Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Salient. The Newspaper of Victoria University College. Vol. 19, No. 8. July 1, 1955

Apathy

Apathy

The Editor. "Salient."

Dear Sir.—Have you ever noticed the pack of "morons" who trudge up to that menagerie "on the hill" every day. These "morons" are supposed to represent men and women who will be in responsible professions in the near future (?): but the more I see of the cliquey nature of the outfit and the actions of some of these types in public, the more ashamed I am of being a member of VUC. Sure you say that throughout the world students are known for their antics but here they are so "corny."

And now to the elections at present taking place—you will note that at the last elections 33 per cent of Student Association members voted, and I'm surprised that that many troubled to vote, and I will lay big odds that 80 per cent of the 33 per cent didn't know much about the "drongoes" (with apologies to exec.) they were voting for and these elections will be the same.

Most will endeavour to make their choice of exec. from the paragraphs in "Salient" or the photographs on the notice-board which appeared on June 16. but I had a fair indication of the men standing to enable myself to vote but not knowing anything about the ladies I could not honestly and did not therefore make a vote for women members of exec.

Surely there could be a meeting at which all the candidates for exec, could be given three minutes to talk or some other arrangement arranged where a person could gauge the candidate's worth much better.

Enough of elections and now Mr-Editor to that "dry bull" publication "The People's Vice" otherwise known as "Salient"; it is not worth the paper it is written on—who wants to know about NZUSA delegates to Cosec or their worthiness of participation in Cosec which took up a total of one page in the last issue of "Salient" or the debate on "State subsidies to schools" which could have been reported in one small paragraph.

Surely there is something else of general interest to students which could fill up the paper but I suppose one cannot expect anything else considering my opening remarks.—

Yours faithfully,

Mince Public Enemy No. 1.

P.S.—I hope that this letter will appear in an unabridged form. Thanking you.

(Normally such an ungrammatical conglomeration of verbal cast-offs would not be published.

1.Regarding lack of knowledge of the voters—we agree. The point is that it is possible to know the candidates by taking an active interest in student affairs.
2.Regarding electioneering: it was mooted and last at last year's AGM, that electioneering be allowed. "Salient" favours meetings of candidates and the "morons."
3.Your remarks about "Salient" are neither pregnant nor mature: they are still-born. You will forgive us for being so incredibly naive in assuming that readers are interested in what happens to their money. Their interests and their representatives. "Salient" considers the matter important; space was allocated accordingly.
4.Similarly with debating reports. "Salient" considers the Debating Club possibly the most important at VUC: your disinterest merely indicates your lack of values, or ours, depending how you look at it.
5.Possibly there is something else of general interest to students which could "fill up the paper": the onus is upon readers to inform "Salient" on their desires in this matter. Until such a tangible expression of student opinion is received "Salient" policy remains much the same.
6.Finally destructive and uninformed "opinion" such as yours is not criticism, informs no-one and indicates solely your own muddled thinking and immature expression.—Ed.)