Studentsay Studentsay

It could be doing more than it is doing now. Letters should be identified. Articles on Apartheid were good. There should be a survey about the cafe. I think the reference to a Chinese brothel (issue before last) was racist.

It is too repetitive. I like the letters and Harold Hedd.

It is good, but it could be improved. It is over-politically orientated - it shoud cover other things that students are doing as well. There should be articles on where to get good deals, and accommodation. The letters are good. It shouldn't be censored (as Harold Hedd was in the issue before last).

Reviews of films in town are good unbiased. Rock reviews are good, but are often ripped off from other magazines. The letters are good - there should be more space for them. There should be more room for student opinion, more on Studass and Executive activities and [unclear: more on local issues].

It is the best of the student newspapers. It should be cleared of political bias. There is room for improvement in the film and record reviews. There should be more humour in it. But generally I am fairly satisfied with it.

I'm reasonably happy with it. I like the letters and Harold Hedd.

The comics are good. It can't cater for everyone. Like the court reporting.

It is better this year than in the past. It needs balance of political content. It should be provocative, (and is) but representative of students' opinion.

It is a typical, grotty student newspaper - that is, bad.