Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Salient: Victoria University Students' Paper. Vol. 29, No. 2. 1966.

Editorials — Salient — March 18, 1966

page 6

Editorials

Salient

March 18, 1966

We Will Be Overcome

Recently a number of persons, mainly university students, saw fit to chain themselves to Parliament Buildings.

Their motives in doing this are far from clear. However, one possible explanation is given by a large sign one of them had next to her, which read: "We have to do this to make ourselves heard."

In point of fact they have to do no such thing. Moreover, even if it were necessary, it is apparent that the action they chose did everything except make their case heard.

If anything came across as the resulting publicity, it was the facts relating the chaining and unchaining, not the protester's Vietnam views, and if any protesters have suffered any stifling of their views, we have yet to see it.

But their action is quite significant on a different level. It shows the desperation which the average thinking individual has come to feel in face of the totalitarian powerfulness of the New Zealand government.

The all-powerful contempt with which anti-citizen legislation (such as the Narcotics Act, the News Media Ownership Act, and the review of Public Services rental house policies) has been bulldozed through in the past year is a frightening demonstration of democracy at work in this country.

The time may yet come when men take to the streets —as some Europeans have done in South Africa—in a wholly understandable but horrifying expression of their faith in democracy.

We go all the way with Mr. P. B. Temm and his NZUSA congress speech. But we would also say that his overstatement of probable action damages his explanation of a very real threat.

This country's freedoms are not being overthrown openly in a wholesale manner. Rather, they are being cut out from under by a growing process of erosion.— H.B.R.

Taylor Time

It Is Customary in the happy little game of student politics at the moment to listen wisely to an indictment of NZUSA, then grin and predict the downfall of Mr. Taylor.

The latest ploy is to make bitter, and unfounded, insinuations about the NZUSA full-time presidency.

It is surely true that the complete absence of interest in the post only reinforces what we said last year—that the whole idea is devoid of value and should have been dropped in favour of the much more usual paid administrative officer.

But if we are to have this post—and the decision seems irrevocably taken—there is no clear reason why Mr. Taylor should be barred from it.

He has given of his best in the organisation of NZUSA, and it is now showing some of the fruits of his labour.

Under his guidance, NZUSA has passed from a part-time political plaything to something near the organisation which it should be.

The constituent bodies have been afraid that their central student body may develop a mind and a scope of action of its own.

This inevitable development is now taking place with the consequent opposition and bitterness which such a move may be expected to create.

It is common knowledge that Mr. Taylor did not intend to apply, and it may be reasonably assumed that he is offering to continue mainly to save his work.

In many fields—travel, insurance, publications, seminars to name but a few—it is work worth saving. —H.B.R.