In reply to the deputation Mr. Ibey stated that he would adopt the eight hour shifts, as soon as the other millowners did so. He would rather not give a letter to that effect as he thought it unnecessary. So far as concerned his mill, he would carry out the promises he made, and was prepared to do so. Thought that a given date should be fixed, say for instance 1st March next; and also suggested that the men should fix the date when the alteration should come into force. Upon it being pointed out that this would be outside the province of the employees, without an agreement upon the subject with the employers, he admitted that it would be better for both interests to fix upon a date, in conjunction one with another. Regarding Sydney his information was not of a recent date, but was aware that arrangements had been made there. In answer to further questions he again affirmed Yes, I give you the promise that forty-eight hours are not to he page 10 exceeded as a week's work." It may be probable that upon some days it may be necessary to work nine or ten hours, but that would not interfere with the forty-eight hours. It may indeed be better to complete the week's work and run the mill say five days instead of the usual six. He did not know that his mill had superior advantages over others, although he held a good position with regard to railway and water carriage.

Mr. Houston also discussed a few minor points of a technical nature upon which there was no disagreement.

The interview was of a cordial character and did not occupy very long. Mr. Ibey personally appeared to have a strong leaning in favour of the movement, and a desire to see it in successful operation. Almost the last words he gave expression to were:—"Yes, you can rely upon me, and I give you the promise." The delegates then withdrew.