in New Zealand from 211 (in 1887) to 18,723 (in 1879) The fluctuations extended further than represented by a mere difference in the number of arrivals, for, with the solitary exception of New South Wales, each of the seven colonies, in certain years, lost more by emigration than they gained by immigration. South Australia and New Zealand were the two chief sufferers in this respect. For seven years past South Australia has been a regular loser, whilst New Zealand has lost in five out of the last six years.

The year 1883 recorded the largest total of immigration ever seen in Australasia, with the exception of the gold-few year of 1854, the number being 81,104. Five years later, in 1888, the number fell to 17,580, the smallest immigration of any one of the fifteen years which we are reviewing; indeed, in the last forty-one years—1851-91—there are only four years page 21 when so small a total was recorded. The immigration returns convey a severe rebuke to those people who would close the labor market of the colonies to outside labor, for everyone knows that during the years when the arrivals were exceptionally heavy the unemployed trouble was unknown, and that during the last five years, when the arrivals fell to less than one-half of what they had been, there was a marked increase in the number of men out of employment. In passing it may be noted that the decrease in immigration during the last few years is due less to depression in Australasia than to prosperity in Great Britain.

Various authorities have estimated the value of an immigrant to a new country at from £200 to £260. Every man who arrives in these colonies contributes to the revenue, assists in the production of wealth, and shares in the burdens of the community. The population of Australasia has been increased by immigration to the extent of 600,000 during the past fifteen jars, in which interval the public indebtedness has increased more than 130 millions, and the entire indebtedness, public and private, more than 200 millions. It would, of course, be absurd to argue that borrowing should be regulated by the immigration, bat if there are large borrowings it is pleasant if there be a rapid increase in the number of those sharing the responsibility. We scarcely think the increase of population is large enough to warrant much satisfaction. 600,000 in fifteen years only averages 40,000 a year, a very paltry exhibit beside that of the United States, where in one year, 1882, the immigration reached no less than 789,000. According to Mulhall, between the years 1851-88 more than twenty-two million people emigrated from Europe. These facts make it clear that the movement of population towards Australasia the past fifteen years can only be looked upon as a moderate one. The tendency of population to concentrate in large cities is one of the most marked features of recent years; but nowhere, probably, is this tendency so extreme, so serious, as in Australia. The following figures are instructive:—
1871. Per cent. 1881. Per cent. 1891. Per cent.
Victorian population in Melbourne 28 32 42
New South Wales population in Sydney 26 29 33
Queensland population in Brisbane 12 14 25
page 22

We fear these figures indicate that the enormous borrowings of late years have tended to bring about an undue, an unusual enlargement of our cities, an enlargement which in the case of Victoria is undoubtedly of a most abnormal character. It is scarcely in young communities that we should look for such concentration of population as we find in the capitals of Australia. So much for the growth of the population as compared with the growth of indebtedness.