Episodes & Studies Volume 1[electronic resource]Creation of machine-readable versionTechBooks, Inc.Creation of digital imagesTechBooks, Inc.Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markupTechBooks, Inc.Mary Westonca. 925 kilobytesNew Zealand Electronic Text CollectionWellington, New ZealandModern English, WH2-1Epi
Publicly accessible
URL: http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/collections.html
copyright 2004, by Victoria University of Wellington
2004707318Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–45Episodes & Studies Volume 1War History Branch, Department Of Internal AffairsWellington, New Zealand1948-1954Source copy consulted: Defence Force Library, New ZealandOfficial History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–45Guns Against Tanks : L Troop, 33rd Battery, 7th New Zealand Anti-Tank Regiment in Libya, 23 November 1941E. H. SmithAchilles at the River PlateS. D. WatersWomen at WarD.O.W. HallThe Assault on Rabaul : Operations by the Royal New Zealand Air Force December 1943 — May 1944J. M. S. RossLong Range Desert Group in Libya, 1940–41R. L. KayPrisoners of JapanD. O. W. HallTroopshipsS. P. LlewellynPrisoners of GermanyD. O. W. HallPrisoners of ItalyD. O. W. HallGerman Raiders in the PacificS. D. WatersWounded in BattleJ. B. McKinneyLong Range Desert Group in the MediterraneanR. L. Kay
Prepared for the New Zealand Electronic Text Collection as part of the Official War History pilot project.
The digital edition of this book was sponsored by Mary Weston, daughter of General Sir Howard Kippenberger whoserved as one of the Editors-in-Chief of the Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War.
All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and
the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding
line. Every effort has been made to preserve the Māori macron
using unicode.
Some keywords in the header are a local Electronic
Text Collection scheme to aid in establishing analytical
groupings.
NZETC Subject HeadingsEnglishNew Zealand World War II History3 December 2004Colin DoigAdded name tags around names of various people, places, and organisations.31 August 2004Jamie NorrishAdded link markup for project in TEI header.18 August 2004Jamie NorrishAdded divisions for sections with no heading.2 August 2004Jamie NorrishAdded funding details to header.28 June 2004Jamie NorrishAdded missing text of distributor details to each text.2 June 2004Jamie NorrishCompleted TEI header.30 June 2005Conal TuohyMarked up a bibliographic entry for each individual text in the book.21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCText-proofing of a sample of the text21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCConversion to TEI.2-conformat markup21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAdding scripted markup21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAddition of encodingDesc21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAddition of bibls21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAssembled all images21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCCreation of derivative images21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCValidation of TEI21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCValidation of names21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCConversion to Unicode (utf-8)21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCPromotion to production21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAddition of text to access control21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCHarvest into Topic Map21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCChecking of text using browser21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAddition of text to corpus21:18:34, Tuesday 7 August 2007NZETCAddition of text to Library Catalogue14:49:44, Tuesday 23 September 2008NZETCMake text available on NZETC website16:19:03, Friday 28 August 2009NZETCPreparation of EPUB (and other formats such as DaisyBook)14:03:59, Wedsnesday 4 August 2010NZETCIndex the text into SOLR to allow searching
cover photograph Two-pounder firing en portée
GUNS AGAINST TANKSL Troop, 33rd Battery, 7th New Zealand Anti-Tank Regiment
in Libya, 23 November 1941E. H. SMITHWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1948
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of campaigns and operations
which will be dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurch
new zealand
Moving into Libya
IN November 1941, when the second British offensive in Libya began, the 33rd Battery of the
7th New Zealand Anti-Tank Regiment consisted of four troops, each of four guns. Three
troops were armed with two-pounders and one with the old 18-pounder field gun modified for use
against armoured fighting vehicles. The two-pounders were carried on the decks of specially
constructed lorries, termed portées, which were fitted with ramps and winches to enable the guns
to be quickly hoisted into place. Special fittings on the lorry enabled the trail and spade to be
clamped firmly to the deck so that the gun, pointing over the rear of the portée, was ready for
immediate action.
During the training in preparation for the campaign, the regimental commander, Lieutenant-Colonel T. H. E. Oakes,
Biographical details of those named in this account are published on p. 31.
insisted that great attention should be paid to training the gun crews in
fighting the two-pounders from the decks of the portées: that is, en portée. It was obvious that the
best place from which to fight an anti-tank gun was from a properly dug gunpit; but the digging
of pits took time and, once dug in, the gun could not be moved at a moment’s notice. Colonel
Oakes therefore made provision in training for those occasions when there was no time to dig
pits or when a formation on the move had to be defended against attack.
Portée tactics had to be based on the fact that the gun was high off the ground, with the gun-shield the only protection for crew and weapon. This shield could ward off small-arms fire only
from the direct front, so that against crossfire, explosive shells, mortar bombs, and armour-piercing projectiles both gun and crew were vulnerable. It was laid down that this vulnerability
should be reduced by exposing the gun and its crew to enemy observation for the shortest possible
time. The men were taught to fight their guns from behind whatever cover, in the form of ridges
or folds in the ground, was available. First the gun made for such cover; then the vehicle was
backed up until the barrel of the two-pounder cleared the concealing rise—that is, to a hull-down
position. A few shots were fired and the portée was again run down under cover. That process was
repeated, with the gun changing its position as often as possible to confuse enemy gunners. The lie
of the land did not always permit this, but on several occasions in the 1941 Libyan campaign these
tactics were employed with notable success, thanks largely to the thorough training of crews and
drivers.
The initial role of the New Zealand Division in this campaign depended on the success of the
armoured divisions of the 30th Corps, which opened the fighting on 18 November by driving
across the Libyan border with the intention of first searching out and destroying the enemy tanks,
and then continuing westward to relieve beleaguered Tobruk. At first reports were most favourable,
and accordingly the three brigades of the New Zealand Division, operating under the command
of the 13th Corps, set out on previously allotted tasks. That of the 6th Brigade, which had under its
command the 33rd Battery, was to move westward along the Trigh Capuzzo
Trigh Capuzzo, marked on the map as a motor road, was in fact a series of tracks to the south of, and running roughly
parallel to, the main Bardia-Tobruk highway. Before turning north to Tobruk, it passed between the features of Sidi
Rezegh and Belhamed.
to an area about
half way between the Egyptian border and Tobruk, there to clear the enemy from Bir el Chleta
and the airfield at Gambut. Then, if necessary, the formation was to assist 30th Corps in its Tobruk
operations.
On the afternoon of 22 November, when the brigade was on its way towards Bir el Chleta,
urgent messages from 30th Corps showed that the early reports of British armoured successes
had been optimistic. Far from being destroyed, German tanks were pressing in strength against
Sidi Rezegh, now held by the Support Group of the British 7th Armoured Division. The 30th
Corps urged that the 6th Brigade should hasten to the relief of Sidi Rezegh. Headquarters New
Zealand Division ordered the brigade to fall in with these demands. The brigade pressed on,
halting at eight o’clock to laager for the night some miles to the east of Bir el Chleta.
Because the German armour was still strong, and not as weakened as the first reports had
indicated, a heavy responsibility was thrown on the New Zealand artillery, and especially on the
Anti-Tank Regiment. The British tanks, outgunned by the German tanks and the very effective
88-millimetre and 50-millimetre anti-tank guns, were far too hard pressed to spare much of their
strength to protect the New Zealand infantry.
The 6th Brigade kept a strict lookout during the night of 22–23 November. The 33rd Battery’s
two-pounders were placed round the brigade perimeter, and outside them the infantry manned a
series of listening posts. In relays, one gunner watched at the firing position of each anti-tank gun
while his crew-mates slept beside the portée. The night was tense but without alarm. At 3 a.m.
the march to Sidi Rezegh was resumed with two battalions forward, the 25th on the right and the
26th on the left, the B echelon vehicles behind them, and the 24th Battalion to the right rear.
In the darkness L Troop was delayed, and it was a quarter of an hour before Lieutenant C. S.
Pepper,2 the troop commander, led the four portées after the rest of the brigade.
The troop caught up with the 24th Battalion, under whose command it had been the previous
day, at first light, just as the brigade group halted for breakfast. The formation had set out with
the intention of swinging to the south to avoid a German force known to be at Bir el Chleta,
but in the darkness an error in navigation had resulted in the halt being made right on top of the
German position, and when the troop arrived a small engagement was raging. The brigade had
clashed with part of the headquarters of the German Afrika Korps. The Germans had a few tanks
and armoured cars, but those were quickly dealt with by a squadron of Valentine tanks of the
42nd Battalion, Royal Tank Regiment, which was in support of the 6th Brigade. In a brisk fight
several of the enemy were killed and valuable documents and some high-ranking officers captured.
None of the battery’s guns had a chance to fire, but there were several casualties among the
transport drivers.
The order of march had been changed overnight, and L Troop now found itself under the
command of the 26th Battalion. There was no longer time for breakfast, and the brigade resumed
its move towards Sidi Rezegh, the gunners allaying the keen appetite of early morning with a
snack from the ration boxes and a short drink from their water bottles. In this campaign it was
seldom that they were able to have a full meal prepared by the battery cooks. Each gun carried
rations for five days, consisting of biscuits, bully beef, tins of meat and vegetable stew, jam or
marmalade, cheese, tea, sugar, and canned milk. The gunners augmented this with whatever they
could buy from the Church Army canteen or had received in food parcels from home: generally
tinned sausages, tinned fruit, and cake.
The brigade made for the Wadi esc Sciomar, a break in the escarpment three miles east by
south of Point 175, a convenient place from which to reconnoitre the position and plan its action.
L Troop was on the left front of the 26th Battalion group, followed by four of the Valentine tanks.
The gunners were surprised that they and not the tanks headed the advance; but the Valentines,
heavily armoured and slow, were not as manoeuverable as cruiser tanks, and not as well fitted for
the lead as the more mobile portées.
A few miles before the wadi was reached there appeared to the west a large group of British
tanks and other vehicles, some of them still smouldering. (It was learned later that on the previous
afternoon enemy tanks had forced the 7th Armoured Division’s Support Group off Sidi Rezegh
after heavy fighting.) Movement among them showed that they were in enemy hands, and Germans
in trucks were seen making away to the south and south-west. The range was extreme, but the
troop opened fire at the escaping vehicles. Lieutenant Pepper hurried to battalion headquarters for
orders, and was told by the battalion commander, Lieutenant-Colonel J. R. Page3, that as there
were probably British wounded among the wrecks their safety must be the first consideration.
By the time Lieutenant Pepper returned and gave the order to cease fire, the troop had fired about
fifty rounds at distances above the limit allowed by the range scales. The Germans were seen to be
making off to the west with some captured Honey tanks, but the gunners were forbidden to
resume firing. Instead, the troop’s guns covered the advance of three of the battalion’s Bren carriers,
which went over to the mass of tanks and trucks to look for British wounded. An ambulance,
packed with injured men, came back to the battalion.
The carriers soon returned and the column resumed its march. At the Wadi esc Sciomar it was
apparent that the enemy held Point 175, on the escarpment to the east of Sidi Rezegh, in force.
At half past eleven Brigadier H. E. Barrowclough4, commander of the 6th Brigade, issued orders
for the 25th Battalion, with the 24th in reserve, to attack and capture Point 175; the 26th Battalion
with its supporting arms was to establish contact with the 5th South African Brigade, five miles
south-west of Point 175.
The 26th Battalion group set out at once. With the infantry were the four two-pounders of
L Troop and eight 25-pounders of Major A. T. Rawle’s5 30th Battery (6th Field Regiment).
Again the troop led the advance, with the guns in a shallow crescent in front of the battalion
column, the order from the right being L1, L2, L3, and L4, the centre guns slightly in advance
of those on the flanks. Lieutenant Pepper in his 15-cwt. truck rode behind L2, and the troop 3-ton
lorry, containing reserve ammunition and rations, in charge of the troop subaltern, Second-Lieutenant I. G. Scott6, followed L3.
The battalion met the South Africans just before half past twelve. They had been in action the
previous day, and had dug in on a rise on the southern escarpment. (Though this was ‘high ground’
by desert standards, the rise was a very gentle one, which did not offer the slightest obstacle to
armoured fighting vehicles.) With the South Africans were a few tanks—those of the 22nd
Armoured Brigade which had survived the previous afternoon’s action. Colonel Page, who had
decided to dispose the 26th Battalion on a smaller rise about a mile to the east, met General Gott,
commander of the British 7th Armoured Division, who had under his command twelve 25-pounder
field guns, the remnants of the regiment which had been with the 7th Support Group at the Sidi
Rezegh airfield. These he proposed to site on the east side of the South African position, facing
north-east, and he directed that the New Zealand guns be disposed to the east, north, and south of
the 26th Battalion area. Should any threat develop against the New Zealanders from the west,
the British guns would be moved to cover the battalion’s western flank.
In Position
THE BATTALION was immediately deployed in an all-round defensive position. Colonel
Page placed four of the 30th Field Battery’s 25-pounders (E Troop) on the northern side of
the perimeter and four (F Troop) on the southern, while L Troop was told to dig its guns in
facing east.
Diagram A.
The level ground offered no choice of positions, so the guns were simply sited in line at intervals
of about fifty yards along the infantry FDLs
Forward defended localities. This term is applied to the most advanced areas of a defensive position. They are
usually sited to support each other by fire. In the case of an all-round defence, as on this occasion, the FDLs marked
the circumference of the area held.
. Once the sites were decided, long training made
the procedure automatic. As the gunners reached for picks and short-handled shovels the gun
commanders (sergeants in charge of individual guns) leaped to the ground and traced with their
heels the dimensions of the gunpits. There had been no chance to brew a cup of tea at breakfast-time or later, and, while the others dug, one man in each crew pumped up the primus stove and
soon had a hot drink ready.
Up to this stage the 26th Battalion had not seen the main enemy force. Apart from the South
Africans, however, there were scores of knocked-out vehicles, armoured and otherwise, to show
that the area had been one of recent desperate combat. The South Africans were only too well
aware that their position was known to the enemy. Early that morning three British-type tanks
had rolled up to their lines, their turrets open, the crews wearing the familiar black berets of the
Allied armoured formations and waving their hands in, presumably, friendly greeting. Approaching
slowly, they had ample chance to gain a good general idea of the South African dispositions.
When right up to the FDLs, their turrets were slammed down, their machine guns fired a few
bursts of unexpected and deadly rounds, and the tanks made good their escape. (Six days later the
Germans were to repeat this same trick to break the desperate resistance of the remnants of the
21st New Zealand Battalion and recapture Point 175.) During the morning one other enemy
group had approached, quickly withdrawing when engaged and giving the impression of a
reconnaissance.
The real blow fell on the South Africans a few minutes after 3.30 p.m. A strong force of enemy
tanks with infantry in lorries approached from the south-west, swung across the brigade’s western
perimeter and, making good use of the knowledge gained from their earlier reconnaissance, drove
hard at the defences.
The smoke, dust, and flames of battle, and the position of the late afternoon sun, made it hard
at first for the New Zealanders to see what was happening. A few shells, probably overs, landed
in the 26th Battalion area. But very soon after the attack started, urgent messages from the South
Africans, asking for all the artillery support the battalion could afford, made it clear that the
situation was desperate. The 30th Battery’s guns were then moved to the western flank and opened
fire at the German armoured vehicles and transport.
About four o’clock, when the L Troop gunners had finished digging their gunpits—L4 was
actually in position in the pit—all gun commanders were called to troop headquarters, in this case
the troop commander’s truck. In charge of the four two-pounders were Sergeants T. E. Williamson7, P. Robertson8, T. E. Unverricht9, and T. H. Croft10, of L’s 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. They
quickly reported to Lieutenant Pepper, and learned from him that the South Africans were in
imminent danger of being overrun, that all the 26th Battalion’s supporting guns were to form a
line on the western perimeter, and that the troop was to move immediately. The sergeants ran
back to their guns. The gunners cursed more or less automatically when they heard that their
digging was all for nothing, but the sight of their commander’s truck, with Lieutenant Pepper
leaning from the cab and beckoning them emphatically to follow him, made it plain that this was
no time for recrimination.
L2 and L3 were the first guns to follow. Their crews had been warned that they would be
required to take part in a dusk patrol and were not to take the guns from the portées before it
was over. L1 and L4 had to be winched back on the portées and clamped down before they could
start to move. Lieutenant Pepper set a merry pace round the northern flank of the battalion
perimeter, and the portées, especially the last two, had to travel fast to keep up with him. The four
field guns that had been deployed to the north had already moved and were getting into action in
new positions, this time preparing to fire over open sights instead of indirectly at distant targets,
when the troop raced behind them. Following the original plan, some of the British guns had
fallen back to help close the gap on the west of the battalion. The new gunline started from the
right with four of the 30th Battery’s 25-pounders, then two British field guns, and then two
two-pounders en portée, also British. When his truck reached the left of this line, Lieutenant
Pepper leaned out of the cab with a red flag. First waving it in violent circles, he pointed to the
west. Every anti-tank gunner knew then where his weapon was to go into action, and the direction
from which the enemy would appear.
The regiment’s two-pounder troops had practised many times the manoeuvre which L Troop
now carried out in grim earnest: the quick deployment of guns en portée to meet a sudden attack.
After the signal for action, the pointing flag told the gun commanders in which direction their
guns were to face. Each wheeled his portée into its place in line facing the enemy. The gunners
agreed that nothing they had done in practice could compare for speed with their performance
under the stimulus of real action. And there was another time-saving factor: the gun commanders
did not have to look for cover. There was none.
It was about half past four by the time the troop’s guns, high on the decks of their portées on a
bare desert and with a sinking sun shining almost directly against them, swung into position on
the left of the line. By this time the enemy was aware of the presence of the New Zealanders for
small-arms fire was brought down on the 26th Battalion. The South African position was enveloped
in swirls of dust and overhung by smoke, shot through in many places by the flames of burning
vehicles, and at first it was impossible to make out individual tanks or trucks. The gunners had
been told by Lieutenant Pepper that the South Africans were being overrun and that German
tanks would almost certainly bear down on the New Zealand position. ‘There are lots of them,’
he said in warning the gun commanders, ‘maybe over 150. But don’t let that worry you. They
are only little ones.’
The infantry waited in their slit-trenches for the enemy to come within effective small-arms
range. On the right of the gunline the 25-pounders were firing steadily, and still farther to the
right the anti-tank gunners could hear the gunfire of the other 30th Battery troop
Diagram B.
. Two tanks,
dimly visible over 1000 yards away on the right front, were thought by the troop to be the
Valentines which had earlier accompanied the brigade group. In the haze they could not be certain,
and until individual targets offered, there was little point in firing into the confused and dust-choked
mass of friend and foe a mile away to the west.
‘Keep your engines running all the time,’ said Lieutenant Pepper to each gun commander as he
hurried round the troop for a final check. Even though there was no cover, the guns were to be
moved after each few shots, so that when smoke and dust obscured the position the enemy gunners
would not be able to pick them by their flashes.
TRANSPORT
A. FIRST DISPOSITIONS
B. FINAL DISPOSITIONS
BATTLE SCENES IN LIBYA
The Attack Begins
THE GUNNERS did not have long to wait before the Germans were seen to be attacking,
with a mass of armoured vehicles, from the South African position. The two supposed
Valentines on the right front suddenly wheeled and opened fire. One of their first shots, a
50-millimetre armour-piercing shell, crashed through the lower left side of L1, disabled the gun,
smashed the left foot and ankle of the gun-layer, Gunner Andy Graham11 and came to rest on
the deck of the portée. (The crew kept this shot, and when Graham went back to New Zealand it
was his most cherished souvenir.) Before an effective shot had been fired at the enemy, L1 had been
knocked out.
At 1800 yards, the extreme range on the range scale, the remaining three guns opened fire on
the advancing enemy tanks. As they cleared the South African position, the enemy descended a
slight fall in the ground below the skyline, which would otherwise have allowed them to be
easily picked out by the gun-layers. On the other hand, as they drew out of the dust and smoke it
was possible for individual vehicles to be distinguished, and the troop went to work in earnest.
Lieutenant Pepper’s remark to the gun sergeants that the tanks, though numerous, were small
ones, was borne out when the troop started shooting. It was amply demonstrated in later desert
campaigns that the more heavily armoured of the German Mark 3 and Mark 4 tanks were impervious to two-pounder fire at ranges over 800 yards. But the early German tanks had much
lighter armour. On this occasion the gunners saw tanks burst into flame from hits scored with the
range at 1500, 1600, and even 1700 yards. The calibre of the shells which knocked out L1 and
scored a subsequent hit on L3, 50-millimetre, showed that there were German Mark 3s among
the attackers. It is probable that they were an early type, without the heavier armour of the later
Mark 3. It is also probable that there were some German Mark 2s, much lighter tanks, among
them; if part of the Ariete Division was with the Germans, there would have been Italian M.13s,
equally vulnerable, as well.
Beyond the apparent fact that there was an imposing mass of them, it was impossible for the
gunners to form an accurate estimate of the number of enemy tanks in this first drive against the
26th Battalion. It was agreed by all on the spot that the number was at least fifty, but they could
not see clearly enough to make an accurate count. Nor was there time to do so. At first the enemy
tanks, apparently without knowledge of the identity or strength of the New Zealanders, simply
poured down on the position with no sign of a definite plan of attack. When the blast of fire from
the 25-pounders and the two-pounders convinced them of the strength of the defence, they
withdrew, and a far more cautious policy was adopted. But until the attackers realised the position
and altered their tactics, the L Troop gunners worked under great pressure.
Following Lieutenant Pepper’s injunction, L3 fired five shots, the tracer tracks of at least two
of them showing direct hits on their targets, then changed its position. As its portée backed again
towards the enemy another German 50-millimetre shell found a mark. It pierced the left side of
the shield, miraculously missing both Sergeant Unverricht and the layer, Bombardier C. J. Smith12,
went on through the cab of the portée, mortally wounding the driver, Gunner F. D. Nicholson13,
and finished by striking the top of the engine and putting the vehicle out of action. Unverricht
jumped to the ground to see the extent of the damage, and was just in time to see Nicholson stagger
from the cab and collapse on the sand. Seeing at a glance how badly he was wounded, the sergeant
at once set off across bullet-swept ground to find medical assistance.
With half the troop’s effective strength out of action, L2 and L4 carried on. In that first few
hectic minutes while the tanks closed the range, the little two-pounder shells were most effective.
The procedure of ordinary anti-tank shooting was, for a short time, discarded. Normally the
Number 1, the gun commander, selects a target and directs the layer until it appears in his telescope.
He then gives the range and deflection to be allowed for a moving target. The loader slams a shell
into the breech and, as the spring forces the block home, taps the layer on the shoulder to let him
know the gun is ready, and the Number 1 gives the order to fire. The gun’s target knocked out,
the Number 1 orders ‘Stop!’ selects a fresh target for the layer, and so on. This time the targets
were too thick to be easily selected and the need too pressing for any stops.
‘Pick your own target through the telescope, Frank,’ said Sergeant Peter Robertson, of L2,
to his gun-layer, Bombardier F. C. Barker14. Almost at the same time, a similar understanding was
reached between Sergeant ‘Chum’ Croft of L4 and his layer, Gunner A. B. Gordon15. Whenever
enemy shells came close the portées moved; but after every change of position, the initial direction
of the Number 1 and his final order to stop were the only formal commands.
As the range closed, the tracer showed hit after hit on the enemy tanks. On the right the field
gunners worked like men possessed, firing armour-piercing shot over open sights. They could not
match the high rate of fire of the two-pounders, with their semi-automatic breech and light,
easily handled ammunition, but one hit with the 25-pound shell was almost always sufficient to
disable a tank, while two, three, and even four good shots were often needed from the lighter
weapons.
Noticing the troop’s rate of fire, Lieutenant-Colonel Page called to Lieutenant Pepper. ‘Cyril,’
he said, ‘if your chaps keep shooting at that speed they’ll be out of ammunition in no time.’
‘It’s all right, sir,’ Pepper shouted in reply, ‘we’ve got some extra.’ When first the group had met
the South Africans he had replaced the ammunition his guns had fired during the morning. The
South Africans had urged him to help himself from their supply, and not only had he replaced
the rounds fired, but he had also loaded a lot more on his own truck.
After what seemed to the gunners to be nearer half a day than little more than half an hour, the
enemy decided he had stumbled on something that presented much more than merely a mopping-up task. The tanks returned to their original start line and fanned out on the flanks in crescent
formation. This favourite German method of attack enabled the machine guns at either end of the
line to bring a severe crossfire on the defenders. A line of burning vehicles testified to the shooting
of the New Zealand guns, both two- and 25-pounders, but the casualties were only a small proportion of the enemy tanks. Enough remained to form a wide crescent and, although more
cautiously, resume the attack. By now there was no sign of the British field or anti-tank guns.
For some reason they had been withdrawn, and only L Troop’s two guns and the 30th Field Battery
remained to protect the infantry and take what toll they could of the enemy armour.
Still there was no lack of targets for the two-pounders. Though the enemy tanks had fallen
back and fanned out the guns were still able to reach them, though not with the same effect as at
the closer range. Lorried infantry joined in the attack, and the troop concentrated some of its fire
on the troop-carrying vehicles. Although these would halt and debus the infantry out of range of
the guns, the layers, Frank Barker of L2 and ‘Abe’ Gordon of L4, made targets of them nevertheless.
They would lay onto an enemy vehicle or group of infantry with the range at 1800 yards, then
cock the gun up a little higher and fire, the gun commanders checking their judgment of the
extra range by carefully observing each shot. Several lorries were hit in this way and parties of
enemy infantry were scattered while trying to bring their mortars into action.
Meanwhile Sergeant Unverricht had not been able to find assistance for the badly wounded
Gunner Nicholson. He reported to Lieutenant Pepper and was directed to get the help of the troop
subaltern, Second-Lieutenant Scott, and the troop 3-ton lorry. Lieutenant Scott and his driver,
Gunner R. F. Davies16, soon backed the lorry to the knocked-out portée. The tailboard was lowered
and Gunner Nicholson lifted gently to the deck. But when the lorry tried to tow the gun back to
a safer place two more casualties were suffered. With the tow-rope attached, Gunner P. J. Keenan17,
the L3 loader, jumped on the front bumper bar of the portée and shouted to Gunner Davies to
drive on. He did so, but just as the portée was gathering way down a slight incline the three-tonner
unexpectedly stopped. With its steering gear and brakes useless, the portée rolled down the slope
and crashed into the back of the lorry, Gunner Keenan having his leg badly shattered between the
two vehicles. There was excellent reason for Davies’ lack of response to shouts to move his lorry
out of the way. He had been wounded in the hip by a Spandau bullet as he sat behind the wheel.
The two guns still in action did not waste an opportunity to disrupt the enemy attack. Trucks
were bringing enemy infantry well up behind the gradually advancing tanks, and parties were
jumping out and trying to bring mortars and anti-tank guns into action. Gordon and Barker,
through their telescopes, found that while the setting sun made it hard to sort out their targets
initially, once they had the enemy within their lenses the bright background made accurate
aiming easy. At extreme range and beyond, they engaged every party of enemy infantry they
could see as they left their lorries, and several times the two-pounder shells prevented mortars
from coming into action and scattered their crews. Many bursts of flame showed hits. All this
time, machine-gun fire from the tanks was sweeping the New Zealand position. Often bullets
rattled against the portées, and it was by good fortune that there were no further casualties in the
troop.
Replenishing the Ammunition
BEFORE long both crews exhausted their ammunition. Each two-pounder in the regiment
carried 192 rounds on the portée. In the morning engagement L4 had fired about ten rounds,
which reduced its supply to 182, and L2 had fired about sixteen, leaving it with 176. There remained
first of all the ammunition on the knocked-out guns. From L2, Gunner A. J. Harris18, the Bren
gunner, and Gunner M. A. Harry19, the ammunition number, made their way over forty yards of
bullet-spattered ground to L3. On each trip they brought back eight rounds apiece, a container
of four shells in either hand. Gunner P. Quirk20, the ammunition number of L4, later assisted by
the Bren gunner, Gunner L. O. Naylor21, had anticipated the shortage and was already replenishing
his supply from the other knocked-out gun, L1. In his case as well, the task of bringing up the
extra ammunition meant a most dangerous sprint under fire.
By this time the Germans were shelling the position and in spite of the efforts of the New
Zealand gunners had managed to get some mortars into action, but very few of the heavy missiles
landed among the troop’s vehicles. Either that was good luck, or the enemy might have been
seeking first to knock out the field guns on the right of the line. But as the tanks and infantry
began to close on the position, the machine-gun fire and armour-piercing shot became heavier.
The ammunition numbers carried on until all the shells of the knocked-out guns were carried to
the two-pounders still in action.
While the action was in progress its various stages were reported to the 26th Battalion’s parent
formation, the 6th New Zealand Infantry Brigade. Brigadier Barrowclough ordered the battalion
to disengage and retire to the main body of the group. To do this darkness was essential. The
question was whether the enemy could be held at bay until last light. It would be about half past
six in the evening before there was sufficient gloom to cover the withdrawal. By six the enemy
was getting close; but the infantry and guns fought sternly on. After one heavy shell and mortar
barrage the enemy’s fire slackened, but the battalion’s Bren gunners and riflemen maintained their
rapid rate. When some of the crew of L4, not noticing that the light was beginning to fail, took
advantage of the lull to smoke the first cigarette of the afternoon, the flare of their matches at
once drew the enemy’s fire.
Any vehicle moving on the front was fired on by the anti-tank guns, and parties of infantry
provided alternative targets. L2 fired all L3’s ammunition. Lieutenant Pepper had expected this,
and in good time had an extra supply available from his reserve store. By the time the withdrawal
was ordered, L4 was using the last of the containers brought over from L1.
The temporary slackening of the enemy’s fire did not mean that he was abandoning the attack.
Just after seven o’clock, when the 26th Battalion was nearly ready to withdraw, there came a
hail of machine-gun fire, which the German infantry followed with a resolute attack. It was dark
by the time they had come within 800 yards of the New Zealanders but they could be seen clearly
against the glare of burning vehicles. The New Zealand infantry then put the finishing touch to an
afternoon of determined and skilful defensive fighting. Led by Captain A. W. Wesney22, the
battalion’s B Company counter-attacked in a bayonet charge that caused heavy casualties and
completely repulsed the enemy. In this charge this fine officer was killed.
As it could not be taken, away, Lieutenant Pepper ordered that L3, the gun with the knocked-out portée, should be made completely unfit for use. Sergeant Unverricht and Bombardier ‘Cy’
Smith took the breech block with its firing mechanism from the gun.
‘Since we’re here, Terry,’ said Smith, ‘wouldn’t it be as well to take some of the tinned stuff?’
The sergeant agreed, and each seized as many tins of tongue, sausages, and fruit as he could
carry. They had just returned to the troop three-tonner when the heavy machine-gun concentration hit the area. Both dropped to the ground. Smith lay flat with his head against a tin of
sausages, and when a lull enabled him to shift position he found that a German bullet had pierced
the tin, missing his head by inches.
The Withdrawal
THE BATTALION’S withdrawal was made in good order, quickly, and with complete success.
German flares were casting a bright light over the position when the troop received orders
to retire. Its vehicles, now three portées, the commander’s ‘pick-up’, and the troop 3-ton lorry,
were in the last party to leave. This comprised the field artillery, which kept up its fire to the very
last moment, the battalion’s Bren carriers, and the last infantry company, the infantrymen riding
on the gun vehicles and the carriers. One German prisoner also found a seat in the troop commander’s truck. It was not until eleven o’clock at night that L Troop and the 26th Battalion
re-established contact with the 6th Brigade and bedded down for the night near Point 175.
Before the withdrawal the troop’s casualties were attended by the 26th Battalion’s Medical
Officer, Lieutenant G. C. Jennings23, who earned the admiration of the gunners by bringing his
RAP
Regimental aid post.
truck to within fifty yards of the forward positions.
Reporting on this action, Brigadier Barrowclough wrote: ‘It will be appreciated that this
small force had been hotly attacked by an enemy column which had already proved itself strong
enough to defeat and overthrow the whole of the 5th South African Brigade Group. That the
26th Battalion and its supporting artillery and anti-tank guns were able to maintain their positions
and come out of the action with surprisingly few casualties was an eloquent tribute to the high
standard of training and fortitude of all ranks. After the action there was no question that the
infantry had the highest possible regard for the gunners. Nor were the gunners less generous in
their praise of the way in which the infantry first stood its ground and then fought the rearguard
action back to the main body of the Brigade group.’
Lieutenant Pepper estimated that L Troop had knocked out 24 tanks as well as many unarmoured
vehicles. As the fight progressed the front had become lined with burning vehicles, some South
African, many of them transport lorries. In the dust and smoke, with the sinking sun shining into
the eyes of the observer, it must have been extremely difficult to make an accurate count. The fact
that eight field guns of the 30th Battery were also in action against the enemy armour made a tally
all the more uncertain. It was reported by the British that the German attack against the South
Africans and the 26th Battalion cost the enemy 52 tanks. With that as a total figure, and taking into
account that the two L Troop guns fired nearly 700 rounds between them in about three hours’
fighting, the figure of 24 certainties is at least possible, even allowing for the long range at which
many of the shots were fired.
On the debit side, one L Troop gunner was killed and three were wounded, and two guns
and one portée lost. The afternoon’s fighting in this area cost the Eighth Army almost the whole
of the 5th South African Brigade, as well as some tanks of the 22nd Armoured Brigade. Against
that there were the indefinite but certainly considerable German infantry casualties besides the
losses in tanks and transport.
At the time of this engagement, it is probable that Rommel thought he had encountered a
considerably larger proportion of the New Zealand Division than was actually the case. It was
later stated by Colonel Mario Revetria, Chief Intelligence Officer of the Italian forces under
Rommel’s command, that the German leader had first been under the impression that the 6th
New Zealand Infantry Brigade had been virtually wiped out in company with the 5th South
African Brigade on 23 November. Instead, on that same afternoon, the 25th Battalion had
driven the Germans from Point 175, and the brigade was to take heavy toll of the enemy from
the Sidi Rezegh escarpment before it was finally dislodged on 1 December.
Throughout this short but severe action the leadership of the anti-tank troop commander,
Lieutenant Pepper, was an inspiration to his men, and indeed to all the New Zealanders there.
Regardless of the heavy small-arms fire, he moved from gun to gun encouraging the crews,
meeting every emergency promptly and with skill. At one stage, when the arrival of some South
African vehicles and the distortion of an order gave the impression that there was a general withdrawal, he corrected the error and by personal visits to each gun made sure that the line was
maintained. For this outstanding work under extraordinarily difficult circumstances, and his
complete disregard of personal danger, Lieutenant Pepper was awarded the Military Cross. It was
a grave misfortune for the troop and the regiment when, three days later, he was so badly injured
by a staff car which backed into the slit-trench in which he was resting, that he had to be invalided
back to New Zealand.
Good fortune attended L Troop to the end of the short but bitterly-fought campaign. Both the
battery’s other two-pounder troops, J and K, were overrun with the 24th and 26th Battalions
above the mosque at Sidi Rezegh on 30 November, with heavy casualties and complete loss of
equipment. With the survivors of the 25th Battalion, L Troop was able to withdraw next day,
and made its way back to Baggush with what remained of the 4th and 6th New Zealand Infantry
Brigades.
Biographical Notes
1Lt-Col T. H. E. Oakes, MC and bar
First World War
, m.i.d.; Royal Artillery (retd); born England, 24 Mar 1895;
CO 7 NZ Anti-Tank Regt, 16 May-30 Nov 1941; killed in action, 30 Nov 1941.
2Lt C. S. Pepper, MC; clerk; born NZ, 18 Nov 1911; Rugby All Black 1935 (United Kingdom); injured
26 Nov 1941; died, Wellington, 30 May 1943.
3Lt-Col J. R. Page, DSO, m.i.d.; Regular soldier; Wellington; born Dunedin, 10 May 1908; CO 26 Bn,
15 May 1940–27 Nov 1941; wounded 27 Nov 1941; invalided to NZ, 25 Feb 1942; Inspector of Training, 26 Aug
1942; GSO 1, Army HQ, 19 Jan 1943; Rugby All Black 1931; 1932 and 1934 (Australia); 1935 (United Kingdom).
4Maj-Gen H. E. Barrowclough, CB, DSO and bar, MC, ED, m.i.d.; barrister and solicitor;
Auckland; born Masterton, 23 Jun 1894; in First World War rose from Pte to Lt-Col commanding 4 Bn, NZRB;
wounded, Messines, 1917; in Second World War commanded 6 NZ Inf Bde, 1 May 1940–21 Feb 1942; GOC
2 NZEF in the Pacific and GOC 3 NZ Div, 8 Aug 1942–20 Oct 1944.
5Maj A. T. Rawle, m.i.d.; insurance clerk; born Auckland, 26 Sep 1909; died of wounds, 3 Dec 1941.
6Capt I. G. Scott; commercial traveller; Auckland; born Australia, 1 Feb 1914; wounded 2 Dec 1941; p.w.
22 Jul 1942.
7Sgt T. E. Williamson; contractor; Te Kauwhata; born Gisborne, 23 Sep 1911.
8Lt P. Robertson; labourer; Wellington; born Scotland, 7 Feb 1919.
9Sgt T. E. Unverricht; labourer; Heretaunga; born Lower Hutt, 4 Jul 1918; wounded 1 Dec 1941 and 5 Jul
1942.
10Sgt T. H. Croft; farm worker; Omihi; born NZ, 6 Nov 1909.
11Gnr A. Graham; labourer; Christchurch; born Scotland, 28 Nov 1912; wounded 23 Nov 1941.
12Sgt C. J. Smith; carpenter; Upper Hutt; born Wellington, 23 Feb 1912.
13 Gnr F. D. Nicholson; labourer; born NZ, 19 Feb 1914; died of wounds, 23 Nov 1941.
14WO II F. C. Barker; freezing worker; Auckland; born Wanganui, 23 Apr 1912; wounded 13 Jul 1942.
15Lt A. B. Gordon; student; Lower Hutt; born Lower Hutt, 24 Mar 1917.
16Gnr R. F. Davies; sugar worker; Auckland; born Auckland, 16 Dec 1919; wounded 23 Nov 1941.
17Gnr P. J. Keenan; salesman; Christchurch; born Christchurch, 10 Jun 1919; injured 23 Nov 1941.
18Sgt A. J. Harris; joiner; Auckland; born Auckland, 26 Dec 1917.
19Sgt M. A. Harry; cellarman; Christchurch; born NZ, 4 Jul 1914.
20Gnr P. Quirk; labourer; Melbourne; born Australia, 13 May 1919; wounded and p.w., 2 Jan 1942; escaped
to Switzerland, Oct 1943.
21Sgt L. O. Naylor; labourer; Lumsden; born Lumsden, 13 Oct 1908; wounded 18 Apr 1941.
22Capt A. W. Wesney; clerk; born Invercargill, 1 Feb 1915; Rugby All Black 1938 (Australia); killed in action
23 Nov 1941.
23Capt G. C. Jennings; medical practitioner; England; born NZ, 21 Jun 1913; p.w. 13 Dec 1941; repatriated
May 1943.
The occupations given in each case are those on enlistment
Acknowledgments
THE OFFICIAL SOURCES consulted in the preparation of this account were
the war diaries of Headquarters 6th New Zealand Infantry Brigade and the 26th
New Zealand Battalion, and a special report on the campaign by the commander of the
6th Brigade, Brigadier H. E. Barrowclough. Most of the material is drawn from interviews
and correspondence with men who took part in the action. The assistance of former members
of L Troop, 33rd New Zealand Anti-Tank Battery, and also of the 26th Battalion and
the 30th New Zealand Field Battery, is gratefully acknowledged.
THE MAP, DIAGRAMS, and SKETCHES were drawn by L. D. McCormick.
THE PAINTING on page 17 was by Captain Peter McIntyre.
THE PHOTOGRAPHS come from many sources, which are stated where they are known:
page 9 (top)I. G. Scott(bottom)New Zealand Army official, W. Timminspage 10 (top)E. A. Frost(bottom)A. B. Gordonpage 11New Zealand officialpage 12Peter McIntyrepage 13 (top)F. C. Barker(bottom)A. B. Gordonpage 14T. E. Williamsonpage 15Australian official, George Silkpage 16 (bottom)A. S. Framepage 18A. S. Framepage 19A. S. Framepage 20 (top)Peter McIntyre(bottom)A. S. Framepage 21 (top)F. C. Barker(bottom)A. B. Gordonpage 22 (top)Australian official, George Silk(bottom)F. C. Barkerpage 23 (top)T. E. Williamson(bottom)I. G. Scottpage 24 (top)T. E. Unverricht(bottom)T. E. Williamson
THE AUTHOR, E. H. Smith, is a member of the staff of the War History
Branch. A former newspaper reporter, he served overseas in the 7th New Zealand
Anti-Tank Regiment and is at present writing the history of that unit. He was
wounded on 3 August 1944 during the advance to Florence.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
ACHILLES
AT THE RIVER PLATES. D. WATERSWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1948
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurch
new zealand
On Patrol
AUGUST 1939 was a month of great activity in the German Navy. The war plans of the
High Command for commerce raiding in the Atlantic were being put into operation.
Between 19 and 23 August, eighteen U-boats sailed for their allotted stations; on the 21st, the
pocket battleship Admiral Graf Spee, commanded by Captain Hans Langsdorf, sailed from
Wilhelmshaven; on the 24th, a second pocket battleship, the Deutschland, put to sea, her tanker
supply ship having sailed two days earlier. To wait upon the Admiral Graf Spee, the tanker Altmark,
carrying three months’ stores, had sailed from Germany as early as 2 August and, having loaded
9400 tons of fuel oil at Port Arthur, Texas, left there on 19 August for the Atlantic. Until war
began, the Admiral Graf Spee was to cruise in an area north-west of the Cape Verde Islands;
afterwards, she was to operate on the South Atlantic trade routes.
The broad lines of British naval policy for the protection of sea-borne trade in the event of
war with Germany and Italy had been laid down in an Admiralty memorandum of January 1939.
Anticipating attacks by raiders, including Germany’s three pocket battleships, the memorandum
set out the ‘traditional and well-proved methods’ of trade protection. These consisted in the
dispersal or evasive routeing of merchant shipping, the stationing of naval patrols in focal areas
where cruisers could concentrate in pairs against a superior enemy, and the formation of adequately
escorted convoys. Detachments from the main fleet could also be used if required. ‘By such
means,’ said the memorandum, ‘we have in the past succeeded in protecting shipping on essential
routes and it is intended to rely on these methods again, adapting them to the problem under
review.’ On the outbreak of war on 3 September 1939, this policy was put into effect; but it
was not always possible to provide adequate escort forces for convoys. This was one of the costly
results of the drastic whittling down of British naval strength during the past twenty-one years.
During the last week of August active steps were taken to put the two cruisers of the New
Zealand Division of the Royal Navy in a state of instant readiness for war. At nine o’clock on the
morning of 29 August, Captain W. E. Parry, RN, commanding officer of HMS Achilles, received
his sailing orders for the North America and West Indies Station. During the morning, two
Reserve officers from the Leander and a draft of young ratings from the training depot joined the
ship, which left her berth at Devonport dockyard, Auckland, at 1.30 p.m. At the last minute a
boat arrived alongside with an additional medical officer, Surgeon-Lieutenant C. A. Pittar,
RNZNVR, who at one hour’s notice had left his private practice to go to sea. The ship’s company
then numbered 567, of whom twenty-six officers and 220 ratings were from the Royal Navy and
five officers and 316 ratings were New Zealanders.
After clearing the harbour the Achilles proceeded at 14 knots for the Panama Canal; but during
the night of 2 September she was ordered by the Commander-in-Chief, America and West Indies,
to alter course for Valparaiso, Chile, and she increased her speed to 17 knots. Shortly before
1 a.m. (ship’s time) on 3 September, the Admiralty signal ‘Commence hostilities against Germany’
was received. From this time on, action stations were exercised daily at dawn and dusk and the
ship was blacked out at night. No ship was sighted on the passage across the Pacific and the
Achilles arrived at Valparaiso at midday on 12 September.
During the next six weeks, the Achilles patrolled the west coast of South America and visited
numerous harbours and anchorages in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia, with due observance
of the neutrality regulations of those republics. As in August 1914, the outbreak of war had almost
completely halted the considerable German trade in those waters. The only German merchant
ships at sea, when the Achilles arrived on the coast, were fugitives such as the Lahn from Sydney
and the Erlangen from New Zealand, which had vanished into the Pacific in the week before the
outbreak of war and evaded the patrolling cruiser by sneaking into neutral harbours. The advent
of the Achilles, the only Allied warship in those waters, sufficed to keep German trade at a standstill
and virtually to immobilise some seventeen merchant ships totalling 84,000 tons along a coastline of
5000 miles from the Panama Canal to the Strait of Magellan. Thus was exemplified the truth of the
old saying that nine-tenths of naval warfare is made up of the continuous drudgery and monotony
of patrol duties and the search for enemy vessels which are not there, but which would be if the
patrols were not.
But the restraining influence of the Achilles on that coast was about to be removed. On 1 October
the Admiralty received word that the British steamer Clement, 5051 tons, had been sunk off the
coast of Brazil on 30 September by an enemy raider believed to be the Admiral Scheer. It was,
in fact, the Admiral Graf Spee, who had struck her first blow. Prompt and far-reaching measures
were taken to hunt her down. The Achilles was in the vicinity of the Gulf of Panama when, on
2 October, she received orders to proceed south-about into the Atlantic to reinforce the South
America Division of Commodore Henry Harwood, who was operating under the orders of the
Commander-in-Chief, South Atlantic. From the beginning of the war, the commodore’s special
care and duty was to protect merchant shipping in the important River Plate and Rio de Janeiro
areas. He had under his command the cruisers Exeter (Captain F. S. Bell, RN), Cumberland (Captain
W. H. G. Fallowfield, RN), and Ajax (Captain C. H. L. Woodhouse, RN), and for about six
weeks, the destroyers Hotspur and Havock. On 5 October the Admiralty informed the Commander-in-Chief, South Atlantic, of the formation of eight hunting groups, each of ‘sufficient strength to
destroy any German armoured ship of the Deutschland class or armoured cruiser of the Hipper class’.
Thus, the appearance of a single enemy raider in the South Atlantic set in motion a vast naval
machine involving twenty-two ships, as well as the despatch of two battleships and three cruisers
to Canada for convoy escort duties. In British ships alone, this entailed the withdrawal from Home
waters of three capital ships, two aircraft-carriers, and three cruisers, and from the Mediterranean
(for duty in the Indian Ocean) of one battleship, one aircraft-carrier, and three cruisers. In addition,
the French Navy provided an aircraft-carrier, two battle-cruisers, five cruisers, and several
destroyers to operate off the west coast of Africa. These elaborate measures recall the similar
widespread dispositions made in 1914 against Admiral Graf Spee’s Pacific Squadron and in the
hunting of the cruiser Emden.
After a second visit to Valparaiso, where she spent two days making good engine-room defects,
the Achilles carried on to the southward. She entered the Strait of Magellan at midday on 19
October, anchored overnight, and cleared the Atlantic entrance the following evening, arriving
at the Falkland Islands about twenty-four hours later. After refuelling, the Achilles sailed from
Port Stanley on 23 October and proceeded to the southern approach to the River Plate, where
she joined company with HMS Exeter three days later. On 27 October the Achilles met the
Cumberland, under orders to patrol with her in the Rio de Janeiro-Santos area. Commodore
Harwood transferred his broad pendant to the Ajax and the Exeter sailed for Port Stanley to carry
out urgent repairs. She replaced the Achilles on 11 November.
Nothing had been heard of the enemy raider for three weeks, and on 3 November the Admiralty
informed the Commander-in-Chief, South Atlantic, that all German capital ships and cruisers
were believed to be in their home waters. Next day, the Admiralty issued orders that Force ‘G’
(Cumberland and Exeter) and Force ‘H’ (Sussex and Shropshire) should exchange areas, an arrangement that would not only give the former ships an opportunity to rest and refit, but also provide
Commodore Harwood with the hunting group of long-steaming endurance he so greatly desired.
The two forces had actually sailed to effect the change-over when, on 17 November, the Admiralty
learned that the pocket battleship was in the Indian Ocean. The exchange arrangements were
immediately cancelled and the ships returned to their respective stations.
The Movements of the Graf Spee
AFTER SINKING the Clement on 30 September, the Admiral Graf Spee made a cast more
than 2000 miles to the eastward and between 5 and 10 October captured and later sank
three steamers—the Newton Beech, 4651 tons, the Ashlea, 4222 tons, and the Huntsman, 8196 tons—
all homeward-bound from South Africa. On 14 October, south-west of St. Helena, the raider
refuelled from the Altmark, to whom she transferred the crews of the sunken ships. Returning
towards the African coast, she intercepted and sank on 22 October the steamer Trevanion, 5299
tons, homeward-bound from South Australia. Six days later the raider again refuelled from the
Altmark in mid-Atlantic. She then made a wide sweep into the Indian Ocean, but sighted nothing
until 15 November, when she sank the small tanker Africa Shell, 706 tons, 160 miles north-east
of Lourenco Marques. Next day she stopped the Dutch steamer Mapia but allowed her to proceed.
Eleven days later, the Admiralty ordered Forces ‘H’ (Sussex and Shropshire) and ‘K’ (Ark Royal and
Renown) to patrol south of the Cape of Good Hope to intercept the raider. But, by that time, the
Admiral Graf Spee was back in mid-Atlantic where, on 26 November, she had refuelled from the
Altmark and re-embarked the masters and senior officers of the ships previously sunk.
The Achilles remained in company with the Cumberland till 5 November and then patrolled
the coast from Santos to Rio de Janeiro, where she arrived on 10 November and spent two days.
Returning south, she met the Ajax on 22 November and spent the day searching for the German
merchant ships Lahn and Tacoma, which had escaped from Chilean ports. The search was unsuccessful, both German ships arriving at Montevideo during the afternoon. After refuelling, the Achilles
started next day on another long, independent patrol which took her more than 2000 miles to the
north. By the morning of 3 December she was off Pernambuco.
Early in the morning of 4 December the Achilles received orders from Commodore Harwood
to return to Montevideo on 8 December. Course was shaped accordingly and the ship increased
speed to 19 knots to arrive on time. The elusive raider had been located again on the eastern side
of the Atlantic. The timely concentration of the cruisers of the South America Division was now
in progress. It is in the immensity of the open sea, devoid of natural features and obstructions
such as restrict the movements of armies, that naval operations differ fundamentally from land
warfare. The constant problem of the naval commander is how to intercept an opponent intent
upon evasion. From the Cape of Good Hope to the Falkland Islands is 4000-odd miles, to the
River Plate 3700 miles, and to Rio de Janeiro 3270 miles. The shortest distance across the South
Atlantic is 1630 miles from Pernambuco to Freetown, and from that line southward to the Cape
is 3100 miles. Even the increased range of observation afforded by the aircraft of the warships
searching for the Admiral Graf Spee represented but tiny circles in the 10,000,000 square miles of
the South Atlantic.
The Admiral Graf Spee had returned to the area where she had sunk the Trevanion and there, on
2 December, she intercepted and sank the Blue Star liner Doric Star, 10,086 tons, homeward-bound
from New Zealand and Sydney with a full cargo of meat, dairy produce, and wool. The destruction
of this ship and her valuable cargo was a considerable success for the raider, but it was shortly
to prove her undoing. The Doric Star had succeeded in transmitting a distress signal giving her
position at the time of attack. Knowing this, Captain Langsdorf left the area at high speed. Early
next morning he sighted and sank the Shaw Savill steamer Tairoa, 7983 tons, bound from Australia
to England with a cargo of meat, wool, and lead. This was the day on which Commodore
Harwood ordered his cruisers to concentrate off the River Plate. On 6 December the Admiral
Graf Spee refuelled from the Altmark for the last time. She was then nearly half-way between
St. Helena and the River Plate area and about 1700 miles from Montevideo. Next day she sank
her last victim, the British steamer Streonshalh, 3895 tons, laden with wheat from the River Plate.
In ten weeks the raider had destroyed nine British ships totalling 50,089 tons without the loss of a
single life.
When the Doric Star reported on 2 December that she was being attacked by a pocket battleship,
she was more than 3000 miles from the South American coast. A similar report was broadcast early
the following day by an unknown ship—it was in fact, the Tairoa—170 miles south-west of that
position. Commodore Harwood correctly anticipated that the raider, knowing she had been
reported, would leave that area and probably cross the South Atlantic. He estimated that at a
cruising speed of 15 knots, she could arrive in the Rio de Janeiro focal area by the morning of
12 December, the River Plate area by the evening of that day or early on 13 December, or the
Falkland Islands area by 14 December. ‘I decided,’ he wrote, ‘that the Plate, with its larger number
of ships and its very valuable grain and meat trade, was the vital area to be defended. I therefore
arranged to concentrate there my available forces in advance of the time at which it was anticipated
the raider might start operations in that area.’
At seven o’clock on the morning of 12 December, the Ajax and Achilles joined company with
the Exeter 150 miles east of Punta Medanos, in the southern approach to the River Plate. The
Cumberland was refitting at Port Stanley. During the afternoon, Commodore Harwood gave his
captains the clearest picture of his intentions in two brief signals, the first of which began: ‘My
policy with three cruisers in company versus one pocket battleship—attack at once by day or
night…’, and then set out the tactics to be adopted. The essence of the second signal was that
captains were to act ‘without further orders so as to maintain decisive gun range’. During the
evening, the British cruisers exercised these tactics. It was a full-dress rehearsal of the drama that
was staged next morning.
The Admiral Graf Spee was a well-armoured ship of some 12,000 tons displacement, with a
speed of 25 knots or better. She mounted six 11-inch guns in two triple turrets and eight 5.9-inch
guns, four on each beam. The 11-inch guns had a maximum range of 30,000 yards (15 sea miles)
and fired a projectile of 670 pounds. She also had eight torpedo-tubes in quadruple mountings.
The Exeter was armed with six 8-inch guns in three turrets, each gun firing a projectile of 256
pounds. The Ajax and Achilles each had eight 6-inch guns in four turrets, firing a projectile of
112 pounds. The secondary guns of the German ship were the equal in weight of the main armament
of either the Ajax or the Achilles. She could fire a total weight of 4830 pounds as against 3328
pounds from the three British cruisers, though the rate of her 11-inch guns was slower. The
British ships had an advantage in speed of about five knots. But against the material superiority
of the Admiral Graf Spee was to be set a vitally important moral factor. British naval doctrine,
established by long tradition, laid down that ‘war at sea cannot be waged successfully without
risking the loss of ships. Should the object to be achieved justify a reasonable loss of ships, the fact
that such losses may occur should be no deterrent to the carrying out of the operation.’
The Battle Begins
AT 5.20 ON THE MORNING of 13 December, the British squadron was in a position
about 240 miles due east from Cape Santa Maria on the coast of Uruguay, and some 350
miles from Montevideo. While daylight was breaking, the ships again practised the tactics to be
employed against the enemy raider. The ships’ companies fell out from action stations at 5.40 a.m.
and reverted to their usual degree of readiness. The squadron then re-formed in single line ahead,
in the order Ajax, Achilles, Exeter, steaming north-east by east at 14 knots. The sun rose at 5.56 a.m.
in a clear sky, giving extreme visibility. There was a fresh breeze from the south-east, with a low
swell and a slight sea from the same quarter. At 6.14 a.m. smoke was sighted on the north-west
horizon and the Exeter was ordered to investigate. Two minutes later, she reported: ‘I think it is
a pocket battleship’. Almost simultaneously, the enemy was identified by the other cruisers.
When the alarm rattlers sounded in the Achilles, a signalman with a flag under his arm rushed aft
shouting: ‘Make way for the Digger flag!’, and proceeded to hoist the New Zealand ensign to the
mainmast head to the accompaniment of loud cheers from the 4-inch gun crews. For the first
time, a New Zealand cruiser was about to engage the enemy. While their crews hurried to their
action stations, the British ships began to act in accordance with the plan which had already been
exercised. The Ajax and Achilles turned together to north-north-west to close the range, while
the Exeter made a large alteration of course to the westward. These movements were made in
order that the enemy would be engaged simultaneously from widely different bearings and
compelled either to ‘split’ his main armament to engage both divisions or to concentrate his fire
on one and leave the other unengaged by his 11-inch guns. According to the German account
of the action, the Ajax and Achilles, when first sighted, were taken to be destroyers and Captain
Langsdorf assumed that the force was engaged in protecting a convoy. He decided to attack at
once ‘in order to close to effective fighting range before the enemy could work up to maximum
speed, since it appeared to be out of the question that three shadowers could be shaken off’. At
6.18 a.m., only four minutes after her smoke was first seen, the Admiral Graf Spee opened fire at
19,800 yards, one 11-inch turret at the Exeter and the other at the Ajax, the first salvo of three
shells falling about 300 yards short of the former ship.
The British cruisers were rapidly working up to full power and were steaming at more than
25 knots when the Exeter opened fire at 6.20 a.m., with her four forward guns, at 18,700 yards.
Her two after guns fired as soon as they would bear, two and a half minutes later. The Achilles
opened fire at 6.21 a.m. and the Ajax two minutes later. Both ships immediately developed a high
rate of accurate fire. The 8-inch salvoes of the Exeter appeared to worry the Graf Spee almost
from the start and, after shifting targets rapidly once or twice, she concentrated all six 11-inch
guns on the Exeter. At 6.23 a.m. one shell of her third salvo burst short of the Exeter amidships.
It killed the crew of the starboard torpedo-tubes, damaged the communications, and riddled the
funnels and searchlights with splinters. A minute later, after the Exeter had fired eight salvoes, she
received a direct hit from an 11-inch shell on the front of ‘B’ turret, which was put out of action.
Splinters swept the bridge, killing or wounding all who were there, with the exception of Captain
Bell and two officers, and wrecking the communications. Captain Bell decided to fight his ship
from the after conning position. He had hardly left the bridge before the ship’s head began to
swing to starboard. The torpedo officer, Lieutenant-Commander C. J. Smith, who had been
knocked down and momentarily stunned, noticed this as he went aft, and he got an order through
to the lower conning position which brought the ship back to her course. When Captain Bell
arrived aft, he found that all communications with the steering compartment had been cut, and
he was obliged to pass his orders through a chain of messengers. For the next hour, the Exeter
was conned in this difficult manner, the captain and his staff being fully exposed to the blast from
the after pair of 8-inch guns and the heavy fire of the enemy. The ship had received two more
direct hits forward and further damage from splinters from short bursts.
IN ACTION
ON BOARD THE ACHILLES
SHADOWING THE ENEMY
THE END OF THE GRAF SPEE
All this had happened during the first ten minutes of the action. In that brief period, however,
the Ajax and Achilles were making good shooting and, steaming hard, were closing the range and
drawing ahead on the Graf Spee. Clearly, their concentrated fire was worrying her, for at 6.30 a.m.
she again shifted the fire of one 11-inch turret to them, thus giving some relief to the Exeter.
The Ajax was straddled three times and she and the Achilles turned away slightly to open the range.
The Graf Spee was firing alternately at the two ships with her 5.9-inch guns, but without effect,
though some salvoes fell close to them. At 6.32 a.m. the Exeter fired her starboard torpedoes, but
these went wide when the enemy turned away to the north-west under a smoke-screen. The Ajax
and Achilles hauled round, first to the north and then to the west, to close the range and regain
bearing. The Ajax catapulted her aircraft away at 6.37 a.m. under severe blast from her after guns.
About a minute later, while she was turning to bring her port torpedo-tubes to bear, the Exeter
was hit twice by 11-inch shells. One struck the foremost turret, putting it completely out of
action. The other burst inside the ship, doing very extensive damage and starting a fierce fire.
All the gyro-compass repeaters in the after conning position were destroyed and Captain Bell had
to use a boat’s compass to con his ship. What little internal communication was possible was
being carried on by messengers. Nevertheless, the Exeter was kept resolutely in action, her two
after guns being controlled by the gunnery officer from the exposed searchlight position. Her
port torpedoes were fired about 6.43 a.m. and she then hauled round to a course roughly parallel
to that of the Graf Spee.
By this time the Ajax and Achilles had worked up to full power and were steaming at 31 knots,
firing fast as they went. At 6.40 a.m. a salvo of 11-inch shell fell short of the Achilles in line with her
bridge and burst on the water. The flying splinters killed four ratings and seriously wounded two
others in the director control tower. The gunnery officer was cut in the scalp and momentarily
stunned. On the bridge, the chief yeoman of signals was seriously wounded and Captain Parry
hit in the legs. The material damage in the director control tower was miraculously small and no
important instrument was affected. After a few minutes, the control tower’s crew, in a ‘most
resolute and efficient way’, resumed control from the after control position which had temporarily
taken over.
‘I was only conscious of a hellish noise and a thump on the head which half stunned me,’ wrote
Lieutenant R. E. Washbourn, RN, gunnery officer of the Achilles, in his report on the action.
‘I ordered automatically: “A.C.P.
After Control Position
take over.” Six heavy splinters had entered the D.C.T.
Director Control Tower
The right-hand side of the upper compartment was a shambles. Both W/T
Wireless Telegraphy
ratings were down
with multiple injuries … A.B. Sherley had dropped off his platform, bleeding copiously from a
gash in his face and wounds in both thighs. Sergeant Trimble, Royal Marines, the spotting observer,
was also severely wounded … A.B. Shaw slumped forward on to his instrument, dead, with
multiple wounds in his chest…. The rate officer, Mr. Watts, quickly passed me a yard or so of
bandage, enabling me to effect running repairs to my slight scalp wounds which were bleeding
fairly freely. I then redirected my attention to the business in hand, while Mr. Watts clambered
round behind me to do what he could for the wounded. Word was passed that the D.C.T. was all
right again. A.B. Sherley was removed by a medical party during the action. Considerable difficulty
was experienced, the right-hand door of the D.C.T. being jammed by splinter damage. When the
medical party arrived to remove the dead, I learned for the first time that both Telegraphist Stennett
and Ordinary Telegraphist Milburn had been killed outright. I discovered at the same time that
Sergeant Trimble had uncomplainingly and most courageously remained at his post throughout
the hour of action that followed the hits on the D.C.T., although seriously wounded. Mr. Watts
carried out his duties most ably throughout…. He calmly tended the wounded… until his rate-keeping was again required…. Boy Dorset behaved with exemplary coolness, despite the carnage
around him. He passed information to the guns and repeated their reports clearly for my information. He was heard at one time most vigorously denying the report of his untimely demise that
somehow had spread round the ship. “I’m not dead. It’s me on the end of this phone,” he said.
The director layer, Petty Officer Meyrick, and the trainer, Petty Officer Headon, are also to be
commended for keeping up an accurate output for a prolonged action of over 200 broadsides….
The range-takers, Chief Petty Officer Boniface and A.B. Gould, maintained a good range plot
throughout the action, disregarding the body of a telegraphist who fell through the door on top
of them….’
The Graf Spee Retires Westward
FOR SEVERAL technical reasons, the fire of the Ajax and Achilles became ineffective for more
than twenty minutes from about 6.46 a.m. The Graf Spee, however, failed to take any advantage
of this, but continued her retirement to the westward at high speed, making frequent alterations
of course under cover of smoke-screens. Still fighting gamely with her two after guns, the Exeter
hauled round to the westward at 6.50 a.m. She had a list to starboard and several compartments
flooded as the result of an 11-inch hit under her forecastle. The Graf Spee’s range from the First
Division (Ajax and Achilles) was 16,000 yards at 7.10 a.m. when Commodore Harwood decided
to close in as rapidly as possible. Course was altered to the westward and the Ajax and Achilles
steamed at their utmost speed. Then the Graf Spee turned sharply to port behind smoke and headed
as if to finish off the Exeter. But, four minutes later, she altered course back to the north-west until
all her 11-inch guns were bearing on the First Division. The range was now down to 11,000 yards.
The Ajax was quickly straddled three times, but was not hit. The enemy’s 5.9-inch gunfire was
ragged and quite ineffective. At this time the shooting of the Ajax and Achilles appeared to be very
good and a fire was seen in the Graf Spee.
The Ajax received her first direct hit at 7.25 a.m. when an 11-inch delay-action shell struck her
after superstructure at an angle of ten degrees to the horizontal. It penetrated 42 feet, passing through
several cabins and the trunk of ‘X’ turret, in which the machinery was wrecked, and burst in the
commodore’s sleeping cabin, doing considerable damage. A piece of the base of the shell struck
‘Y’ barbette
The circular steel structure, below the gun-house, enclosing the lower part of the turret.
and jammed the turret. Thus, this hit put both the after turrets and their four guns
out of action. It also killed four and wounded six of the crew of ‘X’ turret. The Ajax retaliated by
firing a broadside of four torpedoes at a range of 9000 yards. They broke surface after entering
the water and the Admiral Graf Spee avoided them by turning away for three minutes. According
to the German account of the action, she attempted to fire a spread salvo of torpedoes at this time,
but only one was actually discharged because at the moment the ship was swinging hard to port.
The Ajax avoided this torpedo by a sharp turn towards the enemy, thus shortening the range still
more, while the Achilles crossed her wake.
The Admiral Graf Spee now turned away to the west, making much smoke, and zigzagging.
At this time the Ajax had only three guns in action, but the Achilles was making good shooting
with her eight, the range being down to 8000 yards. Though the pilot and the observer of the
Ajax’s aircraft reported that hit after hit was being made, few were observed from either ship.
There was disappointingly little apparent damage to the Graf Spee, whose fire was still very
accurate, and Commodore Harwood remarked to Captain Woodhouse: ‘We might as well be
bombarding her with snowballs’. The enemy was concentrating his fire on the First Division and
the Ajax was straddled by about twelve salvoes, but neither she nor the Achilles was hit. The Exeter
had been dropping gradually astern, having had to reduce speed owing to damage forward.
Finally, power to her after turret failed, due to flooding, and about 7.40 a.m. she steered to the
south-east at slow speed ‘starting to repair damage and make herself seaworthy’. Later, she was
ordered to proceed to the Falkland Islands, where she arrived three days later.
Just before the Exeter turned away, it was reported to the commodore that the Ajax had only
20 per cent of her ammunition left and only three guns in action. He therefore decided to break off
the day action and close in again after dark. Accordingly, at 7.40 a.m., the Ajax and Achilles altered
course away to the eastward under cover of smoke. As the ships were turning, a shell from the
Graf Spee cut the Ajax’s main topmast clean in two, destroyed all her aerials, and caused a number
of casualties. It subsequently transpired that the reported shortage of ammunition in the Ajax
referred only to ‘A’ turret, which had been firing continuously for eighty-one minutes and had
expended some 300 rounds. The Graf Spee made no attempt to follow the British cruisers, but
steadied on a westerly course, heading at 23 knots direct for the River Plate. Six minutes later,
the Ajax and Achilles turned and proceeded to shadow the enemy, the former to port and the
latter to starboard, at a distance of about fifteen miles. Almost exactly twenty-five years before—
on 8 December 1914—Admiral Graf Spee’s four cruisers, Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, Nurnberg, and
Leipzig, had fought to the last against a greatly superior British force, 1100 miles to the south of
the area from which the powerful ship bearing the name of the German admiral was now retreating
at speed from two small cruisers, one of which had only half her guns in action.
Yet, according to the German account of the action, the Admiral Graf Spee had sustained only
two 8-inch and eighteen 6-inch hits. One officer and thirty-five ratings had been killed and sixty
wounded. ‘The fighting value of the ship had not been destroyed,’ the report ran. The main
armament was ‘fully effective’, but there remained only 306 rounds of 11-inch ammunition,
representing 40 per cent of the original supply. ‘The survey of damage showed that all galleys
were out of action, with the exception of the admiral’s galley. The possibility of repairing them
with the ship’s own resources was doubtful. Penetration of water into the flour store made the
continued supply of bread questionable, while hits in the fore part of the ship rendered her unseaworthy for the North Atlantic winter. One shell had penetrated the armour belt and the
armoured deck had been torn open in one place. There was also damage in the after part of the
ship…. The ship’s resources were considered inadequate for making her seaworthy …’ and ‘there
seemed no prospect of shaking off the shadowers.’ Captain Langsdorf therefore decided to make
for Montevideo. He signalled his intentions to Berlin and received from Admiral Raeder the
reply: ‘Your intentions understood’.
On Board the Achilles
THE ACTION had lasted exactly eighty-two minutes. In that brief period, the Achilles had fired
sixty tons of 112-pound shells in more than 200 broadsides. Every one of the 1200-odd shells
and cordite charges fired had been manhandled from the magazines to the hoists, from the hoists
to the loading trays, and then rammed home. All four turrets reported that after firing from sixty
to eighty rounds, the guns began to fail to run out immediately after their recoil, due to heating up,
and had to be pushed out by the rammers. The guns remained very hot for some hours after the
action. ‘The guns’ crews,’ said one turret officer, ‘worked like galley slaves, loving it all, with
no time to think of anything but the job. The whole of the turret from top to bottom thought the
action lasted about twenty minutes. The rammer numbers were very tired towards the end, but
did not appear to notice that till it was all over…. Men lost all count of time. They spoke later of
“about ten minutes after opening fire” when actually more than forty minutes had elapsed….’
‘Toward the end of the action,’ reported Sergeant F. T. Saunders,
Killed in action off Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands, 5 Jan 1943.
Royal Marines, in charge
of ‘X’ turret, ‘the heat in the gun-house was terrific, even though I had the rear door open and both
fans working. The No. 1s of each gun, getting little air from the fans, were sweating streams….
Everyone was very dry and thirsty. There wasn’t the slightest delay in the supply of shells or
cordite, which speaks well for the valiant work of those in the lower compartments. The ramming
throughout was positively deadly; in fact, sometimes I thought they were trying to push the shells
to the enemy instead of firing them. I was amused watching various men just tear off a garment as
opportunity occurred. Some finished up bare to the waist. One of the rammer numbers was
completely dressed in only a pair of white silk pyjama trousers, somewhat abbreviated, and a pair
of native sandals. Another was clad in a pair of short drawers and his cap, to which he added
later a corporal of the gangway’s armlet. Everything went like clockwork, drill was correctly
carried out, orders and reports passed and so on, just as if it was a practice shoot and nothing at all
unusual was happening, except that everything seemed to be done at an amazing speed. The
loading was absolutely superb. Marine Russell told me that we averaged seven seconds a round
right to the end of the action. When we found we had expended 287 rounds, everyone in the
turret was amazed: in fact I re-checked to make sure. The men all thought we’d fired about
forty or fifty broadsides and that was my impression too. There was a spirit of grim determination,
concentration, and cheerfulness during the whole job. Every man seemed bent on keeping this
turret going at full speed…. Marine Harrison, having observed the enemy’s possibly first fall of
shot somewhere in our wake, was heard to say: “Blimey, he’s after our heel!” which I thought
was rather clever….Food of many types was forthcoming from many sources, but I didn’t inquire
too closely what these sources were. Chocolate and sweets were in abundance, apparently supplied
by the canteen staff.’
Not more than one man in ten in the ship’s company saw anything of the action. The majority
were segregated in groups, and in some cases singly, in gun turrets, in engine- and boiler-rooms,
and many other steel compartments below decks where no daylight entered. From the director
control tower above the bridge were passed the ranges and much other data from which the robot
brains of the calculating machines in the transmitting station, situated in the bowels of the ship
and operated by a highly skilled staff, solved the problem of how a ship steaming at up to 31 knots
was able to fire accurately, several times a minute, 8 cwt. of shells at another ship moving at 24
knots up to nine miles away. The officer in charge of the transmitting station reported that the
spirit of his crew was excellent and all were as bright and cheerful as in a practice run. The detonations of the enemy’s 11-inch shells were heard distinctly, sounding like the explosions of depth-charges. ‘“Nutty” (chocolate) was a great help,’ he said. ‘We missed the free cigarettes, but we
did hear that the canteen door had been blown off.’ Another officer remarked that ‘why the
entire T.S.’s crew are not ill with bilious attacks, I cannot imagine, as everything edible was grist to
the mill regardless of sequence’. The officer of the after control position reported regarding his
crew, Marine Cave and Boy Beauchamp, that ‘they were perfect, the boy going out at one time
into the blast of “X” turret to remove some canvas that was fouling vision’.
During the whole of the action the crews of the torpedo-tubes on the upper deck remained
at their stations. No man took shelter. The trainers of the tubes were lucky not to have been hit
by splinters. One able seaman fell and slipped along the deck under the starboard tubes. As he
clambered out he was asked what he was doing there and replied that he thought he saw a three-penny bit. The officer in charge of torpedo-tubes, Gunner G. K. Davis-Goff,
Now Commander, Royal New Zealand Navy.
reported that the
foremost battle ensign was shot away and fell across the port tubes. ‘We rescued it and hung it up
under the starboard whaler. It was later stolen by the signalmen…. During the lull in action, the
tubes’ crews played crib and “uckers”
The Navy version of the game ‘Ludo’.
and had cocoa and sandwiches ….’
A major part in this naval drama was played by the officers and ratings in the engine-rooms
and boiler-rooms of the British cruisers. They saw nothing and heard little of the action while
steaming their ships at sustained full power. ‘The behaviour of all personnel,’ reported the senior
engineer of the Achilles, ‘could not have been better in any way, including general bearing,
endurance and efficiency. The officer in charge of the boiler-rooms remarked that he was most
impressed by the behaviour of the stokers tending the boilers. Many of them were youngsters who
had never before been below during full-power steaming….As each salvo was fired, the blast caused
the flames in the boilers to leap about a foot out from the fronts of the furnaces; yet the stokers
never paused in their jobs of keeping the combustion tubes clean or moved back from the boilers….’
The main engines of the Achilles, it is recorded, were manoeuvred with far greater rapidity than
would have been attempted under any conditions but those of emergency. All demands made on
the machinery were met more than adequately, all material standing up to the strain in such a
manner that nothing but confidence was felt throughout the action. ‘The behaviour of both
machinery and personnel left nothing to be desired.’ This tribute to the soundness of British
shipyard workmanship is underlined by the statement of Captain Woodhouse of the Ajax that
steam had been shut off the main engines of his ship for only five days since 26 August 1939.
Shadowing the Enemy
THE IRREGULAR ARC on which the Ajax and Achilles had steamed and fought had brought
them by eight o’clock to a position barely twenty miles north-west of that from which they had
first sighted the enemy. Shortly after nine o’clock the Ajax recovered her aircraft, which had been
up for two hours 35 minutes. At 9.45 a.m. the commodore ordered the Cumberland, which had
been refitting at the Falkland Islands, to proceed to the River Plate at full speed. She sailed from
Port Stanley at noon and made the passage of 1000 miles in thirty-four hours. Meanwhile, the
Admiralty had taken steps to meet the situation by ordering the Ark Royal, Renown, and other ships
patrolling distant areas to proceed at once to the South American coast.
The Achilles, over-estimating the enemy’s speed, had closed to 23,000 yards when, at 10.5 a.m.,
the Graf Spee altered course and fired two three-gun salvoes of 11-inch shell from her forward
turret. The first fell very short, but the second dropped close alongside the Achilles, who possibly
would have been hit had she not already started to turn away at full speed under smoke. She
resumed shadowing at longer range. About an hour later, the Admiral Graf Spee made a clumsy
and unsuccessful attempt to throw off her pursuers. Sighting the British steamer Shakespeare, she
stopped her by firing a shot across her bows. According to the German account, it was intended
to torpedo the ship as soon as the crew had taken to the boats, and a signal was made to the Ajax:
‘Please rescue boats of British steamer’. As, however, the crew made no attempt to leave the ship,
Captain Langsdorf refrained from sinking her in view of the possible effect upon the treatment of
his own ship in Montevideo. When the Ajax neared the Shakespeare, the latter reported that she
was all well and needed no assistance.
The afternoon passed quietly until the Achilles sighted a strange vessel and made the signal:
‘Enemy in sight, 297 deg.’
‘What is it?’ asked Commodore Harwood.
‘Suspect 8-inch cruiser. Am confirming,’ replied the Achilles who, at a minute to four o’clock,
signalled: ‘False alarm’. She had identified the stranger as the British motor-vessel Delane, whose
streamlined bridge and funnel gave her, at long range, a close resemblance to a German cruiser of
the Blucher class. Thereafter, the shadowing of the Graf Spee continued without incident until
7.15 p.m., when she altered course and fired two 11-inch salvoes at the Ajax, who immediately
turned away under smoke. These were the first shells fired by the enemy for more than nine hours.
At about eight o’clock, being then south of Lobos Island and about fifty miles east of English
Bank, the Ajax altered course to south-west to intercept the Admiral Graf Spee should she attempt
to escape round that shallow bank which extends for sixteen miles across the northern side of
the Plate estuary. The whole duty of shadowing the enemy now devolved upon the New Zealand
cruiser which passed inside Lobos, close to the Uruguayan coast, and increased speed to creep
up on the Graf Spee before dusk. The sun set at 8.48 p.m., leaving the enemy clearly silhouetted
against the western sky. At five minutes to nine o’clock, the Graf Spee altered course under smoke
and fired three salvoes, the third falling close astern of the Achilles, who replied with five salvoes
which appeared to straddle the enemy. This brief engagement was watched from Punta del Este,
the seaside resort of Montevideo, by thousands of Uruguayans, who had a ‘grand-stand’ view and
mistook it for the main action. Between 9.30 and 9.45 p.m., the Graf Spee fired three more salvoes,
all of which fell short. These Parthian shots were probably intended to keep the shadowing cruiser
at a distance. They did not deter the Achilles who by ten o’clock had closed in to 10,000 yards.
The enemy’s intention to enter Montevideo being clear, Commodore Harwood called off the
pursuit an hour later. The Admiral Graf Spee anchored in Montevideo harbour soon after midnight.
For the whole of the next day, the two small cruisers stood alone between the enemy and the
open sea. The Ark Royal, Renown, Shropshire, Dorsetshire, Neptune, and three destroyers were all
making for the River Plate, but none could arrive for at least five days. The arrival of the Cumberland during the night of 14 December restored to its narrow balance a doubtful situation. Now it
was possible to patrol all three deep-water channels.
On 15 December the Ajax and Achilles refuelled from an Admiralty tanker. That afternoon, the
burial of the German ship’s dead took place in a cemetery outside Montevideo. The masters and
fifty-four members of the crews of British ships sunk by the raider had been released by Captain
Langsdorf.
The casualties in the British cruisers during the action were as follows:—
In accordance with the custom of the Royal Navy, the cruisers buried their dead in their
hammocks at sea.
From the moment she sought shelter in harbour, the Admiral Graf Spee became the focal point
of a world-wide flood of radio and press publicity which completely overwhelmed the spate of
Nazi propaganda and falsities that made shift to gloss over the ignominy of her defeat and flight.
Behind the scenes a considerable political and diplomatic struggle was taking place. The German
Ambassador had requested permission for the Graf Spee to remain in Montevideo for fourteen
days. On 15 December, he was informed that the ship would be allowed a stay of seventy-two
hours in which to make her seaworthy. Captain Langsdorf then informed Berlin that there was
‘no prospect of breaking out into the open sea’, and that ‘if I can fight my way through to Buenos
Aires … I shall endeavour to do so’; at the same time he requested instructions ‘whether to scuttle
the ship or submit to internment’. His proposal was approved, but he was told that his ship was
‘not to be interned in Uruguay’ and ‘if the ship is scuttled, ensure effective destruction’. Captain
Langsdorf addressed a lengthy letter to the German Ambassador protesting against the time limit
already fixed and intimating his decision to scuttle his ship.
During the afternoon of Sunday, 17 December, the Admiral Graf Spee transferred most of her
crew to the German merchant ship Tacoma, Captain Langsdorf with three officers and thirty-eight
men remaining on board to take her out. At 6.20 p.m. she left the harbour and proceeded slowly
westward, followed by the Tacoma and watched by thousands on shore. The waiting British
cruisers steamed in from sea. The Ajax flew off her aircraft which sighted the Admiral Graf Spee
in shallow water, six miles south-west of Montevideo. At 8.54 p.m. the aircraft signalled: ‘Graf
Spee has blown herself up’. The British squadron carried on to within four miles of the wreck,
the ships’ companies in the Ajax and Achilles cheering each other till they were hoarse. ‘It was now
dark and she was ablaze from end to end, flames reaching almost as high as the top of her control
tower, a magnificent and most cheering sight.’ That night, Captain Langsdorf shot himself.
A few weeks later, the rusting wreck of the Admiral Graf Spee was purchased by a scrap-metal
merchant.
In a message to the New Zealand Naval Board, Rear-Admiral Sir Henry Harwood (he had
been promoted as from 13 December) said he was ‘deeply conscious of the honour and pleasure
of taking one of H.M. ships of the New Zealand Squadron into action. Achilles was handled
perfectly by her captain and fought magnificently by her captain, officers, and ship’s company.’
He visited the Achilles on 18 December and addressed her company to that effect. After the departure
of HMS Ajax for England on 5 January 1940, Rear-Admiral Harwood flew his flag in the New
Zealand cruiser for three weeks. The Achilles visited Buenos Aires and Montevideo before sailing
on 2 February from Port Stanley for Auckland, where she was accorded a tumultuous welcome
on her arrival on 23 February. During her memorable cruise, the Achilles had steamed 52,333
miles in 168 days at sea and had spent only ten days in harbour.
The casualty list of HMS Achilles was as follows:—
KILLED
Able Seaman A. C. H. Shaw (Ngongotaha, Rotorua)Ordinary Seaman I. W. Grant (Tainui, Dunedin)Telegraphist F. Stennett (Stockport, Cheshire, England)Ordinary Telegraphist N. J. Milburn (Bradford, Yorkshire, England)
SERIOUSLY WOUNDED
Able Seaman E. V. Sherley (Te Awamutu)Chief Yeoman of Signals L. C. Martinson (Devonport, Auckland)Sergeant S. J. Trimble, Royal Marines (Glengormley, Belfast, Ireland)
SLIGHTLY WOUNDED
Captain W. E. Parry, CB, RNLieutenant R. E. Washbourn, DSO, RN (Nelson)Ordinary Seaman R. Gallagher (Levin)Ordinary Seaman C. F. Marra (Waipukurau)Ordnance Artificer 4th Class, E. F. Copplestone (Portsmouth, England)Marine H. J. Blackburn (Gillingham, Kent, England)
Acknowledgments
THIS NARRATIVE is based on the official reports of Admiral Harwood and
his captains, Admiralty documents, and the German official reports. The
photographs were taken by Commander R. E. Washbourn or are from his collection,
with the exception of page 24 (top) C. P. S. Boyer, (bottom) The Weekly News.
The map, diagrams, and sketches were drawn by L. D. McCormick.
THE AUTHOR, Sydney David Waters, is a New Zealand journalist who
has specialised in naval and merchant shipping affairs. He is the author of
Clipper Ship to Motor-liner and Ordeal by Sea, histories of the New Zealand
Shipping Company. He served as a gunner in the 1st NZEF during the First
World War.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
WOMEN AT WARD.O.W. HALLWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1948
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of campaigns and operations
which will be dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Women in the Services
WOMEN in New Zealand were not recruited, as they were in Britain, into auxiliary
branches of the armed forces immediately on the outbreak of war. It was realised only
slowly how great was the unexploited asset of the country’s woman-power for defence and
industry. Nurses indeed were recruited by the Army as soon as war began; but on the whole New
Zealand women were at first left to carry on such voluntary work as they could undertake or
to enter industry wherever chance offered an opening. Many women, eager to serve, regretted
that more use was not being made of their talents and goodwill. If, at the beginning of the war
there had been the experience and understanding of women’s capabilities that existed by 1945,
no doubt far more effective use would have been made of their services, to the great benefit of
the whole manpower position. As it was, the first entry of women into the Services seemed to be
unplanned and almost haphazard, and provided a sharp contrast to the energy used to recruit,
train, and send into action the country’s manhood.
In July 1940 the Women’s War Service Auxiliary was formed as the result of a meeting of
delegates from existing women’s organisations from all over New Zealand. This body, acting
through its Dominion council, with twelve elected members and four appointed by the Minister
of National Service (the Hon. R. Semple), had official status. Its main function was to co-ordinate
the activities of women’s organisations to enable them to be used to the best advantage of New
Zealand’s war effort. The W.W.S.A. was intended to supplement rather than supersede the
existing women’s organisations which were affiliated to it, and it worked in close and harmonious
collaboration with the Department of National Service. It established local committees throughout
the country and carried out extensive and important work in civil defence and in various phases of
the war effort.
When the New Zealand Women’s Auxiliary Air Force was founded in January 1941, the
first women’s service to be established, the W.W.S.A. handled all applications to enter it and later
controlled recruitment for the other two Services. As each of the three Services at different times
complained that women were being unduly directed into one of the other Services, it may be
presumed that the W.W.S.A. and later the National Service Department
In October 1942 the recruiting of women for the Services was transferred to the National Service Department,
still in liaison with the W.W.S.A.
carried out their
recruiting duties impartially.
The main rivalry for the services of women was not, however, between the different branches
of the armed forces but rather between their collective demands and the competing demand,
increasing in insistence during 1944, for women in industry. Late in 1943 the recruitment of women
was placed on a new basis. The three Services were to estimate their requirements in advance and
then, on War Cabinet’s approval, they could recruit the authorised number and no more. Arrangements were even made in 1944 for a few women to be discharged to industry, the needs of which
were considered to be superior to those of the Services at that time. This indicated a certain wavering
in the policy of employing women in the armed forces; it also denoted a confusion of thought.
Since women had generally been considered to do their jobs in the Services as well as men—though
on some work they could not replace an equal number of men—and to do some jobs better than
men, it might have been possible to have made greater use of women at overseas bases, as was
suggested, to release fit men for front-line service and men of lower medical grading for employment at home in industry in the heavier work which women admittedly could not do.
All the members of the women’s branches of the three Services were volunteers. It was
unfortunate that they could not go overseas in larger numbers, as this would undoubtedly have
stimulated recruiting. The women who joined the auxiliaries were all eager to do more than the
minimum of service, and many were disappointed that they could not serve outside New Zealand.
Only a fraction of the W.A.A.F. went overseas, while in the W.A.A.C. the proportion was
somewhat larger, but no Wrens served overseas.
The Wrens
THE FORMATION of what became the Women’s Royal New Zealand Naval Service was
discussed as early as May 1941, but it was not until approximately a year later that the Director
(Miss R. Herrick) and her deputy (Miss F. H. Fenwick) were appointed and the work of organising
the new Service began in earnest. In the meantime some men in the Navy had already been replaced
by women. In the offices of the Naval Officers in Charge at Wellington, Lyttelton, and Dunedin,
and in H.M.N.Z.S. Philomel, the Auckland naval establishment, civilian women employees had
taken over a number of positions, particularly in the supply and secretariat branch, previously
filled by naval ratings who had thus been released for active service. Many of these civilian employees afterwards joined as Wrens, on a voluntary basis, and those who did, although first entered
in the rank of Wren, were given an antedated seniority which made them eligible for earlier
promotion. Those civilians who did not become Wrens were moved to other branches, after
Wrens had been trained to replace them, in accordance with the principle that uniformed and
civilian employees should not be mingled in any branch of the naval service and administration.
The general principle in operation was that the female employees in Navy Office and in such
establishments as the Naval Dockyard, Auckland, remained civilians, while those women who
worked in specifically naval establishments were Wrens. It should be mentioned here that some
highly responsible duties were carried out in Navy Office by civilians, many of them women.
There was considerable discussion on the conditions and status of Wrens in the Royal New
Zealand Navy during late 1941 and early 1942. In practice a close imitation of the British model
was adopted, with the exception that in New Zealand only a few commissions were granted on
entry: most officers in the W.R.N.Z.N.S. were promoted Wrens. The main question of principle
involved in the preliminaries was whether women could be asked to work at night. It soon became
obvious that a fighting service could not accept a limitation on the times of duty of its women
members if they were to be of any real value. At first the members of the W.R.N.Z.N.S. were
mostly employed near their own homes, but early in 1943 it was established that Wrens must be
‘mobile’, that is, prepared to serve anywhere in New Zealand.
At first recruitment was carried out through the W.W.S.A. and later through local manpower
officers. The W.R.N.Z.N.S. was never wholly satisfied with an arrangement which prevented
direct contact between applicants and the Service itself and which was for many reasons cumbersome, even though the other Services were in the same position. It was unfortunate that when in
April 1945 Great Britain asked for 200 Wrens to serve at the British Pacific Fleet’s Australian
bases, the request could not be complied with; the strength of the W.R.N.Z.N.S. was at that
time approximately 500, that is 200 below the establishment of 700, and male ratings had already
replaced Wrens in some jobs simply because not enough Wrens were available.
A factor which had always made it difficult to supply the Service with all the women it required
was the high standard of selection. Of the first 870 applications received up to January 1943, 350
were declined because the applicants were unsuitable, insufficiently qualified, or below the medical
standard. Throughout the whole period of its wartime existence the W.R.N.Z.N.S. was below
complement and eager for more recruits than were available, although the difficulty of providing
living accomodation had on some occasions hampered expansion. The ‘peak’ strength of the
Wrens was 519 and approximately 700 women altogether served in this branch of the Royal
New Zealand Navy.
Wrens at Work
THE MOST URGENT naval requirement in mid-1942 was in the signals department. The
first Wrens were trained in various types of communications work and immediately began
that successful invasion of this branch which might have been predicted from the previous achievements of women in the Post and Telegraph Department. Eventually a substantial proportion of the
Wrens acted as visual signallers, coders, or telegraphists at larger and smaller ports and at the
Waiouru naval wireless telegraph station. Similar full use of Wrens was made in naval accounting
and stores work, while women replaced men entirely as cooks and stewards in officers’ quarters
and in some smaller naval establishments.
The Wrens soon proved themselves in work which had not previously been undertaken in
New Zealand by women. In Auckland both the city and the Navy were equally astonished and
delighted by the smartly turned out Wren crew of the Commodore’s barge. This launch was
kept in a state of smartness worthy of the best traditions of the Service and was handled on the
water with grace and assurance. One degaussing range was also taken over entirely by Wrens,
including the launch which ran out to ships, and the necessary technical work was capably performed by a Wren officer. Wrens operated the D.E.M.S. (Defensively Equipped Merchant
Shipping) cinema projector, and a Wren acted as instructor in the ‘dome’ where films were shown
to male ratings as part of their gunnery training before they joined the gun crews of merchant
ships. Other Wrens were trained to operate radar equipment and took over watch-keeping duties.
Wrens served as dental and sick-bay attendants, drove naval motor transport, worked in the
torpedo branch (highly skilled and specialised work), and replaced men on equal terms in a variety
of exacting tasks. At Wellington four Wrens gained commissions and took over from male
watch-keeping officers in the merchant shipping office ‘very important operational work’. Wrens
acted as plotters in naval óperations and in the control room of the direction-finding network.
A group of Wrens at Blenheim was engaged in ‘very highly specialised and secret work’ independent of male control.
In Wellington a hostel was established for fifty Wrens; it was afterwards enlarged. In Auckland
a similar number was accommodated in a private hotel taken over by the Service, and later some
were lodged in barracks vacated by the Army. The nature of their duties scattered many Wrens
here and there in groups of eight or twelve, and they lived in small houses, bought or rented for
the purpose, close to their work. These Wrens did their own housework, cooking, and housekeeping besides their service duties.
Morale was always very high. The slow method of recruitment, ensuring that no one entered
the Service until she had a definite job to go to, made every new entrant feel that she was not
only wanted in the Navy but eagerly awaited. (The Director of the W.R.N.Z.N.S. once expressed
her regret that the system sometimes resulted in the loss to the Service of some valuable recruits
‘who could not or would not wait’.) Nearly all entrants, beginning their career as probationary
Wrens, went through a fortnight’s disciplinary training at H.M.N.Z.S. Philomel ‘to learn something of naval customs, traditions, procedure and generally acquiring the art of behaving like a
Wren’. After this preliminary training most women either began specialist courses or immediately
plunged into the job itself.
Everything possible was done to help Wrens get adequate exercise and recreation when off
duty, although those stationed in the main ports had, of course, the best opportunities. The
W.R.N.Z.N.S. sports clubs overcame considerable difficulties in their early stages caused by the
current shortages of most sports equipment. When they were unable to buy gear for hockey,
basketball, and other sports, they were usually able to borrow it; later, better supplies were
available. The Wellington sports club soon found its main summer attraction in sailing, in an
‘Idle-Along’ yacht and a whaler.
The gaiety, contentment, and good sense which pervaded the W.R.N.Z.N.S. are seen clearly
in the small cyclostyled magazine produced at irregular intervals, with its record of sport, its
occasional touches of satire (Wrens joining a very ‘hush-hush’ shore station found that even the
local schoolchildren knew all about its functions), and its cheerful humour. But perhaps the greatest
achievement of the members of the W.R.N.Z.N.S. was to merge themselves so completely and
almost indistinguishably in a service of strongly masculine bias; they entered thoroughly into its
spirit, and made their own excellent contribution to it without changing its character or being
themselves changed by it.
The Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps
THE New Zealand Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps grew out of the W.W.S.A. almost
imperceptibly. Although technically the W.A.A.C. was the last of the three women’s services
to be established, on its formation in July 1942 (its Controller, Mrs V. Jowett, had been appointed
shortly before), a number of women were already attached to the Army and carrying out certain
duties, both in New Zealand and in the Middle East. The first women to go overseas in any of the
three Services were the thirty welfare workers, usually known as ‘Tuis’, who sailed for Egypt in
September 1941 to work at the New Zealand Forces Club in Cairo. They were followed to the
Middle East in December 1941 by 200 more women, clerical workers and Voluntary Aids. All
these women were formally enrolled as members of the W.W.S.A., which had recruited them,
but were de facto members of the Army. In New Zealand itself a number of women were employed
in the Army as whole-time typists, clerks, cooks, or waitresses; most of them afterwards became
members of the W.A.A.C. This is to ignore for the moment the very wide range of part-time
voluntary service given to the Army by the W.W.S.A., and others, in camps or military establishments throughout New Zealand.
The formation of the W.A.A.C. did, however, mark a change of policy: the decision to employ
women in the Army wherever possible to release men for active service or, in special cases, for
industry. It was realised that, with the growing threat from Japan in the Pacific, and the decision
to leave the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force in the Middle East, it was necessary to call on
the women of the country to serve in the three auxiliary branches of the armed forces. The women
of New Zealand made a vigorous response to this call.
The age limits were wide: 18 to 50 for home service, 23 to 40 for service overseas. More
women applied for service outside New Zealand than ever had the opportunity of going. By
April 1944 more than three thousand were serving in the W.A.A.C. in New Zealand and 733
overseas, of whom some 200 were in the Pacific. By the middle of 1944 the original attempt to
recruit 10,000 women in the W.A.A.C. alone had had to be modified. The numbers serving at
any one time never exceeded 4600—the demands of essential industry had become too insistent.
Moreover, many women had been released from all three Services because their soldier-husbands
or fiancés had returned from overseas for furlough or discharge.
The New Zealand women arriving in the Middle East in late 1941 made a vital difference
to the atmosphere of the forces clubs in which they served. Before their arrival some misgivings
had been expressed whether they would not be ‘spoiled’ by being too much run after and
entertained. General Freyberg himself told them on their arrival that while their duty was
to supply, as they alone could, the ‘home touch’ in the clubs, they were not expected to gain
the admiration of individuals but rather that of the whole of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force. These qualms proved unwarranted. Although a number of girls married, none
could have been accused of neglecting her duty for the sake of a personal good time. Their service
was given as unselfishly and as fairly as had been expected of them and justified the care with
which they had been selected. In their ‘smart green and white uniforms with embroidered N.Z.
badges and the N.Z.F.C. epaulettes’, the Tuis became an essential element in Army life in the
Middle East, Italy, and the Pacific, and gave a tone of their own to the clubs.
The functions of the W.A.A.C. welfare workers were not exclusively social. Each had a
practical job to do, as well as being at all times, and often in trying circumstances, an indefatigable
hostess. At the Cairo Forces Club the Tuis immediately took charge of the preparing and serving
of sandwiches and fruit salad, looked after the cash desk and the clerical work entailed in running
the club, and served in the library or at the information desk. They also undertook the regular
visiting of patients in the New Zealand military hospitals in the Cairo area. It was not long before
they energetically conducted concerts and revues and took part in debates with the men. They
acted as partners at the dances held at the club and at the different army messes. They attended
these dances and concerts in evening gowns, and both they and their partners enjoyed this escape
from uniform. They also wrapped parcels to send to men in the forward areas, carried out shopping
commissions for men in the field, and were always ready to accompany them on shopping expeditions in the city when they came to Cairo on leave; many servicemen’s womenfolk at home
benefited indirectly from a Tui’s shrewd knowledge of Egyptian shops and shopkeepers in the
intelligently–chosen presents they received from the Middle East.
In November 1943 sixteen of the Tuis from Egypt—the original thirty had been meanwhile
substantially reinforced—left to help staff the New Zealand Forces Club in Bari. Here regular
dances and picnics for men on leave were held and hospital visiting continued. The gift-buying
service was enlarged by the opening of a gift shop. They even found time during leisure that
tended to grow ever scantier to make forays into the surrounding countryside for wild flowers
to decorate the club. Tuis served in other clubs opened in Italy, at Rome and Florence, with the
same cheerfulness, efficiency, and good humour. Their hours of duty were always long, and it
was difficult for them to get much leave to see something of Italy, perhaps the most interesting
to the tourist of all European countries. But most had managed to do some sightseeing by October
1945 when, except for a party in the Fernleaf Club in England, they were sent back to Egypt for
repatriation to New Zealand. Throughout the whole of their service overseas these girls all owed
very much to the care and interest in their welfare shown by Lady Freyberg.
In the Pacific, members of the W.A.A.C. gave equally valuable service as welfare or clerical
workers. From the latter part of 1942 five carried out specially responsible cipher duties in the
office of the British agent and consul in Tonga, and later a W.A.A.C. detachment of twenty
took over welfare duties at a leave centre for New Zealand troops. In Fiji a few members of the
W.A.A.C. were seconded to undertake special duties for the local government. In New Caledonia
much larger numbers were employed as welfare workers, cashiers, clerks, or cooks. Nearly 200
served with the 3rd Division in these capacities and as Voluntary Aids.
In August 1944 an important change was made in the status of the New Zealand W.A.A.C.
in Italy and the Middle East: its members were given the privileges of officers, while retaining their
own rates of pay, and the new designation of ‘welfare secretary’ or ‘secretary’.
Mention should be made here of a small group of women who went overseas as members of
the Y.W.C.A. During the war fifteen left New Zealand to work in service clubs in the Middle
WRENS ON DUTY
W.A.A.C. OVERSEAS
VARIED SERVICE
W.A.A.C. IN NEW ZEALAND
W.A.A.F. IN NEW ZEALAND
W.A.A.F. IN NEW ZEALAND AND OVERSEAS
East, India, Malaya, Ceylon, or Burma. One Y.W.C.A. worker was captured at Singapore and
remained three and a half years interned in Japanese hands in Java. Ten of these workers had their
salaries paid by the New Zealand Patriotic Fund Board. Another New Zealander, Miss Jean Begg,
rendered service of outstanding quality as the chief British Y.W.C.A. representative in the Middle
East and India. The services of these New Zealand members of the Y.W.C.A. to the British forces
as a whole were devoted and untiring. It is noteworthy that since the end of the war twenty more
workers have been sent by the New Zealand Y.W.C.A. to India, Malaya, and Japan.
Voluntary Aids
AMAJORITY of the members of the W.A.A.C. who served overseas were Voluntary
Aids, and they formed a most valuable adjunct to the Army Nursing Service. In the Middle
East and Italy 410 women altogether served as V.A.D.s (Voluntary Aid Detachments), as they
were familiarly called, as opposed to 220 in the General Division who were engaged in welfare
or office work with the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force. The first draft of V.A.D.s, over
180 strong, left New Zealand in December 1941, enrolled as members of the W.W.S.A. (Overseas
Hospital Division). These women were selected by the National Voluntary Aids Council, in
collaboration with the W.W.S.A., from members of the Order of St. John or of the New Zealand
Red Cross Society. Although they had not had the professional training of nurses, V.A.D.s had
to have a substantial background of experience before being accepted for duty in military hospitals.
They had to possess four certificates, given for elementary home nursing, first aid, hygiene and
sanitation, and for sixty hours’ practical work in a recognised hospital training school for nurses;
to secure these certificates entailed practically a year’s spare-time training. The intention was,
broadly speaking, that the V.A.D.s should replace male nursing orderlies and should perform
equivalent duties. Occasions undoubtedly arose when V.A.D.s assumed rather fuller responsibilities,
taking charge of wards of forty to sixty cases, but a sister of the N.Z.A.N.S. was always available
on call.
In New Caledonia from late in 1943 V.A.D.s were assisting the medical and nursing staffs of
the Army hospitals. Here their living conditions were sometimes very primitive, as were the
hospitals themselves at first. At one hospital all water had for a time to be carried, and the women
did their own washing in a running creek. A mobile hot shower unit was available once a week.
Elsewhere they lived for months in tents with gravel floors, and it was left to the women themselves
to make their own surroundings a little more attractive by contriving packing-case furniture,
introducing gaily-coloured curtains or upholstery, and growing flowers. Better accommodation
was gradually provided, although the insects, including mosquitoes, innumerable in a tropical
climate, were always the source of some apprehension and annoyance.
In spite of difficulties and discomforts, the V.A.D.s, like other members of the W.A.A.C.
in the Pacific, cheerfully added to their daily tasks the obligation of taking a full part in army
entertainments and social life, dancing ‘thousands of miles’ and attending, and as often as possible
engaging in, the various debates, concerts, community sings, card evenings, and educational
classes. In all of these their presence was very welcome to the men of the 3rd Division, whether
sick, convalescent, or in training.
Not all of the V.A.D.s were doing nursing work. In the Pacific they also acted as clerks,
telephone exchange operators, and laboratory assistants, and ran the hospital laundries. In the
Middle East and Italy about 7 per cent of the V.A.D.s did necessary clerical work in military
hospitals, and some of the remainder were engaged in what might be considered domestic work as
distinct from nursing. Others acted as storewomen, drivers, radiographers, dispensers, postal
clerks, and masseuses. Towards the end of the war clerical work was undertaken, too, in headquarters at Florence, Bari, and Maadi.
The V.A.D.s had gone overseas aware of their status; they had realised that they would serve as
privates and would have small chance of promotion; they had accepted their position as inferior
and ancillary to that of the qualified nurses of the N.Z.A.N.S. Though the V.A.D.s did not
themselves complain, as time passed others on their behalf argued that they were not being fairly
treated. The chief ground of complaint was that their non-commissioned status handicapped them
socially and also at times caused them real hardship. Because it was ‘for officers only’, they were,
for instance, debarred from the only hotel in Tripoli suitable for European women. Their friends
at home felt that they should share some of the high status of members of the Army Nursing
Service (who ranked as officers), and that their years of faithful service should be recognised by
wider chances of promotion.
The Voluntary Aids’ position was in some respects anomalous: they were members of the
W.A.A.C. administered by their own officers, but for purposes of duty and discipline they were
under the matron and sisters of the hospitals where they worked. In August 1944 this and other
anomalies affecting the status of the W.A.A.C. in the Middle East and Italy were adjusted: at the
same time as the members of the General Division became ‘welfare secretaries’ or, if engaged in a
purely clerical capacity, ‘secretaries’, the V.A.D.s became ‘nurses’. Both sections of the W.A.A.C.
now assumed the status of officers. This gave them the same standing as the women of most of the
other Commonwealth women’s services in the same theatres of war. In April 1947 those V.A.D.
personnel still in the Army were transferred to the Army Nursing Service.
A number of V.A.D.s served in hospital ships. In New Zealand also they were indispensable
assistants to the N.Z.A.N.S. and carried out the same varied duties in local service hospitals as they
had done overseas.
The W.A.A.C. in New Zealand
ONE OF THE immediate effects of the entry of Japan into the war, with its threat to Australia
and New Zealand, was the expansion of coastal and anti-aircraft defences. Women had made
a notable success in Britain of operating the coastal guns and the different types of defence against
enemy aircraft. In New Zealand, with our manpower more and more fully committed, it was
felt that women could assume the same responsibilities, even though this meant placing them in
the front line of our defence. A proposal made in June 1942, shortly before the formation of the
W.A.A.C., envisaged over 8000 women being enrolled in the Army—1800 for duty in bases and
fixed establishments, 6400 in coastal and anti-aircraft defences, and 300 in signal units. This was,
in fact, very much how the W.A.A.C. developed, at least in its first phase. By November 1942,
2200 women had enlisted in the W.A.A.C. and 135 of these were taking an artillery course at the
Army School of Instruction, Melrose. By April 1944 the W.A.A.C. had 3172 members in New
Zealand and another 733 overseas.
The decision made in June 1943 to curtail the development of coastal defence schemes in view
of the improved situation in the Pacific checked the enlistment of women into the Army. They
had been trained to operate artillery fire-control instruments, trained also in radio-location, the
different branches of signalling, instrument-repairing, and driving and servicing motor transport.
In the meantime the members of the W.A.A.C. had proved their capacity to handle the
delicate instruments that enable guns to find their targets and also their ability to lay and fire the
guns themselves, whether the heavy guns pointing seaward from coastal forts or the light anti-aircraft Bofors and Oerlikons. That these women were never tested in war, as were their sisters in
Britain, does not detract from the merit of their high standard of military efficiency, and the
degree of our dependence on their services at what was potentially the most dangerous period
in our history should be gratefully remembered.
Women in the W.A.A.C. served also in many more humdrum capacities. They were telephonists, telegraphists, wireless operators, teleprinter operators, coders, signal clerks; they gave
excellent service as typists and pay and supply clerks and reigned supreme in the commissariat
department. In New Zealand, as overseas, their very presence gave camps and coastal defence
areas a better tone and greatly helped the morale of home-service troops who at times felt that they
had almost the right, stationed so far from the glamour of great events, to become bored and
cynical. The members of the W.A.A.C. had an indispensable contribution to make to Army
social life.
Perhaps the best tribute that has been paid to the W.A.A.C. is that its retention as a permanent
part of the armed forces of New Zealand has been decided. Women are still serving with the
New Zealand troops occupying Japan. The report recommending this continuance of women’s
role in our peacetime forces remarks: ‘It is generally acknowledged that during the war, the
W.A.A.C. proved its worth. Apart from their value in replacing men, it was found that in certain
tasks, women were superior to men’.
The Women’s Auxiliary Air Force
THE Women’s Auxiliary Air Force was the first of the three women’s services in New Zealand.
Beginning in January 1941 it reaped some of the advantages of being first in the field. By
June 1942 its strength had risen to 2100, and it was planning an orderly expansion to 3500 by the
end of that year. The R.N.Z.A.F., whose general policy was often more imaginative than that
of the older Services, deserves credit for this early realisation that women could give it valuable help.
The Superintendent of the W.A.A.F., afterwards known as Director (Mrs F. I. Kain) and her
assistant (Mrs E. N. Carlyon), who late in 1943 succeeded the former as Director, were appointed
in March 1941. The W.A.A.F. chose its members carefully by means of touring selection boards
which interviewed applicants. The W.W.S.A. was represented on these boards, and after the
formation of the other two women’s auxiliaries took over recruiting for all three.
In its early days the W.A.A.F. did not provide living accommodation for its members on
Air Force stations. The 200 women who entered Rongotai in April 1941 either lived at home or
found lodgings for themselves, although they were served meals on the station. Most of them
were engaged in catering duties. This first entry at Rongotai was in some degree experimental.
The experiment was an entire success and led to W.A.A.F. detachments being added to the complement of nine other stations during 1941 and of many more in the succeeding years of the war.
As the number of women in the W.A.A.F. grew and as they became employed in increasing
numbers at remote stations or at stations far from their homes, private lodgings proved quite
inadequate as accommodation and more and more women were found quarters on the stations
themselves.
The W.A.A.F., in common with the other two Services, appealed strongly to younger women,
but a number even of the first entrants were older married women, often the mothers or wives of
men already with the Air Force overseas, who in this way made their own personal contribution.
Many joined the W.A.A.F. (and indeed all three of the auxiliaries) who had never worked before
outside their own homes; their domestic skill was not misapplied. The minimum age for enlistment
in the W.A.A.F. was 18, but the upward limit was determined by physical fitness. The average
age of the 1941 members of the W.A.A.F. was 27; it dropped to 23 in 1943, probably reflecting
the compulsory direction into essential work of girls from 18 to 21, many of whom preferred a
service to a civilian career, and had risen again to 27 in 1945.
Recruiting was hampered from late 1943 onwards by the more urgent requirements of industry.
The recruit reception depot at Levin, set up in July 1943, was designed to take 100 new entrants
every month, but by February 1944 the number of entrants had dwindled to the point where the
establishment was disbanded. The three weeks’ course, which was encroached upon by kitting up,
and necessary medical and dental examination, inoculation, and vaccination, was mainly devoted
to instruction in drill and discipline, including lectures on regulations, service etiquette, and ‘such
knowledge of Air Force Law as was necessary for an airwoman to know’. Previously, similar
courses had been taken by W.A.A.F. entrants at the stations where they first joined.
Owing to the acute manpower difficulties of that time the War Cabinet was unable, during
the latter part of 1943, to allow direct advertising for recruits to the W.A.A.F. ‘It was found,
however, that the best means of recruiting were the airwomen already enlisted who, by their good
bearing and praise of the conditions in the Service, secured many recruits in their own districts.’
Official administrative history of the New Zealand Women’s Auxiliary Air Force, p. 25.
The total number of applications to enter the W.A.A.F. made between 1941 and 1945 was 7886;
of this number 4753 were accepted for service, indicating the high standard of selection maintained
in spite of the acute need for recruits at certain stages during the war. A number of the disappointed
applicants were held in essential civilian work by manpower regulations. The highest strength of
the W.A.A.F. at any one time was approximately 3800. It was officially stated in November 1947
that the W.A.A.F. is to be retained as a permanent part of the peacetime establishment of the
R.N.Z.A.F.
In January 1943, at a time when the W.A.A.C. already had hundreds of its members serving in
the Middle East or the Pacific, it was decided to despatch a W.A.A.F. party to Fiji. This was
partly to supply a genuine need and partly to stimulate recruiting, which it was felt would be
adversely affected by the greater opportunities for service overseas in the W.A.A.C. It is interesting
to note that overseas service was regarded in the women’s services (the opportunity never came to
the W.R.N.Z.N.S.) as the reward of efficiency, and the eagerness to serve in a more active capacity
than at home was always intense. Only volunteers between the special age limits of 23 and 33 were
permitted to go overseas; but the numbers needed were so small that a great many who were well
qualified to go never had the chance.
The first party sent to Fiji had nineteen members. They were shorthand typists, clerks, drivers,
and equipment assistants. Later a stronger emphasis was placed on signals duties, and W.A.A.F.
wireless operators, telephone and teleprinter operators, and cipher officers formed a substantial
proportion of the seventy-seven airwomen who served overseas at the time of the greatest expansion. Others served as meteorological observers and medical orderlies. In the tropical climate of
Fiji service was limited to eighteen months but usually lasted no more than a year. Later it was
further reduced, to nine months, to give a greater opportunity for overseas service to the W.A.A.F.
as a whole. In spite of tropical conditions airwomen performed the same duties and worked for the
same hours as they would have done in New Zealand.
A small W.A.A.F. detachment served also at Norfolk Island. The maximum number of airwomen at any one time on the island was nine—four cipher officers, four medical orderlies, and a
clerk-librarian. Here the climate did not interfere with an eighteen months’ tour of duty.
A few New Zealand girls went to England and joined the Air Transport Auxiliary which was
charged with the duty of ferrying aircraft from factories to service aerodromes. Two airwomen
were, in 1941 and 1944 respectively, specially released from the W.A.A.F. to go to England for
this work, which was, of course, open only to those women who had already qualified as pilots
in pre-war years. One New Zealand woman member of the British Air Transport Service, Second
Officer J. Winstone, was killed in 1944 in an aircraft accident.
In 1942 a New Zealand woman, Section-Officer Florence Duff, the wife of an officer in the
2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force, lost her life at sea as the result of enemy action. She had
been commissioned in the British W.A.A.F. in 1940 and was travelling out to undertake duty with
the R.N.Z.A.F., where her experience would have been of great value. It should be remembered
also that a number of New Zealand women, who were in Britain at the outbreak of the war,
served in the three British women’s auxiliary services, many of them with great distinction.
The W.A.A.F. began its service in the R.N.Z.A.F. in a spirit of modesty and experiment. It
was designed primarily to take over messing, to control every phase of the choice, preparation,
and serving of food. In this department it was conspicuously successful from the outset. It was
found that only moderate help was needed from airmen once the W.A.A.F. had got into its stride,
a man being needed occasionally to help lift heavy containers. The general ratio of replacement
was five airwomen to four men. From the beginning the W.A.A.F. gave the responsibility for
catering to its trained dietitians.
Not only cooks and messhands entered with the first detachments: clerks, shorthand typists,
equipment assistants, medical orderlies, and drivers were also numbered among them. From early
in 1943 the good service of the W.A.A.F. was recognised by the employment of its members to
replace men in certain technical trades. These airwomen went through the same training and passed
the same trade tests as the men whom they released for service in forward areas.
Women of sufficient education were recruited specially for duty with radar and meteorological
units in the course of a campaign during late 1942 which brought in nearly 400 entrants; this was
the only recruitment of women for a named task. All three women’s services posted some of their
members to radar stations; the W.A.A.C. recruited 325 members as the result of the same campaign
which it shared with the W.A.A.F. The usual policy, of course, was to give no specific guarantee
to an applicant that she would do duty of any particular type. At the same time everything was
done to suit the job allotted to the personal qualities, education, and training of the new entrant.
Those entrants without special skill were usually first given duty in the messes, but this was for a
period only and did not afterwards prevent their being considered for more specialised or
responsible work.
It will be obvious that any airwoman concerned with the servicing and maintenance of aircraft
was carrying a high degree of responsibility. Others too had men’s lives literally in their hands,
for instance those who packed and checked parachutes. ‘Once you begin checking and packing a
parachute you do not leave it until you finish …. Each cord must be checked and there must be
no room for doubt. The parachute must open and you must be certain that it will open.’
Many jobs undertaken by the W.A.A.F. needed thorough training: it took three months
to qualify as an instrument repairer, a job demanding special aptitude. One of the most thorough
of all courses was that taken by members of the W.A.A.F. running marine craft. The Air Force
had its own fleet of launches, a separate little navy that needed just as good seamanship to navigate
inshore waters as the small craft of the Navy itself. These girls ‘must be able to handle any type of
craft, from small dinghies to a whale-boat, or a 25-knot motor launch, recognise running faults
and do running repairs’; they had also to be able to use charts and compass and navigate in and out
of harbour. Their seamanship course included methods of salvaging marine craft, beaching them
for repairs, laying and picking up temporary moorings for aircraft, sweeping for lost torpedoes, and
a knowledge of the ‘rule of the road’ in narrow or thronged channels. They had also to learn
visual signalling, first aid, and artificial respiration and pass a special test swimming 50 yards in all
their clothes.
The only airwomen taken for flights in the course of their duty were those passing through
the wireless course at Wigram. They were taken up so that they might see at first hand the working
of wireless apparatus in aircraft and thus gain a better insight into the problems of aircrew with
whom they would be exchanging signals. Wherever possible airwomen were given passages in
service aircraft when they were posted to other stations or went on leave.
Late in 1942 a qualified officer was appointed to organise airwomen’s leisure-time activities.
Besides engaging in the organising of physical recreation, she trained a staff of W.A.A.F. instructors
who were then posted to the larger stations. An instructress in handicrafts and domestic arts,
paid from the funds of the Sarah Ann Rhodes Trust,
This is a fund administered by Victoria University College which enables the services of an instructress in home
science, handicrafts, and dressmaking, whose headquarters are at Massey College, to be made available to women’s
organisations and clubs in country districts. The scheme is part of the adult education movement.
was lent to the W.A.A.F. for two and a half
years by Victoria University College. She usually stayed ten weeks with each large unit in rotation,
taking as many classes as possible in the airwomen’s spare time. Often at the end of her visit,
displays of handicrafts and dresses designed and made by the airwomen themselves were held
(this might take the form of a mannequin parade), and these very effectively demonstrated the
good use to which her services were put and the practical appreciation by her pupils of her work.
Many girls who had not previously ventured on any such activity learned from her to make
clothes for themselves or to do different forms of needlework. Members of the W.A.A.F. were
also able to take any course they wished through the Army Education and Welfare Service,
which provided courses in handicrafts, music, and art as well as in various types of vocational
training. The third anniversary of the foundation of the W.A.A.F., 16 January 1944, was celebrated
by literary, musical, and handicraft competitions. A selection from the competing exhibitors
including tapestry, needlework, etchings, leather work, and water colours was exhibited in
Wellington.
Women and the War
THE SERVICES of the women who entered the three auxiliaries were so meritorious that it is
regrettable their numbers were comparatively so small. They remained in every sense an élite.
It would, however, give a wrong impression of the willingness and ability of the other women of
New Zealand to serve their country if some further explanation were not given, at the risk of
some repetition, of the restrictions placed on women entering the Services. From the first, all
applications to serve were examined by officers of the National Service Department, and applicants
already in essential work were not allowed to transfer from their civilian employment into a
Service. If is fair to state that although women were thus prevented from serving where they
themselves felt they had most to offer, the National Service Department did not insist on the
return to civilian work of women with special skills who had already joined a women’s auxiliary.
It would appear, however, that War Cabinet regarded the women’s services as being less
essential than their male counterparts and, for the most part, as less essential than industry. In
September 1943, for instance, when industry had vacancies waiting for 4000 women, priority
was given to it, and recruitment into the three women’s auxiliaries was virtually stopped. ‘Industry’
had become a wide term: both hotels and laundries were eventually entitled to bear the proud
label of ‘essential’. Yet in June 1943 the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force had asked for
800 women to relieve men in clerical and stores duties in camps and bases, a request increased a
little later to 982 women to relieve 621 men. Only a very small number of women—twenty
typists—went to the Middle East in response to this request, although a year earlier the official
policy had been to replace men by women in the armed forces wherever possible.
In September 1943 the New Zealand Manufacturers’ Federation asked for the cessation of
recruiting for women’s branches of the Services. Of course, the three auxiliaries had to some
extent been to blame for not recruiting at a faster rate when they had the opportunity during 1942,
but shortage of accommodation was at that stage a constant check on the intake of recruits. But
even when they enjoyed the fullest official support the auxiliaries had been in some degree
hampered by their own diffidence. In May 1941 the chairman of a W.A.A.F. selection committee
was reported as saying that ‘the board had no more right to take a girl out of essential employment
than an employer had to retain her if she could be replaced’. It is difficult to resist the conclusion
that women were treated on a different basis from men for manpower purposes. A woman in
an essential job had somehow become more ‘essential’ than a man in an essential job.
Some women were discharged from the three auxiliaries on a voluntary basis in early 1944.
Forms asking whether they would or would not be prepared to leave their Service for essential
industry were at that time completed by 6629 servicewomen, but only 784 of them volunteered
to re-enter civilian life: 254 of them chose the Women’s Land Army, and 234 nursing or work
in hospitals.
The Women’s Land Army, or more correctly, the Women’s Land Service, was established in
1940 under the W.W.S.A. to help meet the shortage of male farm labour caused by enlistments in
the forces. In September 1942 the Women’s Land Corps, as it was first known, was reorganised as the
Women’s Land Service with improved rates of pay, a dress uniform, and a complete set of working
clothes as attractions for recruits. The employment of relatives as land girls on farms was also
authorised under the new scheme and recruitment became the responsibility of district manpower
officers. By September 1944, with the help of special recruiting campaigns in farming districts,
there were 2088 land girls in the service, its highest figure, all of them employed on farms.
On demobilisation women face the same problems as do men and have the same need for
rehabilitation assistance and, in New Zealand, the same rights to obtain it. It is true that many
servicewomen had demobilised husbands to rejoin, while others had their own work in industry
or in a home waiting for their return. On the whole, women who have had a job in a special
emergency like a war tend to want to keep a job after it is over. The friendships which grow in a
large organisation, particularly a fighting service, and the satisfactions of a corporate life, can only
be replaced by joining some other organisation for a common purpose, and even the daily contacts
of office or factory are in their degree a substitute.
The women of New Zealand in the three Service auxiliaries gave their best to help win the war.
Their work, apart from spasmodic praises lavished often enough as an incentive to recruiting, has
not yet been sufficiently valued or understood. It can only be hoped that their capacity will be fully
recognised in the long-term peacetime planning of the New Zealand armed forces.
Acknowledgments
THE OFFICIAL SOURCES consulted in the preparation of this account
included information from the Department of Labour and Employment and
from the Services. The sketch reproduced on page 18 was by W.A.A.C. Bombbardier E. F. Christie, and the drawing on page 26 by Russell Clark.
The photographs come from many sources, which are stated where they are known:
CoverDepartment of Internal Affairs, John PascoeInside CoverRNZAF officialpage 9 (top)The Weekly News, Auckland(bottom)New Zealand Army official, M. A. Frommherzpage 10Department of Internal Affairs, John Pascoepage 11 (top)Department of Internal Affairs, John Pascoe(bottom)C. P. S. Boyerpage 12 (top)New Zealand Army official(bottom)New Zealand Army official, M. S. Carriepage 13New Zealand Army official, M. A. Frommherzpage 14 (top)A. R. Anderson(bottom)New Zealand Army official, G. F. Kayepage 15 (top)New Zealand Army official(bottom)New Zealand Army official, M. D. Eliaspage 16 (top)The Auckland StarDepartment of Internal Affairs, John Pascoe(bottom)Department of Internal Affairs, John PascoeThe Weekly News, Aucklandpage 17 (top)The Auckland Star(bottom)National Publicity Studios, H. H. and G. Bridgmanpage 18 (top)Department of Internal Affairs, John Pascoepage 19 (top)Army Department, F. A. Marriott(bottom)Army Department, R. Steelepage 20RNZAF officialpage 21RNZAF officialpage 22RNZAF officialpage 23RNZAF official (photographers’ names unknown)page 24The Weekly News, Auckland
THE AUTHOR, D. O. W. Hall, graduated at Cambridge with honours in
English Literature and in History in 1929. He was Associate Editor of Centennial
Publications. He served with the Royal New Zealand Naval Volunteer Reserve
in the Pacific in the Second World War, and is now stationed in Dunedin as
Director of Adult Education, University of Otago.
the type used throughout the series is
Aldine Bembo which was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
cover photograph Ventura approaching Rabaul
THE ASSAULT ON RABAULOperations by the Royal New Zealand Air Force
December 1943 — May 1944J. M. S. ROSSWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Fighter Squadrons
RABAUL, on the north-east tip of New Britain, was captured by the Japanese on 23 January
1942. Its harbour and port, protected from behind by jungle-covered mountains, made it an
ideal naval and air base for their campaign in the south and south-west Pacific; they lost no time
in fortifying it, building five airfields nearby, and installing one of the heaviest concentrations of
anti-aircraft guns in the world.
From Rabaul they occupied New Guinea and the Solomons, but any plan to capture Port
Moresby and New Caledonia and to attack the east coast of Australia was frustrated by the
Coral Sea battle in May 1942 and the American landing at Guadalcanal three months later. Rabaul,
though, was still a menace to the Allies, and its destruction as a naval and air base was one of the
chief objects of their South Pacific campaign.
When the main Allied attack started in December 1943 the Japanese were estimated to have
two hundred combat aircraft in New Britain and ninety in the New Ireland area, against which
the Allies had 531 fighters and bombers in operational condition in the Solomons area. The Royal
New Zealand Air Force had two fighter squadrons stationed at Ondonga in New Georgia—
Nos. 14 and 15
See appendix for a list of the New Zealand squadrons that took part in the assault on Rabaul between 17 December
1943 and 2 June 1944.
led respectively by Squadron Leaders J. H. Arkwright1 and S. G. Quill.2 They
were known as the New Zealand Fighter Wing and were commanded by Wing Commander
T. O. Freeman.3 Both squadrons were on their second tour of duty in the Pacific and had seen
action over Guadalcanal earlier in the year. Between them they had destroyed thirty-one Japanese
aircraft.
The first major air operation from the Solomons against Rabaul took place on 17 December,
when a fighter sweep of eighty aircraft—American Corsairs and Hellcats and twenty-four Kittyhawks from the two New Zealand squadrons—left Ondonga at 5.30 in the morning under Wing
Commander Freeman. They flew first to the Torokina airstrip at Empress Augusta Bay to refuel,
and there the time-table was interrupted by the emergency landing of two American aircraft.
As a result the formation was split into two groups, the first, led by Freeman, getting away at
nine o’clock, and the second, led by Quill, twenty minutes later.
The New Zealanders flew in sections of four, and at twenty minutes past ten the two sections
in the lead, Freeman’s and Arkwright’s, crossed the coast of New Britain over Kabanga Bay,
twenty miles south-east of Rabaul, at 20,000 feet. By now there were only two aircraft in the
third section, one having turned home with oxygen trouble and another with a faulty generator.
As the pilots circled above the target they knew they had taken the enemy by surprise, for the
anti-aircraft batteries did not open fire at once and there were no Japanese fighters in the air,
though dust on the airfields showed where they had taken off. The weather, except for a layer of
wispy cloud at 21,000 feet, was clear, and aircraft could be seen lined up on the runways.
While the formation was making its third circuit, four Zekes
The Zeke was an improved model of the Zero, a Japanese fighter aircraft.
dived from the cloud on the
two aircraft of the third section, hitting one in the starboard wing with cannon shell. Arkwright
at once led his section in a sharp right turn to come to the rescue, but he turned too tightly and
went into a spin. So did his No. 2.
The RNZAF fighter aircraft flew in pairs, or in sections of two pairs, for protection, the leading aircraft being
known as No. I, the second as No. 2. When likely to meet enemy fighters, each aircraft in a pair, or each pair in a
section, zigzagged constantly, crossing over or under its opposite number so that between them the pilots could watch
the whole sky. This was called ‘weaving’.
The rest of the section followed them down to protect them,
but not before Sergeant A. S. Mills4 had fired a short burst at a Zeke and had seen it break in half.
Arkwright climbed up again and was joined by his section, except for Mills, who, with a Zeke
on his tail, was weaving with a Kittyhawk piloted by Flying Officer M. E. Dark.5 After re-forming,
the section tried twice to join aircraft that could be seen fighting over Rabaul, but it was attacked
by Zekes and forced to turn home, the Japanese making a running fight of it for forty miles
out to sea.
The first section, meanwhile, was attacking aircraft that had climbed from the Rabaul airfields.
Freeman and his No. 2, Flight Sergeant E. C. Laurie,6 dived on eight or nine Zekes above Praed
Point, shooting down one each, but Laurie’s Kittyhawk was hit by cannon shell in the port wing
while he was pulling out of his dive to look for Freeman, and he was forced to turn home. Later
he joined Dark, who had attacked the Zeke on Mills’s tail and then a dive bomber, and together
they went to the assistance of a lone Kittyhawk in trouble with seven or eight Zekes and trailing
smoke or glycol. This proved to be Freeman’s aircraft. Together the three Kittyhawks shook off
the enemy and flew to the coast of New Ireland, where Freeman began to circle a valley with the
plain intention of making a forced landing. The other aircraft kept guard as long as they could,
but Laurie was attacked by a Zeke and Dark had to chase it away. When they returned to the
valley there was no sign of Freeman.
The rest of the section—Flight Lieutenant M. T. Vanderpump7 and his No. 2, Flight Lieutenant
J. O. MacFarlane8—had dived on eight Zekes that were weaving above shipping in the harbour.
Vanderpump shot down an aircraft over Talili Bay, then chased a Zeke that was attacking his
No. 2 and shot it down in the bush at the foot of Mt. Towanumbatir, just north of Rabaul.
Directly afterwards he was attacked by a number of Zekes and Tonys
Single-seater Japanese fighters.
but escaped by diving over
Rabaul through an intense barrage of light anti-aircraft fire. MacFarlane, though, was shot down.
Of the second formation, which had left Torokina twenty minutes after the first, only the third
section, led by Flight Lieutenant P. S. Green,9 saw action. Flying at 16,000 feet, with four American
Corsairs 5000 feet above them as top cover, they met fifteen Zekes over Credner Island in
St. George’s Channel, and when these seemed unwilling to come to grips Green manoeuvred his
section to allow the Corsairs to get at them. They scattered at once, three of them, followed by
the Kittyhawks, diving to sea-level. Flying Officer H. J. Meharry10 chose one and opened fire at
700 yards, closing to 300. Smoke came from the Zeke’s port wing root and flame from its fuselage.
Then it rolled on its back and dived into the sea. The other two escaped inland, skimming the
tree-tops.
That gave the New Zealanders a score of five aircraft out of nine shot down at a total cost to the
whole sweep of two RNZAF Kittyhawks, but they had lost in Freeman a leader of outstanding
quality. The lesson of the operation was that Allied aircraft could attack successfully the most
strongly defended enemy base in the South Pacific.
Protecting the Bombers
AS THEIR Kittyhawks could not operate at great heights, the usual task of the New Zealand
pilots in the bombing strikes against Rabaul was to provide close cover for the American
bombers. Slightly above the close cover flew a low cover of Hellcats, and above them a medium
cover of Corsairs, with a top cover of P38 Lightnings or Corsairs flying at about 25,000 feet.
The close cover—the Kittyhawks—had to stay with the bombers all the time to protect them
from any aircraft that might dive through the higher covers. It was a role that called for much
flying discipline, as often it meant missing the chance of a fight.
The kind of discipline required is well illustrated by this set of rules drawn up about this time
by the commanding officer of one of the New Zealand squadrons:
Keep both pairs of eyes open, the pair in your head and the pair in your back, and remember
the sun.
Work as a team and be a little more interested in the safety of the other pilots in the division.
They in turn will reciprocate, the whole bringing about a better understanding of mutual
support.
Keep your eye on your division leader and follow him implicitly. He knows what he is
doing. That is why he is a leader.
Never straggle or be lured away from the bombers. If you are left behind catch up immediately and then never fly straight and level for more than five seconds. If necessary weave
with someone—anyone.
Keep radio silence. If it is important, tell your leader, slowly, concisely and quietly. Then
stop talking.
Never get the idea that the fight is over, even on the way home. Don’t get the idea either
that the fight doesn’t start until you are over the target.
Don’t do the block.
Get flustered.
Think quickly, decide immediately, and act simultaneously.
Finally and once again never, never, NEVER straggle.
This high standard of flying discipline was demanded of our pilots because their Kittyhawks
were inferior in performance to the original Zeros, except in diving, and could outfight the Zekes
only through brilliant teamwork.
The sweep of 17 December was to have been followed the next day by a bomber attack, but
this was abandoned because of bad flying conditions. On the 19th, however, a strike was made by
American B24 Liberators from Guadalcanal, and for this the RNZAF Wing provided part of the
escort. No. 16 Squadron, led this time by Vanderpump, sent twelve aircraft, and No. 17, led by
Squadron Leader P. G. H. Newton,11 another twelve. The latter had arrived at Ondonga to
relieve No. 14 Squadron, which had completed its second tour of duty and was due to return to
New Zealand.
The Kittyhawks took off from Ondonga at 6 a.m., flew to Torokina to refuel, and met the
bombers over Bougainville at 11.30 a.m., setting course for Rabaul. Instead of forty-eight bombers
only nineteen had arrived at the assembly point, so there was some difficulty in arranging the
formations. Two more bombers turned back with engine trouble, and the rest set off finally in
groups of seven, six, and four, with Newton’s squadron covering the first group, and Vanderpump’s
the other two. On the way to the target, while the bombers were flying at 20,500 feet, several
New Zealanders had to turn back because their Kittyhawks could not maintain the height. Among
them was Vanderpump.
Anti-aircraft fire was met over Rabaul, but it did no serious damage, and no enemy fighters
appeared until the Liberators had dropped their bombs and were drawing away from the target.
Then four Zekes dived on the rear formation above which Flight Lieutenant J. H. Mills12 (No. 17
Squadron) was weaving with his No. 2, Flight Sergeant D. A. Williams.13 When the New
Zealanders turned towards them two of the Zekes broke away at once, but the other two continued
diving and levelled out 2000 feet below the bombers. Mills followed them, giving two bursts from
his gun and hitting one Zeke in the fuselage. It escaped by making a tight turn, only to run into the
fire of Williams, who was following his leader down. Hit by two more bursts, the enemy tightened
his turn still more, then rolled over on his back and dived to the ground.
During the rest of December bad weather interfered with operations, but on Christmas Eve
the New Zealand squadrons, led by Arkwright and Newton, carried out a fighter sweep over
Rabaul with twenty-four American Hellcats. The sweep approached the target in tiers, with the
Kittyhawks forming the two lowest.
When it was about ten miles north-east of the town, forty or more Japanese fighters climbed
to intercept it, and at once the New Zealand squadrons, each choosing a group of the enemy, dived
to the attack. Soon furious dog-fights were taking place at heights from 18,000 feet to sea-level,
with more fighters joining in all the time. Though the Japanese aircraft were better than the
Kittyhawks at all altitudes in this kind of combat the New Zealanders always engaged them.
They were forced to, for had they dived to safety after striking the first blow those following
would have been at the mercy of the enemy. However, the Kittyhawks gave a good account of
themselves in these dog-fights, damaging many Zekes and sometimes making a kill.
This particular action is described from one man’s point of view by Squadron Leader Newton:
On the way in [to the target] we could see clouds of dust rising off the Tobera strip. When
we were about five miles south-east of Praed Point two groups of ‘bandits’, with more than
twenty aircraft in each, were seen climbing up on our port side. The further group was a little
higher than the nearer group. Squadron Leader Arkwright led No. 16 Squadron down on the
nearer group, and I went down on the further group, both of us saying on the R/T
Radio telephone
that we
were going to attack.
I picked a Zeke near the front of the very loose formation and opened fire at 300 yards in a
stern quarter attack, continuing firing as I followed the Zeke round in a turn until I was dead
astern. The Zeke exploded at the wing roots and started to burn, with bits of the aircraft flying
off. He tumbled over and went down in flames. I saw many aircraft shot down by the Squadron
in this initial attack. I pulled round to the left, looking for another target. The sky was full of
P40s and bandits milling round. I saw a Zeke on my left at the same level doing a left-hand
turn. I turned, closing in astern, and fired a one-second burst at 250–300 yards. He did a complete
flick roll to the left and when he pulled up I was still astern at 200 yards. I fired a 2–3 second
burst and got hits all round the fuselage. He fell off in a lazy roll to the right and went straight
down, apparently out of control.
I then found another Zeke milling round in the sky where about twelve P40s were mixing
with a mass of Zekes. We were now down to about 12,000 feet. I turned in towards him and as
he started a gentle turn to the left, I closed right in to 300 yards astern and fired a short burst.
He flick-rolled to the left and as he straightened up I fired a long burst from dead astern. He
fell away in a lazy roll to the right and then went down in a vertical dive. I rolled behind him
and fired short bursts as he came in my sights. I observed my tracer going into the fuselage.
I broke away at low level as I saw the Zeke go into the sea. As I was following him down I saw
another Zeke go into the sea. This could have been the Zeke I had engaged previously and left
in an uncontrolled dive.
I started to regain altitude and was set upon by six Zekes. I fired several bursts haphazardly
at them, but they hemmed me in and I broke violently down again. At full throttle I could not
shake off some of the Zekes, so I went right down to the water and headed for the Duke of
York Islands. I found another P40 in the same predicament, so we scissored together. As the
Zeke broke away we turned back towards the fight. As I saw four P40s making out to the rally
point (Cape St. George) and as the fight seemed to be working out from Rabaul, we again
turned towards the rally point and were immediately pounced upon from above by six to
eight Zekes. We used full power and overtook the P40s ahead of us. I saw a P40 low down over
the water behind me in the direction of Rabaul so I turned back and started to scissor with him.
After the first scissor he was shot down by a Zeke. His aircraft trailed smoke and went into the
sea, ten miles north-west from Cape St. George. I went right down to the water at full throttle
with two Zekes behind shooting. I skidded violently and most of the tracer (7.7 millimetre)
went over my head into the sea. The Zekes broke off five miles from Cape St. George where I
joined five or six P40s and set course for Torokina. We ‘pancaked’ there at 1300 hours.
In terms of enemy aircraft destroyed this was the most successful action of the war for the New
Zealand Fighter Wing. Twelve Japanese aircraft were shot down, four more probably destroyed,
and many damaged. Seven RNZAF aircraft were lost but two of the pilots were saved. Flying
Officer K. W. Starnes14 crashed just off Torokina beach and was rescued, while Flight Sergeant
Williams, who had been shot down over St. George’s Channel, was rescued after six hours in the
water by an air-sea rescue aircraft and taken to Torokina, where he entered hospital suffering from
slight gunshot wounds. The five pilots lost were Flight Lieutenants A. W. Buchanan15 and P. S.
Worsp,16 Flying Officers M. E. Dark and D. B. Page,17 and Sergeant R. H. Covic.18
By comparison the next operation was almost uneventful. It took place on Christmas Day,
when seventeen RNZAF aircraft acted as close cover for twenty-four Liberators. The formation
was attacked over the target, and Kittyhawks of No. 16 Squadron fired a few bursts at Zeros that
penetrated the higher layers of fighters, but no definite results were observed. This was No. 16
Squadron’s last Rabaul operation in the tour, and it returned to New Zealand at the end of the
year after being relieved by No. 15.
During December 144 Japanese fighters were shot down for the loss of twenty-three Allied
fighters and one bomber. When the first heavy attack was launched against Rabaul on 17 December
the Torokina airfield at Empress Augusta Bay had been in use for only twelve days, and at that
time not more than a dozen fighters were based on it. The rest, like the Kittyhawks of the RNZAF,
were based farther south and had to refuel at Torokina on the way to Rabaul.
During the first fortnight of January 1944, however, more aircraft were brought to Torokina
and the tempo of the attack increased; so too did fighter opposition. For the first time American
IN NEW GEORGIA
BOMBER RECONNAISSANCE VENTURAS
Photographs of Japanese defences taken in September1945
SOME DEFENCES OF RABAUL
RESULTS
medium and light bombers were used, since fighter sweeps and high-level raids by heavy bombers,
though very damaging to the enemy, could not by themselves achieve the main object of the
campaign: the destruction of Japanese airfields.
The first light bomber attack was to have been made on 5 January by Dauntlesses and Avengers
Dauntless—a dive bomber. Avenger—a torpedo-bomber. Both were used extensively in the South Pacific as dive
bombers.
,
but they were turned back by bad weather. They tried again two days later and again failed.
Fighters and flak were thick over the Rabaul area and the target—Tobera airfield—was hidden
by cloud, so the bombers, after twice trying to bomb it, flew to Cape St. George in New Ireland
and attacked targets there. Two Zekes had fallen to No. 17 Squadron, against which one Kittyhawk
had been damaged by flak.
On the 9th the airfield was raided successfully. No. 15 Squadron, under Flight Lieutenant C. R.
Bush,19 escorted the Dauntlesses and met no air opposition except an attack by phosphorus bombs,
which did no harm,
The dropping of phosphorus bombs from high-flying aircraft was a feature of the Japanese fighter defence at this
time. They were supposed to burst among our aircraft, and although they never hit any they sometimes disorganised
the squadrons. Their bursts, moreover, served as rallying points for the Japanese fighters, showing them where they
were most needed.
but No. 17 Squadron, with the Avengers, met a score of Zekes, which
dropped phosphorus bombs and then attacked with their guns. Squadron Leader Newton shot
down two and Flight Lieutenant A. G. S. George20 one, but the squadron lost two fine pilots,
Flying Officers A. B. Sladen21 and D. L. Jones.22 Both parachuted into the sea, and though dinghies
were seen later by a patrolling Ventura they had disappeared before a rescue could be made.
The usual method of attack in this type of operation was for the bombers to fly towards the
target at about 15,000 feet, make a shallow dive to 8000 feet, and then ‘push over’ into their
bombing dive. In the attacks on airfields the Dauntlesses usually led, dropping their bombs on the
anti-aircraft batteries from 2000 feet, pulling out of their dive at 1000 feet, and getting away as
fast as possible. The Avengers followed close behind them, diving to 1000 feet before dropping
their bombs on the runways and then pulling out at 800 to 900 feet. The fighters’ task was to
weave above the bombers as they approached the target. The top cover stayed above them always,
but the close and the low covers followed them down as they dived so that they could protect
them while they reformed—the most critical moment of the raid.
Throughout January and February the Allies attacked Rabaul daily except when the weather
was unfavourable. Unfavourable weather in the New Britain area usually meant that masses of
towering cumulus cloud extended from about 40,000 feet above sea-level down to about 1000 feet,
with heavy tropical rain underneath. When this happened the target was ‘weathered out’, and the
striking force had to seek an alternative one, but even so the RNZAF fighters took part in thirteen
successful strikes during January, acting on almost every occasion as close cover for American
Mitchells
Twin-engined medium bombers.
or for Dauntlesses and Avengers.
The successes of the New Zealand pilots in the air were made possible by the servicing and
maintenance staffs. When an aircraft returned from an operation it was literally pounced on by
the ground crew. If it was undamaged and had developed no faults, it was refuelled, re-armed,
completely checked over, and ready to fly again in half an hour. If, as sometimes happened, it was
badly shot about, the ground crew repaired it. If necessary they worked all through the night,
often in pouring rain, in the uncertain light of electric torches, and interrupted by enemy air raids,
to have their planes serviceable again for operations at daylight next morning.
On 17 January the RNZAF Fighter Wing moved from Ondonga to Torokina, on Bougainville.
They regretted leaving quarters in which they had managed to make themselves fairly comfortable,
in spite of heat, torrential rain, and frequent air raids, but they were now within striking distance of
Rabaul and did not have to leave early in the morning and return late at night after refuelling
on the way.
Bomber Reconnaissance Operations
SINCE THE START of the Rabaul offensive, No. 1 Bomber Reconnaissance Squadron of the
RNZAF, led by Squadron Leader H. C. Walker,23 had been stationed at Guadalcanal with a
detached flight at Munda. Its task was to supply aircraft to follow the striking forces to New
Britain to spot and report the positions of pilots who had been shot down in the sea and, when
possible, stay with them until a ‘Dumbo’ (an air-sea rescue Catalina) arrived on the scene. From
February until the end of March the rescuing was done by Catalinas of No. 6 Squadron,
RNZAF, which had a detached flight in the Treasury Group for this work, and altogether they
picked up twenty-eight survivors, New Zealand and American, from Rabaul strikes.
The Venturas
Twin-engined medium bomber and reconnaissance aircraft, which had superseded the Hudson as standard equipment
for the RNZAF Bomber Reconnaissance squadrons.
of No. 1 Squadron carried extra dinghies that could be dropped if necessary
and they also carried bombs for use after they had finished their patrols. The first ‘survivor patrol’
was carried out by two Venturas from Munda on 23 December. They followed a force of Liberators
bound for Rabaul, saw no survivors, but on their way home bombed Cape St. George in New
Ireland. One was attacked by three Zekes, but, apart from a single hit from flak, both returned
undamaged to Munda.
The next day Pilot Officer D. F. Ayson24 and Flying Officer R. J. Alford25 took off in Venturas
on the same task. While over St. George’s Channel, Alford saw an Allied pilot waving to him
from a dinghy, but before he was able to signal the position he was attacked by three Zekes. He
scored several hits, but his own aircraft was damaged before he was able to escape into cloud and
signal the position of the airman in the dinghy.
Ayson, in the other aircraft, was cruising above the entrance to St. George’s Channel. He saw
Liberators pass overhead, and at 1.15 p.m. set course with them for Torokina. Five minutes later
his turret gunner, Flight Sergeant G. E. Hannah,26 saw two Zekes immediately above him.
At the same moment (said Hannah in his report), I saw tracer off to starboard and then two
Zekes coming straight in at seven or eight o’clock,
This method of indicating direction by the different positions of the hour hand of the clock is used by both the Army
and the Air Force.
level, at our height. The next moment I saw
two Zekes on the port side, flying level at about five o’clock and 900 yards out. I opened up on
the two aircraft to starboard, and they crossed to the back of us, joining the other two on the
port side. One Zeke broke away on the port side, and came in from about 900 yards at five
o’clock, level with us, firing, and approaching to about 75 yards. I got a good five-second
burst at him. He broke off and passed above us at about two o’clock.
At this stage the two Zekes that were above us had dropped to our level and came in, one
at five o’clock and the other at six o’clock, firing as they came. I waited until they were at
400 yards before opening up. They broke off at about 350 yards and went up over our tail.
I got a really long burst into the second one. I lost sight of him as another attack developed from
four o’clock, level, coming to within 300 yards. I fired a burst and saw five or six tracers go into
him. He turned straight over the top of us, and then started to lose height immediately. I saw
him hit the water. There were still two Zekes chasing us, out about 500 yards on the port side
and dead level, and two more on the starboard side at our height, one about 800 yards out and
the other at 1000 yards. The two on the port side attacked, the first from four o’clock. I fired a
deflection shot, and saw the tracer go in along the fuselage behind the cockpit. He turned off
immediately at about 600 yards.
Just then, an aircraft unidentified at the time, appeared at about three o’clock. He increased
speed, got in front of us, and turned as if to make an attack from two o’clock.
I heard the warning, as what we now know to be a Corsair approached, and swung the
turret round and got a burst away. While this was going on we were still being attacked from
the rear. I swung round again, and managed to get a burst into one aircraft attacking at about
six o’clock, level, 600 yards out. He broke off and passed beneath us. He came into my view
again at six o’clock, and as he appeared I got a full seven-seconds burst into him. I saw tracer
hit the engine as he turned to starboard. He went up, turned half over to the right, and then
went straight into the water and broke up.
While the attack was at its height, Flying Officer S. P. Aldridge,27 the wireless operator-air
gunner, who had been giving the pilot advice and directions over the ‘intercom’, was wounded,
Warrant Officer W. N. Williams,28 the navigator, taking his place at once. Meanwhile the aircraft
was being hit repeatedly.
During one particularly violent attack, when I could hear shots hitting all over the aircraft,
I went closer to the water and started skidding to the right (reported Pilot Officer Ayson).
At this moment the rudder controls went slack. I was left without rudder control, and my
weaving was affected….
When I was told that the attack was over, I checked up on the crew and found W/O
Williams was giving first aid to F/O Aldridge. I tested the undercarriage and flaps, and half an
hour from base advised tower
Airfield control tower.
that I had a wounded man on board who needed medical
attention. I also asked for the runway to be cleared. I landed without rudders, fast, but with no
trouble. My crew did a really wonderful job of work.
In Flight Sergeant Hannah’s opinion the Japanese pilots had shown outstanding skill and
determination, but had repeatedly exposed the bellies of their Zekes as they turned to break away.
With side guns he could have done much more damage. Even so, two Zekes were listed as destroyed
and three as damaged. Later evidence changed the score to three destroyed and two damaged. This
feat, a remarkable one in a Ventura, was recognised by a personal congratulatory signal from
General R. J. Mitchell, the American Commander, Air, Northern Solomons.
Mitchell says to Ayson and crew quote for single handedly beggar up finish
‘Beggar up finish’: pidgin English in the Solomons for kill, wipe out.
two Nips
and three damaged stop A mighty well done and Merry Xmas. Unquote.
During the next two months No. 1 Squadron sent out aircraft almost daily on survivor searches
and helped to rescue many Allied airmen. When it returned to New Zealand in mid-February its
place was taken by No. 2 Bomber Reconnaissance Squadron (Squadron Leader A. B. Greenaway),29
which arrived at Guadalcanal on 15 February and sent a detachment to Munda on the 17th. On the
22nd the whole squadron moved to Munda, staying there until it went to Bougainville towards
the end of April. Its chief task, which it shared with American squadrons at Munda, was to take
part in daily searches for enemy shipping and submarines in the area between the northern
Solomons, the eastern tip of New Guinea, and eastern New Britain.
The squadron had little to do directly with the attack on Rabaul. Searching for enemy shipping
and survivors and bombing targets on Choiseul, Bougainville, and New Ireland were its main
concern. It made one raid, however, of great importance.
Near Adler Bay, on the west coast of the Gazelle Peninsula in New Britain, the Japanese were
thought to have a radar station that gave warning of the Rabaul raids. The task of finding and
destroying it was given to two aircraft captained by Flight Lieutenant B. E. Oliver30 and Flight
Lieutenant C. A. Fountaine.31 They left Munda at half past seven in the morning on 29 February,
refuelled at Bougainville, and took off for the coast of New Britain. Making landfall just north of
Adler Bay, they turned south and flew low over the tree-tops in search of their target. Fountaine, in
the second aircraft, was the first to spot the radar station, which was in a clearing on a low, bush-covered headland at the south end of the bay. He called Oliver on his radio telephone, turned out
to sea, and made a run over the station with his front guns firing. He dropped a bomb on the
station, and then, making a left-hand turn, came in again, dropping two bombs that exploded on
the cliff face just above the target. The first run had taken the enemy completely by surprise, but
the defences were in action now and the aircraft was hit by machine-gun bullets.
Oliver, meanwhile, had joined in the attack. Guided by the smoke from Fountaine’s bombs,
he made three runs, dropping six bombs in the target area. Then Fountaine dropped his last three
bombs in a stick. As the aircraft turned home clouds of smoke covered the radar station.
Dive bombers were to have finished the job the next day, but the weather was unsuitable.
On 2 March twelve Dauntlesses and six Avengers set out for Adler Bay. Oliver, who was acting as
a path-finder, got there ten minutes before the main force and filled in the time by making two
attacks on his own. He dropped two bombs in the target area, one on some huts on the beach
below it, and two in the sea. The dive bombers then came in; after their attack Oliver returned to
observe the results and drop his last bomb. It just missed the radar screen, which was still standing
among the debris. He returned next day with Squadron Leader Greenaway and they strafed and
bombed what was left of the radar station until it was destroyed beyond all doubt.
From then on our aircraft were able to approach Rabaul in far greater secrecy, and on 5 March
a force of American destroyers steamed undetected up St. George’s Channel and shelled Simpson
Harbour. This, coming after a long series of attacks from the air, convinced the Japanese that a
full-scale invasion was imminent. In Rabaul there was chaos and panic.
Had the Allies attacked then they might have scored a cheap victory. Enemy morale was low,
a large quantity of stores had been destroyed by bombing, and there was only one division in
the line—the 38th. The troops in reserve had just retreated from western New Britain and were
disorganised and in no condition to fight well.
Fighter Bombers
TOWARDS the end of February the Japanese withdrew nearly all their remaining aircraft
from the Rabaul area, and by early March it was clear that heavy fighter cover was no longer
needed for bombing attacks. The RNZAF fighters flew their last mission as bomber escorts on the
6th of the month, and three days later American bombers made their first unescorted attack.
From then on a large number of fighters, both New Zealand and American, were free for other
jobs, and with this in view many of them had been fitted with bomb-racks and their pilots trained
in dive-bombing.
The first attack on Rabaul by New Zealand fighter-bombers took place on 7 March, when
twenty aircraft from Nos. 14 and 18 Squadrons, led by Wing Commander C. W. K. Nicholls,32
attacked the town. They left Torokina at seven in the morning, each carrying a 500-pound bomb
under the fuselage, where on former Rabaul missions they had carried long-range fuel tanks.
Since the previous day a staging area had been available to Allied aircraft to the north of
Bougainville, almost half-way between Torokina and Rabaul. This was on Green Island, captured
by American and New Zealand troops in mid-February. The formation refuelled there, and soon
after eleven the aircraft approached Rabaul at 16,000 feet. They dived, released their bombs at
between 12,000 and 8000 feet, and left the target smoking fiercely. Neither enemy fighters nor
flak had troubled them.
From then on RNZAF fighter-bombers carried out strikes almost daily until the end of the war.
At first 500-pound general purpose bombs were used, but later it was found that 1000-pounders
could be carried safely by fighters. A bomb used extensively against supply dumps was the 500-pound incendiary cluster, which consisted of 126 four-pound incendiaries. These scattered after
release and caused widespread fires. Sometimes, when the supply of orthodox bombs was short,
depth charges were used.
During March Torokina was under Japanese shellfire for some days and aircraft had to spend
the night either at Green Island or Ondonga, but this did not mean a respite for Rabaul, and by
the 10th of the month the town was so badly knocked about that the fighter-bombers were able
to give most of their attention to supply dumps, notably those near Vunapope and Rataval, to
which the Japanese had dispersed the bulk of their stores, hiding them in coconut plantations. In
an attempt to counter these attacks, the enemy moved his anti-aircraft batteries from the airfields to
the supply dumps, and at times, particularly at Vunapope, the attackers met intense fire; but the
raids were kept up for several weeks and by then the dumps were almost completely destroyed.
Towards the end of March RNZAF dive bombers joined in the attack on the Gazelle Peninsula,
making their first raid on the 27th, when six Dauntlesses of No. 25 Squadron, led by Flight
Lieutenant J. W. Edwards,33 accompanied two American squadrons in a strike against an ammunition dump and supply area near Talili Bay. The aircraft dived from 10,000 feet to 1500 feet before
releasing their bombs, and then strafed the target with machine-gun fire. The whole area was
pitted by bombs, which caused large fires and explosions.
From the end of March until nearly the end of May, Dauntlesses and Avengers of Nos. 25
and 30 Squadrons took part almost daily in dive-bombing raids against supply areas, airfields, and
anti-aircraft positions around Rabaul.
Up to the last week of April the fighter-bombers attacked first the town of Rabaul and then
the supply areas in the Gazelle Peninsula. Then they returned to the airfields which the Japanese
had succeeded in patching up.
To discover whether an airfield could be knocked out by fighter-bombers alone, a force of
twelve Lightnings, twenty-four Airacobras, and twenty-four New Zealand Kittyhawks, the last
led by Wing Commander Nicholls, attacked the strip at Tobera on 23 April. Wing Commander
Nicholls said later that eighteen of the Kittyhawk’s 500-pound bombs landed on the runway.
Afterwards fighter-bombers regularly attacked the rest of the Rabaul airfields, keeping them out of
commission so effectively that from mid-February until the end of the war only an occasional
aircraft was able to operate from the bomb-pitted runways.
To sum up, the results of the air assault on Rabaul were as follows: By the end of February no
vessel larger than a barge could use Simpson Harbour, which had once held some 300,000 tons of
shipping and sheltered important units of the Japanese navy; on Rabaul’s five airfields, at one
time Japan’s strongest air base south of the Equator, not a single serviceable aircraft remained;
Rabaul as a town had ceased to exist, and outdoor supply and ammunition dumps had been hit
so often that there was hardly an important target left on the Gazelle Peninsula.
The RNZAF played a comparatively small part in all this, but in the period 17 December 1943–
15 August 1945, from the start of the main assault to VJ Day, New Zealand pilots dropped on
Rabaul alone 2068 tons of bombs.
* * *
Appendix
The following New Zealand squadrons took part in the assault on Rabaul
between 17 December 1943 and 2 June 1944. The dates given are those of their
first and last missions on each tour:
Fighter Squadrons
No. 14 Squadron17 Dec 1943No. 16 Squadron17 Dec 1943 — 25 Dec 1943No. 17 Squadron19 Dec 1943 — 21 Jan 1944No. 15 Squadron7 Jan 1944 — 11 Feb 1944No. 18 Squadron27 Jan 1944 — 11 Mar 1944No. 14 Squadron12 Feb 1944 — 26 Mar 1944No. 19 Squadron12 Mar 1944 — 20 Apr 1944No. 16 Squadron28 Mar 1944 — 12 May 1944No. 17 Squadron23 Apr 1944 — 2 Jun 1944
Bomber Reconnaissance
No. 1 Squadron23 Dec 1943 — 1 Feb 1944No. 2 Squadron29 Feb 1944 — 4 Apr 1944
Dive Bomber
No. 25 Squadron27 Mar 1944 — 17 May 1944No. 30 Squadron28 Mar 1944 — 22 May 1944
Flying Boat
No. 6 Squadron11 Feb 1944 — 31 Mar 1944
Biographical Notes
1Wing Commander J. H. Arkwright, DFC; farmer; United Kingdom; born Marton, 1920.
2Wing Commander S. G. Quill, DFC; RNZAF, Wellington; born Porirua, 12 Oct 1919.
3Wing Commander T. O. Freeman, DSO, DFC and bar; Royal Air Force; born Lawrence, 1916;
killed on air operations, 17 Dec 1943.
4Flying Officer A. S. Mills; clerk; Dunedin; born Invercargill, 20 Dec 1923.
5Flying Officer M. E. Dark; draughtsman; born Sydenham, England, 1921; killed on air operations, 24 Dec 1943.
6Pilot Officer E. C. Laurie, DFM; warehouseman; born Auckland, 1923; killed on air operations, 30 Apr 1944.
7Squadron Leader M. T. Vanderpump, DFC, United States DFC; farmer; Hastings; born Auckland, 14 May 1920.
8Flight Lieutenant J. O. MacFarlane; architect; born Auckland, 1920; killed on air operations, 17 Dec 1943.
9Squadron Leader P. S. Green, DFC; clerk; Wellington; born Kawakawa, Auckland, 15 Dec 1919.
10Flight Lieutenant H. J. Meharry; traveller; born Reefton, 1917; killed on air operations, 5 Aug 1944.
11Wing Commander P. G. H. Newton, DFC, m.i.d.; engineering draughtsman; Christchurch; born Christchurch, 29 Sep 1917; appointed to short service commission in RNZAF, April 1939; Director of Operations,
Air Department, August 1945—January 1946.
12Squadron Leader J. H. Mills, m.i.d.; bank clerk; Auckland; born Dunedin, 1919.
13Flying Officer D. A. Williams; cutter; Auckland; born Auckland, 25 Jan 1920.
14Flying Officer K. W. Starnes; school teacher; born Motueka, 1919; killed on air operations, 18 Sep 1944.
15Flight Lieutenant A. W. Buchanan; farmer; born New Plymouth, 1911; killed on air operations, 24 Dec 1943.
16Flight Lieutenant P. S. Worsp; law clerk; born Auckland, 1916; killed on air operations, 24 Dec 1943.
17Flying Officer D. B. Page; secretary, Wellington Stock Exchange; born London, 1912; killed on air
operations, 24 Dec 1943.
18Sergeant R. H. Covic; clerk; born Gisborne, 22 Jan 1924; killed on air operations, 24 Dec 1943.
19Squadron Leader C. R. Bush, DFC; assurance agent; RNZAF Station, Ohakea; born Wellington, 7 Feb 1918; killed in aircraft accident in New Zealand, 30 Nov 1948.
20Squadron Leader A. G. S. George, DFC; shipping clerk; Auckland; born Takapau, Auckland, 24 Nov 1922.
21Flying Officer A. B. Sladen; warehouseman; born Motueka, 12 Oct 1920; killed on air operations, 9 Jan 1944.
22Flying Officer D. L. Jones; electrical engineer; born Christchurch, 12 Feb 1921; killed on air operations, 9 Jan 1944.
23Wing Commander H. C. Walker, AFC, US Legion of Merit; airline pilot; Union Airways, Palmerston North; born Edinburgh, 15 Mar 1908; competed in Melbourne Centennial Air Race, 1934.
24Flight Lieutenant D. F. Ayson, DFC; linotype operator; Palmerston North; born Mosgiel, 9 Apr 1915.
25Flying Officer R. J. Alford; farmhand; Cambridge; born Auckland, 1922.
26Warrant Officer G. E. Hannah, DFM; boot repairer; Invercargill; born Invercargill, 7 Oct 1913.
27Flying Officer S. P. Aldridge; engineer and farmer; born Te Kuiti, 16 Jun 1920; killed on air operations, 20 Aug 1944.
28Flying Officer W. N. Williams, DFC, DFM; hairdresser; Christchurch; born Dunedin, 23 Nov 1913.
29Wing Commander A. B. Greenaway; Royal Air Force; RNZAF Station, Wigram, Christchurch; born
Toowoomba, Australia, 13 May 1911.
30Squadron Leader B. E. Oliver, m.i.d.; sheep farmer; Whitehall, Cambridge; born Hamilton, 8 Feb 1912.
31Flight Lieutenant C. A. Fountaine, DFC; farmer; Kumeroa, Woodville; born Frankton Junction, 24 Nov 1918.
32Group Captain C. W. K. Nicholls, DSO; Royal Air Force; Sheffield, England; born Palmerston
North, 1913.
33Flight Lieutenant J. W. Edwards; school teacher; born Auckland, 1915; killed on air operations, 10 May 1944.
The occupations given in each case are those on enlistment. The ranks are those held on discharge from the service or
at the date of death; where a man is still serving the rank given is that held at the beginning of 1948.
* * *
Acknowledgments
THIS NARRATIVE is based on New Zealand and American intelligence reports,
on pilots’ combat reports, and on the operational records of the squadrons concerned.
The maps are by L. D. McCormick (page 4) and E. Mervyn Taylor (page 26),
and the silhouettes on pages 5, 16, and 17 are from aircraft recognition training
manuals.
With the exception of the group at the top of page 14, all the photographs
are from the RNZAF official collection. Photographers’ names are stated where
they are known:
Inside Cover, pages 22, 23, and 30 (bottom) D. H. Vahry
pages 10, 12 (top), and 13, L. White
pages 11 and 13 (top) H. A. C. Davy
pages 14 (bottom), 16 (bottom), 17 (bottom), 18, 19, and 21 (top) C. Stewart
page 21 (bottom) C. T. Cave
page 24 (top) T. W. Ewart
THE AUTHOR: Squadron Leader J. M. S. Ross is Historical Records Officer at
RNZAF Headquarters, Wellington. He graduated with Honours in Philosophy,
Politics, and Economics at Oxford University in 1935, and has served in the
RNZAF since 1939.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
LONG RANGE DESERT GROUP
in Libya, 1940–41R. L. KAYWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
Acknowledgments
THIS NARRATIVE is based on the war diaries and official documents of the
LRDG, and on information supplied by several of the New Zealanders, including
Lieutenant-Colonel D. G. Steele and Major L. B. Ballantyne, who served with
the LRDG. The maps are by L. D. McCormick, and the photographs come from
many collections, which are stated where they are known:
Army Film Photograph Unit Cover, page 9, page 10 (top), page 12 (top), page 13, page 15, page 18
(bottom), page 19, and page 24 (right and bottom)
F. W. Jopling Inside Cover, page 11 (top), page 16 (centre), page 18 (top), page 20 (bottom), page 21
and page 22J. L. D. Davispage 12 (bottom), page 14 and page 16 (bottom)L. B. Ballantynepage 10 (bottom), page 16 (top), and page 23Regia Aeronauticapage 20 (top)New Zealand Army Officialpage 24 (top left)
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Formation of Long Range Patrols
The battles of the North African campaigns of 1940–43 were fought along the shores of
the Mediterranean. Large forces were prevented, by their dependence on supplies received by
sea and along coastal roads and railways, from moving any great distance inland. The only troops
to penetrate beyond the outer fringes of the Libyan Desert were small motor patrols and the
garrisons of remote outposts. It was the function of the Long Range Patrols, which later became
known as the Long Range Desert Group, to operate in the vast inner desert, one of the driest and
most barren regions in the world. These patrols, small, well-armed parties travelling in unarmoured
vehicles, were completely self-contained for independent action deep in enemy territory.
To appreciate the difficulties and the achievements of these patrols, it is necessary to understand
the country in which they operated. The Libyan Desert, which covers western Egypt, north-western Sudan, and practically the whole of Libya, stretches a thousand miles southwards from the
Mediterranean Sea and more than a thousand miles westwards from the Nile Valley to the hills of
Tunisia. Plains and depressions, dotted in places by the remains of crumbling hills, extend from
horizon to horizon. In the south-east the flat surface is broken by the abrupt escarpment of the
Gilf Kebir plateau and the isolated mountains of Uweinat, Kissu, and Archenu; in the south-west
the rocky ranges of Tibesti, reaching 10,000 feet, separate it from the French Sahara and Equatorial
Africa. Huge areas are covered by seas of sand dunes.
Along the Mediterranean coast, where winter rains fall occasionally, there are small scattered
strips of fertile land, widest in the hilly regions of Cyrenaica and Tripolitania; elsewhere, the
scanty tufts of vegetation extend only twenty or thirty miles inland. In the inner desert no rains
occur for ten or twenty years at a time. The arid wastes are relieved only where oases, hundreds of
miles apart, are fed by artesian water. The inhabitants of Libya, who average one to the square
mile, are gathered along the coast and at these oases.
In 1915, as in 1940, Egypt was threatened by invasion from the west. Senussi tribesmen,
equipped and led by Germans and Turks, were twice defeated near Mersa Matruh (on Christmas
Day 1915 and on 23 January 1916) by a British force which included the 1st Battalion of the New
Zealand Rifle Brigade. The Light Car Patrols guarding the frontier and the inland oases during
this campaign were the pioneers of the Long Range Desert Group, who, quarter of a century later,
discovered the wheel tracks of their cars and rusted food tins left at their old camps.
Although official interest in the inner desert lapsed in 1918, exploration was continued in
peacetime by a few enthusiasts, of whom Major R. A. Bagnold1 was the acknowledged leader.
In the nineteen-thirties these private expeditions, encouraged by the Royal Geographical Society,
traversed most of the desert between the Mediterranean and the northern Sudan.
When Italy declared war on 10 June 1940, the British in Egypt faced possible attack, not only
from Libya but also from armies in Eritrea and Abyssinia. Communications between Egypt and the
Sudan lay through the Red Sea, which might be made unusable by the Italian Navy, and along
the Nile Valley, which was open to attack from the west. The Italian garrison based at the oasis
of Kufra, 650 miles from the Nile, was known to possess aircraft and motorised units capable of
desert operations. It was possible that this force might attack Wadi Halfa in an attempt to sever
the Egypt-Sudan lifeline and that the Italians might push down into the Chad Province of French
Equatorial Africa, through which ran the chain of airfields of the West Africa-Middle East route.
It was essential to know whether the Italians in southern Libya were planning an offensive.
At Bagnold’s suggestion, the Long Range Patrols were formed to collect information about
the interior of Libya, harry the enemy’s communications with Kufra, and keep in touch with the
French outposts on the south-western border of Libya. New Zealanders, who had soon adapted
themselves to their new environment in Egypt, were selected for the three patrols. They were
volunteers from the Divisional Cavalry, the 27th (Machine Gun) Battalion, and the 7th Anti-Tank
Regiment, men who were used to an outdoor life and to handling vehicles.
Advantage was taken of the presence in the Middle East of several of the men who had explored
the Libyan Desert. Major Bagnold was appointed commanding officer. Captain P. A. Clayton,2
who had spent eighteen years in the Egyptian Survey Department, came from Tanganyika to
command T patrol, and Captain E. C. Mitford3 from a British tank regiment to command
W patrol. A New Zealander (Second-Lieutenant D. G. Steele4) commanded the third (R) patrol,
which was intended to carry supplies. Until they had gained more experience in the desert, the
New Zealanders were not expected to lead fighting patrols. The adjutant and quartermaster
(Lieutenant L. B. Ballantyne5) and the medical officer (Lieutenant F. B. Edmundson6) were both
New Zealanders; the intelligence officer was Lieutenant W. B. K. Shaw,7 who was borrowed
from the Colonial Service in Palestine.
Vehicles were needed which could carry weapons and ammunition, petrol for 1100 miles,
and rations and water to last each man three weeks. Major Bagnold decided to use 30-cwt. trucks,
which were obtained from the Egyptian Army and from a motor firm in Alexandria. To make
them desert-worthy, doors, windscreens, and hoods were removed, springs were strengthened,
and gun-mountings, wireless, water containers and condensers for radiators were added.
Each patrol consisted of two officers and about thirty men, who travelled in a 15-cwt. pilot
car and ten 30-cwt. trucks and were armed with ten Lewis machine guns, four Boys anti-tank
rifles, one 37-millimetre Bofors anti-tank gun, pistols, and rifles. The Bofors gun was stripped
from its carriage and mounted with traversing gear so that it could fire aft or broadside from a
30-cwt. truck with a strengthened chassis. Later the patrols were reduced in strength to one officer
and fifteen to eighteen men in five or six trucks. The Lewis guns were replaced by Brownings and
Vickers Ks, and the Boys and Bofors by .5-inch Vickers and 20-millimetre Bredas.
Dependable wireless communication was essential; without it a patrol several hundred miles
from its base could not despatch vital information or receive orders. Long-distance communication,
sometimes more than 1000 miles, was achieved with low-powered No. 11 army sets. The absence
of recognisable landmarks in the desert, much of which was entirely unmapped, made it necessary
for the patrols to navigate as if at sea. Each party, equipped with the Bagnold sun compass and a
theodolite, had to be able to keep a dead reckoning plot of its course and to fix its position by
astronomical observation. The navigators were trained by Lieutenant Shaw and Lance-Corporal
C. H. B. Croucher,8 who had a Mate’s ticket in the Merchant Marine.
To enable the patrols to operate beyond the range of assistance, the fitters carried with them the
tools and spare parts necessary for all running repairs. Very seldom did a vehicle have to be
abandoned because of irreparable mechanical defect; the loss of a truck was almost invariably the
result of enemy action. The fitters often had to improvise parts for damaged vehicles. One New
Zealander (Staff-Sergeant A. F. McLeod9), who served first as a fitter and then in charge of the
workshops of A (New Zealand) Squadron, was awarded the BEM.
Across the Sand Sea
The continuous and apparently impassable rolling dunes of the Egyptian Sand Sea, 800 miles in
length and with an average width of 150 miles, lie along the western frontier of Egypt. From its
northern end to the Mediterranean there is a 169-mile gap along which the Italians had erected
a barbed-wire fence and fortifications. Protected by the Sand Sea, the great distances, the intense
heat and the absence of water, the Italian garrisons of southern Libya felt secure against attack.
Captain Clayton led the first expedition into Libya to reconnoitre the Gialo-Kufra track by
which the Italians took supplies from Benghazi to their garrisons at Kufra and Uweinat. Clayton
set out in two light cars with five New Zealanders (Lance-Corporals Croucher and W. J.
Hamilton10 and Privates R. A. Tinker,11 J. Emslie,12 and R. O. Spotswood13) and one of his former
Arab employees. They crossed the Egyptian Sand Sea southwards from Siwa along a route that
Clayton had taken some years before on a survey expedition. From Big Cairn, a point near the
frontier, they struck out westwards into unexplored territory. A level gravel plain stretches for a
hundred miles to the west of the Egyptian Sand Sea. Beyond this, the patrol entered a second sea
of dunes, the Kalansho Sand Sea, which the Italians had not shown on their maps. Near the western
edge ran the Gialo-Kufra track, marked every kilometre by tall iron posts. Although Clayton’s
men spent three days watching for traffic, they saw nothing. A month later another patrol discovered that the Italian convoys, to avoid the cut-up surface, used a route farther to the west.
Protected in the north by the horseshoe formation of the Egyptian and Kalansho Sand Seas, the
route Clayton had discovered was used by LRDG patrols for operations behind the enemy lines.
Soon after Clayton’s reconnaissance, the Long Range Patrols began their first major task.
By this time the Italian Army on the coast had advanced from the Egyptian frontier to Sidi Barrani.
As the enemy might also be on the move in the inner desert, it was decided to examine all the
routes leading to Kufra. The patrols left Cairo on 5 September. Bagnold led the first military
force, a group of fourteen vehicles including Mitford’s W patrol, across the Egyptian Sand
Sea from Ain Dalla to Big Cairn.
Sometimes 500 feet from trough to crest, the dune ranges ran for hundreds of miles to the north-north-west and the south-south-east. The best routes were through gaps in the dunes and on
the firmer going in the valleys, along which the patrol could drive in safety and at speed.
W patrol unloaded extra petrol and water at the western edge of the Sand Sea and returned
to Ain Dalla for further supplies. The patrol marked the route permanently with stones and petrol
cans. Stones dropped on the sand are kept clear by the wind and will remain visible until they are
worn away. While W patrol was ferrying supplies from Ain Dalla, R and T patrols brought petrol
southwards from Siwa to Big Cairn. The three patrols then separated, W to reconnoitre to the
north of Kufra and T to the south, while Steele took R patrol back to Siwa for another load.
W patrol then crossed the level gravel plain, on which it was possible to travel at fifty or sixty
miles an hour, and struggled through the Kalansho Sand Sea to the Gialo-Kufra track. During a
sandstorm they visited two enemy landing grounds and wrecked fuel tanks and pumps. From
wheel marks on the Gialo-Kufra track, the amount of traffic was estimated, after which the patrol
went farther west to investigate the Taiserbo-Marada track and then turned southwards towards Kufra.
At a landing ground about half way between Taiserbo and Kufra, they met two six-ton
lorries belonging to the civilian firm which ran a fortnightly supply convoy to Kufra. A burst of
machine-gun fire resulted in the capture of two Italians and five Arabs, a goat, 2500 gallons of
petrol, other stores, and the official mail from Kufra and Uweinat, which gave details of Italian
dispositions in the inner desert. The two lorries were hidden in the Gilf Kebir, where they may
still remain, and the eight prisoners were taken back to Cairo.
Meanwhile, T patrol crossed into south-west Libya to examine the southern approaches to
Kufra, the Kufra-Uweinat track and the Kufra-Tekro caravan route. Captain Clayton led the
patrol along the latter route across the frontier into Chad Province. The three Senegalese soldiers
guarding the French outpost at Tekro at first mistook the approaching trucks for Italians, against
whom they were prepared to defend the fort. Clayton explained in Arabic and French that they
were friends.
The three patrols then met at a rendezvous near Uweinat, the 6000-foot mountain on the
border of Egypt, Libya, and the Sudan. Among the huge granite boulders at the base of the
mountain were springs of good water; two of these, Ain Dua and Ain Zwaya, were in Italian
territory. At each of them the enemy had an outpost and a landing ground. With no natural
barriers between it and the Nile, 400 miles distant, Uweinat could be a useful base for an enemy
attack on Wadi Halfa. A reconnaissance of the surrounding desert revealed, however, that Italian
patrols had not ventured into the Sudan.
Other expeditions followed. Towards the end of October, R and T patrols made simultaneous
sorties in southern and northern Libya. Captain Steele then returned to Uweinat with R patrol.
They were selecting places to lay mines on a track used by the Italians when they found an enemy
bomb dump buried in the sand. Over 700 small bombs were dug up and destroyed. On the landing
ground near Ain Zwaya, the patrol burned an unguarded enemy bomber and 160 drums of petrol.
Part of the patrol was attacked for an hour by enemy aircraft, which dropped some light bombs
without inflicting any casualties.
Five hundred miles to the north, Captain Clayton and T patrol attacked the tiny Italian fort at
Augila. A Libyan soldier, thinking they were Italians, came to greet them and was taken prisoner.
He said there were five men, two of them Italians, in the fort. The patrol opened fire with the
Bofors gun, anti-tank rifles, and machine guns. While the astonished garrison ran to a nearby
native village, Clayton removed two machine guns, three rifles, and a revolver from the fort.
Captain Mitford’s W patrol visited
Uweinat again at the end of November. Near the mountain they were
attacked for over an hour by three
enemy aircraft which dropped more
than 300 small bombs without doing
the slightest damage. There seemed to
be no sign of life at the Italian post at
Ain Dua, but a round fired from a
Bofors gun brought an immediate
reply of rifle and machine-gun fire.
The garrison, estimated to be thirty men with three machine guns, was entrenched in positions
among 50-foot boulders, with the additional protection of trenches and stone walls. A frontal
attack across open ground was out of the question. Covering fire was given while a troop of eight
men under Lieutenant J. H. Sutherland,14 clambering among the boulders, worked their way
around the enemy’s left flank. With bombs and close-range machine-gun and rifle fire, they drove
the garrison up the mountainside into fresh positions.
The patrol withdrew to avoid being seen by enemy aircraft and then launched a second attack
on Ain Dua. Sutherland’s troop returned to the left flank, another party made its way around
to the right, and covering fire was continued from in front. Sutherland reached the edge of the
fortifications and inflicted casualties with grenades fired from a rifle cup. He was then pinned down
by machine-gun fire. Trooper L. A. Willcox15 crawled with his Lewis gun to within twenty yards
of an enemy gun and, standing up, killed the crew of four. Sutherland moved in closer, but was
again cut off by machine-gun fire. Willcox came to his rescue a second time by silencing an
enemy gun.
The post was too strong to capture without risking heavy casualties. When the New Zealanders
withdrew at dusk, six of the enemy had been killed and at least six wounded, without loss to the
attackers. Sutherland received the first MC and Wilcox the first MM awarded to the 2nd NZEF.
These attacks on lonely Italian outposts had the desired effect: from then on enemy convoys
moving from one oasis to another were escorted by guns and aircraft, the garrisons were reinforced
in men and weapons, and a system of daily patrols over a wide area was inaugurated. The enemy
was forced to divert troops, arms, and aircraft from the main battlefield in the north. The Long
Range Patrols had also obtained conclusive evidence that the Italians had no offensive intentions
in the south against the Nile Valley.
Before embarking on the next phase of its activities, the force that now became known as the
Long Range Desert Group ceased to be composed only of New Zealanders. The New Zealand
Division could spare no reinforcements for the LRDG and some of the men had to return to their
parent units. In December 1940 G patrol was formed with men from the Coldstream Guards and
the Scots Guards. This new patrol took over the vehicles and equipment of W patrol, which was
absorbed into T and R patrols to bring them up to strength. Subsequently the LRDG had no
difficulty in getting men from the 2nd NZEF.
Raids in the Fezzan
In co-operation with the Free French of Chad Province, the LRDG made a series of
raids on the Italian garrisons of the Fezzan, in south-west Libya, a region of sandy and stony
deserts, long wadis, and fertile oases. The chief objective was Murzuk, the capital of the Fezzan,
a thousand miles from the LRDG base in Cairo and 350 from the nearest French post in the
Tibesti Mountains.
Commanded by Major Clayton, a force comprising G and T patrols, seventy-six men in
twenty-six vehicles, left Cairo on 26 December 1940 and crossed the Egyptian and Kalansho Sand
Seas into unknown country to the north-west of Kufra. To reach the Fezzan without being seen,
they avoided the routes that led to wells and oases. Leaving the patrols at a rendezvous about 150
miles to the north, Clayton took four trucks to Kayugi, in the foothills of the Tibesti Mountains,
to collect Lieutenant-Colonel J. C. d’Ornano, commander of the French forces in Chad, together
with two French officers, two French sergeants, five native soldiers, and some petrol that they had
brought by camel over the mountains. While Clayton was away, Lieutenant Shaw took three
trucks to explore a pass through the Eghei Mountains on the route to Kufra. The combined party
then continued its journey into the Fezzan by a detour to the north-east of Murzuk. The only men
they had seen since leaving Cairo were three wandering natives with their camels.
On the morning of 11 January the force reached the road running southwards from Sebha to
Murzuk, which they mined and picketed. Major Clayton led the column of vehicles along the
road towards the fort at Murzuk. A group of natives at a well, mistaking them for Italians, gave
the Fascist salute. The Italian postman, overtaken while cycling towards the fort, was forced into
the leading truck as a guide.
The garrison, some of whom were strolling outside the gates of the fort, were taken completely
by surprise. Lieutenant Ballantyne led a troop of T patrol to the airfield and the remainder of the
force deployed to engage the fort with the Guards’ Bofors gun, two two-inch mortars, machine
guns, and rifles. Recovering from their surprise, the Italians offered stubborn resistance. One
New Zealander, Sergeant C. D. Hewson,16 was killed when he stood up to repair his jammed
machine gun. At a critical time, when the enemy fire was causing casualties, the T patrol navigator
(Corporal L. H. Browne17) kept his machine gun in action and, although wounded in the foot,
remained at his post. Trooper I. H. McInnes18 manoeuvred his mortar into a position where it
could be used effectively: one bomb set the tower of the fort on fire and destroyed the flagstaff.
At the airfield, Ballantyne’s troop of six trucks with the Bofors gun from T patrol opened fire
on men running to machine-gun posts. Major Clayton, who was accompanied by Colonel
d’Ornano, drove off to encircle the hangar. Turning a corner, the truck ran into a machine-gun
post firing at close range. Before Clayton could reverse, d’Ornano was killed by a bullet through
the throat, and an Italian who had been forced to replace the postman as a guide was also killed.
Ballantyne’s troop continued to fire on the hangar until its defenders surrendered. About twenty-five men, most of them in air force uniform, were taken prisoner. The troop removed many rifles
and thousands of rounds of small-arms ammunition and then set fire to the hangar, which contained
three Italian aircraft, a two-way wireless set, some bombs and parachutes. Thick black smoke rose
and the noise of exploding bombs was heard for a long time.
After two hours’ fighting, the fort, although damaged, had not been captured. The purpose
of the raid had been achieved, however, in the destruction of the airfield. It was estimated that
ten of the enemy had been killed and fifteen wounded, while the attackers had suffered two men
killed and three wounded. Of the twenty-odd prisoners taken, all except two, the postman and a
member of the air force, were released for lack of transport space and rations. Hewson and
d’Ornano were buried by the roadside near the town. One of the French officers, shot in the leg,
cauterised the wound with his cigarette and carried on as if nothing had happened. A guardsman
with a serious leg wound had to be taken by truck about 700 miles across country to the French
outpost at Zouar before he could be flown to Cairo.
The enemy made no attempt at pursuit. As the patrols drove away from the town, they were
concealed in a dust storm which blew down from the north. Early next morning they captured
two Italian policemen on camels; they were from the small town of Traghen, about thirty miles
to the east of Murzuk. The patrols surrounded the town and sent the two Italians in to call on the
police fort to surrender. About a quarter of an hour later an extraordinary procession emerged.
COUNTRY OF SAND
COUNTRY OF ROCK
LIFE ON PATROL
DESERT NAVIGATION
RAIDING WITH THE FREE FRENCH
The headman and his elders led fifty natives carrying banners and beating drums, followed by the
two embarrassed Italians. In traditional manner, the headman surrendered Traghen to the Allies.
Machine guns and ammunition from the fort were destroyed and the two Italians were taken
prisoner.
From Traghen the patrols went a short distance eastwards to Umm el Araneb, where there
was another police fort. Warned by wireless from Murzuk, the garrison was prepared for the
attack and met the patrols with machine-gun fire. With bullets flying past and spattering the
ground all around them, the patrols withdrew to a rise about a mile/from the fort. Although
several trucks had difficulty in getting through some soft sand, nobody was hit. Unarmoured cars
with no weapon larger than a Bofors gun were inadequate for an assault on a stone fort. A few
shells were fired into the fort and the patrols then turned southwards for Gatrun and Tejerri.
While the LRDG raided Murzuk, it was intended that the French Groupe Nomade (camel
corps) should attack Tejerri, 120 miles to the south. Because of the treachery of native guides, this
attack was a failure. The LRDG were no more successful at Gatrun, about thirty miles from
Tejerri. They cautiously approached the oasis until within sight of a fort, then made a dash, only
to discover that it was an empty ruin. They motored up a rise on to a landing ground, on the other
side of which they saw some oblong enclosures. Four Arabs came out to tell them that an aircraft
had reported the attack on Murzuk; they also said that there were thirty soldiers in Gatrun. Major
Clayton told the Arabs to ask the garrison to surrender, but when the inhabitants began to leave
the village it was realised that the enemy intended to resist. Moving as close as they could without
exposing themselves, the patrols opened fire with the Bofors, machine guns, and rifles. The enemy
replied with machine-gun fire. After some damage had been done and at least one of the machine
guns silenced, the attack was broken off at nightfall. A bomber circled over the patrols until it was
dark, but none of its bombs fell near the scattered trucks.
Clayton ended his operations in the Fezzan on 14 January and went south to Tummo, on the
French border. The patrols cut across the north-eastern corner of Niger Province to the Free
French outpost of Zouar. Although Chad was the first part of the French Empire to declare for
de Gaulle, the French in the adjoining Niger Province were supporters of Vichy. The patrols
crossed some unexplored desert and entered the western foothills of Tibesti, a region of castle-like
rocks, red-brown gravel, acacia trees, and thin grass. They saw scores of gazelle, some of which they
shot and ate. A smooth-surfaced road led them through a steep mountain defile to Zouar, where a
native guard presented arms as they arrived.
Ambush at Gebel Sherif
After the death of d’Ornano, Colonel Leclerc19 succeeded to the command of the French forces
in Chad. Eventually he led these forces through the Fezzan to link up with the Eighth Army in
Tunisia. In January 1941 he planned a thousand-mile advance from his headquarters at Fort Lamy
to Kufra. His chief difficulty was the provision of supplies and transport. The Free French could
expect little assistance from the British, who were then attacking the Italians in Cyrenaica with
forces much weaker in numbers. Leclerc combed the scrapheaps of Chad to equip his expedition.
Colonel Bagnold flew from Cairo to Fort Lamy to discuss the Kufra operation, for which the
LRDG was to be temporarily under the command of the French.
Clayton’s force of G and T patrols travelled over some very difficult country from Zouar to
Faya, the French base about half way between Fort Lamy and Kufra. From Faya they were to act
as an advanced guard for the French force and were to reconnoitre to Uweinat. As it happened, the
Italians had evacuated their posts at Uweinat. The LRDG left Faya on 27 January and reached
Tekro two days later. The guard at the French post had been increased to twelve; they included
the three men who had challenged T patrol when they first visited Tekro. Next day the LRDG
left for Sarra, where G patrol stayed in reserve while Clayton took T patrol to Bishara. The
Italians, who must have been expecting an attack on Kufra, had filled in the wells at Sarra and
Bishara.
When T patrol was at Bishara on the morning of 31 January, an Italian aircraft came overhead.
The trucks scattered and made for some hills, and the plane flew away without attacking them.
The patrol took cover among some rocks in a small wadi at Gebel Sherif, camouflaged the trucks,
and prepared to have lunch. The plane returned and circled over the wadi, to which it directed
a patrol of the Auto-Saharan Company, the enemy’s equivalent to the LRDG. The Italian vehicles
were seen approaching but disappeared behind a hill. Clayton told Trooper F. W. Jopling20 to back
his truck towards the entrance of the wadi to see if the enemy was there. The enemy patrol then
attacked with heavy and accurate fire at a range of about 200 yards. Three T patrol trucks were set
on fire, and Corporal F. R. Beech21 and two of the Italian prisoners were killed. At least three of
the attacking party were killed and two wounded.
T patrol comprised thirty men in eleven trucks. The enemy who were forty-four strong in two
armoured fighting vehicles and five trucks had the advantage of close co-operation with aircraft
and of being armed with Breda guns. They made the mistake, however, of covering only one
entrance to the wadi. Clayton took the eight remaining trucks out the other end, circled round and
prepared to counter-attack. At this stage the enemy aircraft, which were now increased to three,
began low-flying attacks with bombs and machine guns. The trucks scattered and swerved away
across the boulder-strewn ground.
Machine-gun fire punctured two tires, the radiator, and the petrol tank on Clayton’s truck.
The crew changed the tires, refilled the radiator, but ran out of petrol. The aircraft continued to
attack and the enemy ground troops arrived, so that Clayton, who was wounded in the arm, and
his two New Zealand companions (Lance-Corporals L. Roderick22 and W. R. Adams23) were
forced to surrender. The other seven trucks of T patrol returned to a rendezvous in the south and,
under Lieutenant Ballantyne, rejoined G patrol and the French.
Of the four Italian prisoners, two had been killed and two were recaptured by the enemy.
Four men from T patrol who were missing were presumed to have been killed or taken prisoner;
they were a New Zealander (Trooper R. J. Moore24), two guardsmen (Easton and Winchester),
and an RAOC fitter (Tighe). Unknown to the patrol, they were hiding in Gebel Sherif. When
their truck caught fire and the ammunition began to explode, they ran for shelter among the rocks.
Encouraged by Moore, they decided not to give themselves up to the Italians, but to follow the
patrol southwards in the hope that they might be picked up by the British or the French. Easton
was wounded in the throat and Moore in the foot. They had less than two gallons of water in a
tin and no food. Everything else had been burnt in the trucks.
On 1 February they began walking southwards along the tracks of the patrol. Tighe, who began
to feel the effects of an old operation and who could not keep up with the others, was left behind
on the fifth day with his share of the water. The other three reached Sarra, 135 miles from Gebel
Sherif, on the sixth day; Tighe arrived a day later and sholtered in some huts, where he was found
three days later by a party of French returning from a reconnaissance of Kufra. They had to wait
until dawn before they could follow the footmarks of the other three men, who had continued
walking southwards from Sarra. On the eighth day Easton had dropped behind. Moore and
Winchester were seen by two French aircraft that must have realised their plight, but as the ground
was too rough for a landing, the planes circled about and dropped a bag of food and a bottle of
water. The food could not be found and the cork had come out of the bottle, leaving only a
mouthful or two. Next day Winchester, who was a veteran of Dunkirk, became too weak to
continue. Moore shared the last mouthful of water with him and pushed on alone.
The French party left Sarra at first light on the tenth day. Fifty-five miles to the south they
found Easton lying on the ground but still alive. Despite the efforts of a French doctor to save his
life, he died that evening. Ten miles farther on they found Winchester, delirious but still able to
stand. Another ten miles farther south, they overtook Moore, still walking steadily. He was then
210 miles from Gebel Sherif and believed he could have reached Tekro, eighty miles away, in
another three days.
Moore, Winchester, and Tighe remained a month in the care of the French. They spent a
week recuperating at an ambulance post at Sarra and were then taken to Fort Lamy, in Equatorial
Africa. Eventually they were flown to Khartoum and returned to Cairo by Nile river-boat and
train.
As the situation had changed following the ambush of T patrol, and as the Italians at Kufra
were obviously on the alert, Leclerc had to change his plans. He formed a temporary base at Tekro
and released the LRDG from further service with the Free French forces. One T patrol truck,
under Lance-Corporal F. Kendall,25 stayed with the French to help them navigate. The two patrols
started north-eastwards on 4 February and, passing to the south of Uweinat, reached Cairo five
days later. Since setting out in December the LRDG had covered about 4500 miles of desert, with
the loss of four trucks by enemy action and two by mechanical breakdown. One vehicle with a
broken rear axle had been towed about 900 miles from Tummo to Faya before it could be repaired.
The casualties included three dead and three captured by the Italians. The leader of the expedition,
Major Clayton, now a prisoner of war, was awarded the DSO. The services of three New
Zealanders were also recognised: Corporal Browne, who showed coolness and gallantry in the
action at Gebel Sherif as well as at Murzuk, was awarded the DCM, while Moore’s march earned
him the DCM, and Trooper McInnes’s mortar-shooting the MM.
Later in February Leclerc attacked Kufra with a force of 101 Europeans and 295 natives. They
defeated the Auto-Saharan Company, which withdrew to the north and left the besieged garrison
without mobile protection. The French shelled the fort for ten days with their one 75-millimetre
gun. Although strong enough to hold out for weeks, the garrison of sixty-four Italians and 352
Libyans, armed with fifty-three machine guns and four Bredas, surrendered Kufra to the French
on 1 March.
General Wavell’s advance into Cyrenaica cut off a garrison of approximately a thousand
Italians at Giarabub, an oasis in a depression below sea level 160 miles to the south of Bardia and
twenty-five from the frontier. Giarabub is a holy city of the Senussi; a white-domed mosque
contains the tomb of the founder of the sect.
While T and G patrols were co-operating with the French in south-west Libya, the other New
Zealand patrol (R), under Captain Steele, assisted a force which included the 6th Australian
Divisional Cavalry Regiment in the siege of Giarabub. To prevent any supplies reaching the
garrison and the enemy from escaping, the Australians watched the northern approaches to the
oasis and the New Zealanders the tracks to the west.
R patrol was engaged on this very tedious task for two months before it was relieved by
T patrol on 2 March. The Italian garrison, supplied by aircraft, continued to withstand the siege
until attacked by the Australians. A fierce assault during a sandstorm resulted in the capture of
Giarabub on 22 March.
Occupation of the Southern Oases
After the expulsion of the Italians from Cyrenaica in February 1941, it was decided
to transfer the LRDG base from Cairo to a place farther to the west. At first the neighbourhood of El Agheila was considered as a site, but as German patrols were active in that area, Kufra
was recognised as a more suitable station.
By this time the LRDG had been expanded to include a Yeomanry (Y) patrol and a Southern
Rhodesian (S) patrol. When G, Y, and S patrols were trained in desert work, the LRDG was
divided into A and B Squadrons. A Squadron was composed originally of G and Y patrols, and B
Squadron of R, S, and T patrols and the group headquarters, which included the signal, repair,
and heavy transport sections.
The fort in the Kufra oasis was held by a French garrison of 250 natives, without any form of
mobile defence. The outlying oases of Taiserbo and Zighen were unoccupied. Whoever held these
oases, situated in the gap between the Kalansho and Ribiana Sand Seas, held Kufra against attack
from the north. Consequently, R patrol was despatched from Cairo on 1 April to occupy Taiserbo.
Rommel began his offensive in northern Libya and by 7 April had occupied the whole of
Cyrenaica except the fortress of Tobruk. The LRDG was ordered to reinforce Kufra as soon as
possible. By the end of the month, as well as R patrol at Taiserbo, S patrol was at Zighen, and the
LRDG headquarters, T patrol, and the French were at Kufra, with Colonel Bagnold in command
of the Anglo-French force. The detached A Squadron (G and Y patrols, commanded by Major
Mitford) was at Siwa, under the control of the Western Desert Force.
Centuries of wind erosion have lowered the surface of the desert at Kufra to a water-bearing
strata. Many thousands of date palms surround the white salt marshes and two blue lakes, as salt
as the Dead Sea. Fresh water for the irrigation of crops and gardens is obtained from wells. The
entire region has a population of less than 6000, more than half of whom live/in the central oasis.
The garrison obtained supplies of fresh vegetables and meat by encouraging the natives to cultivate
gardens and to resume their trade in livestock with Chad and Tibesti.
T patrol relieved R at Taiserbo on 9 June. This oasis, 157 miles from Kufra, has only 700
inhabitants and consists of little more than a few palms scattered around brackish salt ponds. The
temperature rises above 110 degrees and dust storms are frequent. In their attempts to avoid the
flies, which were the worst they had ever experienced, the New Zealanders moved their camp
from one site to another. At each place they obtained water by sinking a well to a depth of from
five to twenty feet. The flies were not the only pest. Corporal L. H. Browne was bitten by a snake
but recovered after suffering hours of agony, and Gunner C. O. Grimsey26 was stung three times
by a scorpion; the man survived but the scorpion died.
Using this dead scorpion as a model, Grimsey designed the badge (a scorpion within a wheel) which became the
official insignia of the LRDG.
The Sudan Defence Force was responsible for supplying the Kufra garrison. Guided by a New
Zealander (Corporal Browne), the first convoy, an odd assortment of vehicles driven by inexperienced natives, left Wadi Halfa on 28 April. Some undesertworthy lorries had to be left half
way and their loads taken over the last 300 miles in two lifts. Consequently, the delivery of the
supplies was not completed until 13 May. By that time there was not enough petrol at Kufra to
evacuate the garrison, should it have been necessary. More suitable transport was obtained from
Cairo and by the end of June a satisfactory convoy system was functioning.
The LRDG ‘air force’ was created during the occupation of Kufra. Major G. L. Prendergast,27
one of the pre-war explorers of the desert and an experienced airman, joined the unit in February
1941. Realising the value of aircraft to the LRDG, he had two Waco machines adapted for long-distance flying. Prendergast flew one himself and a New Zealander (Sergeant R. F. T. Barker28) the
other. These aircraft were used for reconnaissance, liaison with the patrols, for bringing in wounded
men, and for flights to Cairo. When Bagnold was appointed to the staff of General Headquarters at
Cairo in August, Prendergast became the commanding officer of the LRDG.
Throughout the summer of 1941, while Rommel’s army stood at the Egyptian frontier, the
LRDG remained in Italian Libya, without hope of assistance if attacked or surrounded. Enemy
activity in the direction of Kufra, however, was confined to reconnaissance by Italian aircraft, and
no attempt was made to recapture the oasis. The French troops were gradually withdrawn from
Kufra and on 18 July the Sudan Defence Force relieved the LRDG of garrison duty. The patrols
then returned to their former role of long-distance reconnaissance.
In anticipation of an eventual British advance into Tripolitania, the LRDG explored towards
the coast to the north-west of Kufra. Information was gathered about the ‘going’ for wheeled and
tracked vehicles, sites for landing grounds, and the local supplies of water. At the end of July,
T patrol left Taiserbo for the desert to the south of the Gulf of Sirte. It was in this region that the
New Zealand Division outflanked the enemy at El Agheila sixteen months later. One T patrol
truck approached at night to within a short distance of the main coastal road, along which enemy
traffic was passing. Two or three weeks later, S patrol made a similar reconnaissance farther to the
east, between Gialo and Agedabia. These tasks were completed without discovery by the enemy.
R patrol relieved the detached G and Y patrols at Siwa in August 1941 and was joined by T
patrol in October. Major Steele was appointed to command the independent New Zealand
squadron and an Englishman (Captain J. R. Easonsmith29) assumed command of R patrol. Steele
was awarded the OBE in recognition of his services while in command of A Squadron at Siwa and
later at Gialo. He planned operations which included successful attacks on enemy communications
and airfields, reconnaissance as far as Tripolitania, and the carrying of demolition parties, search
parties, and Arab and British secret agents to various points behind the enemy lines.
To discover all they could about the enemy and to enlist the support of friendly natives,
British secret agents lived as Arabs among the tribesmen of Gebel Akhdar and sent back information
by wireless. Gebel Akhdar—which means ‘the green mountain’—is a fertile tableland between
the sea and the desert. The Italians had established a dozen colonial settlements there before the war.
The LRDG took the secret agents where they wanted to go, delivered wireless batteries,
ammunition, and explosives to them, and distributed food among the natives. Constantly in
demand for this and similar tasks, the patrols ran what they called a taxi service. Because it was
uneconomical to operate at full strength on the short journeys from Siwa, they were reorganised as
half patrols, each with an officer and from twelve to fifteen men in four or five vehicles. The patrols
of A (New Zealand) Squadron became known as R 1, R 2, T 1, and T 2.
Captain Easonsmith, who led several of these expeditions from Siwa, earned a reputation for
fearlessness. In October, when R 1 patrol was in the hills to the north-west of Mechili, he discovered
an enemy camp in which there were four light tanks and thirty or forty vehicles. With the intention
of seizing a prisoner or two for interrogation, he decided to stage an ambush on a track leading to
the camp. Protected by two R patrol trucks stationed behind a rise, Easonsmith pretended that
his own truck had broken down on the track a mile or two from the camp. The first convoy that
came along was larger than he had expected—there were at least sixteen vehicles. The leading
lorry stopped, but before Easonsmith could seize its two occupants they ran off and were killed or
wounded. Italians with rifles began to appear from the other lorries. Corporal Spotswood had
fired only a few rounds from the back of Easonsmith’s truck when his machine gun jammed.
Shouting ‘I must get a prisoner’, Easonsmith ran down the column and bowled grenades among the
Italians, who tried to take cover under their vehicles. He captured two men, but one was wounded
and later died. The other revealed that the Trieste Motorised Division was on its way to Mechili.
Having killed six or seven of the enemy and wounded a dozen, the patrol escaped without casualty.
In Support of the Eighth Army
To take part in the British offensive in Cyrenaica in November 1941, the LRDG was
placed under the command of the newly-formed Eighth Army and the whole group was
moved from Kufra to Siwa. The patrols were to watch the desert tracks to the south of Gebel
Akhdar and to report on the movements of enemy reinforcements and withdrawals. In addition,
T 2 patrol was to take four British officers and two Arabs to a rendezvous in the Gebel and was to
collect them three weeks later. R 1 patrol was to pick up Captain A. D. Stirling30 and a party of
British paratroops after they had raided enemy airfields to the west of Tobruk.
It had been planned that Stirling’s paratroops should destroy aircraft on the landing grounds
near Gazala and Tmimi. Everything went wrong. Because of bad weather, the RAF dropped the
parachutists wide of the target, and some of them were lost or drowned in a wadi running bank-high with water after sudden, torrential rain. R 1 patrol collected Stirling and twenty men at the
prearranged rendezvous and took them back to the British lines. The next time the parachutists
raided enemy airfields they were carried there and back by the LRDG.
T 2 patrol, commanded by Captain A. D. N. Hunter,31 took the four officers and two Arabs to
Wadi Heleighima, in the southern hills of Gebel Akhdar, to the west of Mechili. One of the
officers (Captain J. Haselden) made his way northwards to the coast, where he signalled to a British
submarine which landed a party of commandos under Lieutenant-Colonel G. C. T. Keyes.32
Haselden led this party to Beda Littoria, an Italian colonial village where Rommel was known to
have his headquarters. The commandos planned to kill the German General on the eve of the
Eighth Army’s advance. Keyes and two men, Campbell and Terry, entered the house at midnight,
but unfortunately Rommel was not at home. In the fight that ensued, Keyes and four Germans
were killed and Campbell was wounded and captured; only Terry escaped. Keyes won a posthumous award of the VC.
After taking the four British officers and two Arabs to Wadi Heleighima, T 2 patrol was
divided into three parties to watch the roads leading to Mechili. Lance-Corporal R. T. Porter33
was captured by an Italian reconnaissance patrol while on picket duty with the party watching the
Mechili-Derna road. Captain Hunter, taking two trucks to the area where Porter disappeared,
was attacked at close range in a wadi by about twenty Italians in two vehicles, armed with a Breda
gun. One truck returned to warn the rest of the patrol, but Hunter, Corporal Kendall, and Trooper
L. A. McIver34 were presumed to have been captured or killed. The patrol reported by wireless
to headquarters and was ordered to withdraw to Siwa. Second-Lieutenant Croucher, with three
trucks, was sent to Wadi Heleighima to complete the task. At the rendezvous he found the four
British officers and two Arabs, and also Hunter, who had evaded capture. The three New Zealanders, Porter, Kendall, and McIver, were prisoners.
On 24 November, when the battle in the Tobruk-Bardia area had reached a critical stage, the
role of the LRDG was suddenly changed. Eighth Army issued orders for the patrols to ‘act with
utmost vigour offensively against any enemy targets or communications within your reach’. For
this purpose, Y 1 and Y 2 patrols were allotted roads in the Mechili-Derna-Gazala area, S 2 and
R 2 the Benghazi-Barce-Maraua road, and G 1 and G 2 the main road near Agedabia. The combined Rhodesian and New Zealand patrols (S 2 and R 2) ambushed nine vehicles and killed and
wounded a number of the enemy, Y 2 captured a small fort and about twenty Italians, and Y 1
damaged fifteen vehicles in a transport park. Mechanical breakdowns prevented G 1 and G 2
from joining forces, so G 1 made two independent attacks on road traffic and shot up a few vehicles.
S 2 (under Second-Lieutenant J. R. Olivey35) and R 2 (under Second-Lieutenant L. H. Browne)
drove on to the road in the evening of 29 November, cut the telephone wires, and turned eastwards
towards Maraua. They laid the first ambush at a point where the road dropped through a 20-foot
cutting. A vehicle approached from the east and, as it drew level, was engaged by machine-gun
fire. Olivey noticed that it was marked with a red cross. Before he could stop his men from firing,
however, enemy troops armed with rifles and sub-machine guns clambered over the tailboard.
After about a minute of sustained shooting on both sides, several of the enemy were killed and
wounded and the remainder dispersed. The patrols moved towards a vehicle approaching from the
opposite direction and engaged it with machine-gun fire. The lorry stopped and a liquid, presumed
to be wine, gushed from its load.
Continuing along the road, the New Zealanders and Rhodesians attacked four lorries and
trailers. They put each vehicle out of action, probably killed the crew, and riddled the load with
machine-gun bullets. Taking up positions at a 30-foot cutting, where they over-looked the road
in both directions, they attacked two more lorries and trailers and an oil tanker. They wrecked the
vehicles and killed all of the enemy except one badly wounded man. The patrols then cut the telephone wires and retired to the south, having completed the operation without casualty. Second-Lieutenant Olivey was awarded the MC, and a New Zealander (Lance-Corporal C. Waetford36)
and a Rhodesian the MM.
Rommel disengaged his forces from the battle in Cyrenaica in mid-December and began to
withdraw towards Agedabia. In an attempt to prevent the enemy’s escape from Benghazi, Eighth
Army despatched columns, including the 22nd Guards Brigade, across the desert to the south of
Gebel Akhdar to the Benghazi-Agedabia road. During this move T 1 patrol navigated and R 1
and R 2 patrols provided flanking scouts for the Guards Brigade. Major Ballantyne’s T 1 patrol
waited two weeks at the rendezvous near Bir Hacheim for the Guards to disengage from the
battle west of Tobruk. During this wait the patrol survived repeated bombing and strafing attacks
by German dive bombers and fighters. The only casualty was Second-Lieutenant P. R. Freyberg,37
who was slightly wounded.
The advance began on 20 December. R 1 and R 2 patrolled the country to the north, while
T 1 guided the main column of the Guards Brigade westwards towards Antelat. Corporal Tinker,
with two trucks, was responsible for the navigation of the Scots Guards through Msus towards
Sceleidima, thirty miles to the north of Antelat. A member of Tinker’s party, Corporal Moore,
was wounded in an air attack. The operation ended in failure. An enemy covering force including
thirty tanks held up the outflanking columns in the Sceleidima-Antelat area on 22 December and
this enabled the Axis troops to complete their withdrawal from Benghazi.
Rommel’s forces retired from Cyrenaica to strong defensive positions among the salt marshes
between Agedabia and El Agheila. From a base at Gialo, an oasis about 140 miles to the south-south-east of Agedabia, the LRDG continued to harass the enemy’s communications farther
to the west.
Biographical Notes
1Brig R. A. Bagnold, OBE, m.i.d.; Founders’ Medal of Royal Geographical Society, Fellow Royal
Society; born England, 1896; served with Royal Engineers on Western Front, 1915–18; Royal Corps of Signals,
1920; original Commanding Officer LRP and LRDG, 1940–41; Inspector of Desert Troops, GHQ MEF, Aug 1941.
2Maj P. A. Clayton, DSO, MBE; Founders’ Medal of Royal Geographical Society, Fellow Royal Geological Society, Fellow Royal Geographical Society; born England, 1896; served with Royal Field Artillery in
Greece and Turkey, 1915–20; Inspector, Desert Survey of Egypt, 1920–38; Survey Department, Lands and Mines,
Tanganyika, 1938–40; Intelligence Corps, 1940; patrol commander LRP and LRDG; wounded and p.w. 31
Jan 1941.
3Col E. C. Mitford, MC; Royal Tank Regiment; patrol commander LRP and LRDG; first OC A Sqn
LRDG, 1941.
4Lt-Col D. G. Steele, OBE, m.i.d.; farmer; Lake Roto Ma; born Wellington, 22 Mar 1912; patrol commander LRP and LRDG; OC A (NZ) Sqn LRDG, 1941–42; CO 22 NZ (Mot) Bn, 1944; CO 27 NZ (MG)
Bn, 1944.
5Maj L. B. Ballantyne, ED, m.i.d.; sheep farmer; Pongaroa; born Waitahora, 18 Jul 1912; Adjutant and
Quartermaster LRP and LRDG; patrol commander LRDG; CO Composite Training Depot 2 NZEF, 1942.
6Col F. B. Edmundson, OBE, m.i.d.; medical practitioner; Auckland; born Napier, 22 Jan 1910; Medical
Officer LRP and LRDG; CO 4, 5, and 6 NZ Field Ambulances at various times; Deputy Director of Medical
Services 2 NZEF, 1945.
7Maj W. B. K. Shaw, OBE, MBE, m.i.d., Belgian Croix de Guerre with Palm; Gill Memorial of Royal
Geographical Society; born England, 1901; Sudan Forest Service, 1924–29; Department of Antiquities, Palestine
1936–40; Intelligence Corps, 1940; Intelligence Officer LRP and LRDG.
8Capt C. H. B. Croucher, m.i.d.; Merchant Navy; Feilding; born England, 25 Feb 1910; commissioned in
British Army; patrol commander LRDG; GSO III, G(Ops), GHQ MEF, 1942; Adj LRDG, 1943; IO LRDG
(Aegean operations), 1943; GSO II Raiding Forces MEF, 1944; IO LRDG (Adriatic operations), 1944.
9WO II A. F. McLeod, BEM; motor-body fitter; Auckland; born Canada, 1 Jul 1905; in charge of Light
Repair Section, A (NZ) Sqn LRDG.
10Cpl W. J. Hamilton; labourer; Auckland; born Auckland, 23 Jun 1917.
11Capt R. A. Tinker, MC, MM, m.i.d.; motor driver; Timaru; born NZ, 13 Apr 1913; patrol commander
LRDG; now in New Zealand Regular Force.
12S-Sgt J. Emslie; truck driver; Auckland; born Scotland, 5 Dec 1909.
13Sgt R. O. Spotswood, m.i.d.; plumber; born Carterton, 8 Jan 1914; killed in action, Italy, 4 May 1944.
14Lt-Col J. H. Sutherland, MC; stock inspector; Masterton; born Taieri, 10 Dec 1903; second-in-command
of patrol LRP and LRDG; CO 2 NZ Div Cav, 1942–43.
15Sgt L. A. Willcox, MM; sawmill hand; Wanganui; born Hawera, 25 Aug 1918; wounded 19 Sep 1942.
16Sgt C. D. Hewson; labourer; born Auckland, 27 Jan 1908; killed in action, 11 Jan 1941.
17Capt L. H. Browne, MC, DCM, m.i.d.; accountant; London; born England, 8 Jul 1908; patrol commander LRDG; GSO III, G(Ops), GHQ MEF, 1942; IO LRDG, 1943; wounded 11 Jan 1941, 31 Jan 1941,
18 Nov 1942, and 22 Dec 1942.
18Sgt I. H. McInnes, MM; labourer; born Waipu, 8 Jun 1908; killed in action, Alamein, 24 Oct 1942.
19General Leclerc, CB, DSO and bar; born France, 28 Nov 1902; Governor of French Cameroons, 1940;
Military Commander of French Equatorial Africa; GOC 2nd French Armd Div; GOC French Far East Forces,
1945; Inspector-General of French Armies in North Africa, 1946; killed in air accident, 28 Nov 1947.
20Tpr F. W. Jopling; farmhand; Auckland; born England, 15 Apr 1913; wounded and p.w. Sep 1942.
21Cpl F. R. Beech, m.i.d.; radio engineer; born Picton, 24 Jul 1908; killed in action, 31 Jan 1941.
22L-Cpl L. Roderick; linesman; born Gisborne, 19 Feb 1913; p.w. 31 Jan 1941; killed in Italy, 6 Apr 1944, while
leading Italian partisans.
23L-Cpl W. R. Adams; salesman; Whangarei; born Auckland, 1 Aug 1918; p.w. 31 Jan 1941.
24Cpl R. J. Moore, DCM, m.i.d.; farm hand; Morrinsville; born Tc Aroha, 10 Sep 1915; wounded 31 Jan
1941 and 22 Dec 1941.
25Cpl F. Kendall, m.i.d.; carpenter; Kati Kati; born South Africa, 7 May 1904; p.w. 23 Nov 1941.
26L-Bdr C. O. Grimsey; farmer; Te Aroha; born England, 25 Dec 1907; p.w. 27 Dec 1942.
27Col G. L. Prendergast, DSO; Royal Tank Regiment; CO LRDG, 1941–43; second-in-command Raiding
Forces (Aegean operations), 1943.
28Capt R. F. T. Barker; engineering foreman; Christchurch; born Waimate, 7 Nov 1909; pilot LRDG
aircraft.
29Lt-Col J. R. Easonsmith, DSO, MC; Royal Tank Regiment; patrol commander LRDG; OC B Sqn
LRDG; CO LRDG (Aegean operations), 1943; killed in action, 16 Nov 1943.
30Lt-Col A. D. Stirling, DSO; Scots Guards; CO Special Air Service; p.w. Jan 1943.
31Maj A. D. N. Hunter, MC; Royal Tank Regiment; patrol commander LRDG.
32Lt-Col G. C. T. Keyes, VC, MC; Royal Scots Greys; born England, 1917; killed in action, 17–18 Nov 1941.
33L-Cpl R. T. Porter; clerk; Whangarei; born NZ, 3 Nov 1915; p.w. 22 Nov 1941.
34Tpr L. A. McIver; taxi driver; born Wairoa; 22 Feb 1914; p.w. 23 Nov 1941; wounded in battle between
Germans and Russians, 9 Feb 1945; died while p.w. 16 Feb 1945.
35Capt J. R. Olivey, MC; Sherwood Foresters; patrol commander LRDG.
36Sgt C. Waetford, MM; truck driver; Whangarei; born NZ, 27 May 1914.
37Capt P. R. Freyberg, MC; attached LRDG; wounded 12 Dec 1942; now in Grenadier Guards.
this will be followed by an account of the lrdg in egypt, libya, tunisia, and the aegean sea in 1942 and 1943.
THE AUTHOR, R. L. Kay, who is a member of the staff of the War History Branch, was a newspaper reporter before the war and served with the 2nd NZEF Public Relations Service in the Middle East. He graduated BA at Victoria University College in 1948.
cover photographS Imperial troops capurated by the Japanese
Letter-Card from Thailand
PRISONERS OF JAPAND. O. W. HALLWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Prisoners of Japan
The new zealanders who fell into the hands of the Japanese were mercifully few. From
the armed forces were the survivors of warships sunk in battle in East Indies waters, airmen
attached to a Royal Air Force unit in Java, the crews of planes, Air Force or Fleet Air Arm, shot
down over Burma or over Japan itself. Among the Army prisoners of war were some New Zealanders
serving in the Australian forces who were captured when Singapore fell, as well as others, in civil
life public servants or engineers in Malaya, who were enrolled in the Malayan Defence Force.
A miscellaneous group of professions supplied the New Zealand internees in Japanese hands:
missionaries and teachers in China or Japan, officials in Malaya or Sarawak, engineers and technicians
employed in Thailand or on the China coast.
The places of imprisonment or internment were as varied as the localities and the circumstances
in which these people became captives. The conditions of internment were on the whole better
than those endured by service prisoners of war. For the latter a broad policy of brutality appears to
have been imposed from above. For civilian and service personnel alike the will of local commanders
seems to have been the dominating factor, and some surprisingly humane conditions (surprising
when set beside the general conduct of the Japanese) were offered to small groups in favoured
localities. It is, however, possible to generalise and say that all, prisoners of war or internees, were
badly fed by Japanese standards, atrociously by European.
The rights and obligations of prisoners of war in relation to the detaining power are defined in
the Geneva Convention. A writer who examined this Convention critically has pointed out that it is
a weakness, from the point of view of European troops, that the detaining power is obliged to give
its prisoners only the same standard of diet as its own Base troops enjoy. As a Japanese can live on
less food, on a smaller total of calories though not, of course, on a less well-balanced ‘spread’ of
vitamins, than a European, the latter on a diet that satisfies the former must suffer from malnutrition.
It is true that the Japanese in any case paid only lip service to the Geneva Convention; they declared
their adherence to it after their entry into the war and violated its letter and its spirit in every detail
in almost every prison camp. But even if their attempts to conform to the Convention had been
sincere, prisoners and internees in their hands must have suffered severely. Some part of the blame
for the slow starvation of their prisoners must be attributed to the differences in racial standards,
though nearly everywhere it was due far more directly to a cynical disregard of every humane
consideration and an active desire first to humiliate and then to destroy their victims. Prisoners of
war paid with their blood and their lives for the national sense of inferiority of the divinely-descended
children of Nippon.
The Incalculable Japanese
In their entry into the war the Japanese provided themselves with every modern weapon,
used the latest tactics, and imitated, often with overwhelming success, the western nations in
every mechanical and industrial device to increase their striking power and chance of victory. But
they themselves were less Europeanised than their ships, planes, weapons and uniforms suggested.
How little they had advanced towards civilisation (a condition they understood mainly on the
material side) was shown most clearly in their abominable treatment of their prisoners.
The Japanese themselves did not ‘allow’ their troops to become prisoners of the enemy. It was
their duty to die rather than face the world in which they had suffered defeat. Japanese soldiers who
fell into the hands of the Chinese, for instance, were considered officially to be dead: their relatives
were paid compensation and their glorious death was reported at the Shinto shrines. Never, never
could these living dead return to their homes to outrage both their sorrowing relatives and their
ancestors by contradicting so satisfying a legend.
The Japanese in some degree extended this attitude to those sailors, soldiers, and airmen of the
Allies who fell into their hands. (This did not, however, prevent them in some camps attempting to
victimise New Zealanders as a reprisal for the shooting of Japanese prisoners at Featherston in
February 1943; this discrimination broke down in practice because the general treatment of all
prisoners was in any case already a terrible victimisation.) Men who should have been dead could
have no rights. But the Japanese declared their adherence to the Geneva Convention, which they
had not previously ratified and could not therefore have been blamed for not observing. Thus, for
the sake of wishing to appear before the world as humane, to appear as though they were capable of
behaving by the standards of the European nations, the Japanese greatly increased their war guilt.
It would seem, however, that the Japanese were in any case incapable of understanding the humanitarian spirit which lies behind this international agreement.
The Japanese themselves in their own services and even to some extent in civil life practise the
active brutality of which prisoners of war were so often the victims. Himself struck by his superiors,
the non-commissioned officer passes on the blows to the private on any occasion of displeasure;
the humble private slaps or clubs the civilian or, when he is within reach, the prisoner of war.
Among their former prisoners the consensus of opinion seems to be that the Japanese were
brutal rather than sadistic and largely unaware of their own brutality, which might find its target
in an animal as readily as in a helpless prisoner. (That so much of their motives must be left to
conjecture is some indication of the bewilderment of anyone who attempts to elucidate the contradictions of the Japanese character.) Undoubtedly they were arrogant in victory and obsessed with
a desire to avenge on individuals the galling pretensions to superiority of the white races over the
coloured. This led to calculated humiliations being heaped on their prisoners. An intelligent
observer,
John Coast, Railroad of Death (Commodore Press), p. 243.
who was their prisoner for three and a half years in Malaya and Thailand, considered the
main characteristic of the Japanese to be a frightening lack of balance, ‘which means that they can
swing from murder to laughter in a couple of seconds, and this makes them always unpredictable and
impossible to trust in any way’. They have a marked tendency to hysteria. Before attacking prisoners
who had offended them, they used to work themselves up into a berserk condition until virtually
they did not know what they were doing. Prisoners of war found a very few who were uniformly
considerate, fair, honest, and humane. Their national tradition placed no value on these virtues even
within the circle of their own families.
It is impossible not to feel deep indignation at the treatment of their prisoners by the Japanese.
But, while pitying the prisoners, one may also pity the Japanese. One ex-prisoner, when asked
why the Japanese had beaten up so many prisoners of war for trivial offences or for what were
not really offences at all, replied, ‘Because they were unhappy’. Many times the Japanese committed
atrocities which were directly opposed to their own interests. The building of the Burma-Thailand
railway with prisoner-of-war labour is a case in point: it was obviously in the interest of the
Japanese war effort to keep this labour force in a condition of health and vigour, yet the callous
denial of essential drugs to the sick or of adequate food to any of the workers resulted in the labour
force dwindling away through every type of tropical disease being added to malnutrition.
After Capture
The hours following capture are always the most anxious for a prisoner of war. He has no
guarantee that his surrender will be accepted. Even such large-scale capitulations as those of
the forces defending Singapore and Hong Kong had an element of uncertainty, for it was widely
believed that the Japanese ‘took no prisoners’.
In 1904 the Japanese took prisoner large numbers of Russians.
The prisoners taken by the Japanese Navy were generally (but not always) well treated while
in its hands. This was true of the coast-watchers captured in the northern Gilberts and of the crew
of the Hauraki, captured in the Indian Ocean in July 1942. But it was not true of the passengers
(some of them servicemen) and the crew of the Behar, another merchant ship sunk by a squadron
of Japanese cruisers in March 1944 in the Indian Ocean. The shelling of the ship went on while the
boats were being launched. An officer shouting through a megaphone directed the lifeboats to
row to one of the cruisers, and as each survivor climbed up a rope ladder on board he was stripped
of any valuables and of much of his clothing, beaten and kicked, then tied up and left for many
hours in a position of great discomfort. The rest of the voyage, too, was made under terrible
conditions.
The Japanese did not interrogate all their prisoners. When they did they often used violence
at the interview, and before and after it, to enforce their demands for accurate information. An
Air Force officer shot down over Burma in 1944 was subjected to questioning accompanied by
various methods of ‘persuasion’. He had been advised to tell the enemy nothing, but ‘Japs have no
limit to their brutality, so this was bad advice’; he felt that he should have been instructed to tell
some sort of prepared story. (Fleet Air Arm pilots shot down over Japan in 1945 gave, as they had
been advised, long, rambling statements with much inaccurate and misleading detail.) This airman
held out for a fortnight before giving his squadron number (it was due to move in a fortnight),
earning some left-handed admiration from some of his tormentors for his steadfastness.
A few Japanese officers took in good part a complete refusal to give more than name, rank, and
number. But, that the use of violence to induce a prisoner to ‘talk’ was part of a general policy
is shown by the establishment in Japan itself at Ofuna, near Yokohama, of a naval interrogation
centre, known as ‘Torture Farm’. Here the prisoners, appallingly fed even by Japanese standards,
had to engage in exhausting physical exercise, do everything at the double, and suffer mass and
individual beatings at the hands of Japanese of above the average height and physique, to demoralise
them before their interrogation by teams of intelligence experts. However, most prisoners of the
Japanese found it easy to give some answer which would satisfy their questioners without betraying
vital information.
Captivity usually began with a long march on foot carrying all baggage. Prisoners captured in
small groups often had their valuables taken from them; others surrendering in larger units were
better able to retain them. Although they did not realise it at the time, the clothes they carried
with them into captivity were likely to have to last them the three or more years of their imprisonment. Prudence in selecting kit to take into prison camp paid heavy dividends.
The first quarters allotted to newly captured prisoners of war were usually the worst of their
captivity. To some extent this was due to the exigencies of war, and in part to the unpreparedness
of the Japanese to accept the surrender of large numbers of prisoners. It frequently happened that
men were given no food at all during the first two or three days of captivity.
Singapore
The changi peninsula was used by the Japanese as a concentration area for the British
forces captured at the surrender of Singapore. This peninsula of Singapore Island was
eminently suitable for the purpose—if the prevention of escapes is the criterion for the siting of
a prison camp. Barbed wire across the small portion not already cut off by swamps and river
secured the landward side; for the rest there was the sea.
Although a New Zealand doctor witnessed the slaughter of patients and medical staff in a
military hospital soon after the surrender, in general the Japanese behaved with restraint, judging
them by the standard of the sack of Nanking. The prisoners had their own organisation within
the area, and the appearances of the Japanese were comparatively rare. Some Indian guards who
had gone over to the Japanese behaved vindictively; but there were other Indians of unshakeable
loyalty who made great sacrifices for their European fellow-prisoners and others who paid with
their lives for their refusal to collaborate. The quarters were fairly good and the food poor. The
curious mentality of the Japanese was seen in their treatment of hungry men caught pillaging.
A party who had been beaten for stealing sugar at the docks was surprised to see the Japanese send
the sugar to the prisoners’ cookhouse. Some Australians who had succeeded in selling some petrol
illicitly to Singapore Chinese were punished by several days’ exposure to the sun in a confined
space; but they kept the money.
John Coast, Railroad of Death, pp. 29–30.
The guards, when they appeared, demanded an exaggerated respect. The first prisoner to see
them shouted a warning, then all within sight, whatever their rank and whatever the rank of the
Japanese, stood rigidly to attention, saluting or, if without a hat, bowing to the soldier of Nippon
when he approached. Failure to stand properly to attention or the omission of any detail from this
ceremony would bring down on the head of the offender (and literally on the head) a severe
beating. The victim would be lucky if this were given only with the fists. A Japanese once explained
to a prisoner that for a guard to slap his face was ‘like a mother lovingly correcting her child’.
The broken jaws or broken eardrums commonly resulting from these encounters cannot, however,
be attributed to the intensity of the guards’ affection.
The ‘Changi Square’ incident, as it is called, occurred in September 1942, when orders from
Tokyo reached all corners of the Japanese Greater Asia Co-prosperity Sphere that all prisoners of
war, who were regarded as having been incorporated in the Japanese forces, should sign a pledge
not to escape and to obey all orders. This was universally resisted and almost as universally signed
under varying degrees of compulsion. In Changi the ‘persuasion’ to sign took this form: all the
Allied troops, some 17,000-odd, were concentrated in one barrack square (Selerang Barracks),
an area of about ten acres. Under indescribable conditions the men held out for three days, many
of them already suffering from dysentery and other diseases; then the senior officer, on the advice
of the doctors (the Japanese had threatened to cram in the hospital patients as well), ordered the
men to sign and himself recorded that the signatures had been given only under heavy duress.
Towards the end of 1942 the fittest men were drafted away from Changi to work on the
Burma-Thailand railway. Changi, largely depopulated, remained by comparison only one of the
better camps. Later, its prisoners were concentrated in Changi jail, which until then had been the
place of internment of the British civilians in Malaya.
The Netherlands East Indies
When the allied forces in Java capitulated on 8 March 1942, several hundred members
of the Royal Air Force, including some New Zealanders, as well as fugitives from Singapore belonging to all three services (some of whom had evaded the Japanese blockade in all sorts
of crazy small craft), found themselves unable to leave the island. One party of Air Force men
made their way to the south coast and began building a boat to take them to Australia, but after
six weeks the local Javanese police made them surrender to the Japanese. Others also reached the
south coast and found it impossible to escape. Another Air Force party at Tjilatjap, a south-coast
port, made valiant efforts to get away. The Dutch refused to allow them to take over a corvette
which was abandoned by its crew but fully fuelled and provisioned—instead it was sunk to block
the entrance to a harbour which the Japanese never attempted to use—so in an aged launch,
towing two lifeboats, sixty-two men began their journey. After a few miles the launch broke
down and one of the lifeboats was damaged in being beached. About a dozen men put to sea
again in the remaining boat.
This party reached Australia after forty-four days at sea.
The others remained hidden for six and a half weeks. Then the
natives, though sympathetic, unlike most Javanese, urged them to surrender, and as their food
supply was in any case nearly exhausted, they walked some miles to do so. They were received
by the Japanese with the usual face-slapping as a suitable rebuke for causing trouble.
Those men who were unlucky enough to be captured at the western end of Java had an unenviable sojourn in a cinema, together with survivors of HMAS Perth and USS Houston, and their
next lodging in Serang jail was little better. Soon they were concentrated in ‘Bicycle Camp’,
Batavia, a former Dutch barracks. Most Allied prisoners of war in Java passed through this camp,
and many also through the inland Bandoeng camp. In both the prisoners’ own organisation was
good. In Bandoeng, a school,
The subjects taught included architecture, law, accountancy, and ‘about fifteen different languages and dialects,
including Russian in three stages and Arabic, as well as the usual modern foreign languages and the Eastern ones’.
a library, concerts, and plays helped to make life less unendurable.
Later, assemblies of more than three persons were forbidden. Food was poor, but at first it was
possible to buy from outside, and the Dutch, while they had funds, made an allowance to British
prisoners. There were occasionally pleasant surprises: a new Japanese adjutant was annoyed to find
that the prisoners were being cheated of their proper allowance of meat; this was a ‘disgrace to
the Japanese Army’ and he had it put right for a few weeks. Rarely were the Japanese so sensitive
in these matters. Many prisoners were afterwards taken from Java to work on the Burma-Thailand
railway or in Japan itself.
A number of men, a majority from, the Navy, were captured in Sumatra. Some reached there
from Singapore and found it as difficult to go farther as others had found it to leave Java. Some
were survivors from ships sunk in Banka Strait, where both Japanese air and surface units maintained
a blockade. Conditions of imprisonment in Sumatra—the main camp was near Palembang—were
very bad. Food was poor, even when supplemented by judicious thefts from Japanese stores, and
the opportunities for local purchase were limited. A fund was established from a pool of valuables
and spare clothing, and most of whatever could be bought, under black-market conditions, was
reserved for the hospital. Medical facilities were virtually non-existent, though a doctor with a
knowledge of botany made some use of herbal remedies. Of 1200 in the camp it is estimated that
four hundred died. The hospital, with its stench from tropical ulcers and dysentery cases, was bad
enough to impress the Japanese, who burned it just before the surrender. In the Sumatra dry
season even water was scarce.
Subsidiary camps throughout the Netherlands East Indies were among the worst in Japanese-held territories. At a camp in the Ambon Group the Korean interpreter (Koreans often made
themselves more insufferable than the Japanese, until a few weeks before the surrender when they
suddenly became wondrous sweet) shouted into a hospital full of desperately ill prisoners, ‘Why
don’t you hurry up and die?’ This camp was notorious for its ‘blitzes on the sick’. In turning out
for working parties men who could scarcely stand, the Japanese would blandly assure them that
the ‘spirit’ would cure them, and perhaps for that reason supplied no drugs. It is not altogether
surprising that only 25 per cent of a draft of 2000 prisoners taken from Java to Haruku Island
survived life on the island and the terrible two months’ voyage to traverse a distance which in
peacetime took four days.
Near Makassar, on Celebes, were other bad camps where at least fourteen New Zealanders,
including survivors of HMS Exeter, were imprisoned. Again the sick were among the principal
victims. Men whom the doctors sent to hospital had first to parade before the Japanese in charge
of discipline ‘who was liable to send you to work or make you run around the compound until
you collapsed’. In hospital it was a case of ‘either get better or die’. In this camp, in the middle of
1945, there were several mass beatings of scores of prisoners (in one case of 300) for one man’s
offence: the offence for which 300 men were punished was that of bringing into camp food
picked up while out on a working party. In many prisoner-of-war camps the Japanese became
generally more, rather than less, brutal with the gradual realisation of their defeat. One New
Zealander mentioned that trading (among prisoners and to some extent, illicitly, with guards
in articles made by the prisoners) was ‘the spice of existence and kept men from going mad’.
Another naval rating remarked that they were constantly in danger of beatings ‘as we tried to
outwit the Japs on the supreme matter of food’. No private fires were allowed in Makassar, but
the prisoners did their cooking in holes dug under the boards of their beds. One of these men
celebrated peace by going out of the camp and chasing and killing a goat. As in most of the outposts
of the Co-prosperity Sphere the ‘supreme matter of food’ obsessed everybody.
The Burma-Thailand Railway
The major work project carried out by prisoners of war for the Japanese was the
construction of the Burma-Thailand railway. The line, about 260 miles long, was built in
about a year, between October 1943 and October 1944, by approximately 60,000 prisoners of
war and an unnumbered host (probably 100,000) of Asiatic coolies. It is estimated that a quarter
of the Europeans died; the proportion of deaths among the Tamil, Javanese, Malay, and Chinese
labourers, recruited voluntarily with fair promises of pay, was much larger, for if the Japanese
treated their European prisoners badly they treated their fellow-Asiatics atrociously.
The construction was of a much lower standard than European engineers would have tolerated.
Some important bridges had concrete foundations and above that earth filling and precarious
structures of timber. The enemy used very little mechanical equipment, and the formation and
laying of the track cut through heavy jungle was carried out by coolies—white, yellow, or brown.
The method of work was for sticks to be placed horizontally to show the level to which the track
had to be raised; gangs of prisoners under the supervision of a guard then grubbed out earth
beside the track with crude hoe-like implements, filled up sacking stretchers, and emptied them
on the slowly rising mound.
Men were brought up from Malaya by train and from Java by sea to work in Thailand and
Burma. The packed journeys in closed carriages or metal trucks or crammed into the holds of
archaic ships (650 prisoners in a space 48 feet by 75 feet) were the worst part of most men’s experience
in Japanese hands. From the railhead they had to march carrying all baggage, perhaps for five or six
days, to reach their allotted camp. These camps were strung out at 15-mile intervals along the
track. The prisoners’ first task was to erect camp buildings with wood from the jungle: first
guardhouses and living quarters for the Japanese, then huts for working prisoners, cooking shelters,
and the inevitable hospital. The huts had long, thatched roofs and often no walls. Inside, on either
side of a narrow central gangway, were raised bamboo sleeping platforms; each man was allowed
between two and three feet of room laterally.
At first officers were required only to head working parties. This gave them the duty of intervening between the guards and the prisoners during the many misunderstandings that arose from
ignorance of Japanese or the capriciousness of individual guards; nearly always these misunderstandings resulted in the officer being included in the private soldier’s beating. Soon officers as a
body were made to work on the railway. If they did not, they were told, then more of the sick
would have to turn out. The drive to finish the railway against a prearranged timetable was
intense and the guards pushed the prisoners to the last gasp.
In the populated districts nearer the coast in Thailand it was possible to get extra food by
trading with the Thais, who showed themselves generally friendly. In the inland jungle camps
opportunities to get extra rations were more limited. In one camp prisoners were issued with
wooden tabs inscribed in Japanese and were allowed out into the jungle to forage for themselves.
But while the railway was being built the hours of labour—from dawn to dusk with one yasume
(rest) every fortnight—left the men with little superfluous strength. The rations which the Japanese
issued were a shade more ample than in Malaya or Java, though they dwindled after the completion of the line.
In 1944 the only work to be done was maintenance and the fittest prisoners were drafted away
to Japan. Incidentally, it was from 150 survivors of a torpedoed Japanese ship picked up by Allied
vessels early in 1944 that the outside world first heard of the conditions on the railway. With 1000
miles to travel to reach friendly territory, either through jungle or across the sea, no one had
escaped. The others were drafted in increasing numbers from the jungle towards the coast into
what were virtually hospital camps. Here some men had the spirit and the energy to act plays,
hold concerts, and carry on a more developed social life.
The Japanese guards on the railway seem to have been among the most savage and badly
conducted of any, perhaps because of the remoteness from supervision. An ironic story is told of a
Japanese officer in Burma jumping down from a passing train when he saw a guard ‘bashing’ a
prisoner and apologising to the prisoner for the ignorant brutality of ‘this coolie’, whom he then
beat up himself before returning to his train. Such interventions were infrequent; indeed, some of
the worst atrocities in Thailand were committed by Japanese officers, particularly by the engineers.
It was revealed after Japan’s capitulation that the Japanese had planned to massacre their prisoners
at the end of August 1945, a plan known, through Thai sympathisers, to the Allies, who had dropped
specially trained paratroops to forestall it. These paratroops armed and organised Thais to help
in overwhelming the Japanese guards. Similar action had already been taken by the United States
forces at internment camps in the Philippines and by the Australians in Borneo.
The only support for the prisoners’ morale was their sense of solidarity. New Zealanders and
Australians, it was generally agreed, came through the ordeal well. In Thailand, as elsewhere,
the guards were distinguished by suitable nicknames: the Mad Mongol, Donald Duck, Harold
Lloyd, the Black Prince, Blind Boil, Puss-in-Boots, and others which cannot be set down here.
This attitude helped morale but was dangerous: one prisoner records that he received a beating
for ‘silent contempt too plainly shown’.
The railway had been, like nearly all the other work to which the Japanese set prisoners of war,
a military project. Naturally it became a military objective, and prisoners still living in camps
close to the line were killed when Allied bombers began their attacks in late 1944. The Japanese
ran locomotives alongside prison camps when the bombers appeared; anti-aircraft guns were also
sited equally close to the camps.
The experiences of prisoners working on the Thailand railway throw strange sidelights on the
Japanese mentality. The major fact is that the atrocious treatment of the sick (and of the well so
that they rapidly became sick) was against the interests of the Japanese. As one ex-prisoner has
put it, ‘reason met its last frustration in asking why the enemy should want to destroy the labour
force they needed so urgently.’ Late in 1944 the Japanese forbade the prisoners’ canteens to buy
from the Thais any further meat, sugar, or salt, because the Geneva Convention said that these
commodities should be supplied by the detaining power. ‘If you have to buy them, it means we
are not giving you enough. If we stop you from buying them, therefore, it means you are getting
enough.’
Rohan D. Rivett, Behind Bamboo (Angus and Robertson), p. 329.
Logic of Nippon!
THE FALL OF SINGAPORE
SOLDIERS AND CIVILIANS
The Burma-Thailand Railway
WORK IN THE JUNGLE
FREE MEN
Hong Kong
By the standards of Japanese prison camps those at Hong Kong were relatively
humane and well run. In Shumshuipo camp there was a good library, and the prisoners held
classes (until mid-1942, when they were forbidden), produced plays and concerts. Sports gear
and instruments for a band were sent into this camp, the former bought with money sent by
His Holiness the Pope. But malnutrition was common. Food sent in by the Red Cross helped
to keep up a minimum standard of health, and in one camp a garden of 3 ½ acres was cultivated.
A shortage of wood for fuel was a constant annoyance. This was one of the few areas outside Japan
itself where any clothing was issued to prisoners. In the Netherlands East Indies, Malaya, Burma,
and Thailand, men who would otherwise have been completely naked were given loin-cloths
(nicknamed ‘Jap-happies’); few had more than a tattered shirt and a pair of shorts or a loin-cloth
at the capitulation.
Even in these relatively good camps the guards gave frequent exhibitions of brutality, arrogance,
and bad temper, keeping prisoners in a perpetual state of tension. The prisoners suffered, here as
elsewhere, from the universal habit of Japanese officers of backing up any action of a Japanese
private. Each guard could make his own camp rules, and did, so that there was no end to the petty
annoyances and interferences prisoners had to endure.
The Japanese had the habit in many of their camps of distributing English-language newspapers
containing their own versions of the progress of the war. The Hong Kong News gave a fairly
accurate account of events in Europe but a wholly biassed and even childishly fantastic story of the
Pacific war. Like others in Malaya and in Thailand, the Hong Kong prisoners had their own
secret radios and knew the real news. This was a service which a few men rendered to their comrades at very great personal risk. Lieutenant H. C. Dixon, RNZNVR,
Lt H. C. Dixon, MBE, RNZNVR; radio engineer; Wellington; born Wellington, 24 Apr 1908; taken prisoner at Hong
Kong, 25 Dec 1941; released Aug 1945.
a radio engineer in civil
life, in North Point and Shumshuipo camps constructed several receiving sets under great difficulties. Once valves were smuggled in wrapped up in the bandages round a prisoner who had
been operated on, outside the camp, for appendicitis. The set itself was kept hidden under the ovens
in the kitchen and later in a specially built space under a flower-bed, where it was subsequently
discovered by the Japanese.
A secret radio was a highly dangerous possession. The senior officers in Shumshuipo, who had
instigated the building of this set, had been extremely careful in feeding out news bulletins to the
camp. Few were in the secret. But the necessity for drying out the radio after it had been taken
from its damp hiding place under the flower-bed made its existence known to other prisoners,
one of whom must have been indiscreet. One day the Japanese military police cleared the camp
and then went straight to the flower-bed. The radio was not there, but some hours later the
Japanese found it on the stove where it had been placed to dry. Lieutenant Dixon and other officers
were taken away for a ruthless interrogation which lasted a month. Fortunately they had a story
prepared with enough of the truth in it to satisfy the Japanese and reduce the circle of their victims.
Dixon was inevitably among these. Another New Zealander, who escaped to China in July 1944,
reported that he expected that Dixon would have been executed, but, surviving the maltreatment
of the Japanese police, who had been especially alarmed because this set could have been used for
transmitting, he received a sentence of fifteen years’ imprisonment and was released from Canton
jail at the capitulation.
The Islands of Japan
Prisoners of war taken to the Japanese home islands were no better treated, except
in some minor ways, than those who remained in the newly-conquered Co-prosperity
Sphere. The voyage itself was the most terrible ordeal. A prisoner who was moved from Java to
Japan (by Singapore, Saigon, and Formosa) late in 1942 recorded that one man in three died on the
way, the living being too weak to remove the corpses and using them as pillows in the ghastly congestion of a hold only four feet high. All who survived went into hospital in Japan. The risk of being
torpedoed grew as the war proceeded. The Lisbon Maru, torpedoed in October 1942 on a voyage
from Hong Kong to Japan, was carrying about 1800 prisoners. She went down by the stern
and the 200 men in the after hold had no chance of escape; the 1600 in the forward holds got
out into the water where the Japanese machine-gunned them; eventually 930 were picked up.
The camps in Japan were widely distributed and were usually attached to some industry: a
ship-building yard, a steel-works, a coal mine, or the wharves of a large port. Some were on
Hokkaido, the northern island of Japan, where the winter climate is rigorous and the summer
prolific of mosquitoes. Most of the prisoners going to Japan had been given uniforms of a rough,
sacklike material, but it was inadequate to keep out the cold in a region whose inhabitants wore
fur in winter. The prisoners were set to work shovelling coal, working in factories, digging
on the hillsides, or carpentering. Early in 1944 an English-speaking Japanese commandant, a
Colonel Emoto, stopped beatings and increased rations, but next year, with his departure and the
Japanese reverses, there was a new wave of ill-treatment.
A dockside work camp at Yokohama consisted of a large goods shed fitted with wooden
platforms on which several hundred prisoners of all ages and nationalities slept; these quarters
were infested with rats, lice, and fleas. Zentsuji camp, in the southern part of Japan, was one of the
few designed to accommodate prisoners of war, but it was cramped and insanitary, though at
first conditions in it were comparatively good. Some of the prisoners were sent to the Kamishi
steel-works, about 200 miles north of Tokyo. This was twice shelled by the United States Fleet,
and the prisoners, quartered between the sea and the factory building, suffered many casualties.
Others elsewhere had bombs dropped near them in Allied raids. At the capitulation the Japanese
faithfully observed its conditions, putting out 20-foot squares on the roofs of the prison barracks
to guide American aircraft coming in to drop supplies for immediate use. To the delight of the
prisoners, one of these mercy parcels dropped at Kamishi broke the thigh of a Japanese in the
prison office.
The prisoners found Japanese civilians generally friendly and their gentleness and good manners
a sharp contrast to the habits of the prison guards. They were glad to trade if prisoners had anything
to barter in exchange for their own increasingly meagre supplies of food. At considerable risk
some men were able to get out of their camps at night to forage, but it was hopeless to attempt
escape. Propaganda in the English newspapers printed in Japan was known to over-reach itself:
for instance, it was asserted that ‘the New Zealanders were so short of meat they were eating
rabbits’. The food shortage in Japan weighed on the civil population just as heavily as on the
prisoners and gave everyone a fair idea of the trend of the war.
Representatives of the Red Cross and of the protecting neutral power visited many prison and
internment camps in Japan, as well as in China and Malaya. Although these visitors were never
allowed to speak to the prisoners and comedies of plenty were sometimes played for their benefit
(well-stocked canteens were set up for the few hours of their visit and emptied immediately
afterwards), they were able to send supplies into the camps. Rather more Red Cross parcels were
distributed in Japan than elsewhere,
Although a prisoner of war in Japan itself might receive three or four parcels during the whole of his captivity, a
prisoner in Indonesia, Malaya, or China was lucky if he received more than one in three years. The Red Cross
packed and forwarded enough parcels to permit the same distribution as in European prison camps—one to each
prisoner every week.
though the guards pilfered them mercilessly, saying that
everything belonging to prisoners of war was legally the property of the Japanese government.
Aircrew Prisoners
The japanese, so insouciant themselves of international law, were quite ready to attempt
to impose it on their enemies. Allied aircrew who fell into their hands were treated as ‘special’
prisoners or ‘criminals’, because they were supposed to have made war on the civil population of
the areas they had attacked.
Aircraft operating from India in the Burma theatre from 1944 could not always pass unscathed
through the enemy’s flak: his light anti-aircraft fire was particularly efficient. Alighting in paddy
fields to avoid the jungle, pilots rarely crash-landed without the death or injury of some of the
crew, but injuries did not earn them any specially considerate treatment from their captors. It was
usually some days before they reached a regular prison, after going through the usual cycle of
being handed over by Burmese villagers (sometimes friendly, but in terror of the Japanese),
interrogation, and a long journey by punt or ox-waggon which might involve exposure to violence
at the hands of pro-Japanese Indians.
These ‘special’ prisoners were miserably lodged in Rangoon jail, five men in each 9ft by 15ft
cell, sleeping on concrete with a minimum of clothing (the only accessions were the garments of
dead comrades), allowed out once a day with a wash once a week, fed a meagre amount of rice
and water, and maltreated by their guards. The wounded received no attention, although one
prisoner was eventually allowed to undertake the duties of amateur doctor. A prisoner who asked
whether his capture had been notified to Geneva was told: ‘It will not be necessary, you will die.’
However, after some months the Japanese lodged the aircrew ‘criminals’ with the other Allied
prisoners in the adjoining compound. The improvement in sanitation alone, as well as in morale,
did much, in spite of the attacks of the guards, to make the sombre Japanese prophecy untrue:
untrue, that is, for about half their victims. A prisoner in Rangoon remarked that moral attitudes
were important; the man who exercised, even walking up and down the tiny cells, was not
affected by malnutrition to the same extent as others.
Some Fleet Air Arm aircrew were shot down over Japan itself in the last few weeks of the war.
These men, too, were ‘special’ prisoners. They were beaten up, but not with the specialist skill of
prison guards, by the local population, then interrogated and lodged in civil jails. One New
Zealander was led out before a firing squad, but it was a mock execution. In jail, clad only in an
undergarment, these prisoners had to submit to conditions as hard as any in Japan. These men owed
their lives to the capitulation following so closely upon their capture.
Another late prisoner of war was a fighter-pilot shot down over an outlying island of New
Britain in June 1945. He broke his leg in the crash and was brought in to Rabaul tied to a stretcher.
There he was confined in an unlighted cave 15ft long by 3ft wide and 5ft high entered by a barred
door about 2ft high and 1ft 6ins wide. He was brought out of this cell only to undergo interrogation. No violence was used against him, but he received no attention for his injury and set his leg
roughly himself. He kept up his spirits by singing and helped to pass the time by fraternising with a
toad in the cave. After more than two months in darkness the Japanese brought him out and told
him of the capitulation. He then found that there were eight other Allied prisoners of war there,
some in worse condition than himself.
Civilian Internees
The civilian interness were on the whole better treated by the Japanese than the
service prisoners of war. If anything, they received less food, but they also experienced much
less direct brutality. They had better facilities than the prisoners of war for recreation and education
(schools were organised where children were interned), and they were generally made to work
only on duties about their own camps.
The civilians interned in Malaya were gradually concentrated in Changi Peninsula, first in
Changi prison, the civil jail built to accommodate 600 native prisoners but made to receive 3000
or more internees, and later in Sime Road barracks, in both with separate sections for men and
women. In these camps conditions were more rigorous than in most other internment centres,
and after October 1943 approximated closely to those experienced by prisoners of war. The camp
was governed internally by a ‘very complex and democratic organisation’, which succeeded in
checking if not in altogether eliminating rackets, which were, of course, connected with extra
food. Discipline, including bowing to the Japanese, was not so much severe as ‘humiliating’ with
‘too much indiscriminate bashing’. Punishments for men internees included ‘beatings, kneeling
in the sun for long periods, and other subtle methods’. At first, courses of study were organised
on a very full scale; a library of 7000 books was collected, and concerts, plays, and other community activities helped to make the time pass.
On 10 October 1943, known to the Changi internees as the ‘double tenth’, the scene changed
abruptly. The military police descended on Changi, searched the building, and left carrying off
fifty men and three secret radios they had found. The Japanese suspected that the internees were
sending out radio signals and attributed to these a successful Allied attack on a Japanese convoy.
How the internees were to collect the information they were supposed to have sent out was
apparently not given any consideration. Not all of the fifty interrogated returned, and most of
those who did had been badly injured. Everyone endured a cut in rations, and all forms of study
and recreation were abolished except for a weekly concert.
Conditions of internment were severe also at Kuching, in Sarawak; here the food was poor
and a man might receive a beating for smiling through the wire without permission at his wife
and child. In China, both at Shanghai and Hong Kong, conditions were less harsh. In Hong Kong,
apart from the inevitable matter of food, the internees were not badly treated, and the Japanese
even gave up attempts to teach them to bow. ‘Generally speaking, our passive refusal to take the
Japanese seriously proved to be an excellent technique,’ one reported. These internees successfully
combated the usual manufacture of propaganda: ‘flashlights were taken of an open-air concert but
the audience spoilt them by making V signs just before each flash.’ Parcels from friends outside
could be brought into the camps in China once a month. At Bangkok, in Thailand, in a camp
which the Japanese inspected but did not control, the conditions of internment were relatively
mild although the area was intolerably confined.
Many of the internees in China or Japan were missionaries. The Japanese appear to have
treated them with something approaching respect: this does not apply to their attitude to the
chaplains captured with military formations. Many missionaries were not imprisoned until months
after Japan had entered the war. Japanese respect for old age showed itself in their treatment of a
small group of nuns and Protestant missionaries interned together in Japan itself. They were
allowed out to go shopping and for walks under guard; they received kindnesses from their
guards and exchanged language lessons with them. A missionary who ran an orphanage in Hong
Kong was allowed to remain in charge of it without being interned at all. She was given access
to the orphanage funds in a bank seized by the enemy, had a pass to move about, and was not
molested even when soldiers were quartered in part of the building; instead, the Japanese, who are
supposed to cherish children as well as to respect age, sent some of their own food to the orphans.
Except for the increasing food shortage she could hardly have been better treated. A priest in the
Philippines, although not interned until 1944, found that the 2000 internees at Los Banos camp
were being fed starvation rations although the American paratroops who liberated them found
nearby stores stuffed with rice. The guards at this camp shot it out with the liberating troops
while the internees lay flat on the ground in their own quarters; none of them was hurt, but 165
Japanese guards were killed for one casualty among the attackers. This is one of the few instances
of direct vengeance descending on Japanese guards.
A New Zealander interned with the Dutch in Java found compensation for his loss of liberty
in the books available and in the excellent concerts organised. Discipline was intermittently severe,
hundreds of men being lined up on occasion and made to beat each other, a form of collective
punishment more usually reserved for prisoners of war. Collective punishments of a less brutal
character were frequently inflicted on internees, in a few instances for escapes. In spite of the acute
shortage of food the Japanese frowned on personal efforts to supplement rations, and nearly
everywhere they made trading ‘over the wall’ an offence. But even comparatively harsh punishments might fail in their effect. At Wei-hsien in China in 1943, ‘one man was caught getting eggs
in over the wall and he was imprisoned in a cowshed for a fortnight. He was a Trappist monk and
he rather enjoyed his solitary confinement.’
Food and Health
The life of a prisoner of war, whether in the Far East, Italy, or Germany, centred
around food. Universally throughout the Japanese prisoner-of-war or internment camps
food progressively deteriorated both in quantity and quality as the war went on. Some of the blame
for this may be laid at the door of the war situation: Japanese supplies (Japan itself consumes more
rice than it grows) were disrupted by the successful attacks of Allied submarines and bombers
on Japanese shipping. In a small internment camp in Japan an elderly nun, otherwise well treated,
remarked that the internees, though short of food, were better fed than the mass of the Japanese
people. On the other hand, in almost every camp plenty of food could be produced during the
few weeks following the capitulation when the Japanese were desperately trying to redeem
themselves, and at this time, too, Red Cross parcels, some of which had been so long in store
that their contents had gone mouldy, were issued. Few Japanese prisoners of war had more than
two parcels issued to them during more than three years, and then often they received only a
fractional share of a parcel. Many camps, however, benefited by Red Cross purchases in bulk.
The guards extensively plundered Red Cross supplies, both of food and medicines.
The staple diet was rice and vegetables. The rice would be served with traces of sugar, with
pickles or vegetables (often only sweet-potato tops or some pale variety of melon), and occasionally
with shreds of meat or of fish. Vegetable soup was also commonly served. In some areas, including
Japan, the rice might have barley or other grain mixed with it.
In Japan itself the proportion of rice to its substitutes (millet, barley, maize, and soya bean) in the prisoners’ diet
was often very low.
Quantities were almost invariably
short, the shortages roughly corresponding to the laziness or black-market opportunities of the
Japanese quartermasters. Even when the quantity was nearly enough to give men the illusion of
fullness, the deficiency in vitamins began to make itself felt after six months. Although many
men caught such tropical diseases as malaria, dengue, or dysentery, the chief disease, immeasurably
increasing the deadliness of all the others, was slow starvation. It was malnutrition which killed
most of the victims of the Japanese, and to a large extent it was calculated malnutrition. The food
bought by the prisoners with their own funds, or gifts to them, were taken into account by the
Japanese. It was apparently their policy to keep their captives below normal—something below
their own low standard, that is—so that they would be less likely to give trouble, and, moreover,
might disembarrass their captors of their presence altogether.
Men fully realised the nature of this life-and-death struggle. They lost no chance of supplementing their diet, and soon learned to steal from the enemy whenever opportunity offered. It paid
to eat pilfered food on the spot. While their comrades kept watch, men were known to cram
themselves hastily with as much as they could swallow of even raw rice and dried fish. Valuables,
such as watches and fountain-pens, were sold to the Japanese, to the civil population, or to other
prisoners who had money. Some, in their desperate need, signed cheques at fantastic rates of
exchange to get money from fellow-internees or prisoners of war: it would be interesting to
know whether those who exacted these cheques have held their fellow-victims to their bargain.
They might well take as their example the Thai merchant who allowed prisoners of war after
the capitulation to redeem the possessions they had sold to him for exactly what he had paid for
them. A man who sold his fellow-prisoners food stolen from the Japanese was regarded as a
‘benevolent racketeer’; most rackets were anything but benevolent.
Prisoners of war were paid, supposedly, at the same rates as corresponding ranks in the Japanese
forces. Officers received what would have been substantial amounts but for the Japanese habit
of ‘banking’ a part on their behalf and deducting a sum to cover the cost of their ‘keep’. After
contributing half or more of the balance to funds for the sick and for other ranks, an officer did
not command more than the equivalent of £1 a month. Other ranks who worked were paid on a
scale that gave them about 15s a month. At first in nearly all camps there were canteen supplies—
usually local fruit and vegetables—and the Japanese took a percentage of the canteen profits.
In the last year inflation in all the countries controlled by Japan made money of very little value.
In Hong Kong, in 1943 and 1944, the daily ration was 500 grammes of rice and beans, but in
1945 it had dropped to 350 grammes. Rations everywhere declined in about the same ratio as at
Hong Kong. Dogs, rats, lizards, and snakes were all eaten. In 1945, in the Sime Road civil internment camp at Singapore, a snail farm was instituted. Prisoners of war and internees realised the
protective value of certain foods. At Hong Kong soya beans, eggs, and synthetic vitamin B1 were
bought in small quantities, the usual preference to the sick being given in the distribution. There,
too, men ate green swamp weed or garlic, when they could get it, not for nourishment but to
check skin diseases.
It is true that some had needs even sharper than food. Some men at times bartered their rations
for cigarettes, a form of trading aptly described as ‘polite cannibalism’.
The doctors did magnificent work among the prisoners and internees. Rarely were they given
any substantial assistance by the enemy: on the other hand, there were numerous cases of deliberate
obstruction. Some of the doctors performed amputations and other operations with razor blades,
with meat saws, with a piece of sharpened hoop-iron. In Burma the ingenuity of a Dutch chemist
supplied a local anaesthetic concocted from jungle plants. In many camps a little copper sulphate,
used in the treatment of tropical ulcers, was the sole medicament supplied, even though other
drugs had been provided by the Red Cross. One of the most bitter revelations of the capitulation
was the large stock of drugs held in store by the Japanese which would have saved the lives of many
prisoners. The only occasions when the Japanese showed any solicitude for the health of their
prisoners was when epidemics were threatening. Once a man was sick, his chances of survival
were further reduced because of the smaller rations given to those who did not work. Also, it was
difficult to get men who were ill to touch rice.
The civilians interned in Singapore had a diet of about 2000 calories a day to begin with, since
during the first two years about 25 per cent more food was available in addition to the Japanese
rations. But there were fluctuations and more than one period of crisis. In 1945 the diet had sunk
by May to 1500 calories, and it was impossible to work the same hours daily. The death rate was
low for the conditions: 18 in 100 during the whole time of internment. This was attributed to the
fact that so many of the men working in Malaya had passed stiff medical tests before taking up
their appointments. Moreover, in a camp community health measures could be enforced. The
shortage of medicines (the Japanese did supply a proportion of the drugs asked for) was offset
by the knowledge and skill of the 100 doctors in the camp, many of them specialists. And the
circumstances of their internment eliminated two causes of illness—over-eating and over-drinking.
The effects of malnutrition were widespread. Men with legs swollen from the effects of beriberi
or with hideous tropical ulcers, which often resulted in amputation or death, were common sights
in all camps. And ‘once a man was a victim of beriberi work held no pleasure …. to drag one
foot after another was an effort’. It was a common thing for prisoners and internees to sink in
weight from 12 stone to 8 stone, or less. In internment camps only a few of the children, for whom
the grown-ups made great sacrifices, were not noticeably affected.
Many prisoners noticed two common effects of malnutrition—dimmed eyesight and unreliable
memory. Long after release many still feel physical effects, particularly a tendency to tire easily.
Others have confessed to nervous symptoms resulting from their captivity—hatred of crowds,
exaggerated shyness, extreme sensibility (to the point of weeping at the cinema).
Release
In most of the Japanese-controlled areas there was a time-lag between the capitulation and
the rescue of prisoners in their hands. In many areas prisoners knew from their secret radios
or from the admissions of their guards exactly when the war had ended; a week or more might
pass before the Japanese could bring themselves to make a formal announcement. In many camps
this interval was used to flood the camp with food, medicines, and hoarded Red Cross parcels,
and in most the Japanese intention of fattening up prisoners and internees before they were released
was childishly obvious. It was impossible to remedy years of malnutrition in a fortnight, especially
as starved men and women could not immediately adjust their digestions to a fuller diet.
In Japan itself Allied aircraft soon identified the camps and began dropping food, cigarettes,
medicines, and clothing, as well as radios by which the prisoners could themselves make known
their condition and their wants. Early in September men were being taken on board United States
hospital ships, where they were ‘processed’
‘Processing’ was the comprehensive term for attending to the immediate needs of liberated prisoners of war: it
included disinfestation, medical and dental’ examinations, giving particulars of all the circumstances of captivity, the
issue of new clothing and kit, and of free cable forms to communicate with relatives.
before being flown out to Manila. New Zealanders
mostly went by sea from here to Australia on their way home.
The RAPWI (Repatriation of Allied Prisoners of War and Internees) organisation, functioning
under Lord Mountbatten’s command, was in action soon after Japan’s capitulation, though the
delay in arranging the surrender of the Singapore area entailed a wait that was peculiarly trying to
most prisoners. First, leaflets were dropped from the air addressed to the Japanese. Then some
helpers ‘dropped in’ by parachute. Once the initial contact had been made, supplies, medicines,
and medical staff were brought in and the camps entirely taken over. Men were evacuated as
rapidly as was humanly possible: by air, mostly, if they were fit enough. The prisoners and internees
in China were liberated by the British Fleet, and many did the first lap of their homeward journey
in carriers emptied of their aircraft for the purpose. The Rangoon prisoners had been freed earlier
in 1945 when the Japanese had retreated from the town. The Sarawak and Celebes prisoners and
internees were liberated by Australian troops.
The work of the RAPWI organisation won praise. New Zealanders in Malaya and Java had a
further advantage in the speed given to their homeward journey by the RNZAF Prisoner of
War Evacuation Flight which arrived in Singapore on 12 September. This small unit ferried
released prisoners from Singapore to Auckland.
The capitulation took most prisoners and internees by surprise. They had known that the war
had been going badly for Japan, but they had feared that the Japanese would fight on as they had
so often declared they would. Some believed that the Japanese would kill their prisoners at the
end. So many heartening rumours had proved groundless in the past that liberation was a mental
jolt to most prisoners. The emotion was almost unbearable. The transition from misery to happiness
had been too abrupt.
The Gain and the Loss
It is difficult to write with moderation of the Japanese treatment of their prisoners.
Comprehensive schedules have been drawn up of the many ways in which particular articles
of the Geneva Convention were deliberately and cynically violated. The crimes are being dealt
with by the proper authorities, and justice will be done where the perpetrators can be identified—
no easy matter. No mention has yet been made of the cruelty inflicted on the relatives of prisoners
of war and internees by the failure of the Japanese to notify the Red Cross of the capture or
internment of thousands of persons, or by such actions as the burning of prisoners’ mail. Some
next-of-kin had their first notification that their sons or husbands were in Japanese hands when
they received from them, possibly two years after capture, one of the rare cards that the enemy
allowed to be sent. Most men sent three or four cards a year, less than half of which reached the
addressees. Another device of the Japanese for plaguing their prisoners was to refrain from
delivering letters until many months after their arrival. Most letters were never delivered: this is
hardly surprising as the Japanese kept no records of the prisoners and internees in their hands.
It may be thought that the continued castigation of the Japanese in this survey, which relates
primarily the experience of New Zealanders, is based on prejudice and exaggeration. On the
contrary, the worst atrocities have been left unrelated, and it must be understood that types of
maltreatment instanced as having happened in a particular camp or area were practically always
common to all camps. However clearly we may diagnose the maladies that have twisted the
Japanese spirit, it is no longer possible by explaining to excuse them. No doubt in some ways the
Japanese might have been worse. They generally allowed prisoners the restricted exercise of their
religion. They did not specially persecute women, though the circumstances of internment
inevitably bore more heavily on them than on men. Some Japanese, the most brutal among them,
could reveal strange flashes of kindness and generosity.
Former prisoners of war and internees show surprisingly little vindictiveness towards the
Japanese. Their feeling is rather one of contempt, and few condescend to outright hatred; some
reserve that feeling for fellow-prisoners who acted selfishly or who took advantage of the general
misery to gain some personal advantage. An ex-prisoner, however, looking back, noticed signs
of hysteria and felt that trivial incidents had sometimes been allowed to take on an exaggerated
importance in the unnatural and harsh conditions of imprisonment. One man has lost his ‘comfortable belief in the general decency of the human race’: he remarks that many who find it
easy to be brave on a full stomach become different persons with an empty one. Yet another
ex-prisoner noted that ‘men from whom one would expect nothing did things of kindness and
bravery which astonished one’. Men showed a stern, unyielding pride in taking without flinching
the beatings inflicted on them.
It was the solidarity and comradeship, more intense even than while serving in the forces
before capture, which sustained most men in captivity. One ex-prisoner robustly stated that he
would not have missed the experience for anything. Another gained ‘an education that many
books or any university in the world could not have taught me’. Another felt that nothing in the
future could be worse than his time in Japanese hands. A naval surgeon said roundly that ‘my three
and a half years with men of high morale under grim conditions have made me quite unable to
endure any form of grousing and complaints’. This is a constant theme with former prisoners and
internees: they are impatient with the pettiness, self-seeking, and querulousness of people at home,
and some explicitly regret the unselfishness and common sacrifice of prison life, a sharp contrast
to the ‘dog eat dog’ spirit of ordinary society. Many men entirely revised their attitude to life and
learned in bitter earnest the true meaning of the theme of the prisoner-chaplain’s sermon, ‘The
Wisdom of Adversity’. It is unlikely that much of the heroism of these men and women will
ever be recorded in detail, much less rewarded officially. But its reaffirmation of the strength of
the moral fibre of ordinary people deserves to be paid the highest honour.
Acknowledgments
The sourcesconsulted in the preparation of this account include books written
by former prisoners of war, as well as eye-witness accounts and interviews recorded
by the author of the official prisoner-of-war volume (Wynne Mason).
The sketches and paintings are by the artists as credited in relevant captions.
The photographs come from many collections, which are stated when they are
known:
Cover, (top) S. Polkinghorn, (bottom) D. Cook Wilkie
page 5, S. Polkinghorn
page 14 (top left) G. G. Chennells
page 14 (top right) and page 15 (top) A. H. Harding
page 14 (bottom), page 16 (centre), page 17Australian War Memorial
page 19 (bottom) S. C. Parker
page 20 (top) RNZAF Official, Dorothy Cranstone
page 20 (bottom) US Navy Official
page 30 Father G. Bourke
THE AUTHOR: D. O. W. Hall, graduated at Cambridge with honours in
English Literature and in History in 1929. He was Associate Editor of Centennial
Publications. He served with the Royal New Zealand Naval Volunteer Reserve
in the Pacific in the Second World War, and is now stationed in Dunedin as
Director of Adult Education, University of Otago.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
cover photograph The Second Echelon leaves Lyttelton in the Andes, May 1940
TROOPSHIPSS. P. LLEWELLYNWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
The First Voyage
ALL WAS READY in the liners. In the cabins the fluffy, woollen blankets were folded on
the beds as for peacetime passengers, the hand-basins were spotless, the floors polished. The
ships’ military staffs—Officer Commanding Troops, his adjutant, quartermaster, messing officer,
senior medical officer, sergeant-major—were aboard and at work, and the gangways waited now
for the stamp of boots: brown boots and black boots, boots polished that morning in Trentham
and still bright, boots dusty and dulled after the long train journey from the northern camps,
Papakura and Ngaruawahia.
As the troops came aboard they were directed to cabins—first class for officers, second for
senior non-commissioned officer, third for the rest. As yet, there had been no time to convert
liners into transports, and only a small proportion of the First Echelon was given improvised
quarters in the ships’ holds. Many of the third class cabins contained six berths, but some only
two, and groups and pairs of friends hurried down the companionways and shouted along the
corridors in an effort to keep together during these few moments that would determine their
cabin mates throughout the voyage.
After stowing their gear and, in some cases, waiting to change into deck shoes and grey jerseys,
the soldiers went above to wave and shout to the crowd gathered on the Wellington waterfront
to watch them sail—an event the authorities had naturally tried to keep secret. Meanwhile, with a
steady roll of boots on gangways, unit after unit came aboard, the ships moving into the stream
to anchor as soon as they were full. Until nighfall the crowd watched and waited, tooting motor
horns and waving to the four liners: Orion, Strathaird, Empress of Canada, and Rangitata.
The ships sailed the next day, 6 January 1940, the Polish liner Sobieski and the troopship Dunera,
which had embarked the South Island contingent at Lyttelton, joining them in Cook Strait. Then
the whole convoy, guarded by the battleship HMS Ramillies and the cruisers HMS Leander and
HMAS Canberra, headed west. At six in the evening land faded from view, and soon afterwards the
light went, leaving the sea dark and drained of colour. The submarine lookouts, who for two
hours had been straining their eyes for periscopes and torpedo tracks, came off duty, and the
convoy closed on the Orion, the commodore’s ship. Behind, in the darkness, six trails of rubbish—
broken butter-boxes, bad oranges, empty tins—bobbed and eddied.
No chink of light showed from any of the ships. Only the streams of air from the ventilators,
hot and tremulous and carrying a stench of cooking, moist bodies, and rubber shoes, told of the
quick, crowded life hidden behind deadlights and thick blackout curtains—1428 men in Orion,
1357 in Dunera, 1352 in Strathaird, 1147 in Sobieski, 811 in Empress of Canada, 444 in Rangitata:
men playing cards in mess rooms; men lying in their bunks reading or writing home (‘Bill and me
are in one cabin, just ourselves—we’ve got an electric stove and fan, also carpet and wardrobe!’);
men drinking in crowded beer bars at small tables completely covered by glasses (Australian and
English beer fourpence a pint, New Zealand beer tenpence a quart bottle); men in long queues
waiting for a supper issue of cocoa, ship’s biscuit, and cheese; keen sergeants in quiet corners
reading training manuals; four men in a cabin opening a tin of peaches bought that afternoon from
the canteen after an hour’s wait in a queue; men playing housie-housie (tombola) in recreation
rooms (‘Number three—the sergeant! Two-one, the key of the door! And another little shake!’);
men, furtively and with scouts posted, playing Crown and Anchor, while veterans of an earlier
war, with the years slipping off them and leaving them boys again in Base camps at Zeitoun and
Mena, intone their magic: ‘Where you like and where you fancy—the club, the heart, the sergeant-major, and the old hook’. In lounges, designed and furnished by famous interior decorators,
officers sit over their drinks and discuss the future: ‘The Division can be equipped more easily
in England, but the tactical situation—Italy not showing her hand—points to Egypt’. Squatting in
corridors, smoking and sipping cocoa, the troops talk: ‘I’ve got an aunt in England—Dad was in
Cairo last war’. A sentry posted near a galley straightens his lifebelt at the approach of the duty
officer and prepares to answer questions: ‘What,’ says the officer, ‘would you do if you smelt
smoke?’
Far behind in the darkness, the butter-boxes and oranges, spread now over many miles,
float home.
At the Fleet Club
IN THE EARLY DAYS of the war New Zealand soldiers in Egypt had no club of their own,
and if they chose to spend their leave in Alexandria rather than in Cairo one of the reasons was the
Fleet Club for men of the Merchant and Royal Navies. There, over a bottle of Stella, the ‘tiffy’
from the Ramillies and the sergeant from the 5th Field Park Company could renew a friendship
started first in Fremantle in January 1940 and continued a fortnight later in Colombo. All the old
memories came back: that day in the Australian Bight when smoke rolled from the Ramillies
and the convoy scattered in star formation, while, away on the horizon behind mist and smoke,
the guns of the Leander and Canberra blinked brightly, the reports, something between a cough
and a thud, sounding long seconds later. (It was a practice attack, but the troops lining the rails
had watched and wondered.) And that day when the shadows lengthened on the Orion’s boat-deck
and the angry soldiers, boots polished and uniforms pressed, waited for pay, though leave to
Fremantle and Perth had started an hour ago. But when they did get ashore—well, the ‘tiffy’
would remember: he was there, too. And that day when the Kiwi fell overboard—a welcome
change from lost medicine balls—and the consequent warning that in future no one need expect
to be rescued: the safety of the convoy came first. The day (it was 23 January) when the troops
were told officially that Egypt was their destination. Then, in the Indian Ocean, manning ship to
salute the aircraft-carrier HMS Eagle as she steamed down the lines of transports; and the next
day seeing one of her aircraft crash and sink. The oily calm of the Red Sea; the coast of Italian-owned Eritrea slipping past on the port side; the anchor rattling down off Port Tewfik; Anthony
Eden and the British Ambassador to Egypt, Sir Miles Lampson, speaking from a hatch-top covered
by the Red Ensign; a message from the King: ‘I know well that the splendid tradition established
by the armed forces of New Zealand will be worthily upheld….’
White-coated Achmed brings more beer, and at another table a greaser from the Orcades
talks with members of the Third Echelon of ships they know: Mauretania, Empress of Japan,
Orcades, Ormonde, Orion, HMAS Perth, HMNZS Achilles, HMAS Canberra—ships they have seen
ducking and tumbling in the Tasman in a grey flurry (Troops must remove artificial teeth before being
seasick: Routine Order No. 91), or watched all day sliding past them through seas flecked with
flying-fish, or gazed at wonderingly from wharves in Fremantle or from the ferry Rohna in
Bombay Harbour.
With memories of the Duchess of Bedford still fresh in their minds—in fifty-seven days she took
them from Newport, England, to the patrolled lanes near North America, where the cold was
bitter, to Freetown (Sierra Leone), to Capetown, and at last to Tewfik—members of the Second
Echelon describe their two Odysseys. With them the talk is of the Athlone Castle, which was in
the same convoy as the Duchess of Bedford and also carried New Zealanders, and of the Aquitania,
Empress of Britain, Empress of Japan, and Andes, and the escorts Canberra, Australia, Shropshire, and
Hood—ships that helped to carry or escort the Second Echelon from New Zealand to England,
taking it by way of Fremantle, Capetown (to which the convoy had been diverted in the Indian
Ocean because of Italy’s attitude to the Allies), Freetown, the Atlantic, St George’s Channel
(where wreckage floated and the soldiers saw a tanker hull down and burning), and at last safely
to the grey Clyde: a journey of 17,000 miles in forty-six days.
Small wonder that the rest of the Division called the Second Echelon the ‘Glamour Boys’ or
the ‘Cook’s Tourists’, and listened not always courteously to their tales of the Battle of Britain,
alarms at sea, and the antics of the Duchess of Bedford, the ‘Drunken Duchess’, the world’s champion
roller….
‘Last house,’ announces a black-bearded petty officer known by sight to nearly everyone in the
club. ‘May I remind you, gentlemen, that the snowball is now worth over fourteen pounds?’
Food and Accommodation
USUALLY YOU HAD the choice: you could sleep on deck or you could sleep below.
Sleeping on deck meant that you were woken at dawn by Lascars (‘Wash-ee deck-ee,
George!’) or by British seamen (‘Mind your eye, chum!’), the perfunctory warning preceding
only by seconds the stream of cold salt water. Sleeping below meant that you woke six mornings
out of seven suffering from a slight hangover caused by the soupy atmosphere of the troop-decks,
which smelt always of soft soap, warm oil, stale tabacco, greasy dixies, and unwashed socks.
Troops of the First Echelon were for the most part accommodated in cabins, but later drafts,
travelling in the same ships after they had been modified, slung hammocks above the linoleum-covered mess tables and unrolled mattresses on or under them. Rising early to avoid queueing for a
hand-basin or a shower (and in most ships, though reveille was at six o’clock, any time before
seven o’clock breakfast was considered early), you bumped against laden hammocks or stepped
heavily on out-flung arms.
Mess orderlies were of course expected to be among the early risers. In some ships they were
appointed for the whole voyage, but in others only for a day or a week, how often their turn
for duty came round depending on the number of men at their respective tables: usually it was
somewhere between twelve and twenty-four. Grabbing dixies for tea and porridge (fruit in the
tropics), and shallow trays for bread, butter, jam, and the meat course, they hurried to join the
queue rapidly forming outside the galley. Here they showed their table cards to the chief steward,
an officer whose naturally suspicious mind was likely to have been soured by many hundreds of
attempts to change ‘13s’ into ‘18s’ and so draw extra rations.
The food varied in quality and quantity from ship to ship, though the New Zealand Government was always at pains to make sure that the shipping companies gave the goods and services
for which they were paid. On the whole, our soldiers ate well at sea. That is to say, the food tasted
very nice during the first week of the voyage, was tolerated during the second and third, and from
then until the ship anchored at Tewfik was the subject three times a day of bitter and sometimes
brilliant invective. This was due less to any real falling off in the quality of the meals than to a
daintiness of appetite caused by tropical weather, the debilitating effect of shipboard life, and the
certainty that if you had prunes and rice on the first Monday of the voyage you would have them
every Monday till the last.
This is what the men in the Sobieski ate on 27 January 1940. Breakfast: oatmeal porridge, beef
goulash, boiled potatoes, bread, butter, marmalade, tea, and milk. Dinner: tomato soup with rice,
butter, cheese, rock cakes, jam, pickles, and lime juice. Supper: grilled steak with onions, mashed
potatoes, spring cabbage, peach compote, bread, tea, and milk. Nothing to complain of there.
And this is what a lance-corporal wrote in his diary about the messing conditions in the Duchess
of Bedford during her voyage from England to Egypt: ‘We have two dining-rooms and there are
three sittings to each meal. I’m in the last sitting, by which time the tables are sticky with spilt
tea, jam, butter, gravy, bread-crumbs and fish bones, according to what the meal has been. Our
own men do the waiting—one man to a table of eighteen, and he’ll bring eighteen plates on one
tray, so that the bottoms of the plates are always mucky from resting on the food beneath. Sometimes with sloppy food such as porridge or custard, the top plates have nearly emptied themselves
into the bottom layers, which, overfilled, drip as they’re handed down…. Quite often we’ll get
the pudding before the meat and often we’ll get the meat put out for the previous sitting when not
enough men have turned up at their right times.’
When there was trouble in the ships—on the whole there was very little—it was caused nearly
always either by bad food or by bad accommodation. The trouble in the Ormonde, to which Third
Echelon troops were trans-shipped from the Mauretania in Bombay, was the result of both. While
embarking, the men saw native stevedores dragging fly-covered carcasses—provisions for the
voyage—through dust and filth. This, and the fact that the ship was very crowded and rather
dirty, led the next day to an outbreak of disorder in which troops took possession of the bridge
and the wheelhouse and refused to let the captain put to sea. Happily, the men’s mood was neither
ugly nor even unduly truculent, so the officers were able to handle the situation without assistance
from the shore, and the next day the ship joined the rest of the convoy, which had been sailing
at reduced speed.
Far less serious was an incident that occurred at Freetown in the Rangitiki, which, with the
City of London and Elizabethville, took part of the Second Echelon from England to Egypt in
December 1940. An order prohibiting troops from sleeping on deck because of malarial mosquitoes
was disobeyed by about ninety men, some of whom treated British and New Zealand senior officers
with a certain amount of disrespect—the euphemism becomes apparent when one remembers
that the decks were unlit and the night dark. They were persuaded to go below at last by their
own officers, and the incident is worth mentioning only because of the unique defence of the
New Zealand non-commissioned officers who were court-martialled as a result of it. ‘They
maintained,’ runs an official report, ‘that when the men had a genuine complaint the NCOs
should be with them if they wanted the men to follow them into battle later on. A somewhat
New Zealand outlook.’
Against these breaches of discipline it is agreeable to remember a tribute paid to New Zealanders
by the master of the Netherlands liner Nieuw Amsterdam, which brought the first furlough draft
back to New Zealand from the Middle East in 1943. ‘We felt uneasy,’ he wrote; ‘you were so
many. You invaded every corner and did not ask questions; you did not complain and did not
want service. Your whole attitude taught us a proud and useful lesson….this was war and no
business…. when you left us we felt much more confident. Trooping, after all, was not so bad
as it looked, the passengers did not smash the ship to pieces, nothing was ruined. We became
friends. Only twice we have had the privilege to work with you in this war. We can assure you
that every time something unpleasant, or minor difficulties, have occurred on board with other
passengers, we remarked truthfully: “The Kiwis would not have done that!”’
Recreation, Training, Fatigues, Health
THE NORMAL KIWI was neither saint nor sailor (remember the routine order relative to
false teeth!) but his gift for ‘jacking himself up’, for making his own amusements, for lying
in the sun and doing nothing, stood him in good stead during long, dull voyages. Much was done
for his entertainment—games, books, and sports gear were bought from the National Patriotic
Fund; there were shipboard magazines (which may speak for themselves); concerts were held in
nearly all ships; often the crossing-the-line ceremony was observed, and on most voyages it was
possible to see a film at least once a week—but what he remembers best, perhaps, are long hours
beneath his favourite lifeboat, his clothes in a heap beside him, the ‘makings’ handy, and his
‘Mae West’, in defiance of routine orders, pillowing his head. And long hours, star-lit instead of
sun-lit, when he leant on the rails, a glass at his elbow (in the Strathaird more than 1400 glasses
were lost or broken before one voyage was half over), and discussed the mysteries of whales,
sharks, porpoises, flying-fish, and the Marie Celeste, or argued tirelessly and dispassionately that
Orion was Venus and Dunera the Sobieski.
Training, of course, accounted for many hours. In the case of the First Echelon, lack of equipment prevented a full training programme, but the decks of the Orion were seldom completely
clear between a quarter past nine and a quarter past eleven in the morning of men balancing on
their shoulder blades and ‘bicycling’ or performing some other feat to which lack of space was no
bar. Marching files, wearing boots to harden their feet, stamped round the promenade deck to the
alternately swelling and diminishing strains of ‘Colonel Bogey’ played by a stationary ship’s band.
Parties from other units, who had been dodging round Lewis gun tripods (‘Aircraft right! Aircraft
left! OK, chaps, pack up!’), would grab their impedimenta and press back into doorways just in
time to avoid being marched down. In lounges and smoking-rooms, where the depth and softness
of the chairs was often responsible for that sharpest of questions, ‘And what did I say last, soldier?’,
officers gave lectures on infantry tactics, ammunition, army law, vehicle maintenance, and hygiene.
Defence duties took up some time—in most ships the troops manned four submarine lookout
posts during daylight in two-hour watches and at least two machine guns to combat low-flying
aircraft—but fatigues took up more. In the Dunera, the first echelon of the New Zealand Divisional
Signals (287 all ranks) supplied 102 permanent fatigues for the voyage: thirty mess orderlies,
thirteen men for a galley party, ten for signal duties, and the rest for deck-scrubbing and duties in
the bakehouse, butcher’s shop, canteen, storeroom, and armoury. During its duty week, which
came round once a month, the unit was called on to supply sixty sentries, twenty-eight deck
scrubbers, four fatigues for the hammock-room, and two for the sergeants’ sitting-room—196
fatigues in all.
Of all these duties the most monotonous, perhaps, was sentry-go in the bowels of the ship.
After reading the fire instructions, you had a choice between risking punishment by smoking
or reading furtively and falling into a heavy stupor induced by listening to the ship as she chattered,
sighed, throbbed, slurred, purred endlessly through the night. Aeons elapsed before it was time to
return to the guardroom—usually, for some reason, the ship’s nursery—and sleep for four hours in
your clothes with your head under a rocking-horse and Donald Duck looking quizzically down
on you.
Thus the New Zealander at sea under supervision. His free time—no exact calculations are
possible—was spent as follows: 15 per cent playing games of chance, 15 per cent doing his washing
and watching it dry on deck, 12 per cent listening to and spreading rumours, 12 per cent grumbling
about the food, 46 per cent lying on deck in the sun.
While engaged in the last pastime he was not always culpable of sloth. Often he was suffering
from headache, a sore and swollen left arm, and a feeling of extreme lassitude. The space in his
paybook reserved for Protective Inoculations bore the record of his indignities: TAB
Triple vaccine against typhoid and the two para-typhoid ‘A’ and ‘B’ infections
in the
Tasman, vaccination in the Australian Bight, Tet. Prop.
Tetanus prophylactic
in the Indian Ocean. No sooner had
he recovered from one than he was standing again with bared arm under the sardonic grins of
orderlies with swabs of iodine and of doctors with blunt needles.
The doctor is an important man in a troopship. In the ships that took the First Echelon to
Egypt seven emergency operations were performed, one of which was the removal of a mastoid
with an electric drill borrowed from the ship’s engineers and two carpenter’s chisels. Small wonder
that reports from medical officers with the First Echelon stressed the need for more surgical
instruments, drugs, sterilisers, and nursing equipment.
In most ships, however, the sick parades produced only colds, upset stomachs, boils, and
tonsillitis, though an epidemic of influenza occurred in ships taking the Second Echelon from
Britain to the Middle East and in a ship carrying the 5th Reinforcements to Egypt. It was then
that the nurses proved their value.
The doctor’s last word was said usually a day or two before the end of the voyage. In a little
masterpiece of the macabre he would point out that the flesh-pots of Egypt could be enjoyed only
at a price. Death lurked in sweets and ices, disease in raw fruit, disaster in Sharia Wagh el Birket.
THE FIRST VOYAGE
FOOD AND ACCOMMODATION
TROOPSHIP AND ESCORT
DUTIES & AMUSEMENTS
SHORE LEAVE
THE PACIFIC
HOMEWARD BOUND
War and Rumours of War
CONSTANT BOAT-DRILL, alarms (practice and real), and a trick of German radio
announcers of speaking as though they were in constant consultation with the British
Minister for Shipping protected the soldier at sea from feelings of false security. We-See-All-And-We-Know-All was what the Germans tried to convey, but they spoilt their effects somewhat
by sinking ships about whose safety one could reassure oneself merely by going on deck and
looking around.
From the moment the ships carrying the Second Echelon to England left Fremantle the German
radio took an enormous interest in them, sinking the Queen Mary, which had joined the convoy
from Sydney, more than once. (Actually there is very good reason to believe that a torpedo did
pass between her and the Aquitania off the Irish coast.) Again, New Zealanders in the Felix Roussel,
which took to Egypt in October 1940 about 600 members of the Third Echelon who had been
left in Bombay to await transport, heard over the German radio that their ship had been sunk.
She very well might have been too, for the convoy had been bombed several times in the Red Sea,
attacked by a surface raider, and that very morning straddled by bombs while replenishing in
Port Sudan.
The experience of having their ship hit directly by a bomb, and of putting back to port in
England, was reserved for some 200 Second Echelon reinforcements in October 1940. None of
them was hurt, and the majority went to Egypt later in the convoy that included the Duchess of
Bedford. Had they sailed with the earlier convoy they would have shared with the troops in the
Rangitiki the experience of being shelled in the North Atlantic on Christmas morning by the
German heavy cruiser Admiral Hipper. One merchant ship in this convoy, the Empire Trooper,
was holed above the water line.
Most voyages, however, were mercifully dull, and for this the soldiers could thank the Royal
Navy and the Dominion ships. One or more of the latter—HMNZS Achilles, Leander, and
Monowai, and HMAS Canberra, Perth, Australia, and Sydney—would hand over their task to
Royal Navy ships somewhere in the Indian Occan, and then, in farewell, steam down the lines of
transports, spray dashing from their bows, while the bands played and the crews—brown line
of faces, wider line of white tropical shirts and shorts, brown line of knees—stood stiffly at attention.
What had been grey shapes scarcely moving on the horizon were then seen in all their swiftness
and beauty by the soldiers dressing their own ships. Every detail was clear: sharp, graceful bow,
guns cleared for action, control tower a miracle of strength and balance, after flat gleaming
white, and long straight wake, silver like a healed scar.
‘Kiwis thank you for safe escort. Your fine displays of naval efficiency have increased our
pride in the British Navy.’ Thus a typical message from an Officer Commanding Troops to the
captain of an escort.
Shore Leave
THE NEW ZEALAND SOLDIER was at home abroad because he invariably behaved as
though he were in his own country and safely hedged about by his own customs and prejudices. As he was cheerful, kind to children, sometimes considerate of other people’s feelings,
and seldom conspicuously beastly in his cups, much was forgiven him in Rome by the bewildered
Romans. In Fremantle and Perth, of course, he was understood at once and welcomed as a long-lost
cousin, and in Capetown, Durban, and the cities of England his welcome, though it sometimes
came a moment before the understanding, was only the more kind and cousinly for that. The East,
though, found him wholly bewildering.
In Colombo the people were used to soldiers—British privates and non-commissioned officers
who treated them with that blend of severity and impersonal kindness typical of the best nurses
in the best families, and British officers who visited the Galle Face and the Grand Orient Hotel and
didn’t treat them at all—but New Zealand soldiers were outside their experience. What was
the rickshaw boy, untouchable to millions of his own race, to think of the grizzled, rather stout
man, twice his own age, who tapped him smartly on the shoulder, saying ‘Hop in the back, George,’
and then set off down the main street at a smart trot? And what of the broad-shouldered young
sergeant who squatted down on the pavement in the blazing sun to make friends with a black slip
of a girl of rather less account in her own country than a stray chicken?
To New Zealand soldiers personal contacts were always more important and more amusing than
sights—than things. For every minute spent in beautiful Buddhist temples, where saffron-robed
priests intoned their liquid and almost perfect English, hours were spent in the market-places in
haggling over cigars, ivory elephants, Benares brassware, carpets, carved knives, and cheap
jewellery—seldom with the object of making purchases: mostly for the sheer pleasure of destroying
social and racial barriers.
Anyway, with a pay of only ten rupees in their pockets, few soldiers could afford elephants
and carpets, and Japanese beer cost two rupees the bottle.
This is a strong and rather revolting brew, but the Kiwi soldier is hard-headed, and, though
much has been made of his fondness for drinking while on leave, in Colombo, as in Bombay,
Cairo, and Singapore, he usually remembered that the good guest does not get drunk in other
people’s houses or in other people’s countries. It was the same man—the same ten, twenty, thirty,
one hundred men—who got drunk and missed the ship, who kept the picket busy in Cairo, whose
conduct led eventually to the closing of the Fleet Club to New Zealanders.
That is not to say that the rest were model tourists. Many a returned man in New Zealand
today sighs over sights missed and wonders neglected. He blames only himself that the lovely city
of Perth, which he is unlikely to visit again, remains in his mind merely as a vision of amber Swan
beer heady in tall glasses and a memory of a sunny hour spent resting and eating melons and
strawberries among the bright flowers in the public gardens; that Colombo, so magical to E. M.
Forster, suggests to him only expensive and doubtful drinks; that Capetown, where he took
the view from Table Mountain on trust and spent in Delmonico’s days that would have paid
better dividends on the white beaches of Muizenberg, is as much a mystery to him as Persepolis.
Of all the New Zealanders who had a chance to do so, how many visited the Parsee Tower of
Silence on Malabar Hill, Mount Lavinia in Ceylon, and the Museum Constantia at Capetown?
What did they do, then, with their shore leave? They ate large meals—steak, four eggs, and
chips: in Capetown, juicy rump steaks and the eggs of well-bred Wyandottes; in Cairo, thin,
coffee-coloured steaks and eggs, peppery-tasting, and the size of ping-pong balls. They spent much
time in cafés, beer gardens, and soldiers’ clubs; they shopped (though 80 per cent of this shopping
was mere haggling and ‘pricing’), and they walked endlessly along dusty pavements under hot
suns, stopping now for an argument, now for a joke, now for a drink—occupations they would
have described collectively as ‘having a bit of a shufti
look
round’. Their leave ended, they returned to
their transit camps, their hotels, or their troopships, more than ever convinced that New Zealand
was the cleanest country in the world, its food the best and most wholesome, its licensing laws
the strangest.
The Mediterranean: Greece
WEIGHED DOWN under greatcoats, haversacks, valises (with blanket rolls bound round
them), full web equipment, rifles, ammunition, water bottles, respirators, and in some
cases kitbags as well, besides those few heart-breaking odds and ends that constitute the final straw
(haversack rations no haversack will hold, ukuleles and cameras they were never intended to
hold), the New Zealanders staggered on to the wharves at Alexandria and into the ships that
were to take them to Greece. Straps (supporting, web) cut into their shoulders, their arms ached
intolerably, and they answered the mocking questions of the Egyptian stevedores with less than
their usual good humour.
To make sure that it would not be crippled before it saw action, the Division was divided into
small parties, called flights, and in this way 16,500 men were brought safely to Piraeus, the port
of Athens, in the spring of 1941, in ships of the Merchant Navy and the Royal Navy. Some of
the earlier crossings were rough and one convoy was attacked by aircraft, bombs falling near the
SS Barpeta, carrying Headquarters 6th Brigade, and setting fire to a tanker, but there was no real
interference from the enemy. For this the Division could thank the Royal Navy, which had beaten
the Italian Fleet at the Battle of Matapan (28–29 March).
In the crowded holds of merchant ships and on the mess decks of destroyers comfort was
neither found nor expected. Anyway, the trips were short, the warships taking only about twenty-four hours and the slowest convoys not much more than a week. The men slept where they could
in their clothes, washed where they could, and spent most of their time keeping an eye on their
gear, which lay in contiguous heaps on all the decks.
The Division left Greece six weeks later—this time with only light luggage. At Raphena, Porto
Rafti, Nauplion, Kalamata, and Monemvasia, sometimes with nothing but a rifle and what they
stood up in, the troops shuffled on to the embarkation beaches in the pitch darkness and into the
landing craft, too tired even to think. The landing craft took them to the Ajax, Griffin, Calcutta,
Vampire, Voyager, Perth, Kingston, Glengyle, and other ships great and small, some of them merchantmen, and the sailors leant out of the darkness to help them up the last rungs of the ladders, relieved
them of rifles and packs, handed them through blackout curtains, pointed the way they were to go,
and went back to help more men aboard. The men, in torn and filthy battle dress, some with
overcoats, some without, sat, crouched, or lay down in the brightly-lit mess decks. Sailors came
round with hot cocoa and thick, bully-beef sandwiches, saying: ‘Take a couple, chum.’ Ave a fag.
Make yourself at home at our place’. Then they went back to their watches above, or to their
broken watches below, as they had been doing for days past, mocking with their levity and
common sense all the tales of heroes at Trafalgar and Thermopylae.
Under bombs and machine-gun bullets, the ships went to Egypt or Crete, and a month later
the men who had been in Crete came back at last to Egypt, again in ships of the Navy and Merchant
Navy. This time they had less luggage than ever. They limped, strolled, swaggered down the
gangways in the bright sunshine, boots cut to ease blistered heels and raw feet, and the sailors said:
‘So long, Kiwi. Be good, Snow. Bye, Bill’.
The soldiers met them later in the Fleet Club, but not all of them. Men were missing from
most ships, and the cruisers Gloucester and Fiji, the anti-aircraft cruiser Calcutta, the destroyers
Juno, Greyhound, Kashmir, Kelly, Hereward, Diamond, Wryneck, and Imperial, and the transports
Ulster Prince, Costa Rica, Araybank, and Pennland were lost.
The Mediterranean: Italy
NEW SHIPS AND NEW CREWS came from England and America, and, two and a half
years afterwards, the New Zealand Division, with victories behind it as well as defeats,
sailed for Italy. To the individual burdens it had taken to Greece were now added empty two-gallon water cans, bivouac tents (one for two men), and anti-malarial pills and ointments.
Again the Division sailed in flights, not more than one-third of any unit travelling in one ship,
though by October 1943 the Mediterranean was almost safe. Only one ship was damaged: the
motor vessel Lambrook. She struck a mine, but managed to limp to Brindisi, ten hours away, with
back broken and plates rippling. One voyage was much like another, and this impression, written
by a member of the 1st New Zealand Ammunition Company, is true of most of them:
Every morning a sea of pewter, burnished and dully shining. Sound of water slushing
lazily in scuppers: murmur of stem and bow sighing patiently through the Mediterranean:
patter of bow-spray falling on smooth swell.
Breakfast in the soupy atmosphere of the troop-decks: electric lights burning: smells of
porridge and of sweat and sleep: the appalling clatter of crockery: shouting and jostling of
mess orderlies: dixies, warm and slippery. After breakfast, no room to move on deck because
everyone has been hounded from below to leave the ship clear for inspection. Impatient waiting
for ‘Three Gs’ to sound. Lunch, with appetites a little keener than at breakfast, and then a long,
dozy afternoon. Tea, but not enough of it, for appetites are ravenous now, and, after tea,
cards and examination of the day’s rumours.
In wartime each troopship carries three rumours—more sometimes, but never less. They
seldom vary in their essentials. (1) The enemy has broadcast the ship’s name and her date of
sailing. (2) An infectious disease has broken out. (3) Senior officers are awaiting court martial
on serious charges.
These three, especially the last, go pleasantly with the cool of evening when khaki caterpillars circulate on all the decks, when destroyers fuss around laying smoke-screens, and barrage
balloons (midget dirigibles that were silver earlier and are now dark like slugs) are hauled in.
The distance between ships has lessened and smoke from a dozen stacks trails across the sea
for miles. The spirit of protection and comradeship—the high, brave spirit of the convoys—is
all about you. Silence then, and a light blinking quick and secret, and the drawing in, from all
the corners of the sea, of the soft darkness.
One by one these transports—Dunottar Castle, Reina del Pacifico, Llangibby Castle, Nieuw Holland, Letitia, Aronda, and Egra are names New Zealanders will remember—came safely
Astonishingly few New Zealand lives were lost in the Mediterranean, but the tragedy of the 8000-ton merchantman
Chakdina should be remembered. While evacuating some 380 wounded from Tobruk to Alexandria on the night of
5–6 December 1941, she was sunk in less than four minutes by a torpedo-carrying aircraft. The loss of life was appalling.
Of the 97 New Zealand wounded aboard, most of whom were stretcher-cases, eighteen were rescued by the corvette
Farndale.
to
port, those with troops to Taranto after about five days, those with transport to Bari after as much
as a fortnight. The troops staggered down the gangways under their terrific loads and marched
away into the new country, praying with all their hearts that the next voyage would be the long
one home.
Pacific Voyages
IN OCTOBER 1940 the main body of a force of brigade strength (B Force) went to Suva,
Fiji, in the Rangatira and HMS Monowai. They made three voyages, carrying over 900 men
each time. When the last draft arrived on 22 November, men of the earlier ones had learnt already
to refer to themselves rather ruefully as the ‘Coconut Bombers’, drink kava, and sing ‘Isa Lei’ and a
cheerful but disrespectful ballad commemorating the Monowai’s seamanly appearance:
Side, side, Monowai side—Her skipper looks on her with pride ….
Everything in the Monowai was done Bristol-fashion.
After Japan entered the war, reinforcements reached Fiji in the Rangatira, Matua, Wahine, and
Monowai, and by early 1942 the force had become the 3rd New Zealand Division. In July, however,
the Division was relieved by Americans, and by the middle of August it was back in New Zealand
in the role of Army reserve. Most of the troops came home in USS President Coolidge.
During November and December it assembled in New Caledonia, the main body (7000)
sailing in USS West Point, and in August 1943 it began moving to an advanced base on Guadalcanal
in the Solomon Islands, again in American ships escorted by American destroyers. There were
three convoys, and each halted at Efate (New Hebrides) so that the troops could practise beach
landings. Using nets, they trans-shipped to landing craft and were taken ashore.
On 18 September, under enemy observation but also under an umbrella of fighter aircraft,
3700 troops of the 3rd Diyision disembarked at Vella Lavella with their ammunition, petrol,
transport, and supplies. The ramps of the landing craft splashed into the sea or fell on soft, muddy
sand, and the vehicles bumped away into the jungle while human chains unloaded boxes of
ammunition and supplies. Escorted by American destroyers, the troops had been two days at
sea in landing craft and APDs (obsolete destroyers carrying about 200 men), but their only
experience worth mentioning was their difficulty in finding room in which to record their votes
in the parliamentary election with due secrecy.
The New Zealanders’ task on Vella Lavella was to relieve American troops and clear the island
of Japanese as quickly as possible. While they were doing this, reinforcement drafts arrived at
regular intervals from Guadalcanal in landing craft, and on 1 October a convoy was caught on the
beach by dive bombers. One craft was wrecked, two were damaged, and fifty-two men, including
fifteen of the 209th New Zealand Light Anti-Aircraft Battery, were killed in a few minutes.
After clearing Vella Lavella, the 3rd Division attacked the Treasury Islands, making the first
opposed landings in which New Zealanders had taken part since the days of Gallipoli. At dawn on
27 October a force of 7000 New Zealanders and Americans lay off the entrance to Blanche Harbour
in Mono Island, which was seen through rain squalls as a green mound wreathed in mist. The men
scrambled from the APDs to landing craft and the covering destroyers went into action, ceasing
fire at twenty-four minutes past six. Two minutes later the first troops went ashore in the face of
Japanese machine guns.
The third and final operation—a landing on Nissan (Green Islands)—was carried through
without opposition on 15 February 1944, though the convoy, which carried a mixed American
and New Zealand force of 5800 troops, was bombed in sight of the island.
Bombers were less a menace in the Pacific than submarines, which in 1942 and 1943 were
active near both Fiji and the Solomons. In January 1942, off Suva, the Monowai exchanged fire
with a Japanese submarine that had tried to torpedo her, and later in the war another submarine
attacked one of the convoys that took the 3rd Division to Guadalcanal, a torpedo missing the
USS Fuller by some 200 yards. The longest Pacific voyage, however, was comparatively short,
and the troops seldom had time to become nervous, bored, or tired of the food.
The short ‘As’ of the voices from the loud-hailers (‘Troops on the ăfter deck…’); cigarettes
at 50 cents for two hundred; the politeness, almost the courtliness, of the American crew to
strangers; the good food (‘chow’ was the American term) obtainable after anything up to a three-hour wait in a queue; the compartmented trays it was served on (each with a mug of black coffee
balanced in one corner); daily physical training; a few lectures, guard duties, and fatigues; much
sun-bathing; the green and purple of distant Pacific islands; a glimpse of palm trees beyond
breakers; shipping in a crowded staging port (at Espiritu Santo, say); double rows of bunks in
tiers of four with a gap of two foot six between each row; sharing a ship’s hold with 600 others; the
continual humming of the forced draught system—by the time they had assimilated all this the
voyage was over.
The Troopship Track
MONTH BY MONTH, their grey paint chipped and faded and splashed here and there
with ugly patches of red lead, their forward and after decks cluttered with Carley floats,
Bofors guns, pom-poms, oerlikons, and improvised wash-houses, the troopships cleared Wellington
heads, carrying reinforcement drafts to the Middle East and the Pacific, Royal New Zealand Air
Force trainees to Canada or the United Kingdom, and seamen to Britain for service with the
Royal Navy.
Reinforcement drafts for the Middle East were limited usually to one shipload (each ship
having a permanent Officer Commanding Troops and military staff), and so were the drafts
returning to New Zealand for furlough or for discharge to essential industries.
Men of the RNZAF bound for Canada under the Empire Air Training Scheme, or for the
United Kingdom, travelled as ordinary passengers, sometimes in parties 250 strong, but usually in
smaller drafts. Little was attempted in the way of training (though in British ships the men manned
anti-submarine watches), and living conditions were almost of a peacetime standard, making the
later voyages to England in troopships suffer by contrast.
Travelling as a civilian, of course, did not guarantee safe arrival. In November 1940 the
Rangitane was sunk by German raiders a few hundred miles east of Auckland, and the civilian
passengers were put ashore later on Emirau Island, north of New Guinea, the men signing an
undertaking not to take part in the war. Thirteen Fleet Air Arm entrants were among those released
on this condition, but fifteen others were made prisoner, some because they were enrolled members
of the RAF or the RNZAF, some because their passages had been booked by the Air Department
or the Navy Office.
Naval drafts destined for Britain and service with the Royal Navy also travelled as ordinary
passengers in many cases, though whenever possible a service passage in a commissioned ship
was arranged for them.
In the days before Pearl Harbour, men of the New Zealand armed forces sailed to and from
Pacific bases, Canada, and the United States in neutral American ships escorted (‘trailed’ was
the term used for this type of escort) by New Zealand warships. At first New Zealanders travelled
in civilian clothes, but later they wore uniform.
Month by month the troopships slipped quietly past the heads, and by the end of 1945 New
Zealand had sent overseas 114,000 soldiers
Of these 38,000 went to the Pacific, many of them serving later in the Middle East.
, some 18,000 airmen
A further 19,000 went by air to the Pacific.
, and 10,000 sailors. Nearly
every man and woman in the three services who went overseas left and returned by ship.
Homeward Bound
AS THE REINFORCEMENT drafts reached the Middle East, men who had seen long
service overseas were sent home on furlough or for discharge to essential industries. The
first furlough draft sailed from Egypt for New Zealand in June 1943 in the Nieuw Amsterdam, the
second in January 1944 in the Scythia, trans-shipping to the Mariposa at Bombay. The ships were
very crowded, but under the circumstances it seemed unreasonable to complain.
After victory in Europe, and increasingly after VJ Day, troopships brought back to New Zealand
not only servicemen and released prisoners of war but the wives, children, and finacées of men in
the three services.
With the blackout lifted, with no unnecessary parades or picket duties to annoy them, the
men had little to grumble about (except the food and the overcrowding) and even less to do. At
sea they played Crown and Anchor and two-up, fell into deep day-dreams of the future, and
nursed the children on the boat-decks. In port many of them took the opportunity of having a
final fling, but not with the old fierce concentration, and they returned almost with relief to the
boredom, the day-dreams, and the babies on the boat-deck.
‘Mothers,’ wrote a soldier in the Durban Castle, ‘soon grew resigned to losing sight of their
children for hours at a time. They always turned up safe and sound, for there is no doubt that
Kiwis make good mothers.’ In this ship the children took part in a biblical tableau: ‘The singing
of the angels made a scene not unlike a 15th century fresco of choiring angels on the walls of some
old Italian church—the same grave, untroubled faces, and the same deep concentration on the
work in hand, so characteristic of children and of angels’.
In Australian ports the ships picked up military staffs sent from New Zealand to help with the
arrangements for disembarkation and leave.
One after another the ships came into home waters. The Orion, which had left Taranto on
10 January with 4500 New Zealand soldiers, 33 sailors, 16 wives and fiancées, and one child,
passed the Snares, south of Stewart Island, early in February 1946. Peeping between the rails
was the ship’s mascot, five-year-old Diana from La Spezia, in the Gulf of Genoa. She was bound
for Auckland with her mother.
Porpoises—olive-grey sometimes, sometimes steel-blue—played about the ship’s forefoot,
leaping and plunging in the bow-wave, scraping themselves against the bow-plates, turning
cartwheels in twos and threes, and delighting Diana from La Spezia.
The Orion, which had sailed with men of the First Echelon six years before, came into Lyttelton
harbour on 9 February. It was a warm, sunny morning.
Acknowledgments
THE SOURCES consulted in the preparation of this account include the first two
volumes of the official 2nd NZEF Narrative, two accounts by D. O. W. Hall, a
number of private diaries, and troopship newspapers and magazines.
The sketches are by J. Figgins (page 11), Nevile Lodge (page 15), Frank
Haggett (page 17), Robert Brett (page 22) and K. Niven (page 24).
The photographs come from many collections, which are stated where they
are known:
Cover George Weigel
Inside Cover, page 14 (top centre), and page 24 (top) New Zealand Army Official, S. J. Weymss
page 9 (top) and page 12 (top) Green and Hahn, Christchurch
page 9 (bottom) C. P. S. Boyer, Wellington
page 10 (top) and page 11(top) The Weekly News, Auckland
page 12(bottom) Star-Sun, Christchurch
page 13 (top) C. W. Hawkins
page 14 (top left), page 15 (top right and bottom), page 16 (top and bottom left) and page 19 (top)
G. R. Bull
page 13 (bottom), page 14 (bottom), page 16(top and bottom centre), page 17 (top) and page 22 (bottom)
New Zealand Army official
page 18 D. M. Burns
page 19 (bottom) G. McIntosh
page 19 (centre) Australian National Travel Association
page 20 (top) Dr. P. V. Graves
(bottom) E. K. S. Rowe
page 21 (top) New Zealand Army official, M. D. Elias
(bottom) New Zealand Army official, G. F. Kaye
page 23 (top and centre) J. G. Penman
(bottom) R. H. Blanchard
THE AUTHOR, Peter Llewellyn, was until recently a member of the staff of
the War History Branch. He served overseas with the 1st Ammunition Company,
New Zealand Army Service Corps, from January 1940 until the unit was disbanded
in October 1945, and on his return to New Zealand wrote its history.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
cover photograph The guard tower of Stalag 383
PRISONERS OF GERMANYD. O. W. HALLWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Foreword
By Sir Howard Kippenberger
DURING the Second World War 9038 New Zealanders were taken prisoner, 68 of them
sailors, 575 airmen, 8395 soldiers. Of these, 1251 were wounded when captured. Altogether
560 died while prisoners, of their wounds and of disease; at Tarawa, seven New Zealand wireless
operators and ten soldiers were murdered by the Japanese.
The great majority of the soldier prisoners were volunteers, victims of the disasters of the
early years. In Greece, Crete, Libya1941, and Egypt 1942, these men, with their contemporaries in
service—of whom only a fortunate few were not killed or wounded—bore the brunt of the costly
battles for time while the armies and air fleets of victory were being prepared. Many were left on
the beaches in Greece and Crete. Having arrived there in good order and with their weapons, they
were the unlucky ones whom the Navy could not take away. Very many of them wandered in the
mountains for months before being captured, all the while making desperate efforts to escape to
Egypt. Three or four hundred succeeded in doing so. Those taken in Libya and in Egypt before
Alamein were members of units that had been overrun by tanks. It was almost the customary
thing. Our splendid infantry would take a position by a night attack with the bayonet, with none
of the air or artillery support that later was always provided. Whatever the opposition they never
failed, though usually the losses were grievous. Then the depleted battalions would after daylight
be counter-attacked by tanks, infantry, and guns, and when their few and feeble anti-tank guns
had been knocked out with their heroic crews, the Panzers, invulnerable to the infantry weapons
of the time, would close, trample over the positions, and the choices were surrender or useless
death. In those terrible battles we lost, helplessly taken prisoner, many of the best men who ever
served this country, and many who with better fortune would have reached high rank. As one
man said in a report written after he had escaped—to be killed in a later battle—‘I had thought
of death or wounds but never of surrender. Yet there it was.’
The airmen captured were those who survived after being shot down over enemy territory.
A very few had the good fortune to escape to neutral countries. The sailors were taken when their
ships, merchant ships, were captured. No warships surrendered.
As prisoners they endured years of uncertainty, privation, and frustration. They unremittingly
continued the struggle in every way that courage, pride, and ingenuity could suggest. Some
escaped in almost incredible exploits, others continuously strove to escape or unselfishly helped
those better equipped. In every camp they bore up against adversity, defied and deceived their
guards, maintained discipline, soldierly spirit, and pride of race. Only a very few failed.
I saw those who came out of Germany after the war ended. They were thin and strained,
but they carried themselves as soldiers and as men who knew that they had acquitted themselves
as men in a long and bitter ordeal. I was proud that I had served with them in the hard years.
In these publications, Prisoners of Germany, Prisoners of Italy, Prisoners of Japan, Escapes, something
of their experience is given. They are honourable chapters in New Zealand’s history.
The full story will be told in the official Prisoner-of-war volume which will be published
during 1950.
In German Hands in Greece and Crete
THE GERMANS made little attempt to provide properly for the prisoners taken by them in
Greece. Though some prisoners did not leave that country for more than a year after their
capture, every camp in Greece was little more than a transit camp. Some of the men captured at
the evacuation beaches in the Peloponnese were held a few days at Nauplion in the playground
of a school before they were taken to Corinth, where an old stone barracks had been named a
transit camp for prisoners of war. Into it, without blankets or mattresses, over five thousand men
were crowded; they were each given one cooked meal a day and a ninth of a kilogram (approximately quarter of a pound) of bread.
Corinth was only a staging base to the ‘frontstalag’ at Salonika from which prisoners were
sent on by train to Germany. There were two camps at Salonika—a barracks building in the town
and a camp farther out. The first months there were the worst. Dysentery and malaria were rife,
the food poor and insufficient (a 70-pound bag of lentils—and nothing else—was daily made into
soup for the 5000 men in the camp; in addition each man received a biscuit or a small piece of
bread), and the guards were aggressive. The Greek Red Cross supplied some cigarettes, fresh
fruit, and vegetables, but it was many months before any other Red Cross supplies appeared.
Conditions in the German cages in Crete were very similar to those in the camps on the Greek
mainland. Most of the New Zealanders were held in a dusty seaside camp at Galatas where the
only amenity was bathing in the sea, ‘a tremendous asset in keeping down the vermin’. The rations
issued were mostly captured British stores, but the guards kept the lion’s share for themselves and
tantalised the hungry prisoners by the amount of food they wasted. One prisoner performed the
dangerous feat of stealing a 50-pound bag of oatmeal from a dump guarded by a German sentry.
On good days the prisoners had light gruel for breakfast, a hunk of bread for lunch, perhaps with
mint tea, and in the evening a thin stew of bully beef, lentils, and beans, ‘all stirred up into something that revolted the hungriest of us’. The best part of the food was the bread. The more
enterprising of the prisoners got out at night, picked up what food they could find on the neighbouring farms, chiefly bread, raisins, and vegetables, and returned to camp the next night with
their booty. The Austrian guards were generally lenient and some winked at these expeditions.
The prisoners from Crete were taken to Salonika for transport to Germany. The first stage of
the journey was the unpleasant, crowded voyage in the holds of some commandeered Greek cargo
vessel; the luckier batches of prisoners were allowed up on deck during the day. Even Galatas
with the wretched shelter of its tents seemed better than the crowded, verminous barracks at
Salonika, without beds or blankets, living on food which had already produced beriberi in those
who had had to endure it longest. Mint tea was the total breakfast, a lentil soup with the appearance
of ‘horse-meat having walked through it’, the dinner, and an Italian biscuit the tea. The journey
to Germany, crammed into cattle-trucks, was terrible. Food which would have been adequate for
two days had to last the prisoners, with very little supplement, a journey of five or six days,
sometimes extended to ten. On some trains no one was allowed to leave the trucks during the
whole of the journey. Men arrived in Germany weak, exhausted, lousy, and with their spirits the
lowest of the whole period of their captivity.
Stalags
THE CAMPS where most New Zealanders other than officers lived were Wolfsberg, in
Austria (Stalag XVIIIA), Gorlitz (VIIIA), east of Dresden, and Lamsdorf (VIIIB), in upper
Silesia. The important camps for non-working non-commissioned officers were Hohenfels (Stalag
383) and Fallingbostel (357). Some of these camps later changed their locations and their numbers—
a source of some confusion. Airmen were imprisoned in ‘Luft’ camps, New Zealanders mostly at
Sagan (Stalag Luft III), naval and merchant seamen in marlags: these are not separately described
in this survey. Stalags were central camps from which men left to go out to work camps, or
kommandos. A stalag had therefore a changing population, although in each there was a core of
men who lived there permanently—men unsuited to heavy work or given some administrative
function. But every other-rank prisoner passed through a stalag at some time in his career of
captivity.
Wolfsberg in late 1943 had a population of some 8000 British prisoners, 25,000 French, and
numerous Russians, Yugoslavs, and Italians. British troops were lodged in 75-man huts or in old
stables: the men slept in three-tiered bunks, generally reserving the bottom bunks for their kit.
They were issued with two blankets each. Hot showers were available all day, but, as in most
German camps, the fuel issue for heating and cooking was insufficient. Medical care was adequate
and the food in the stalag infirmary better than in the rest of the camp. The camp had a good
gymnasium and a flourishing theatre but few facilities for study. Discipline was fairly lax, thanks
to the venality of the guards. Wolfsberg was the central stalag for the whole of Austria, and the
camps at Markt Pongau, Maribor, and Spittal-an-der-Drau were in some degree dependencies of it.
Lamsdorf (in 1944 shifted to Teschen) was the main camp in the Silesia-Poland area. It covered
13 acres and normally accommodated 10,000 men, though in 1943 at least 5000 more were crammed
into it. (All the German camps in the East and South became crowded after the prisoners had been
brought there from Italy.) Earlier, it had seemed comparatively luxurious. The huts were built of
adobe or cob with concrete floors and tarred paper roofs, flat with a slight fall. The water supply
at this camp was inadequate and inefficient. The food was poor. Discipline was ‘strict but on the
whole not unjust’. The prisoners’ morale remained high. They liked to show off the superiority
of their clothing and equipment and were careful to be smart and well turned-out whenever they
left the camp. ‘The contrast between us and our guards was striking and caused frequent comment
among the civilians.’
Residence in a stalag had the advantages and disadvantages of greater regularity of administration. Rackets, though they had to be better concealed, sometimes reached larger proportions than
in kommandos. Inside the camp all sorts of intellectual and social activities were far more fully
developed than in smaller groups. On the whole, relations with guards in a stalag were less close
than in a kommando, and although prisoners were left more to themselves it was harder for them
to escape.
Kommandos
THE WORK CAMPS dependent on each stalag were known as arbeits-kommandos, often
shortened to kommandos. A stalag might have on its strength 5000 to 7000 prisoners of war
with another 10,000 to 30,000 men distributed through the farms, factories, railway yards, quarries,
and mines of the neighbourhood. Kommandos fell into three main classes—farming, industrial
work, and work for the commissariat of the German Army (for instance, unloading stores from
trains). They consisted of groups of from six to 500 men, although the usual strength of a kommando was between fifty and 100, as this was an economical administrative unit for a guard of
from six to ten to handle with the aid of an interpreter and was also suited to the needs of most
industries. Men on kommandos usually went back to the stalag only for disciplinary reasons or for
medical treatment. A medical orderly was attached to most kommandos, each of which was
administered by the usual man-of-confidence. This man-of-confidence (or Vertrauensmann) was
elected by the prisoners themselves from their own numbers. He was in charge of the issue of
Red Cross parcels and clothing and was responsible for all matters concerning the welfare of his
fellow-prisoners. As one prisoner remarked, the principle of the elected man-of-confidence was
‘rather ironic in a dictatorship country’.
Work on the land offered the greatest freedom and the best food, but the advantages were
‘to a large extent offset by the arduous nature of the work and the long hours’. The usual practice
was for the prisoners to be lodged at some central point from which they marched out every
morning under guard to the scene of their labours, returning in the same way to their quarters
in the evening. During the day the farmer they were working for was responsible for them to the
German authorities, and he also fed them. One prisoner amusedly described the arrival of fourteen
prisoners of war at a new village, where the local farmers immediately engaged in a ‘rather obvious
wrangle over who should have the big men and who the small’. These farmers had been strictly
briefed by the German authorities in the correct demeanour towards prisoners of war: the general
principle was the avoidance of fraternising. When they had got to know each other better, this
elaborate structure of restrictive regulations (which had even forbidden the farm children to
speak to the prisoners) was regarded by both farmers and prisoners as the ‘joke of the century’.
Work was hard and the hours long, partly because the implements were generally very primitive,
but the food and exercise built up the men’s strength to normal. Every Sunday was spent in camp:
in winter, resting, reading, or playing games; in summer, swimming, or climbing the neighbouring hills. Towards the end of the war prisoners were made to work on Sundays.
Of all the industrial jobs work in the coal mines was perhaps the worst, with work in the salt
mines almost as bad, yet some prisoners were reasonably treated even in the mines. A prisoner
in Poland had to get up at 5 a.m. and walk five kilometres to the coal mine where he worked,
but his day ended with his return to camp at 4.30 p.m. Allowing two hours for going to and from
the mine and another hour for changing and for hot showers after the day’s work, actual working
hours were less than eight daily. But another prisoner described the German coal-mine foremen
in Poland as ‘real thugs’, and the chief guard of his kommando was a notorious character who was
believed to have shot twelve prisoners at various times. Quarrying also was difficult and strenuous
work. Many men were employed in factories: this work had advantages in the opportunities it
gave to meet other workers—foreign or German—and exchange commodities with them.
Generally the work prisoners were ordered to do was not a direct contribution to the German
war effort, though there were jobs which were exceptions to this and which prisoners successfully refused.
The German policy was to force prisoners to work under threat of punishment. Many guards
found in practice that more conciliatory methods produced better results for both sides. The
prisoners were determined not to help the enemy by working hard, and the only occasions when
men put their best into the job was when it was on a contract basis and they could, when finished,
go home early. Some guards tricked prisoners by beginning the day on contract and, when the
allotted task was nearly finished, returning to day labour for set hours. This was not likely to
succeed more than once or twice. For their part the prisoners were willing to trick their guards.
On one occasion a group greatly reduced the labour of filling in a deep trench carrying power
cables by putting boards over it near the surface and throwing earth on top; an Allied bomb
exposed the deception to the Germans many months later. Prisoners were able to engage in a good
deal of quiet sabotage in the course of their work. On a dam-construction job the concrete mixture
was tampered with, tools were lost in the mould with the concrete, and sand was thrown into the
bearings of railway trucks.
Men on kommandos were paid anything from 70 pfennigs (IId) to 3 marks (4s) a day, the
highest earnings being in the coal mines. They had very limited opportunities for spending this
money; local German wartime beer, greatly despised, was practically the only thing they could
buy with their lagergeld, notes specially printed by the Germans for the use of prisoners of war.
It was possible to remit savings home through the International Red Cross. The real currency
with which prisoners corrupted guards, overseers, and any of the civil population with whom they
came in contact was provided by the luxury items in their Red Cross parcels—tea, coffee, cocoa,
cigarettes, and soap. Men had qualms sometimes whether they were not in fact helping their
enemies by giving them things denied them by the Allied blockade. But nearly all felt that the
advantages to themselves from successful barter were so great that the Red Cross authorities
would certainly have considered their gifts were being well used, and the effect on the Germans’
morale of having to depend on their prisoners for goods they could not otherwise obtain outweighed any mitigation of the enemy’s wartime hardships which might result. Barter with Red
Cross commodities enabled the prisoners to add eggs, white bread, flour, fresh fruit, milk, and
cream to their diet, to acquire contraband articles, and generally to soften the rigours of captivity.
Naturally a small group of men at a distance from the authorities had better opportunities
than those who remained in a large camp for coming to terms with their captors. But this relaxation
worked both ways. It sometimes happened that living accommodation and conditions on kommandos, which were rarely visited by the International Red Cross, were appalling, the guards
offensive and unjust, and the local population hostile and unyielding. The opportunities for sport,
recreation, and education were generally smaller and less rewarding than in the main camps. But
to most men the kommando was welcome for its closer approximation to the conditions of
ordinary civilian life.
Non-Commissioned Officers’ Camp
ACAMP for non-working non-commissioned officers, Stalag 383, at Hohenfels in Bavaria,
was well run, largely because the Germans left the prisoners a good deal to themselves, and
because the camp man-of-confidence, a British warrant officer captured in 1940, was through long
experience expert at handling the Germans. The prisoners lived in small, 12-man wooden huts
with low, flattened roofs. Originally the camp had been divided into three compounds, but the
posts in these fences had one by one been removed for firewood until the internal divisions had
disappeared. As the stalag grew to 7000 men, of whom about 350 were New Zealanders, the
huts became more crowded until fourteen men lived in each.
Few were without occupation. A prisoner in this camp remarked that the men who were
worst affected by their captivity were those who did nothing but lie apathetically all day in their
bunks or sit in the sun. The higher ranks had plenty to do administering the camp: the prisoners
themselves ran the kitchen, the parcel store, the sorting of mail, and the sanitation services. A school
flourished in a big stable which the prisoners had fitted out for themselves. It was open twelve
hours a day, sixty different classes being conducted every day for its 3500 students. A good reference
library, as well as a fiction lending library (together over 13,000 volumes), supplied the needs of
the camp’s readers. In addition, two theatres regularly put on plays, musical shows, or revues,
and a symphony orchestra, a piano-accordion band, a pipe band, swing orchestras, and three
choirs gave expression to different types of musical accomplishment. Many men kept gardens
which supplied the fresh vegetables not otherwise obtainable, and some fattened rabbits, pigeons,
and roosters.
Yet the great resource of the prisoners in this camp was sport. The keenest rivalry grew between
the twelve ‘companies’ into which the camp was divided or between the nations of the British
Commonwealth. Tournaments were held in football, cricket, tennis, basketball, wrestling, boxing,
hockey, softball, and deck tennis. In summer the fire-fighting reservoir was used for swimming
and for international water polo matches, and a model yacht club also held races there; in winter it
became an open-air ice-skating rink. Gymnastics and athletic sports were also carried on at this
camp, whose area, if not ample, was adequate. Stalag 383 might be arctic in winter, but in summer
it was a pleasant place with its view of nearby wooded hills, while even in winter the neighbouring
pinewoods, loaded with snow, took on a new beauty. In the dreary winter evenings nearly everyone played contract bridge or other card games; many played chess.
The amenities of this camp were mainly the work of the prisoners themselves who ‘made their
own fun’. They were helped also by outside agencies, the International Red Cross or the Swedish
YMCA, which supplied sports gear and educational material; little credit was due to the Germans,
although the guards were corruptible and the commandant himself ‘not a bad chap’. During two
distinct periods, largely because of Allied air attacks on the German railway system, rations at
this camp suffered because of the failure of Red Cross supplies. The first occasion was for three
months in the early part of 1943, when the deprivation was uncomfortable rather than serious.
In November 1944 the failure of Red Cross food parcels to arrive coincided with progressive
cuts in the rations issued by the Germans. Eventually men were living on not much more than a
little bread and two potatoes a day. Some small relief was given later by the Red Cross ‘white
angels’ (white-painted motor-waggons with consignments of parcels for prison camps), which
twice brought parcels. ‘Apart from the morning check parade, the majority of the men remained
in bed all day to escape the blistering cold outside.’ At the end of the war everyone was much
weakened by this four-month period on starvation rations.
The greatest hardship at Stalag 383 was the shortage of fuel. The German issue of coal and wood
was not enough either to cook meals from Red Cross parcels or to keep the huts warm. ‘Blowers’
‘Blowers’ were ingenious stoves designed to make the most of scraps of fuel by using the forced-draught principle.
eked out the scanty supplies. Occasionally one representative from each hut was allowed to join
a party gathering dead wood in the forest: but this was two miles away, and the amount one man
could carry was limited. As no working parties went out, the wood supply was virtually restricted
to what could be found inside the camp itself. Here the prisoners waged a ruthless war of attrition
against the Germans, a war which went in their favour but in which time was on the side of the
enemy. ‘An army of “destructional engineers” sprang up overnight’ which reduced the eight
beams in the roof of each hut to four or even three, did the same for the beams under the floors,
and absorbed any other pieces of wood anywhere in the camp which could be taken without
obvious harm or without drawing too rapid vengeance on the takers. In December 1944 the
destructional engineers of Hut 171 planned and executed ‘one of the greatest fuel drives ever
conceived in the Stalag. The target was a large striped sentry box standing just outside the main
gate of the camp … in which the half-frozen sentry was wont to retire from time to time.’ This
sentry box measured 9ft by 3ft 6ins by 4ft and weighed, as its ravishers were pained to discover,
over 3cwt. While the hut’s best German speaker lured the sentry some way down the wire to
discuss an attractive barter transaction, eight of the men opened the gate and grabbed the box,
carrying it into their hut under cover of the dusk. They had to take the hut door off its hinges
to get the box in; it was then hastily broken up into small pieces. Next day the Germans made an
intensive search for the lost sentry box, lifting the floors of every hut, but without result as the
broken fragments had been hidden in an underground darkroom, whose existence had never been
suspected by the guards, the trap-door replaced and covered with earth. The prisoners waited a
few days and then brought up the fragments a few pieces at a time: ‘it proved the best fuel we
had ever had.’
Oflags
THE GERMANS were extremely respectful to rank. In general, officer prisoners were given
all the privileges accorded them by the Geneva Convention’s provisions, but they found the
Germans harsh enough if they committed any breach of the regulations. Mass reprisals against
officers included the removal of all furniture from their quarters and the suspension for several
weeks of the issue of Red Cross parcels. With their greater leisure and greater resources of technical
knowledge, officers had fuller chances than the men of engaging in secret or resistance activities,
Most of this activity is described elsewhere in this account or in the surveys in this series dealing with escapes, but two
incidents at one officers’ camp may be cited as typical. The first was an escape by twenty-seven officers in 1942, a most
elaborately contrived affair. The escapers climbed out over the wire on ‘assault ladders’ whose three hinged sections
were successfully thrown right over the compound fence. A sapper officer had fused the camp lights; the Germans,
fearing a general mutiny, did not care to enter the darkened camp, and German-speaking prisoners added to the
confusion by shouting contradictory orders to the German guards. Four of the twenty-seven escaped completely.
The other incident occurred later: as the Germans had periodically run a heavy traction-engine round the compound
to cave in any tunnels, the tunnellers in retaliation dug a broad underground chamber which, when the surface
collapsed, completely engulfed the engine; it ‘came to rest well down, to the consternation of the German authorities’.
and these chances were generally exploited. They had also better opportunities for education and
recreation. This burden of time often made captivity more tedious for them than for men who were
obliged to work.
Although undoubtedly better treated by the Germans than were the men, officers did not
receive any better food and their accommodation could be very poor. At one officers’ camp
(ofiag), in a former school which had held 150 pupils and now accommodated 450 officers, the
sanitary system was hopelessly overtaxed. The medical treatment was unusually poor, being
administered by German doctors described as ‘ignorant, indifferent, and frankly hostile’. Another
oflag was in an old castle whose dry moat was the prisoners’ chief place of recreation. This camp
had a good library, theatre, and orchestra. But the prisoners frequently came into collision with
the German authorities, and in any case did not find the quarters comfortable.
Few features of life in oflags differed from those of other non-working camps, although
cultural activities were perhaps more fully developed. As in the men’s camps, anything that was
achieved in the arts or in education was due to the persistence and talent of the prisoners themselves,
assisted by the International Red Cross, not to any indulgence on the part of the Germans.
INTO CAPTIVITY
REALITY
RESOURCE UNDER ROUTINE
ON THE MARCHES
The Red Cross Provides
THE PARCELS of food distributed from Geneva by the International Red Cross
In New Zealand the Red Cross and the Order of St. John act as a single body under the control of the Joint Council
of the Order of St. John and the New Zealand Red Cross Society for certain purposes. In a specifically New Zealand
context the term ‘Red Cross’ refers to the Joint Council, whose magnificent work for prisoners of war and internees,
for the wounded of both wars, and for the sick and destitute generally, cannot be too warmly acknowledged. The
Joint Council expended funds raised for prisoners of war by the National and Provincial Patriotic Fund Boards.
were the
prisoners’ life-line. An ex-prisoner of the Germans wrote: ‘This point cannot be stressed sufficiently; as all who were in captivity agree, we literally owed our very lives to the Red Cross and
Order of St. John and our thanks must be put on record to these two humane organisations.’ Other
prisoners have said that they could never have worked or even kept their health without these
weekly parcels. The Germans fully realised their value and gave them transport priority; indeed
at some camps they took this extra food into account when fixing the prisoners’ ration issue, even
though this was a gross violation of the terms of the Geneva Convention.
The rations issued by the Germans were meagre. They varied slightly from place to place.
At an Austrian camp in 1943 the rations issued to each man consisted of one-fifth of a 4-pound
loaf of black bread daily, vegetable soup five times a week, and potatoes boiled in their jackets
and served with meat sauce on the other two days; there was also a weekly issue of four ounces
of margarine and seven dessertspoonfuls of sugar, and on Sundays each man received a slice of
sausage about two and a half inches in diameter and half an inch thick. These men preferred to
go without tea or coffee (the Germans supplied mint tea and a coffee made from roasted barley)
rather than waste the sugar ration sweetening it. In the difficult days at the end of the war, the
Germans, short of transport, cut down prisoners’ rations.
The occasions when parcels failed to arrive brought home to those in enemy prison camps
how dependent they were on this extra food. Local distribution to working camps was not always
perfectly organised, and newly established camps, whether main camps or working ones, sometimes did not get any parcels for months. Towards the end of the war, the period from about
November 1944 onwards, the parcel supply in the depths of a particularly bitter winter, dwindled
to nothing, mainly owing to the breakdown of communications under bombing, making the last
months in enemy hands the worst. In early 1945, however, Geneva began sending out every
week a fleet of white-painted motor-waggons with consignments of parcels direct to prison camps
or to the columns of prisoners which had begun the terrible marches forced on them by their
captors as the Allies advanced into Germany. The relief which could be afforded by these ‘white
angels’, as these waggons were called, could only be small. They visited one camp of 7000 men
twice in four months, each time bringing 10,000 parcels, a total distribution of less than three
parcels altogether for each man. But the German rations were so poor by this time that this relief,
brought into Germany at considerable risk, may in many cases have been decisive; it was the
weakest and worst-nourished who fell out from the columns of marchers.
The contents of the parcels from England, Canada, Australia, South Africa, or New Zealand
varied with the country of origin. The Canadian parcels usually contained one pound each of
dried milk, butter, jam, biscuits, bully beef, and meat roll, eight ounces of salmon, six ounces
each of sardines, prunes, and sugar, seven ounces of raisins, five ounces of chocolate, four ounces
of cheese, four ounces of tea or coffee, salt, and a cake of soap. This parcel was the most popular,
because while four meat and three fish meals could be made from its main contents, the fruit and
the dried milk were interesting additions, and the biscuits could be ground up to make porridge
or flour. The English parcel had much more varied contents and cocoa as the alternative to tea.
The New Zealand parcel was liked for its honey, but the pound of brown sugar (a larger quantity
than in any other parcel) and the raisins did not always arrive in perfect condition as our parcels
had the longest journey of all to make.
In most camps the Red Cross store had two locks, the key of one held by the Germans, the
key of the other by the British man-of-confidence. German orders were that the tins had to be
punctured at the time of issue, so as to prevent the accumulation of stores of food which could
be used for escapes. In some camps the tins had to be emptied out at once. However, many
escapers were recaptured with numbers of unopened tins in their possession, for the strictest
system has flaws in it, especially when guards are in greater or less degree corruptible. Although
on occasion the Germans withheld the issue of parcels as a disciplinary measure, they scrupulously
respected their contents, and pillaging was a rarity. On the other hand, many next-of-kin parcels
never reached the addressees.
Discipline
THE GERMANS did their best to govern camps and kommandos through the prisoners
themselves. Other-rank prisoners elected their own man-of-confidence; in officers’ camps the
Senior British Officer had the same functions. All orders to prisoners of war were given through
the senior non-commissioned officer at each camp, but the man-of-confidence, who was in charge
of all matters concerning prisoners’ welfare, had also to carry a considerable burden of administrative duties. Complaints and representations to the German authorities might only be made
through the senior non-commissioned officer. With very few exceptions, the senior non-commissioned officers did a splendid job in maintaining morale, prestige, and self-esteem among
the men under their command. In some camps they were punished for offences against discipline
committed by those under them.
The Germans were better gaolers than the Italians, as those men who had been in Italian prison
camps before going to Germany immediately noticed. German efficiency made treatment more
systematic, less subject to local variations, and in total effect more just and humane; the Germans
were ‘not petty like the Italians and seem extraordinarily patient with our many misdemeanours’.
The same prisoner, however, remarked that some German guards were too eager to shoot, killing
or wounding prisoners leaving their huts at night or at any time approaching too close to the
wire, although obviously without bad intent. More than one case occurred of mentally unbalanced
prisoners being shot while attempting to climb the fences.
Most friction with the Germans came from working parties. The Germans put the greatest
pressure on non-commissioned officers to join kommandos ‘voluntarily’: in one camp the issue
of clothing was at first refused to men who did not go out on working parties. In another camp,
as one man wrote, ‘we are referred to as work-refusing NCOs and not allowed any of the Camp
amenities, nor are we allowed to mix with the British prisoners.’ Admittedly the numbers of
non-commissioned officers had been swollen by the numerous self-promoted ‘stalag corporals’,
sergeants, or warrant officers. ‘Later the Germans got wise to this and would not accept any rank
until it had been confirmed by Geneva.’ On the job men slacked to the maximum extent possible.
In the unpopular coal mines ‘krankers’ (self-inflicted wounds) became so common a means of
avoiding work that eventually the Germans would not transfer men out of the mines for any
reason whatsoever. When men regained their health after sickness, voluntary or involuntary, they
had to go back into the mine.
Men who did not work or who fell foul of the Germans in other ways were sent to special
punishment camps. A man who had served a sentence in the stalag gaol for some offence (escaping,
abusing the guards, slacking on a working party, or ‘taking Hitler’s name in vain’) was sent to a
disciplinary camp for the next six months. Discipline at these camps was tough: here occurred
occasional shootings, stabbings, and beatings, and the guards were encouraged to oppress their
prisoners. However, some Germans had a curious regard for a rebellious prisoner: a German
captain told a parade of prisoners at Wolfsberg in 1944, ‘I respect these Disciplinaires; they are
prisoners who have done and are doing their duty. It is the duty of all prisoners of war to attempt
to escape and my duty to stop them.’ It is interesting to note also that at least one commandant
always accepted the word of a prisoner against that of a guard.
Serious offences would be punished by a term in a military prison, shared with German soldiers
also serving sentences. A New Zealand warrant officer spent eight months in Torgau military
prison for an assault made on a guard in an attempt to escape. While at Torgau he was several
times condemned to further ‘arrest’, in cells on bread and water, for refusing to work, these
periods being additional to the original sentence. When representatives of the International Red
Cross visited the prisoner-of-war section of this prison, it had been specially cleaned up for their
benefit, and as soon as it had been inspected such things as bedding were immediately removed
again from the prisoners’ quarters. The conditions, without blankets, parcels, books, games, or
any communication with the outside world, were very bad. ‘All of us were under great nervous
strain … conditions were so rigid that many of the inmates inflicted wounds on themselves in an
endeavour to get treatment in an ordinary prisoner-of-war hospital. In other words, they tried
to regain the status of an ordinary prisoner-of-war. Others escaped … and entered ordinary
stalags under false names with the same end in view.’
After the Dieppe raid, in which an order that prisoners should be tied fell into German hands,
the Germans made an elaborate and in some ways ludicrous attempt at mass reprisals against their
prisoners. All Canadians and all prisoners who had been put on the Germans’ black-list for any
reason were chained. Handcuffs connected by lengths of chain were used, but the men found it
easy to make keys to unlock them. The prisoners would form up in queues to be handcuffed;
then, to annoy the guards, they would unlock their handcuffs and queue up again and again to be
re-handcuffed: ‘This went on time after time and appeared to leave the guards completely mystified
and very bad tempered.’
Rackets and Resistance
THE GERMAN administration was efficient. The regulations for the control of prisoners of
war, in general consonant with the Geneva Convention, were well devised and had few
loopholes. How then did men acquire such articles as secret radios, genuine personal documents
as models for the forger, cameras and photographic material, as well as the thousand and one other
contraband items which helped to alleviate the rigours of prison life? The answer is simple: the
German guards were corrupt. Using such commodities as cigarettes, cocoa, tea, coffee, chocolate,
and soap, which came to them in their Red Cross parcels, prisoners of war by a process of attrition
combined with judicious blackmail wore down the never over-strong resistance of most of their
captors. Once a guard had yielded he was hopelessly compromised. Taking a bribe from a prisoner
exposed him afterwards to being reported to his superiors by the prisoner if he did not ‘behave’.
This was used deliberately as a means of ‘fixing’ unpopular guards. Guards were so much in the
prisoners’ confidence that they would warn them of stool-pigeons being planted in the camp or of
approaching searches by the Gestapo: here, of course, the guards had the personal motive that the
discovery of contraband by the secret police would bring punishment upon them. Naturally, no
guard could be induced to do more than a certain amount for prisoners.
It was usual for ‘rackets’, as these ‘gentlemen’s agreements’ between prisoners and guards
were called, to be exploited for the benefit of all prisoners. Extra food was the normal fruit of
barter transactions, but in one camp a dentist obtained his materials and also rented a drill illicitly.
In at least two oflags the Senior British Officer would only permit barter transactions by selected
officers for the purpose of obtaining security and intelligence information or escape equipment.
Sometimes individuals ran their own rackets for their own benefit, quite often to the disadvantage
of fellow-prisoners. Men who expended cigarettes in the right quarter could avoid leaving stalags
on working parties or could wait for the working party they preferred. In most stalags anything
could be bought for cigarettes. These conditions occasionally led to a breakdown of the discipline
imposed by the prisoners’ own nationality; in Lamsdorf, for instance, a razor gang (not New
Zealanders) at one time intimidated the prisoners’ own officials until strenuous action was taken
to break it up.
The elaborate secret organisations built up by prisoners of war to forward escapes or for
general resistance to the enemy could have existed without benefit of rackets, but they were
usually greatly helped by materials acquired by bribery. Some organisations were highly successful,
others were little more than wish-fulfilling hobbies. One officer felt that ‘tactical organisations’ in
camp were a menace in the hands of ‘impractical and talkative’ officers. Another officer found the
organisation in his camp very good with efficient security: no one who could not be vouched for
‘ever received any information of a confidential nature’.
The exploit of one camp’s secret committee while in transit between camps in April 1944 is
too good to pass unrecorded. Before the move 2000 pamphlets were printed: they told, in German,
of the good conditions in England, the favourable state of the war for the Allies, and the uselessness
of continuing resistance, and to the bewilderment of the Gestapo were distributed from the train
all along the route.
It had been found that the stone lining the latrine walls was suitable for lithography; using this stone, maps, in three
colours, were printed for escapers.
Education, Recreation, and Welfare
THE SCHEME for advancing the education of prisoners of war was first set on foot in the
summer of 1941. It could function only through the co-operation of a number of parties—
educational bodies, the International Red Cross, and the German authorities. The last gave it a
qualified blessing: they censored books to a minor extent and prohibited the study of European
history to any date later than 1914. Ninety-four different bodies, from bee-keepers and chiropodists to organists and swimming instructors, and twelve universities
The University of New Zealand conducted examinations in German prison camps through the University of London.
held examinations in the
camps; nearly the full range of academic courses could be studied, including the early stages of a
medical course. The scheme had originated partly in parents’ anxieties about the loss of opportunities their sons suffered in prison camps, partly in the frustration of prisoners’ own ambitions.
Many men also were aware of the chance offered them of cultivating interests or talents previously
foregone for lack of time or money; some wished to acquire knowledge for its own sake. All
courses and books were provided free to prisoners of war and examination fees were waived,
costs being borne by their respective governments.
Officers had the best opportunity for study. But at a typical stalag it was possible to maintain a
‘school’, affiliated to the University of London, with a roll of 5000 students, out of the 8000 in the
camp, studying different subjects from technical and trade training to philosophy, theology, and
history. The school kept open from 9 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. and made the maximum use of its five
classrooms. The head of this school was the graduate of an English university, and he had a staff
of about forty: prisoners with special qualifications gave their time and services with the utmost
unselfishness. Books were sent out through the International Red Cross from a specially established
section of the Bodleian Library at Oxford. Each prisoner’s needs were considered individually
in the light of his educational standard and his knowledge of his subject, and books were prescribed
accordingly; many prisoners followed individual courses of study independently of the camp
‘school’. The degree of enthusiasm and application of prisoner-students is shown by the fact that
about three-quarters of those who sat examinations passed them, in spite of the great material
hardships of prison life, the long time mails took in transit between Britain and the camps, and the
distraction of working in a crowded atmosphere; spiritual obstacles had also to be overcome,
particularly the peculiar mental lassitude which afflicts the prisoner in spite of all his resolutions.
Examining bodies were scrupulous not to lower their standards for the special benefit of prisoners
of war.
The great solace of camp life was sport. All sorts of competitive games were played, and
although space limitations sometimes made football and cricket impossible, a basketball or deck-tennis court could usually be established even on a pocket-handkerchief ground. The tanks dug
in many camps to hold water for fire-fighting in the event of air raids made excellent swimming
baths in summer, and in winter were used for skating rinks on which ice hockey could also be
played. In a hospital for the disabled, swimming sports were held for the blind, ‘comrades guiding
them along the course by calling out their names as they swam’. The societies of the Red Cross and
St. John, working through the International Red Cross at Geneva, supplied most materials for
sports and games, and the Danish and Swedish YMCAs also gave generous and valued help.
In kommandos the main recreations were card-playing, reading, and talk. Lack of space in the
compounds where prisoners were confined when not at work, and the restriction of their leisure
to Sundays, curtailed more vigorous pastimes.
Many camp theatres flourished and absorbed the energies of the talented. Not only were plays
put on but the players appeared dressed in something approximating the appropriate costumes,
for which purpose uniforms were dyed, blankets turned into men’s suits, and a thousand and one
odd rags and pieces of wrapping paper and cardboard changed into men’s and women’s clothes of
unimpeachable smartness. Stage sets, as original and complete as any used in a London theatre,
were designed and made in the camps, often from the scantiest of materials. The German authorities
were usually very sympathetic to dramatic enterprise, and it was sometimes possible for them to
hire costumes from civilian agencies on the prisoners’ behalf. The high quality of the performances
of plays, revues, and musical shows made these among the most satisfying of prison-camp
activities, both for the actors and others who contributed to the productions and for their audiences.
In stalags periodicals flourished, usually in the form of wall newspapers. The Germans printed
and sponsored a weekly paper, The Camp, for prisoners of war, to which prisoners contributed,
but which had more than a faint flavour of propaganda. In some areas prisoners’ news-sheets
were published in the stalag expressly to keep men in kommandos in touch with what was going on.
One such periodical, The Pow Wow, dealt with questions of distribution of Red Cross parcels,
administrative details, personal items, and also included messages from chaplains of the different
denominations.
The Germans’ attitude to chaplains and doctors was curious. They were recognised as protected
personnel, but they were not always encouraged to carry on their work. The Germans were
reluctant to place prisoner-of-war medical officers in charge of camp infirmaries, because they
thought they were too ready to excuse men from work. This was a soundly-based suspicion: most
medical officers in captivity prevented as many men working as they reasonably could. Chaplains
also were regarded to some extent as trouble-makers—for the Germans—and at first they were not
allowed to visit kommandos to conduct services and meet the men. In some camps, but not in all,
they were not allowed to preach without a German interpreter being present. In captivity personal
problems weighed on men more heavily than in ordinary life, and the chaplains in prison camps
did work of the highest value.
Letters, always important to men away from their homes, were the focus of many men’s
thoughts. Mail came quickly and regularly from the United Kingdom (many people in Britain
wrote to prisoners of war who were strangers to them), but letters from New Zealand were slow
in transit.
Except for part of 1944 when letters from New Zealand took less than two months to arrive.
Prisoners were allowed to send home a card and a letter every week. Delays in censorship were a constant complaint.
The Marches
AS THEIR DEFEAT came closer the general tendency of the German armies was to retreat
into the centre of Germany, taking with them not only their supplies but their prisoners as
well. Thousands of German refugees streamed towards the West in the face of the advances of the
dreaded Russians. Thousands of prisoners of war followed them in long, dreary columns on foot.
The motive for this mass removal of prisoners is a little obscure. In January 1945 the Germans
might still have deluded themselves with the hope of making a peace by bargaining, perhaps by
playing off the United States and Britain against the Soviet. In March and April it was apparent
that the German armies could not drive back the Allies, nor could Germany hope to make a
negotiated peace. The progress of the fighting had already destroyed the value of prisoners of war
as hostages before they began their terrible compelled marches. But in Germany an order, once
given, tended to continue to be carried out long after the reason for giving it had disappeared.
By early 1945 the German railways had been heavily bombed and petrol was in short supply;
if prisoners of war had to be moved they had to go on foot. It is difficult to generalise about the
routes of these marches. Men in the eastern parts of Germany or German-held territory were
earliest on the move, but camps in the West were also evacuated to the East and the North. Some
camps in the South were left undisturbed until March or April, when they were evacuated farther
south only a few days before the liberating armies appeared. The longest marches were from the
East to the West, from Poland, Silesia, or Czechoslovakia into central or southern Germany, and
the actual distances covered were increased by the general use of back roads and country lanes to
avoid the congested main thoroughfares. One good result of the marches was that many men who
would otherwise have come into Russian hands were liberated by the Americans or the British.
British prisoners liberated by the Russians in Eastern Europe were very critical of their treatment. The governments
of the British Commonwealth considered making protests to the Russian Government, but decided that the hardships
suffered by liberated prisoners of war in Eastern Europe were due to the drastic conditions of the time. It appeared that
by their own standards the Russians had treated our prisoners as well as they could, while the virtual re-imprisonment
of the men was probably due to an oddly applied sense of responsibility for their welfare. About 170 New Zealanders
were repatriated by the Russians through Odessa.
In late January 1945 the prisoners in Lamsdorf, near the borders of southern Poland, were
marched off in batches of about a thousand men to Gorlitz, fifty miles east of Dresden, covering
260 kilometres in fourteen days. After a few days in crowded discomfort in this camp, which had,
of course, its own prisoner-of-war population, the prisoners from both camps resumed their
journey and marched for a month, with three single days of rest, to Duderstadt, about thirty
miles east of Kassel. The columns had been billeted en route mostly in barns or empty factories,
occasionally in German military barracks. At these barracks the prisoners always got a hot meal;
on the farms they were dependent on the charity of the farmers, many of whom were openly
hostile. At Duderstadt the marchers were lodged in a brickworks building, in which 4500 men
were crowded into insanitary, waterless quarters where the air was filled with a fine red dust.
After a week there under the care of guards becoming more and more jittery and savage, they
moved on north, reaching Braunschweig in five days; here they were lodged for about a fortnight
in barracks evacuated by political prisoners but not by lice. On 10 April a new march began, but
it had lasted only three days when tanks of an American armoured division overtook the column.
These prisoners had been on the move for two and a half months. They had been scolded on
by nervous guards who clubbed those who fell out and shot men who scavenged for roots in the
fields. One guard who personally shot four prisoners was afterwards ‘dealt with’ summarily by
the American troops. The fifty guards who accompanied each column of a thousand prisoners
took part in the march, but many of them had bicycles, they had better food than the prisoners,
proper billets, and their gear was carried for them in waggons. Yet many of them were in almost
as bad case as those they guarded. In some of the guards the accumulating evidence of defeat
induced only apathy, in others a neurotic brutality which caused many atrocities.
Food was the gravest difficulty. There was not much of it and its distribution was irregular,
men sometimes going two days without any being issued. Some guards angrily repulsed civilian
attempts to trade with the prisoners, most of whom still had kit, such as woollen scarves or gloves,
which civilians were eager to buy. Most men, remembering losses in previous moves, began the
march loaded with as much personal gear as they could stagger along under. German civilians
gave them food only in exchange for something. ‘At no time did I see even a drink of water given
gratuitously to a sick man,’ said one prisoner. The Germans no doubt were hardened to the sight
of sick and starving men being hounded through their streets. Sometimes food was issued to
prisoners on the move and they had ‘to wolf it down while still marching, to the intense curiosity
of the Germans, who looked mildly disgusted at such a display of hunger….’ Czechs, however,
gave food to prisoners as they passed, unless prevented by the guards.
As Red Cross supplies had failed in most camps during November 1944, most of the men
began their marches in a weakened condition. The meagre diet on the march and the intense cold,
together with the fatigue of marching in all weathers over all types of going from mud to ice,
in boots falling to bits, caused widespread and increasing sickness. The men had practically no
opportunity of washing either themselves or their garments, and most of them wore the same
clothes unchanged for two and a half months. The Germans made little attempt to treat the sick:
only the fortunate few were admitted to hospitals. A column of a thousand might have a hundred
cases of dysentery, malaria, pneumonia, influenza, crippled feet, or frostbite trailing along behind
the main body in a special slow-moving ‘sick column’. Some columns provided horse-drawn
transport for these men, but numbers of them died.
Many men escaped from these columns and found shelter with friendly foreign workers until
the liberating troops appeared. ‘One of the most unpleasant details was lack of knowledge of the
column’s ultimate destination. It was impossible to discover whether the march would continue
for five, fifteen, or fifty-five days.’ Many had the encouragement that they were marching in
the general direction of England.
It might be asserted that, in view of the diminishing resources at their disposal and their acute
transport difficulties, the Germans did the best they could for the prisoners on these marches.
Though this might explain, without excusing, the scanty food rations, it does not dispose of the
responsibility for the marches taking place at all. Not only were men killed by starvation and the
bitter weather, but they were also exposed to the brutality of guards remote from their superiors
and to the hazards of war. For many men the marches were by far the harshest treatment they
received in Germany, where the treatment of British and American prisoners of war was on the
whole reasonable. It was the order to march which was criminal, and the incidental miseries and
abominations flowed from that initial order.
Liberation
LIBERATION came to many prisoners far away from the camps where they had spent most
of the war. Others enjoyed the spectacle of the familiar guards surrendering their arms,
perhaps to the prisoners themselves in anticipation of the early arrival of the Allied armies, and of
the gates of their prisons being opened by friendly troops. The long years of boredom and anxiety
were rolled back; the day of days had come, for some so much more moving than they had
anticipated, for others an anti-climax, a slackening of tension, even a disappointment.
For some the few days following liberation were difficult, especially as prisoners had to assume
new responsibilities. Some, armed with German rifles without ammunition, became guards to their
former captors. They had still to feed themselves, and sometimes dependent foreign workers as
well, in a country collapsing under the last of the strains of war, that of defeat, until full army
supply services caught up with the fast-moving tanks. One group, which was not liberated until
May 1945, broke out of its Austrian camp; the situation in the locality was confused, with SS
formations still resisting. The prisoners fed themselves, looting German food dumps and trains:
‘We had a lot of fun, but did not commit any murders or atrocities I am glad to say,’ one wrote.
Freedom in the first instance did not necessarily mean a Bacchanalian carnival; it might sooner
express itself in a return to the forms of Army life. ‘Up early, wash, dress as a soldier again. Nothing
but guards and duties and orders, counter-orders.’ A sapper took command of an Austrian camp
and drove away in an enormous car to find the Allied forces. Another New Zealander, a non-commissioned officer, took charge of the town of Graz, dispersed the local Nazis, whom he could
not entirely protect from the vengeance of the population, and was in complete control when the
Allies arrived.
Late in March 1945, the senior British officer at a prisoner-of-war hospital, a New Zealand
major, received a deputation from the local South German townspeople, offering to kill the few
genuine Nazis in their town and surrender it. On his orders a messenger was sent to the American
forces, who next day occupied the town without resistance. The New Zealander then remained
as Town Major for several weeks. Some SS troops hiding in the woods used to make periodical
forays in search of food, and to check these raids he instituted patrols of former prisoners armed
with captured German weapons. He commandeered a factory generator to supply the town with
essential electricity, erected a new 60-foot bridge to replace one blown up by the Germans, and
allocated ‘all labour between 16 and 60 to farms so that the seed might be sown for next season’s
harvest’.
This man, like others, had doubly earned his leave by the time he was flown out to English
reception areas. The arrangements for the transfer of prisoners from Germany to Britain in
Dakotas or Lancasters worked promptly and efficiently. The service was flexible enough to take
men from almost any part of Germany to Britain, using French or Belgian airfields as staging
points, within a few days of liberation. Some prisoners from Austria were flown out to Italy.
Going by air was closer to the pattern of liberation which men had sketched in their own minds:
the rapid transfer from the prison camp to friendly hands and the excellent and smoothly running
organisation reassured those who had been fearful, in the years of captivity, of being forgotten;
they found that their needs were being met as rapidly as was humanly possible, and their priority
was second only to that of military operations.
The Germans
THE GERMANS in the main observed the provisions of the Geneva Convention and on the
whole they treated prisoners of war and civilian internees
About 100 New Zealanders, including some women, were interned by the Germans; they were mostly merchant
seamen or passengers captured at sea.
with fairness and justice. It is
well to bear this in mind, as this account of prisoners of war in German hands cites instances
of German brutality or violation of the Convention. But the Germans’ consideration for their
prisoners fluctuated during the war and reflected the fortunes of war. After the Greek campaign
their treatment of prisoners was generally harsh; it improved for a few months and then deteriorated
again in the summer of 1942 with the German advance to the Caucasus and Rommel’s successes
in the Western Desert. After Stalingrad and the landings in North Africa a marked change for the
better showed itself in German manners and behaviour. Yet, even at the end of the war, many
Germans would not admit to themselves that their country could be defeated, and they remained
constant in their attitude of rigour to their prisoners. But, by and large, courtesy to prisoners had
returned by the end of the war.
The Germans treated the sick humanely except sometimes in forward areas such as Greece.
The medical equipment they supplied to prison camps was inadequate, however, and prisoners
would have fared very badly if it had not been for the special supplies of medicines and comforts
sent in through the International Red Cross. The Germans were punctilious about funerals,
burying with full military honours those who died of sickness or accident; numbers also were
killed in Allied air raids.
Prisoners of war gained considerable insight into the German character in their years of
captivity. They remarked on the constantly vituperative, hectoring manner of German non-commissioned officers and their liability literally to scream with rage. Most of their guards they
found ‘decent chaps’, if a trifle wooden and blindly subservient to orders and to rank. Many of
them were men of low physical grading or elderly, of a very different type and outlook from
German front-line troops, whose treatment of men at the time of capture was nearly always
excellent. The German virtues of order and obedience were fully exhibited in their prison camps,
whose commandants on the whole were fair and just.
Another side to the character of Hitler’s Germany was seen in the Germans’ treatment of
prisoners of other nationalities. Many camps had a Russian compound, and the condition of the
Russian prisoners (whose government did not adhere to the Geneva Convention and who had to
exist on the German rations) was pitiable. British prisoners made gifts to them from their own
parcels to the utmost extent possible. They were astounded to find the Germans able to behave
humanely to one group of captives and so brutally to other groups. But few had not seen these
distinctions obliterated before the end of the war.
The fall of greatness has been a constant theme of tragedy. Prisoners of war witnessed, from all
too intimate a vantage point, the drama of Germany’s overthrow. The nation which had filled all
Europe with terror had been beaten in the field; force had been mastered by greater force; the
nation which had waxed great by the sword was perishing by the sword. This historic tragedy
should have been profoundly moving as an emotional spectacle. But prisoners of war were
generally indifferent to it. That is not to their discredit. Their thoughts were fixed on their own
homes, and they did not pause to feel vindictive towards the captors from whom they had at
last been liberated.
Acknowledgments
THE SOURCES consulted in the preparation of this account include books written
by former prisoners of war, as well as eye-witness accounts and interviews recorded
by the author of the official prisoner-of-war volume (Wynne Mason).
The sketches are by A. G. Douglas (page 7 and foot of page 14), R. W. Collier
(top of page 14), E. G. Smith (page 16), and M. A. Cameron (back cover).
The photographs come from many collections, which are stated where they
are known:
page 15 (top), page 17 (top) page 19 (bottom) A. J. Spence
page 16 (top) T. G. Bedding
(bottom) A. H. Kyle
page 18 (bottom) J. Ledgerwood
page 20 (top and bottom), page 21 (top), page 22 Lee Hill
page 21 (centre) I. M. Matheson
The photographers risked severe punishment and showed considerable resource in
overcoming the technical difficulties of taking and printing photographs while prisoners
of war.
THE AUTHOR: D. O. W. Hall, graduated at Cambridge with honours in
English Literature and in History in 1929. He was Associate Editor of Centennial
Publications. He served with the Royal New Zealand Naval Volunteer Reserve
in the Pacific in the Second World War, and is now stationed in Dunedin
Director of Adult Education, University of Otago.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
cover photograph Camp perimeter
PRISONERS OF ITALYD. O. W. HALLWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
After Capture
NEARLY all the New Zealand prisoners of war in Italian hands were first captured by the
Germans. A few were caught in Greece by Italian occupation troops, and some were airmen
shot down over the Western Desert or over Italy. On several occasions in the Desert campaigns
German tanks overran positions held by New Zealanders, and these men found themselves, dazed
and unbelieving, ‘in the bag’. Some few made their escape shortly after capture; others had the
luck to be liberated by our own forces.
The first anxiety of enemy guards was to get their prisoners back quickly into territory they
firmly held. But they rarely had transport for prisoners, and the men had to march back distances
varying from ten to sixty miles, taking from one to four days on the way. Their first captors.
German front-line troops, were usually courteous, correct, and good-natured; often they apologised
to their prisoners when they handed them over to the Italians, to whom—since they had been
captured in Italian territory—they were to ‘belong’. The Italians frequently relieved them of their
valuables—wristlet watches, fountain pens, cigarette cases—and on many occasions behaved
arrogantly and without consideration for their welfare, although some of the men noticed that
their Italian guards were much less demonstrative when there was no audience to witness their
warlike demeanour while guarding unarmed prisoners of war.
Few men were given any food at all during the first one or two days after their capture, and
until they reached a more or less permanent camp they were rarely given any form of shelter.
The Italian prison camps in North Africa were appallingly run, and it was only because their stay in
them was comparatively short that many of the men survived. At Benghazi, for instance, in 1942,
one of the holding camps used was in a saucer-shaped wadi, a few miles from the town, where a
group of date palms provided the illusion of a fertile oasis. Up to two thousand men were herded
into 2½ acres, groundsheets set up as tents giving shelter to about a quarter of the number. Sanitation, always a weak point with the Italians, consisted of three or four trenches, only four feet
deep, as the ground was rocky and difficult to dig; after a few days these latrines overflowed and
new ones had to be dug. Food was scanty: a daily ration of four ounces of Italian bully beef,
perhaps eight ounces of bread, a cup of cooked rice, a cup of synthetic coffee. On this diet, even
if supplemented by bread gained by exchanges with the guards for any valuables that had survived
the searches, and by prickly pears gathered on expeditions through the wire (at the risk of being
shot), the men within a few weeks suffered from the dizziness and ‘blackouts’ which are symptoms
of malnutrition. The other camps, whether barbed-wire pens in the open or massive, fortress-like
buildings, provided no better conditions; some were worse.
The prisoners had to languish in these holding camps for anything up to three months waiting
for transport to Italy. They began to know the Italians better and on closer acquaintance found
them mostly humane, though unpractical and inefficient. As there was little to do in the compounds,
a few concerts were organised. In one group, men turned to carving small objects from wood and,
strange as it may seem, an arts and crafts exhibition was held, in Cyrenaica, a few weeks after
capture. The listlessness of undernourishment did not encourage energetic pursuits even if they
had been available. Trading became important. A man who had been captured in a shirt and shorts
was glad to ‘buy’ an army greatcoat for a tin of bully and twenty cigarettes. Rumour also flowered:
one of its strangest blossoms was ‘King Farouk has given Rommel twenty-four hours to get out
of Egypt!’ Morale was still high as no man realised that he might remain a prisoner of war for
several years.
Across the Mediterranean
OFFICER prisoners of war generally did not have long to wait before being taken to Italy.
Many were flown across the Mediterranean; some went by submarine and others by ship.
Those who went by submarine—their conditions were very cramped but they were otherwise
amiably treated—strongly hoped that the vigilance of the Royal Navy would be at least temporarily relaxed. Those who went by air were equally anxious about the activities of the Royal
Air Force. Many of those on board cruisers or destroyers called at Crete or Greece before crossing
to the south of Italy.
The men were taken to Italy packed in the holds of freighters. Before they sailed they were
issued with three days’ rations—two small loaves of bread, four biscuits, and three tins of bully
between two men. The voyage, usually by way of Piraeus, through the Corinth Canal, and thence
across the Adriatic, might last longer without more food being issued, although in one ship the
prisoners gained access to the ship’s stores and so fared reasonably well. In some ships the men had
to remain in the hold without light or adequate ventilation, conditions which were worsened by
the number of cases of dysentery; in a few ships they had the run of the decks during daylight.
The Mediterranean in 1941 and 1942 was hardly safe for Italian ships. Vessels were torpedoed
and prisoners drowned in them without even a chance of escape. One merchant ship with 2000
prisoners in its holds was torpedoed or mined a few miles off the coast of Greece. The Italian crew
abandoned it immediately, taking off a few of the prisoners of war but leaving most of them and
their Italian guard on board. A German engineer officer who remained on the ship saved the
situation. Although slowly sinking by the bow, the ship’s engines were intact, and with the help of
the prisoners he succeeded, in spite of deteriorating weather, in beaching her. Meanwhile,
the medical orderlies had rescued the survivors among the prisoners in the forward hold and had
attended to their injuries as best they could. Many men got ashore that night by a bosun’s chair
rigged between the ship and the top of the cliff, and others later left the ship by a pontoon bridge
built by some German marines. Although some took three days to get ashore, the Italians did not
move the many injured away to hospital until the last man had come off.
Prisoners of war in Italian hands in Greece were mostly either the survivors of torpedoed
vessels or fugitives who had hidden after the German invasion and were later captured by or
betrayed to Italian garrison troops. Conditions generally were comparable to the harshness of
Cyrenaica rather than to the better-regulated, though not wholly satisfactory, treatment of Italy
itself. The Italians seem to have small gift for dealing with the unexpected. The survivors, some of
them bare-footed, from the damaged ship whose beaching was described above, were made to
march six miles along a road covered with rough metal and bordered by thistles, were imprisoned
several days in Navarino Castle, and were then taken by bus and train to Acacia and confined in an
intolerably small compound, a field hastily surrounded by barbed wire. Here the prisoners lived in
tents and suffered from the cold: it was nearly Christmas, the dead of winter, and some of the men
already had frostbite from their misadventures by sea. Rations were meagre; this was one of the
camps where some of the more privileged fared better than their fellow-prisoners. Soon there was
ample reason for the camp’s nickname of ‘Dysentery Acre’. As nearly everyone was ill, there
was small point in establishing hospital tents. Only the worst cases, some of whom died, were
removed to a Greek hospital for treatment.
Bad feeding and confused organisation were not the only faults of which the Italians in Greece
were guilty. In a transit camp a man was clubbed and tied up for six hours for not obeying
promptly enough a sentry’s order to move away from the boundary wire. In another camp a man
who had been recaptured after several months’ wandering in Greece was punished for an attempted
escape by being severely flogged with a rubber whip: this was done publicly on the order of the
commandant.
Although Red Cross parcels were occasionally issued to prisoners in Greece, the Italian camps,
none of them permanent (though Italian transit camps had a way of becoming permanent), did
not receive the visits of the representatives of the protecting power. The voyage of at least some of
the shipwrecked party from Greece to Italy was satisfactory. These men sailed in an Italian troopship, had the same rations as the Italian troops on board, and were generally well treated.
Transit Camps
PRISONERS landing in Italy were given a preliminary clean-up at their port of disembarkation, usually Brindisi or Taranto. At Taranto the arrangements, in the hands of the Italian
Navy, were efficient. The men had hot showers, very welcome after the cramped conditions on
board ship, and simultaneously their clothes were steamed and fumigated to kill the lice—most
men had picked up these squalid insects in the North African holding camps. One disadvantage
of this necessary process was that the clothes came back with hundreds of creases which could
never afterwards be removed. Thus the last vestige of military smartness disappeared from the
uniforms in which prisoners had already been forced to live and sleep for weeks or months together.
From the port of disembarkation prisoners of war went to transit camps in the south of Italy.
Bari (Campo 75) may be taken as typical of these. In the winter of 1941 it was not a pleasant place.
It was overcrowded, 250 officers and 2000 men living in what might have been reasonable
accommodation for a quarter of those numbers. Sanitation was bad, medicines and medical equipment scarce (the shortage was general throughout Italy), and the treatment of the sick within the
camp rudimentary: only the severely ill were taken to hospital. The rations issued did not exceed
1100 calories daily, and even from this meagre diet some of the Italian supply staff were able to
subtract something to sell for their own benefit on the black market. In four months only two
and a half Red Cross parcels were issued to each man; the commandant, tersely described as
a ‘swine,’ refused to issue one to each prisoner every week.
Campo 75 had already been the scene of an atrocity which was afterwards punished as a war
crime. The General in charge of the district, who vied with the commandant of the camp in his
unpleasantness to prisoners of war, had invited two British officers, recaptured after an escape, to
demonstrate for his satisfaction just how they had passed through the camp’s barbed-wire perimeter.
They reluctantly complied, and as soon as they were well entangled in the meshes he ordered the
guard to shoot and himself fired on them with his own revolver. One of the officers was killed,
the other wounded.
Report of the war criminal trial of Maj-Gen Bellomo, 23–28 July 1945.
At Bari also, after a tunnel had been discovered in their section of the camp,
the officers’ possessions were searched while they were absent on a walk: all Red Cross food was
confiscated and many personal articles disappeared.
A medical orderly who revisited this camp in the spring of 1942 on his way to be repatriated
found it much improved, possibly because it held smaller numbers; the sanitation was better, and
the food clean and good. The general tendency of Italian prison camps was for them to begin as
transit camps and after several months to become permanent, with some consequent amelioration
of conditions.
This survey inevitably cites instances of Italian inefficiency and corruption. It is not its purpose
to sum up for and against the Italian people, but it must also be mentioned that while the treatment
of prisoners by the Italian Army or by the Carabinieri Reali was sometimes harsh, ordinary Italians
were often prepared to go out of their way to do prisoners of war a good turn without any hope
of reward. Women threw bread into camps like Tuturano, where conditions were known to be
bad, and prisoners who gave their water bottles to civilians to be filled with water while waiting
to board trains at Bari station in transit to other camps had them returned full of wine. The machine
of Fascism regarded it as a duty to behave oppressively, although this was not the sentiment of
most Italians.
Gruppignano
GRUPPIGNANO (Campo 57), near Udine, between the Adriatic and the Alps, was a camp in
which many New Zealanders were imprisoned; it was the policy of the Italians to carry out
the terms of the Geneva Convention by concentrating in the same camp prisoners of war of the
same nationality.
Most of the New Zealand prisoner-of-war NCOs and men were confined in Campo 57 (Gruppignano) and Campo 52
(Chiavari); there were smaller numbers at a few other main camps and at numerous working camps, particularly in
northern Italy. At one stage Gruppignano housed nearly 2000 New Zealanders.
This was one reason for the train journeys which punctuated prisoner-of-war
existence. These journeys were made in varying degrees of comfort. If many men moved together,
they might be packed tightly into closed trucks resembling furniture vans, with or without wooden
seats. The guards were chary of letting prisoners out at halts even though the journey might last
three days. On the other hand, small groups of prisoners travelling separately with their guards
were usually well treated. Guards were known to buy them food and wine out of their own
pockets, and invariably civilian travellers, without distinction of sex, were evicted from their
seats to make room for the prisoners.
Every prisoner-of-war camp in Italy had a squad of Carabinieri Reali, the police force whose
specialist efficiency preceded the advent of Fascism. These men were responsible for security,
seemed to be able to over-rule the Army commandant of camps, no matter what his rank, conducted the most rigorous and unexpected searches of personal belongings, and sometimes treated
prisoners with the brutality which presumably had become habitual to them in dealing with
civil offenders. At Gruppignano the commandant was himself a colonel in the Carabinieri Reali;
he was also military governor of Udine and an ardent Fascist. This man, Calcaterra, prided himself
on the strictness of his discipline, and the thirty cells at Gruppignano were never empty. Had he
not been killed by Italian partisans, he would probably have faced war-crimes charges. Many
prisoners had something approaching respect for this would-be ogre, and one recorded his
satisfaction that Calcaterra at the fall of Mussolini did not, like so many Fascists, attempt to change
his coat. Atrocities were committed in this camp—a man who had got drunk was shot by a
carabiniere while being helped back to his hut, and another was shot while getting wood after
dark—and in general discipline was childishly pin-pricking. Men whose faces twitched on roll-call
parade went straight to the cells, without trial or inquiry. If too much talking went on at night
in any hut, the Carabinieri took several men at random and put them in the cells. Life in the camp’s
cells was not as bad as it might have been, as extra food and cigarettes were smuggled in by friends,
the cigarettes being hidden inside ration bread. When escapes took place, collective punishments
were imposed on the whole camp. Although Gruppignano was strictly run by the Carabinieri,
many prisoners of war preferred this camp to others because it was run efficiently and the ‘rackets’
which flourished elsewhere were suppressed.
On arrival at Gruppignano, after weeks or months in transit camps, many of the men were in
rags and tatters. They and their garments were disinfested, and they were issued with old Yugoslav
or Greek uniforms. It was a great relief later to get British uniforms through the Red Cross and
woollen underwear in the first parcel from New Zealand House. In the camp, baths were irregular
and lice common: the periodical steaming of clothes did not kill them all. The medical department
was backward, although matters improved when an Australian medical officer took over the sick
parades.
In Gruppignano the space available for exercise was ample, but there was no hut set aside for
recreation. Cricket, football, baseball, volley ball, and deck tennis were played, much of the
material being provided by the British Red Cross, sometimes indirectly: the Italians would not
allow balls for cricket and baseball to be supplied, but the prisoners made their own, weaving
them from the string round Red Cross parcels. ‘Blowers’
Blowers were of several different types. This is a former prisoner’s description of the ingenious ‘1942 Rotary Model’:
‘These little blowers, made solely out of old food tins plus an old bit of wire for an axle, a heel plate for bearings and
a bootlace for driving belt, are ideal. They create such a draught that we can burn any old bits of swamp wood and
rubbish we like to stick in the fire box.’
were a feature of life in this camp, as in
many others. The scarcity of fuel was severe throughout Italy, and much ingenuity was lavished
on the perfection of these cookers; competitions were held between different types and different
operators to boil water in the shortest time. Several could bring over a litre (approximately 1 ¾
pints) to the boil in less than two minutes. Even the Italian commandant was fond of displaying
his camp’s ‘blowers’ to visiting Generals.
Like many of the Italian camps Gruppignano had beautiful surroundings, including a view of
the distant Dolomite Mountains. A prisoner has recorded that his main memories of this camp
were the beauty of the Alps, the echoing of the bells of the many old churches nearby, stamping
the feet on the frozen mud in winter in an attempt to keep warm, the long waits for meals, the
weaving of the searchlights along the wire at night, ‘the weird solemnity of the funeral processions
out to the gate when a man died’, and ‘the box-like interiors of the huts, the patterns on the walls
in the place where I slept, the strange, coke-like smell of a charcoal burner’.
Officers’ Camps
ALTHOUGH in their treatment of officer prisoners of war they sometimes violated the
provisions of the Geneva Convention in detail, on the whole the Italians tried to observe
them. The three principal prison camps in which New Zealand officers were held at different
times in Italy were Padula (Campo 35), an ancient monastery, Poppi (Campo 38), a villa in the
Apennines, formerly a convent, and Modena (Campo 47), a military barracks. A few senior
officers lived in a modern country villa near Florence (Campo 12) from which Brigadiers J. Hargest
and R. Miles made their notable escape, and those ardent spirits who came into too fierce collision
with authority were sent to the punishment fortress of Gavi (Campo 5).
At one time Padula was oppressively ruled by an emotional Carabinieri colonel who hysterically
maltreated prisoners caught attempting escape.
Horned Pigeon, by George Millar (Heinemann), Chapter IX.
At another time in Padula a kindly, elderly
commandant presided over a camp in which a fair standard of comfort had been achieved;
prisoners had developed the black market possibilities of the commodities contained in Red Cross
parcels to get whatever they wanted. It was in Padula, in 1942, that 400 New Zealanders on their
first Anzac Day in captivity held their own dawn parade.
Poppi was the first camp set aside exclusively for New Zealand officers, but perhaps through
Italian haziness in Commonwealth geography, a few South Africans, Rhodesians, and British
were also to be found among its 100 inmates. Until Red Cross parcels began to arrive in the spring
of 1942, three months after the establishment of the camp, Poppi was a hungry place where most
were too listless to move about unnecessarily and squander energy. (Newly established camps
rarely received parcels promptly. There was a time-lag before the International Red Cross became
aware of their existence, but as soon as it did, the new camps were sent full supplies.) Like most
Italian camps in winter it was bitterly cold: there was the usual shortage of fuel for the stufas
(stoves) which were scattered through the different rooms with a delusive liberality. In spite of the
small recreation space out of doors, basketball and deck tennis were played on a ground excavated
by the prisoners themselves, and many engaged in gardening on the steep slopes. Lectures and
courses of study were extensively developed, particularly the study of Italian. On Saturday evenings
a formal mess and a smoke concert were held; these were enlivened by wine saved from the
week’s ration.
Unwilling Guests, by J. D. Gerard (A. H. and A. W. Reed), p. 65.
The Florence bookshops had provided Tauchnitz editions of English books
before the arrival of Red Cross supplies.
Towards the end of 1942 the New Zealand officers were moved to Modena, where, with
others captured in the Alamein fighting, their numbers rose to 200. They shared the camp with
800 South Africans and 200 British. With the additional resources of larger numbers and the
productive capacity of the most fertile part of Italy, Modena was a well-fed camp. It was also
comfortable and the Italian staff were well ‘managed’ by their prisoners. Wine was available in
greater quantity than to civilians. The space for exercise was ample, and baseball, football, and
basketball were played with keen international rivalry. Entertainments were many and the camp
had an excellent orchestra.
Capture
Conditions at Benghazi
Then to Italy
Officers’ Camps
Work & Routine
Food
Guards and Prisoners
Although university and professional examinations were not available in Italy, the studious
at Modena did a good deal of work. Ex-prisoners, however, have commented on the quick waning
of enthusiasms and their own inability to persevere with continuous study. A central news agency
digested the contents of German and Italian newspapers and issued a suitably adjusted version of
the news.
As the Allies advanced in Italy chances of liberation were very much in everybody’s mind.
At Modena the nearness of the water level to the surface made the digging of escape tunnels
difficult, and interest in them waned as the chances of being liberated by the Allied armies appeared
larger.
Other Camps in Italy
CIRCUMSTANCES varied from camp to camp, but some conditions were fairly general—
hunger in the early days, overcrowding in all transit camps, poor sanitation until protests had
taken effect, and an atmosphere, until the authorities’ bluff had been called, of overbearing truculence
and petty restrictions. Tuturano (Campo 85), near Brindisi, rivalled Bari as a bad camp, although
men straight from the amenities of Benghazi were delighted to be given bunks, palliasses, and
blankets.
Early in 1942 Tuturano had an outbreak of meningitis which alarmed the Italians as well as
the prisoners: however, one Italian doctor certified several supposed deaths from meningitis as
being caused by malnutrition. Discipline was harsh or at least contrary to the Convention: some
men were tied up for periods ranging from two to ten hours for trading their boots with the
Italian soldiers for bread. When the Red Cross found that the camp existed and sent parcels,
shortage of fuel to cook their contents became a problem which the prisoners solved by using the
shutters from the windows of their huts. To the despair and disgust of the Italians, 150 of these
shutters disappeared in a few weeks.
Another camp where many New Zealanders were held was Chiavari (Campo 52), on the
Ligurian coast near Genoa. This was considered a fairly good camp. Of course, it is important to
remember that a camp which could be very bad at one period, particularly in the early days, might
be greatly improved later; few camps had bad conditions permanently, but none was perfect
continuously. Discipline was moderate, although the twice-daily appello or check parade was
strictly enforced. One commandant had himself been a prisoner in the hands of the Austrians in
the 1914–18 War and had a certain sympathy with his British captives. However, the Carabinieri
ran true to form here, as elsewhere, and once, when a tunnel had been found, kicked and beat a
hut leader to reveal the names of the offenders. Protests to the camp commandant for this and
similar acts of violence were ineffective.
Some New Zealanders passed through Sulmona (Campo 78) where the prison was located
on a site which bore the encouraging name of Fonte d’Amore, or Fountain of Love. During 1941
water was turned on for only six hours a day, and in any case the ablution arrangements were
inadequate. Men had baths at slightly longer intervals than once a fortnight. The concrete huts
were crowded and the lack of ventilation and adequate air space dangerous to health. The outdoor
recreation space was small, though there was a hut set aside for recreation. It was typical of Italian
inefficiency that the cells at Sulmona were the easiest part of the camp to escape from.
Gravina (Campo 65) was a bad camp. It was cold and hungry. Men died of starvation. Before
the autumn of 1942, when Red Cross parcels began to arrive, the camp was filled with rows of
exhausted men sitting or lying down to conserve their meagre energy. The commandant at this
time was believed to be corrupt and to be selling food, boots, and clothing intended for the
prisoners in his charge.
No account is given here of the many work camps where from fifty to 200 men lived with rather
more freedom than in the main camps, even though their facilities for recreation were more
limited. Their contacts with the Italian population were more direct and sympathetic. But, even
in a camp like Tuturano, an Italian civilian cook was at pains to provide from his own resources
special cakes at Christmas for the prisoners. Nearly all the 3600 New Zealanders who were in
Italian hands at the Armistice had received some acts of kindness from individual Italians which
tempered their resentment of the inefficiency of Italian administration.
Working Camps
THE ITALIANS were apparently unwilling to allow men to work singly or in small groups
as they did on farms in Germany. They were employed therefore in groups of from fifty
to 100, heavily guarded, a fact that itself contributed to the uneconomic character of prisoner-of-war
labour. Another factor was the uncooperative attitude of most of the workers, something the
Italians had difficulty in believing. A farm party for instance always had a remarkable ‘inability
to distinguish between a beet and a weed’, and most prisoners on working parties were interested
primarily in the black market opportunities given them by direct contact with the Italian people.
They did not work very heartily, and the language difficulty was something to hide behind when
reproaches were heaped upon them. The Italian guards, unless they were Carabinieri, though
vigilant to prevent escapes (for which they themselves would be heavily punished), were not
good as slave-drivers. Most prisoners felt that the produce of the large farms where they worked
was fair game, and acquired extra vegetables and fruit with or without the connivance of friendly
guards. Their rations were in any case better as manual workers. On most farms the owner found it
politic to be generous, giving his prisoner-workers wine daily and generally attempting to build
up a good impression. Soap was very scarce in Italy, and with that supplied to prisoners in Red
Cross parcels, bread, wine, eggs, and other food could be acquired. It was reputed to be popular
with the guards because it was believed to help them in their love affairs.
Hours of work on a typical farm were from 7 a.m. to noon, then, after a two-hour siesta, from
2 p.m. to 6 p.m. A party doing navvying work excavating a canal had a nine-hour day in summer
but in winter worked only six hours. The pay, at 4 lire a day, was better than the 1 lira paid in
camp, but in at least one instance it was still paid in ‘camp lire’ and had to be sent back to the
parent camp to be exchanged for real money and then spent by the Italian officer in charge of the
working camp on behalf of individual prisoners, a typically cumbersome Italian arrangement.
Generally conditions and treatment were much better than in camp. When anything happened of
which they strongly disapproved, prisoners organised effective strikes or periods of ‘go-slow’.
It was amazing to the peasants, disciplined by twenty years of Fascism, to see authority challenged,
even more amazing when the challenge was successful.
The Italian peasantry were mostly friendly, although the friendship did not always show itself
very actively until after the Armistice. Most were indifferent to politics; many were weary of the
war and wearier still of Fascism; some had sons of their own who were prisoners of war in British
hands. The Red Cross parcels that prisoners received were an obvious contradiction of the propaganda story that England was starving, and in any case many Italians regarded Fascism as a
‘shop-window stunt’ unable to hide the real poverty of Italy. At work in the fields, vineyards,
mines, and quarries, civilian workers would willingly trade and were also eager to pass on information about the war (often the most exaggerated of rumours) whenever the guards’ backs
were turned.
Life in Camp
THE ITALIANS were themselves short of food. The drastic cut in rations made in March 1942
was applied to Italian base troops as well as to prisoners of war: these are supposed to receive
identical rations, and in this matter the Italians kept to the letter of the Geneva Convention. A New
Zealand doctor has stated: ‘After I escaped and had lived with the Italian people for some time,
I was able to get a truer perspective of the poverty of Italy, and to realise how much the authorities
did try to help us….’ Although prisoners of war fared badly and could not have survived without
Red Cross parcels, the mass of the Italian people, at least in the towns, was no better off.
Food was the main preoccupation of men’s thoughts. The Red Cross parcel was the focus of
intense interest, and the day of issue was the ‘day of days’ in prison life. How to deal with the ten
pounds or so of tinned food it contained was a problem each solved for himself. The two main
schools of thought were ‘the seven-day planners who allocated portions for each day’ and those
who preferred to overeat for two or three days and then go hungry for four or five. Unfortunately
the supply of Red Cross parcels to camps in Italy was sometimes interrupted for months together,
though the attempt was always made to make the regular issue of one a week. Peculation and
pillaging of parcels occasionally occurred: in one camp an Italian officer and two privates were
placed under arrest for ‘thieving from Red Cross parcels’ in transit.
The men themselves ate the bulk food in their parcels, but they sometimes traded away some
of the tea, coffee, cocoa, and soap which they contained. It was even possible to dispose of used
tea-leaves to advantage. Bread, fruit, eggs, and wine were the chief articles acquired in these illicit
exchanges with guards or civilians. The prison canteens offered small opportunity to add to the
food supply. They had on sale intermittently figs, grapes, oranges, tomatoes, biscuits, and sweets,
but more usually their stock-in-trade consisted of notebooks, pencils, combs, and similar articles;
in any case prices were high, 5 lire for a kilo. (2 ¼ lb.) of grapes or 15 lire for a half kilo. of figs,
a whole kilo. of figs thus representing approximately a month’s pay. Prisoners could make their
purchases only with ‘camp money’, and thus the canteen had a monopoly which seems always to
have been exploited to their disadvantage. At some camp canteens bottles of brandy and even of
champagne were for sale, but at 200 lire each only ‘“Two-up Kings” or similar gambling
aristocracy of vast wealth’ could afford to buy them. For each British Commonwealth prisoner of
war in Italy, the British Red Cross paid a lira a day for the purchase of fruit and vegetables in
addition to the Italian ration, but prisoners doubted whether anything like value was obtained
for this expenditure.
After the halving of prisoner-of-war rations in March 1942, the daily issue was reduced to a loaf
of bread weighing perhaps five ounces and a ladle of macaroni or vegetable stew. Every few days a
piece of cheese the size of a matchbox would be issued, and about twice a week there were traces
of meat in the stew. Breakfast consisted solely of ersatz coffee, described as ‘sugarless and milkless
and tasting strongly of earth’. The midday stew was thin: ‘Thirty pieces, or more, of macaroni in
half a pint of faintly oily water was considered by the fortunate recipient to be quite a lucky
occurrence’.
The ration of five Italian cigarettes daily to prisoners of war was punctually distributed. Some
wine was also occasionally issued, one-third of a litre of Italian Army issue, christened ‘demon vino’
by those who found it too sour for their unsophisticated palates. ‘Plonk artists’ were eager to buy
it from comrades in exchange for cigarettes. At Christmas the Italian Red Cross made gifts of
cake, biscuits, and wine in some camps; in one the Italian Air Force gave each prisoner a bottle of
beer. His Holiness the Pope, at Christmas and at other times, made gifts to prisoners of war of
musical instruments, medical comforts, or money to be spent for their welfare.
Books found their way into camps in considerable numbers, at least after the first months of
captivity, but not many had the mental energy to study hard. Light novels were favoured. Before
1943 the Italians would not allow sheet music to be sent into camps as they feared that musical
notation might be used as a code. Men welcomed sport, concerts, debates, plays, and revues,
organised by the more restless or conscientious spirits; they welcomed the services held by padre
prisoners of war; but life tended more and more to be built up on routines. ‘There was not much
that was done purely for the sake of its being done,’ wrote one prisoner. ‘A man did not normally
read to enjoy a literary form or the skill of a plot. Nor did he genuinely listen to a lecture for
enlightenment. He used such happenings to ease the time between meals. There was a peculiar
dislike of any irregularity …. existence is more effortless if built upon simple habit patterns.’
Much time was spent (one cannot say ‘wasted’) in purely personal gossip. Prisoners were
generally able to send a letter-card and a postcard every week, but the arrival of inward mail was
very irregular and infrequent. Men would lend their own letters from home to friends who had
not had mail, and those who received these favours derived a strong vicarious pleasure from
somebody else’s family gossip.
No camps had illicit radios, as the general standard of supervisory vigilance in Italy was high.
But news came in by word of mouth, sometimes from Italians who heard the BBC. In one camp
the comments in a wall newspaper displeased the Italians so much that it was suppressed; its very
title Domani (‘tomorrow’: the stock Italian answer to any request whatsoever) was itself an insult.
But this journal still managed to carry on; it was read out in each hut every night. In another camp
a prisoners’ newspaper called The Mountain Echo, consisting of a single longhand copy, was
openly circulated. It was highly critical of the Italians, but they never suppressed it.
Give Me Air, by Edward Ward (John Lane), p. 63.
Guards and Prisoners
THE RELATIONSHIP between a prisoner of war and his guards is bound to be an uneasy
one for both parties. The guard cannot fraternise with his prisoner without danger to himself.
In Italy there were heavy penalties imposed on guards for any dereliction of duty, especially
heavy for failure to prevent escapes. So that guards should never become too closely associated
with any group of prisoners, they were changed about every two months. When it was possible
to gain some privileges or extras through a friendly guard, the more scrupulous used this for the
benefit of their fellow-prisoners as personal exploitation of a successful ‘racket’ excited resentment.
The Italian guards were efficient, if vigilance in the prevention of escapes or the breaking of
camp rules by prisoners is efficiency. At night the Italian sentry was always alert, for ‘he is so
damned scared he keeps himself wide awake’. Many of the guards were good fellows. One result
of the severity of the punishment hanging over the head of any guard who allowed a prisoner to
escape or break the rules was that guards would wink at minor infractions of the rules and even at
serious ones. A New Zealander who tried to escape from a hospital in a orderly’s white coat was
able to convince the guard who caught him that it was in their mutual interest to say no more
about the incident.
Unwilling Guests, by J. D. Gerard, p. 103.
The morale of prisoners of war is seen most clearly in their attitude to their captors. One
officer said that he never settled down to the humiliation and boredom of prison life and ‘having to
obey orders handed out by an inferior race’. Perhaps the sense of the inferiority of their captors
was a necessary element in men’s self-esteem, but prisoners had every opportunity of evaluating
Italian efficiency: Italians could never refrain from fuss and petty restrictions. Generally the attitude
of those in positions of responsibility, camp leaders or Senior British Officers, was extreme belligerence on behalf of those junior to them, often to their own immediate detriment. A New Zealand
Regimental Sergeant-Major on many occasions stood up to the authorities, securing the punishment of an Italian officer who had kicked a prisoner and refusing to call for volunteers from
among the prisoners to go on a working party. During the hungry early days in Tuturano transit
camp the same man had been placed under arrest for refusing to keep the troops on parade on
empty stomachs. It was a habit of the Italians to punish hut leaders and even camp leaders for successful escapes by those under their command.
In many camps prisoners of war achieved a definite moral ascendancy over their captors, who
allowed them increasingly to ‘run their own show’. The comic drawings of Arthur Douglas
made at a small working camp near Ampezzo give the atmosphere of what may be called mature
prison life: the guard of a working party lying asleep while prisoners inspect the rust in his rifle,
the civilians chatting to prisoners through the wire on Sunday, the untidy peasant corporal in a
crowded hut vainly trying to get the evening count right while a practical joker ties his bootlaces
together.
Medical Care
IN LIBYA and Cyrenaica the Italians treated wounded prisoners of war atrociously—through
neglect rather than active brutality. Five days after being taken prisoner, a group of New
Zealand doctors, who had been formally thanked for their services to the Italian wounded whom
they had treated along with our own in a captured New Zealand field hospital, were separated
from the men they had been looking after and sent to Italy. Their protests were silenced by glib
promises of rejoining the wounded later, but the latter were left to fend for themselves with
practically no medical attention.
In Italy itself some of the wounded were distributed through different military hospitals,
where, if they received bad treatment, it was no worse than that given the Italian troops. Each
camp also had its hospital. In addition some special prisoner-of-war hospitals were established.
Nominally at least all medical care of prisoners of war was in Italian hands, but prisoner-of-war
medical officers and orderlies were able to take over much of this work, usually greatly improving
the condition of the wounded or sick. In December 1941, in Tuturano, a transit camp, medical
treatment was especially poor, a dose of bismuth being prescribed indiscriminately for dysentery,
influenza, lumbago, and rheumatism. Requests that men should be taken into hospital were
ignored. The prescription of a few stock remedies (partly due to Italian shortage of drugs) for all
complaints and complete ignorance of cross-infection among the Italian orderlies were common
to many camps. Repatriated or escaped medical officers made two main complaints about the
treatment of prisoner-of-war patients: the lack of necessary equipment, medicines, and drugs,
and the low standard of Italian medical practice. The special Red Cross parcels of drugs and
comforts for the sick saved the lives of many men.
A New Zealand doctor was on the staff of a prisoner-of-war hospital at Lucca (Campo 202).
Although the British doctors in this hospital began with ill-defined ancillary duties (‘The Italian
authorities apparently expected us to act as dressers.’), they eventually took over the running of the
hospital almost entirely. Many stupid and hampering regulations were overcome by ‘our gradual
encroachment’. This doctor credited the Italians with sincerely sharing his own desire for the
welfare of the 500 patients, though their medical methods were astonishingly callous. The terrible
condition of some Yugoslav patients, who had been living on four ounces of bread and some
cabbage soup daily, showed that British prisoners were apparently receiving the best treatment
Italy could give. Nuns were attached to this hospital, and their help with the feeding and welfare
of prisoners was invaluable.
A complaint made by medical officers was that the Italians persistently treated them as prisoners
of war and not as protected personnel. They had to fight all the time for the status and privileges
allowed them as non-combatants under the Geneva Convention: for instance, the right to take
two walks a week under guard. But their right to repatriation, together with badly wounded
prisoners, was recognised. Patients for repatriation went before a combined Italian and neutral
medical board. At Lucca the patients voluntarily submitted to being examined first by an unofficial
British medical board, so that the candidature of those who had obviously no chance of passing
the board would not prejudice the chances of those who had every right to expect repatriation.
Every wounded prisoner hoped for repatriation and it was a difficult and invidious task to select
who should go. Once they had made their own selection the doctors’ attitude was to get everybody
past the board, and by judicious exaggeration of patients’ infirmities a number of border-line cases
were passed. About 220 New Zealanders were repatriated from Italy to the Middle East. An Italian
hospital ship took them to the Turkish port of Smyrna, where they were transferred to a British
hospital ship for passage to Alexandria.
Many doctors and orderlies remained in Italy to carry on the work they knew to be vital to
the health of prisoners of war. The men who were repatriated were able to report on hospitals
and camps in Italy, and in some instances protests made through the protecting power, Switzerland,
secured amelioration of the conditions of those who remained behind.
Prisoners’ Welfare
THE RED CROSS parcels which have been mentioned so often in the course of these surveys of
the life of prisoners in enemy hands did not come into their camps by magic. The International
Red Cross, with its headquarters in Geneva, undertook the distribution of food parcels, clothing,
and recreational and educational material to prison camps. The parcels and other commodities
were supplied by every country of the British Commonwealth and by the United States, if not
directly then in the form of money subscribed through each national Red Cross. The New Zealand
Patriotic Fund supplied money for the welfare of prisoners of war.
The route taken by Red Cross supplies was by sea to Lisbon, thence by sea to the south of
France and inland to Geneva, which was the clearing house. In Switzerland, too, the central
records of all prisoners of war, the Germans and Italians in British and American hands as well
as the British and American prisoners in Germans and Italians hands, were faithfully kept and the
necessary information passed promptly to the belligerent countries. Thus the Swiss, with some
assistance from other neutrals, particularly the Swedes, undertook to look after the physical
welfare of prisoners and also to mitigate the effects of their captivity on themselves and on their
relatives by providing the channel of communication for letters and personal information. The
Swiss handled these vast problems of organisation, affecting the life and happiness of millions,
with characteristic efficiency and the humanity for which their nation is famous.
New Zealand had an organisation of its own at New Zealand House, London, to deal with all
aspects of the welfare of prisoners of war, though food parcels and military clothing were handled
from a central pool in Geneva. Whenever a man was reported as a prisoner of war, even if casually
in another prisoner’s correspondence, New Zealand House immediately sent him a clothing parcel
and followed it with monthly tobacco parcels, each of which contained 200 cigarettes or an
equivalent amount of tobacco. In close collaboration with the New Bodleian Library at Oxford,
which was supplying books to the British Red Cross, New Zealand House sent to prisoners the
educational books they required to carry on courses of study. A weekly news-letter giving
prisoners the New Zealand news gleaned from cables and official sources was also compiled.
Apart from its work for the material welfare of prisoners of war, New Zealand House was a
clearing house for information about all New Zealanders in Italian or German hands or about
casualties in general. Innumerable personal and special services were given to individuals by the
Prisoner-of-war Section, and the staff’s persistent and unremitting care did much to keep up the
morale of men wearied by long captivity. The service to their relatives was no less valuable and
important.
The Italian Armistice
PRISONERS of war in Italy waited with eager expectancy for the Allied armies to drive up
the peninsula and set them free. An exceedingly sanguine view of the situation was general,
and at the Armistice this optimism helped to prevent some getting away who afterwards were
taken to Germany. One prisoner wrote ‘we had a grandstand view of the collapse of a nation.
If ever a country got poetic justice I suppose Italy did.’ It was satisfactory enough at the fall of
Mussolini to see the bombastic symbols of Fascism being publicly effaced. When the axe and rods
were being wrenched off a small bridge, the Italians accorded a prisoner-of-war worker standing
by the privilege of dropping the emblem into the water. But the overthrow of Fascism did not
mean that Italy had yet changed sides. With the disintegration of Italian resistance the situation
became more and more confused. Mussolini’s fall, celebrated so freely by the general population,
left prisoners of war carrying on as usual and in some camps was the signal for new vigilance
and intensive searches in which all surplus Red Cross food was confiscated. In some camps, to
prevent the accumulation of supplies for escape, Red Cross parcels were no longer issued
weekly but at the rate of one-seventh each day.
At the news of the Armistice most camp commandants told their prisoners that they would
release them in good time ‘if the Germans came’; alternatively, they and their men would defend
the prisoners against the Germans. Practically none of them, whether from faint-heartedness,
treachery, or sheer inefficiency, kept this bargain. In some cases these fulsome promises must have
been deliberately intended to deceive prisoners and keep them inside the wire until the German
troops arrived to collect them. As for the prisoners themselves, messages sent out by the War
Office in code to the Senior British Officer in each camp had ordered that, should peace be declared,
everyone was to remain in camp as a special organisation would arrive by plane to take over
every camp. In spite of personal misgivings the Senior British Officers passed on these orders,
though some afterwards released men from obeying them. This policy of the British authorities
has been sharply criticised by former prisoners of war: ‘It had been a ghastly blunder …. Thousands
of men had been cheated of the freedom they had so anxiously awaited for so long.’
The Way Out, by Uys Krige (Collins), p. 181.
But many
never had the shadow of a choice.
The circumstances at each camp at the Armistice varied considerably. Some were entirely
deserted by their guards, who flung away their rifles, climbed into civilian clothes, and disappeared
homewards. In these and other camps there were mass escapes. In one instance the prisoners took
over their guards’ quarters and lived in them until the Germans rounded them up. In another camp,
the prisoners were warned by civilians that the Germans were close and they were able to disperse
into the countryside. In some camps the Carabinieri remained faithful to what they conceived
to be their duty and kept their prisoners until they could hand them over to the Germans. In
many camps a number of the prisoners left hurriedly when the Germans were within sight.
The adventures of those who escaped at the Italian Armistice are told elsewhere. Nobody
could have foreseen exactly how the events would shape themselves. Those who got away did not
do so solely because they could think quickly; they also had good luck. In many camps escape was
impossible, and their inmates, embittered and disappointed, had no choice but to go to Germany.
Acknowledgments
THE SOURCES consulted in the preparation of this account include books written
by former prisoners of war, as well as eye-witness accounts and interviews recorded
by the author of the official prisoner-of-war volume (Wynne Mason).
The sketches are by A. G. Douglas (page 13, pages 16 and 17, page 19, and
foot of page 21 and outside back cover), and by Nevile Lodge (top of page 21).
The photographs come from many collections, which are stated where they
are known:
Cover, Inside Cover, page 18, page 23 (top), and page 24, Lee Hill
page 9, page 11 (bottom), L. Steward
page 10, page 11 (top), page 12 (top), page 23 (bottom), H. R. Dixon
page 14 (top), A. C. W. Mantell-Harding
(bottom), C. C. Johansen
page 15 C. N. Armstrong
page 12 (bottom), page 20, W. A. Weakley
page 22 (top), P. W. Bates
The photographers risked severe punishment and showed considerable resource in
overcoming the technical difficulties of taking and printing photographs while prisoners
of war.
THE AUTHOR: D. O. W. Hall, graduated at Cambridge with honours in
English Literature and in History in 1929. He was Associate Editor of Centennial
Publications. He served with the Royal New Zealand Naval Volunteer Reserve
in the Pacific in the Second World War, and is now stationed in Dunedin as
Director of Adult Education, University of Otago.
the type used throughout the series isAldine Bembowhich was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus in 1495 * the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
GERMAN RAIDERS
IN THE PACIFICS. D. WATERSWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1949
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
German Raiders in the Pacific
‘THE ONE AND ONLY POSSIBILITY of bringing England to her knees with the forces
of our Navy lies in attacking her sea communications,’ wrote Admiral Doenitz, Commander-in-Chief, Submarines, and later head of the German Navy, in a memorandum dated 1 September
1939. To that end the main resources of the German Navy were devoted in a mortal struggle that
lasted sixty-eight months. The U-boat was the enemy’s principal weapon, but he did not hesitate
to employ also his most powerful warships whose forays were supplemented by the world-wide
operations of a fleet of merchant ships fitted out as auxiliary cruisers.
The operations of German surface raiders, supported by a great and elaborate organisation at
home, extended over a period of more than three years and accounted for 182 merchant ships of
1,152,000 tons, an average of about four ships a month. The German aim was the ‘disruption and
destruction of merchant shipping by all possible means’, and the orders to the raiders laid it down
that ‘frequent changes of position in the operational areas will create uncertainty and will restrict
enemy merchant shipping, even without tangible results.’ The raider captains ‘interpreted their
orders with comprehending caution’; but the Admiralty were, on the whole, remarkably well
informed about their general movements, and by evasive routeing and such cruiser patrols as were
possible with a shortage of that class of ships, kept the vital stream of merchant shipping moving
steadily and with relatively small losses. The merchant seamen themselves performed their part
and sailed without hesitation in defiance of the raider threat to their safety. The Royal Navy had
been cut to the bone during the ‘locust years’, and when the war came it had to perform ‘enormous
and innumerable duties’ with a woeful shortage of cruisers. Many a ship and many a life were lost
as the result of that peacetime improvidence. The provision of adequate cruiser strength would
have been a small insurance premium to pay in mitigation, if not prevention, of the losses of ships,
cargoes, and men at the hands of German raiders.
The operations of the German auxiliary cruisers covered the period from April 1940 to
December 1942. In all, ten ships were employed, one of them making two cruises. Five were
destroyed during their cruises in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans, one was destroyed by an
explosion and fire in harbour at Yokohama, and another was damaged in the English Channel
and returned to Germany. That they were efficient fighting ships of their type was shown by the
fact that one raider in three separate actions outranged and damaged two British armed merchant
cruisers and sank a third, HMS Voltaire. Another raider, the Kormoran, was responsible for the loss
with all hands of HMAS Sydney, though she herself was sunk by that cruiser.
Three of the raiders were oil-burning steamships; one was a diesel-electric twin-screw vessel;
the others were motor vessels. The largest was of 9800 tons and the smallest of 3287 tons gross
register. All were officially known by numbers, but these were apparently allotted at random,
and the fact that there was a ship No. 45 did not indicate that there were forty-five raiders. They
were also given ‘traditional’ names. The raiders were very well equipped and capable of remaining
at sea for at least twelve months, with the assistance of fuel tankers and supply ships, supplemented
by oil and stores taken from captured vessels. Great use was made of disguise. Special workshops
and mechanics were carried for this purpose and also for the extensive repair work made necessary
by long periods at sea.
In general the raiders’ armament comprised six 5.9-inch guns, a number of small guns, and
four or more torpedo tubes; they were fitted with the director system of fire control as well as
elaborate wireless telegraphy plants. Most of them carried a small seaplane and several were
equipped for minelaying. Whatever their tactics in approaching a victim, the attack was always
sudden and ruthless, the primary targets being the ship’s wireless room, navigating bridge, and
defensive gun. Captain Helmuth von Ruckteschell, who commanded two different raiders and
who was awarded by Hitler the Oak Leaves to the Knight’s Insignia of the Iron Cross, is at present
serving a sentence of ten years’ imprisonment for his brutal conduct in the sinking of three merchant
ships.
The first German raider to operate in the Pacific and bring the war to the shores of New Zealand
was Ship No. 36, otherwise known as the Orion. Formerly the Kurmark, of the Hamburg-America
Line, she was a general cargo steamer of 7021 tons gross register, her maximum speed when clean
being about 15 knots. She had a stowage of 4100 tons of oil-fuel, estimated to give her a steaming
endurance of 35,000 miles at 10 knots, but this was well above her actual capacity. Her armament
comprised one 3-inch and six 5.9-inch guns, six light anti-aircraft guns, and six torpedo tubes in
triple mountings, and she also carried an Arado seaplane.
The Orion was commissioned by Captain Kurt Weyher at Kiel on 9 December 1939 and sailed
from Germany on 6 April 1940, three days before the German invasion of Denmark and Norway.
She entered the Atlantic by way of Denmark Strait, between Iceland and Greenland, and cautiously
made her way south. Her first victim was the British tramp steamer Haxby, 5207 tons, which was
intercepted east of Bermuda in the early morning of 24 April. When the Haxby made a distress
signal she was ruthlessly shelled for six minutes, seventeen of her crew being killed. The master
and twenty-four others were taken prisoner and the ship was sunk by a torpedo.
Having refuelled from her supply tanker Winnetou about 660 miles from South Georgia, the
Orion entered the Pacific, passing about 200 miles south of Cape Horn. She arrived in New Zealand
waters in the afternoon of 13 June. The raider was carrying 228 mines, and her orders from the
German Naval Command were that they should all be laid in the approaches to Auckland. With
good visibility, under a cloudless sky, she cautiously approached the land in the early dusk of
mid-winter to carry out this operation.
Starting at 7.26 p.m., the Orion laid the first row of mines across the eastern approach to the
passage between Great Mercury Island and Cuvier Island. In the clear weather prevailing, said
Captain Weyher, it was ‘not possible to approach closer than eight German nautical miles to the
Cuvier lighthouse without being sighted by the Signal Station’. A second barrage of mines was
laid across the approach to Colville Channel in a zig-zag which overlapped the south-east end of
Great Barrier Island. A third and much longer barrage was laid across the northern approaches to
Hauraki Gulf. It extended from a point off the northern end of Great Barrier in a wide arc 6 ½ miles
off Moko Hinau Islands, and thence in a straight line to the north-west, passing about six miles
outside the Maro Tiri Islands to a point about five miles from the mainland. All the mines were of
the moored contact type.
During the operation, which took just over seven hours to complete, three outward-bound
steamers and one inward-bound vessel were sighted by the Orion, but by eleven o’clock the sky
had clouded over and she was not detected. HMNZS Achilles and HMS Hector, an armed merchant
cruiser, arrived at Auckland between nine o’clock and midnight while the minelaying was in
progress. The last of the mines was dropped at 2.36 in the morning of 14 June and the raider then
steamed away to the north-east at full speed.
The mines soon claimed their first victim. In the early hours of 19 June, the Niagara, 13,415 tons,
bound from Auckland for Suva and Vancouver, struck and exploded two mines and sank in
seventy fathoms in the fairway between Bream Head and Moko Hinau. Fortunately, there was no
loss of life. During the morning minesweepers swept and sank two mines close to the position in
which the Niagara had gone down. On 23 June the homeward-bound liner Waiotira reported by
wireless that she had cut a mine adrift with her paravane in the same locality. During the week
four mines were swept and destroyed in the vicinity of Cuvier Island.
The loss of the Niagara and the discovery of the mines were the first indications of the presence
of a German raider in the Pacific. The four main ports were closed to shipping until minesweepers
had carried out clearing sweeps in the approach channels to the harbours. When traffic was resumed
the inter-island steamers Rangatira and Wahine made the passage between Wellington and Lyttelton
in daylight. From time to time during the next twelve months, mines that had broken adrift from
the Hauraki Gulf field were washed ashore or were sighted at sea and destroyed. On 14 May 1941
HMNZS Puriri struck a mine, the explosion sinking her immediately. One officer and four ratings
were killed. The 25th Minesweeping Flotilla commenced sweeping on 13 June 1941, and by the
end of September 131 mines had been accounted for, apart from a number dealt with off Cape Brett.
After leaving New Zealand waters the German raider cruised along the Australia-Panama
route. She passed the Kermadec Islands on 16 June and three days later captured the Norwegian
motor-vessel Tropic Sea, 5781 tons, bound from Sydney to the United Kingdom with 8100 tons of
wheat. On 25 June the raider and her prize refuelled from the Winnetou. The Tropic Sea was
placed under the command of the captain of the Winnetou, Lieutenant Steinkraus, with a prize
crew of twenty-eight men, and on 30 June she sailed for Europe by way of Cape Horn.
On 3 September the Tropic Sea was intercepted by the British submarine Truant in the Bay of
Biscay and was scuttled by the prize crew. The Truant took on board the Haxby survivors and the
Norwegian master and his wife, the other Norwegians being rescued next day by a Sunderland
flying-boat. Lieutenant Steinkraus and his prize crew landed in Spain and made their way back to
Germany. Three months later he arrived in Japan and took command of the captured Norwegian
tanker Ole Jacob, which was employed to refuel German raiders in the Indian Ocean.
During the whole of July and the first week of August, the Orion steamed along and across
the routes from New Zealand and Australia to the various groups of the South Pacific islands,
San Francisco, and Vancouver, but not a ship was sighted. From 19 to 23 July she cruised near the
Fiji Group, and on the 28th refuelled from the Winnetou in an area north of the Ellice Islands.
After a day’s steaming to the Equator, east of the Gilbert Islands, the Orion proceeded south-west
and, passing between the Santa Cruz Group and San Cristobal Island, the most southerly of the
Solomon Islands, entered the Coral Sea. On 7 August she refuelled from the Winnetou and the
empty tanker then sailed for Japan.
Captain Weyher recorded in his log that the ‘unsuccessful patrols along the previously quoted
shipping lanes under conditions of from 20 to 25 nautical miles maximum visibility prove that
enemy shipping, even in Australian, New Zealand and South Sea waters no longer steers the
peace-time routes. Radio interception shows merely the traffic of United States and Japanese
passenger ships which apparently still run on these routes…. Under these conditions it was
specially necessary to use the aircraft, but this was prevented by the constant swell.’
North-east of Brisbane on 10 August, one of the Pacific Phosphate Commission’s steamers
was sighted, but it altered course away and no attack was made. From 11 to 16 August the raider
cruised between Brisbane and Noumea and its aircraft made a reconnaissance flight over the latter
port. In the evening of the 16th she intercepted the French steamer Notou, 2489 tons, on passage
from Newcastle to Noumea with a cargo of 3900 tons of coal. The crew of thirty-seven, including
twenty-seven natives, and one passenger were taken prisoner and the ship was sunk. Twenty-four
hours later an unsuccessful attempt was made to close a vessel whose lights were sighted right
ahead. This ship apparently saw the raider against the moonlight, for she switched off her lights
and ‘was lost to sight and could not be found again.’ The Orion then carried on down the Tasman
Sea.
The Sinking of the Turakina
FROM the early morning of 20 August the raider ‘steered along the route Cook Strait—Sydney’,
and late in the afternoon a steamer was sighted on the starboard bow as it came out of a rain
squall. This ship was the New Zealand Shipping Company’s steamer Turakina, 9691 tons, commanded by Captain J. B. Laird, on passage from Sydney to Wellington. She was carrying some
4000 tons of lead, wheat, and dried fruit loaded at Australian ports and was to have filled her
insulated space at Wellington with frozen meat for England.
The raider signalled the Turakina to stop instantly and not use her wireless. Captain Laird at
once ordered maximum full speed, turned his ship stern on to the enemy, and instructed the radio
office to broadcast the ‘raider signal’. The Orion then opened fire at a range of about 5250 yards
with the object of destroying the Turakina’s radio office and aerials. Nevertheless, the Turakina
was able to make her signal several times, and it was received by stations in Australia and New
Zealand in spite of the raider’s efforts to jam it. She gave her position as approximately 260 miles
west by north from Cape Egmont and some 400 miles from Wellington.
The Turakina at once replied to the enemy’s fire with her single 4.7-inch gun, and, in the
gathering dusk, there began the first action ever fought in the Tasman Sea. It was an unequal
contest, but Captain Laird had vowed that he would fight his ship to the last if ever he was attacked.
At the close range of two and a half miles, the raider’s fire quickly wrought havoc on board the
Turakina. The first salvoes brought down the fore topmast and the lookout, partly wrecked the
bridge, destroyed the range-finder, and put most of the telephones out of action. The galley and
the engineers’ quarters were hit by shells which set the vessel badly on fire amidships. In little more
than a quarter of hour she was reduced to a battered, blazing wreck and was settling aft; more than
half her crew had been killed and others were wounded. At least one of her shells had burst on
board the raider and wounded a number of Germans. To hasten her destruction, the raider discharged a torpedo at a range of about a mile, but ‘due to the swell it broke surface and hit the
steamer on the stern. No visible damage results. The vessel burns like a blazing torch,’ wrote
Captain Weyher.
Meanwhile, Captain Laird had given the order to abandon ship. The two port lifeboats had
been wrecked, but one of the starboard boats got away from the ship with three officers and
eleven hands, seven of whom were wounded. A number of wounded were put into the remaining
boat, but when it was lowered a sea swept it away from the ship’s side and it was some time before it
could be worked back again. When the lifeboat came alongside, the badly wounded chief radio
officer was put into it and the others were told by Captain Laird to ‘jump for it’. At that moment
a second torpedo struck the Turakina, which sank two minutes later. The only survivors of the
explosion were the third officer, the seventh engineer, an apprentice, two able seamen, a fireman,
and a steward. They were picked up by the raider, as were the fourteen men in the other boat.
An able seaman, who had been badly hurt when the Turakina’s foremast was shot down, died on
board the Orion and was buried next day. Captain Laird and thirty-three of his officers and men
had died in the Turakina, and twenty survivors were prisoners in German hands.
In refusing to stop when challenged and in ordering wireless messages to be transmitted,
Captain Laird had carried out an obligation that was accepted by thousands of British and Allied
shipmasters. The Turakina and her ship’s company paid a great price, but the raider was compelled
to leave the Tasman Sea and did not sink another ship for two months.
The only warship in New Zealand waters at that time was HMNZS Achilles, which was lying
at Wellington. She received the distress signal at 6.56 p.m. and sailed two and a half hours later,
at 25 knots, for the Tasman Sea. The one flying-boat available took off from Auckland early next
morning and was sighted by the Achilles at eight o’clock. When the cruiser arrived at the position
given by the Turakina she found no sign of wreckage or boats. For the next few days the Achilles
and the aircraft carried on their search, but without success. An equally fruitless patrol was made
in the south-west Tasman Sea by HMAS Perth and Australian aircraft. The raider had, in fact,
succeeded in escaping to the southward.
After picking up the survivors from the Turakina, the Orion steamed away at easy speed to the
south-west in generally poor visibility. At midday on 25 August she had reached a position about
200 miles south of Hobart. She then headed north-west and zig-zagged across the Australian Bight
to the westward. ‘The hopes of the captain for success in these waters were not however realised,’
recorded the raider’s log. ‘Again and again the shipping-lanes from Capetown to South Australian
ports and from Aden and Colombo via Cape Leeuwin to South Australia were crossed without
sighting a ship. The weather was, as expected, generally very bad. The vessel rolled as much as
34 degrees….’
Assuming that shipping was hugging the coast, Captain Weyher approached to within twenty
miles of the south-west coast of Australia. During the night of 2–3 September, with the object
of disturbing shipping traffic, dummy mines were laid ‘in view of the beacon on Eclipse Island,
outside Albany harbour.’ The raider then headed out to sea at full speed. At eight o’clock next
morning a ‘Hudson bomber appeared and circled the ship twice at an altitude of 600–800 metres’.
The bomber made a wireless report as it flew away and from ten o’clock onwards ‘at least six
aircraft which had just taken off from Busselton were located by radar.’ They failed to find the
Orion, which was hidden by heavy rain squalls. Thereafter, the raider kept well offshore outside
the range of air reconnaissance.
For the next five days she cruised along the shipping routes south-west of Cape Leeuwin but
sighted nothing. The weather was persistently foul with strong westerly gales. According to the
orders of the German Naval Command, the Orion was to have met the raider Pinguin (Ship No. 33)
in that area, but the latter was having good hunting in the Indian Ocean and did not come south
of Australia till the middle of October. The Orion was therefore ordered to return to the Pacific
to replenish stores from a supply ship from Japan and to overhaul her machinery in the Marshall
Islands.
Accordingly, on 9 September, the Orion sailed to the south-east for eight stormy days until she
reached a position about 400 miles south-east of Hobart. She then steamed up the Tasman Sea
to an area midway between Sydney and the North Cape of New Zealand, which she patrolled for
five days from 21 September. No ships were sighted. In five days’ cruising in the Kermadec
Islands area she again drew a blank. On 1 October she headed north, steamed close by the Fiji
Group four days later, and, passing between Nauru Island and Ocean Island, arrived on 10 October
at the atoll of Ailinglapalap, in the Marshall Islands. There she met the supply ship Regensburg,
8068 tons, from which she took some 3000 tons of fuel-oil as well as stores and provisions. Another
supply ship, the Weser, 9179 tons, had been captured on 25 September by the Canadian armed
merchant cruiser Prince Robert, a few hours after sailing from Manzanillo, Mexico, for the Marshall
Islands.
The Orion and Regensburg left the atoll on 12 October. Two days later the raider captured the
Norwegian motor-vessel Ringwood, 7203 tons, on passage from Shanghai to Ocean Island. The
crew of thirty-six was taken prisoner and the ship, after being looted of stores and equipment,
was sunk by an explosive charge. On the following night a steamer of 6000 to 7000 tons with
‘large though unrecognizable neutral markings on the bows’ was sighted steering south-east.
The raider’s maximum speed of 12.5 knots at that time was not sufficient to overtake the stranger,
which disappeared in the darkness. On 18 October the Orion and her supply ship arrived at
Lamotrek in the Caroline Islands, where they met the raider Komet (Ship No. 45) and the supply
ship Kulmerland, 7363 tons.
The Komet Enters the Pacific
THE Komet, which had arrived in the Pacific after an extraordinary passage across the Arctic
Ocean and the Behring Sea, was commanded by Captain Robert Eyssen. She was a relatively
small ship of 3287 tons gross register, built in 1937 as the Ems for the Norddeutscher-Lloyd.
Propelled by two sets of oil engines geared to a single shaft, the ship had a speed of 15 knots or
better. She was armed with six 5.9-inch guns, nine anti-aircraft guns, six deck and four underwater
torpedo tubes. She carried one Arado seaplane and a high-speed motor-launch. Her complement
was 270 officers and men.
The Komet had sailed from Gdynia on 3 July 1940, passed close inshore round the heel of
Norway, and then made a wide sweep clear of the coast until she reached the North Cape. She then
headed eastward across the Barents Sea to the south end of Novaya Zemlya, where she arrived
on 15 July.
The Russian ice-breaker, which was to have met her, failed to appear, and the Komet spent the
next four weeks cruising and waiting. Captain Eyssen had good reason to believe that the Russians
were ‘carrying on a skilful delaying policy’. On 13 August he received orders to proceed to
Matochkin Strait, the narrow channel which bisects Novaya Zemlya, but when the Komet arrived
there she found no sign of the promised ice-breaker, the Lenin, which had gone on with a convoy
a week before. Captain Eyssen pushed on into the strait, where he picked up two Russian ice-pilots.
The Komet finally passed through the strait on 19 August, and, following close behind the ice-breaker Stalin, she safely cleared Cape Chelyuskin, the most northerly point of Siberia, 720 miles
from the North Pole. Escorted by the ice-breaker Lazar Kaganovich, the raider had a stormy
passage across the East Siberian Sea. On 1 September, when there were still 600 miles to go to
Behring Strait, the ice-breaker suddenly stopped and reported that ‘orders had come from Moscow’
not to accompany the Komet any farther eastward but to bring her back.
Captain Eyssen, ignoring the Russian protests, went on alone; after passing Wrangel Island,
the Komet experienced fine, clear weather, and the sea was free of ice. During the night of 4–5
September she entered the Behring Sea. ‘From receipt of orders in the Barents Sea we had taken
twenty-three days for nine of which we were stopped or at anchor; that is to say, we took only
fourteen days on passage to cover a distance of 3,300 sea miles, of which 720 were through ice.’
On the passage southward from the Behring Sea the Komet was joined by the Kulmerland from Kobe.
On 20 October the Regensburg sailed for Yokohama, and the two raiders, with the Kulmerland
in company, left Lamotrek to operate in the area east of New Zealand, raiding shipping on the
Panama route. The Komet and the Kulmerland were camouflaged as Japanese ships, the former
bearing the name Manyo Maru and the latter Tokyo Maru. They had these names and the Japanese
mercantile flag painted on their hulls. During daylight hours the three ships steamed in line abreast
at masthead visibility distance apart, this giving them a range of observation in clear weather of
from 90 to 100 miles. At night the raiders closed to within visibility distance of the Kulmerland.
The ships passed south between Nauru and Ocean Islands ‘in the rather vain hope of coming
upon steamers carrying cargoes from there to Australia.’ From 29 to 31 October the raiders were
steaming through the area between the New Hebrides and Fiji. In the evening of 3 November
the lights of a ship were sighted in a position about 250 miles north-west of the Kermadec Islands.
She stopped when warning shots were fired ahead of her and proved to be the American motor-vessel City of Elwood, 6197 tons. Her name and United States markings were seen when searchlights
were turned on her and ‘without further questioning she was released.’
On 7 November 1940 the raiders arrived in an area some 400 miles east by north of East Cape,
New Zealand, on the lookout for ships on the Auckland-Panama route. ‘After four days of
unsuccessful patrolling in conditions of poor visibility, operations were transferred 300 nautical
miles further south, so as to concentrate activity on the Wellington route’, 500-odd miles due east
of Cape Palliser. This area was combed for ten days without success, so, assuming that shipping
was being routed south of the Chatham Islands, the Germans left on 20 November for a position
about 100 miles south-east of that group. Four days of cruising in that area failed to locate any
shipping, and on 24 November the raiders headed northward intending to proceed direct to
Nauru Island, which was to be attacked on 8 December.
MINES &
MINESWEEPING
SURVIVORS
Holmwood and Rangitane Sunk
EARLY in the morning of 25 November their fruitless eighteen days’ patrol was rewarded when
the Komet sighted and captured the steamer Holmwood, 546 tons, which had left the Chatham
Islands a few hours before for Lyttelton. The crew and passengers, numbering twenty-nine, and
including four women and two children, were taken off, as well as several hundred live sheep,
after which the Holmwood was sunk by gunfire. Less than forty-eight hours later, about 450 miles
to the north, the raiders scored a second success when they intercepted and sank the New Zealand
Shipping Company’s motor-liner Rangitane, 16,712 tons.
No radio message was transmitted by the Holmwood before she was captured, and consequently
no warning of the presence of enemy raiders to the east of New Zealand was received. A subsequent
commission of inquiry expressed the view that had a wireless message been attempted ‘it would
probably have reached New Zealand, or, if the enemy had attempted to jam the message, this
jamming would have been heard in New Zealand…. The receipt of such a message in New
Zealand would have resulted in the recall of the Rangitane which had left her anchorage off
Rangitoto at about 5.30 that morning. Having regard to the position then existing, it is clear that
the receipt of a message from the Holmwood would have given the Navy certain advantages in
searching for the raiders which did not exist at a later date.
‘We are fully aware,’ said the commission’s report, ‘that any attempt to send the message
would have brought about the shelling of the Holmwood, and that this might have meant heavy
loss of life, including the lives of women and children. But, having regard to the methods of
warfare with which we are faced, that consideration is irrelevant. Loss of civilian lives must be
faced in an effort to locate and destroy raiders….’
The Rangitane was fully laden with dairy produce, frozen meat, and wool for the United
Kingdom. Her crew numbered about 200 and she was carrying 111 passengers, including thirty-six
women. She was about 300 miles east by north of East Cape when, at 3.40 in the morning of 27
November, the raiders were sighted.
Captain H. L. Upton at once instructed the Rangitane’s wireless office to broadcast the ‘suspicious
ship message’ and, immediately the enemy opened fire, to send the ‘raider message’. He also
ordered maximum full speed on the engines and altered course to bring his stern on to the Orion,
which seemed to him to be in the best position to open fire. After signalling by morse lamp,
ordering the Rangitane to stop and not to use her wireless, the Orion switched on a searchlight and
commenced firing. When Captain Upton was told that the messages had been transmitted, he
stopped his ship. The time was then 3.59 a.m., so that only nineteen minutes had elapsed since
the raiders were first sighted. They continued firing after the Rangitane stopped. Captain Upton
signalled that there were women on board, and shortly afterwards the firing ceased.
The Rangitane was considerably damaged and well on fire by this time. Five passengers,
including three women, were killed and a number wounded, one of the latter, also a woman,
dying on board the Orion next day. Two stewardesses and three engine-room hands were killed,
and five others of the ship’s crew wounded. The conduct of the ship’s company was exemplary
and in keeping with the traditions of the British merchant service. They went about their duties
calmly and did everything possible for those in their charge.
After the firing had ceased, a German boarding party arrived in a motor-launch and ordered
the immediate abandonment of the ship. As soon as the passengers and crew had been taken on
board, the raiders sank the Rangitane by torpedoes and gunfire and steamed away at full speed to
the north-east. That evening, when they were ‘about 450 miles from the nearest possible air base’,
a low-flying aircraft on a westerly course was sighted ahead. The Orion’s war diary recorded that
‘as no radio activity followed, however, it was presumed that the aircraft, in spite of good visibility
through the light haze, had not seen the ships against the dark surface of the sea’.
When the Rangitane’s radio messages were received, HMNZS Achilles, which was lying at
Lyttelton, was ordered to sail with all despatch. She cleared the harbour at 8.10 a.m. and steamed
at 25 knots towards the point of attack. HMNZS Puriri, which was at Auckland with her engines
partly dismantled, was ordered to sea, and she sailed at seven o’clock that evening. The flying-boat
Aotearoa, after refuelling, took off from Auckland harbour at 11.11 a.m. It commenced a search
at 2.30 p.m. and carried on till about six o’clock without sighting anything. The flying-boat
Awarua arrived at Auckland from Sydney at 11 a.m. and, after refuelling, took off at 2.18 p.m.
It began its search at 4.30 p.m. and carried on till dusk, but saw nothing.
At one o’clock in the afternoon of 28 November, the Achilles reached the southern end of an
expanse of oil which extended for nine miles from the position where the Rangitane had been
attacked. The cruiser sighted a lifebuoy and a number of boxes of butter. The flying-boat Awarua,
which had been ordered out a second time, arrived at the position at 8.10 that morning. It saw the
oil ‘slick’ and a number of very small floating objects which she reported to the Achilles. Not
another trace of the Rangitane was found.
On 29 November the raiders arrived at the Kermadec Islands and the prisoners were partly
re-distributed among the three ships, the thirty-nine women and five children being accommodated
in the Kulmerland. The raiders then steamed to the north-west, passing between New Caledonia
and the New Hebrides and south-east of the Solomon Islands. On 6 December, a day’s steam from
Nauru Island, the Orion intercepted and shelled the Pacific Phosphate Commission’s steamer
Triona, 4413 tons. The crew, originally sixty-four men, of whom three were killed, and the
passengers, six women and a child, were taken on board the Orion and Kulmerland. The Triona
was sunk by a torpedo.
Next day the Komet sank the Norwegian motor-vessel Vinni, 5181 tons, which was loaded
with phosphates for Dunedin. On 8 December the Orion sank the Pacific Phosphate Commission’s
motor-vessels Triadic, 6378 tons, and Triaster, 6032 tons, and the Komet sank the Union Steam
Ship Company’s steamer Komata, 3900 tons, all within sight of Nauru Island. There were now
675 prisoners—265 in the Orion, 153 in the Komet, and 257, including 52 women and six children,
in the Kulmerland.
The German records of the cruise of the Orion make it abundantly clear that her commanding
officer had no fore-knowledge of the movements of New Zealand shipping, other than that certain
general routes were followed, and that the interceptions of the Turakina, Holmwood, and Rangitane
were fortuitous. The Germans claimed to their prisoners that they met the Rangitane by design
and that they possessed information which enabled them to intercept her. This was believed by
many survivors from the sunken ships, including the masters of the Rangitane and Holmwood. But
such knowledge of the movements of the Rangitane as was paraded by the Germans doubtless was
obtained from foreigners among the passengers who were segregated and interrogated in German.
As has been shown, the two raiders and their supply ship carried out an extensive patrol of the
trade routes east of New Zealand from 6 to 24 November without success. They were actually
leaving the area when they happened first upon the Holmwood and, two days later, upon the
Rangitane. Yet, during that period of three weeks, eleven large ships had arrived at Auckland and
Wellington from the Panama Canal and seven had left for Balboa, while seven ships had arrived
from, and five had sailed for, the South Sea Islands and North America. In other words, the
raiders intercepted only the Rangitane out of thirty large overseas ships which passed through
the area intensively searched by them.
Moreover, when the dim shadow of the Rangitane was first seen in the darkness by the raiders,
they had not the slightest idea of her identity but believed her to be a warship. ‘The first impression
received by the two AMC’s
Armed merchant cruisers
was that of a large warship, at least as big as a cruiser,’ states the
war diary of the Orion. ‘As evasion now seemed quite impossible, the commander of the Orion
determined to attack, in the hope that one or other of the German ships would have a chance to
escape. As became apparent later, the commander of the Komet came to the same conclusion.
Under these circumstances, after the position of the four ships became clearer and the possibility
of firing on one’s own ships in the confusion had lessened, the commander of the Orion gave
orders for the searchlights to be switched on, in order to open fire with his main armament against
the supposed enemy warship.’ Not until then was she seen to be a two-funnel merchant ship,
and not until after she was boarded was she identified as the Rangitane.
The Komet refuelled from the Kulmerland at Ailinglapalap and the three ships then steamed to
Emirau Island, in the Bismarck Archipelago, where they arrived on 21 December. While the
prisoners were being disembarked, the Orion lay alongside the Kulmerland and took in the 1100 tons
of fuel remaining in that ship. By midday, 343 Europeans and 171 Chinese and natives had been
landed. Captain Weyher refused to land any European prisoners from his ship as he held that
‘trained officers and crews are as much a problem for Britain as shipping itself.’
Apart from the natives, the only inhabitants of Emirau Island were two white planters and
their wives, Mr. and Mrs. Collett and Mr. and Mrs. Cook, who did everything possible for the
women and children. The shipmasters and their officers organised their respective ship’s companies
into camps. The Germans had provided food and other supplies, and these were generously
supplemented by the settlers from their own stores.
The Germans had left a lifeboat on the condition that it would not be used to communicate
with Kavieng, seventy miles away, until twenty-four hours after the raiders had left. The planters,
however, sent some natives in a canoe to Mussau Island, fifteen miles distant, for a motor-launch,
in which a party went to Kavieng for assistance. On 24 December the schooner Leander arrived
with food and other stores. A doctor also brought medical supplies. Under much improved
conditions, the castaways spent Christmas Day in a spirit of festivity. During the day the Administrator of New Britain arrived from Rabaul in a flying-boat bringing still more supplies.
Meanwhile, the Naval authorities had arranged for the steamer Nellore to proceed from Rabaul
to Emirau Island, where she embarked the stranded passengers on 29 December. The overcrowded
ship arrived on 1 January at Townsville, whence special trains took her passengers on to Brisbane
and Sydney. The Australian and New Zealand Governments had made elaborate arrangements
for the well-being of those who had passed through so trying an experience.
After leaving Emirau Island, the German ships went their separate ways. The Orion steamed
north to the Caroline Islands to carry out a much-needed overhaul of her engines and boilers and
effect further changes in her outward appearance. The Kulmerland left for Japan, where she arrived
on 31 December. The Komet steamed towards Rabaul, arriving off the harbour during the night
of 24 December. There she hoisted out her fast motor-launch Meteorit to lay mines in the fairway;
but the engines of the launch failed and the operation was abandoned. The Komet then steamed to
Nauru Island where, on 27 December, she shelled and wrecked the phosphates plant, including the
great cantilever loading structure.
According to reports received by the British Phosphates Commission ‘about 200 shells had been
fired at the shipping plant and oil storage, besides hundreds of rounds of armour-piercing and
incendiary bullets. One of the concrete foundations for the cantilever was so damaged that
apparently another shell would have brought the whole structure down on the reef…. Of the
three sets of main moorings holed by armour-piercing bullets, two of the large buoys were saved
by the four-watertight-compartment construction. The oil storage and about 13,000 tons of oil
were destroyed and the blazing oil spread in all directions. The 12,000-ton shore bin of the cantilever suffered badly as the blazing oil made the heavy steel [supporting] columns white hot and
they collapsed….’
The raiders’ attacks on Nauru Island were, in effect, their greatest success in the Pacific, since
they seriously affected the volume and continuity of the supplies of phosphates to New Zealand
and Australia and, in less degree, to Britain. The sinking of five ships totalling 25,900 tons, including
three of the Phosphate Commission’s steamers which had been specially adapted to the peculiar
requirements of the trade, was a bad blow in view of the increasing shortage of shipping tonnage
and the consequent difficulty of chartering suitable vessels. But, far worse was the drastic cut in
available supplies of Nauru phosphates and its ultimate economic effect.
The output of phosphates from Nauru and Ocean Islands had reached a peak of nearly 1,500,000
tons in the year ended 30 June 1940, of which the former provided 919,750 tons. It was ten weeks
after the bombardment before shipments from Nauru were resumed, the loading of the first
cargo starting on 6 March 1941. The British Phosphates Commission estimated that shipments
from both islands during 1941 would total 600,000 tons, including 250,000 tons from Nauru,
but in the event, because of the bombardment damage and a long period of bad weather, the actual
shipments were far short of the estimate. To supplement Nauru and Ocean Islands’ shipments of
phosphates the British Government refrained from drawing supplies for the United Kingdom from
those islands and arranged through the Phosphates Commission to give New Zealand and Australian
requirements preference up to 120,000 tons from Makatea Island in the Pacific and 100,000 tons
from Christmas Island (for Australia) in the Indian Ocean, but, again because of the shortage of
shipping, supplies from those sources were relatively small. Several ships chartered to bring
phosphates from Egypt to New Zealand were requisitioned for urgent war purposes. It was
officially stated in July 1941 that New Zealand farmers were on a ration for fertilisers, based on a
total annual importation of 200,000 tons of phosphate rock. Supplies of phosphates from Nauru
and Ocean Islands ceased when those islands were occupied by the Japanese in 1942.
Operations of the Pinguin
AT the end of 1940 seven German raiders were operating on the high seas. Besides the Orion
and Komet in the Pacific, there were the Atlantis and the Pinguin in the Indian Ocean and the
Thor in the Atlantic. The pocket battleship Admiral Scheer was on her way down the Atlantic after
sinking HMS Jervis Bay and six merchant ships in a convoy and the Port Hobart in the West Indies
area. The Kormoran had sailed from Germany on 3 December 1940 to operate in the Atlantic and
Indian Oceans. The Widder had returned to Germany at the end of October after sinking twelve
ships in the Atlantic.
On her way to the Indian Ocean the Pinguin sank five ships and captured another, in which
the crews of her other victims were sent to Bordeaux. In the Bay of Bengal she captured the
Norwegian tanker Storstad, which was renamed Passat and to which she transferred some of her
mines. Both ships then sailed south of Australia. During the night of 28 October 1940, the Pinguin
laid three rows of minés between Newcastle and Sydney, one of which sank the coastal vessel
Nimbin, 1052 tons. After laying others off Hobart, the Pinguin worked in to the coast of South
Australia and, during the night of 6 November, planted three rows of mines across the entrance
to Spencer Gulf. It was in this field that the Federal Steam Navigation Company’s steamer Hertford,
11,785 tons, was badly damaged on 7 December 1940. In the meantime, the Passat had laid her
mines off the north-east coast of Tasmania, and off Wilson’s Promontory and Cape Otway.
Between them, the Pinguin and Passat laid a total of 230 mines. The Federal Company’s steamer
Cambridge, 11,373 tons, was mined and sunk off Wilson’s Promontory on 7 December, and the
American steamer City of Rayville, 5883 tons, off Cape Otway on the following day.
Returning to the Indian Ocean, the Pinguin sank three well-known New Zealand traders—
the Maimoa, 10,123 tons, on 20 November, the Port Brisbane, 8739 tons, on the following day, and
the Port Wellington, 10,065 tons, on 30 November. The Pinguin then continued on far to the south-west and on 14–15 January 1941 captured the Norwegian whaling factory ships Ole Wegger and
Pelagos (formerly the Athenic), the supply ship Solglimt, and eleven whale catchers. The whaling
fleet was taken to France by prize crews, with the exception of one catcher which was renamed
Adjutant and retained by the Pinguin as a reconnaissance vessel. The Adjutant reappears later in this
account. During the next five months the Pinguin sank three more ships, but her raiding career
was ended on 8 May 1941, when she was intercepted and sunk in the north-west area of the
Indian Ocean by HMS Cornwall. The Pinguin was the most successful of the German raiders.
During her cruise of eleven months she sank or captured thirty-one vessels totalling 156,910 tons.
After shelling Nauru Island, the Komet proceeded north about the Gilbert Islands and thence
far to the south-eastward through the central Pacific. About this time Captain Eyssen received
notice of his promotion to the rank of Rear-Admiral. During the latter half of January 1941,
the raider passed between the Marquesas Islands and the Tuamotu Archipelago, round Pitcairn
Island, and thence along the Panama-New Zealand route; but no ships were seen. Rounding the
Chatham Islands on 6 February, she went due south on the 180th meridian to the Antarctic, where
she was held up by ice in the Ross Sea about 250 miles east of Cape Adare, the north-east extremity
of Victoria Land. She then headed north-west and, passing close by the Balleny Islands, sailed
within sight of the ice-bound Antarctic Continent until 28 February, when she shaped course for
Kerguelen Island. There she met the raider Pinguin and the Adjutant, as well as the supply ship
Alstertor, and spent some time taking in stores and ammunition.
The Komet then went north into the Indian Ocean and spent more than two months in fruitless
cruising along and across the Australian shipping routes. At the end of March she refuelled from
the Ole Jacob. On 21 May she was joined by the Adjutant, and on 1 June they headed away well
south of Australia for the Pacific. On 11 June the Komet transferred to the Adjutant the mines that
six months earlier were to have been laid outside Rabaul.
Harbour Entrances Mined
WHILE the Komet carried on to a rendezvous near the Chatham Islands, the Adjutant steamed
in to the New Zealand coast and laid the mines close to the entrances to Lyttelton and
Wellington harbours. In each case ten mines were laid, under cover of darkness, across the
approaches to both ports. There is no record of any suspicious vessel having been seen in the vicinity
of either port at that time. The Adjutant was a small ship of about 350 tons, closely resembling a
minesweeper, several of which were then operating between Lyttelton and Wellington and for one
of which she might have been mistaken had she been seen at night. Nothing was known of the
minelaying until more than four years later, when it was revealed by captured German documents.
Unlike those laid by the Orion in the Hauraki Gulf area, these were a magnetic type of ground mine.
It is probable that they were defective when laid, since they have given no indication of their
presence. Hundreds of ships have passed safely over the areas in which they were laid and which,
during the war, were subjected to routine sweeping by flotillas fitted to deal effectively with magnetic, acoustic, and moored mines.
The following account of the Adjutant’s bold operation is taken from the Admiralty translation
of the war diary of the Komet:
At 1130 on 11 June, Ship 45 [Komet] sent Adjutant, as planned, to lay ten T.M.B. mines in
the approaches to the New Zealand harbours of Port Lyttelton and Port Nicholson (Wellington) during the next new moon period. Apart from engine trouble, the voyage to New Zealand
is uneventful. The Auckland Islands appear to starboard at 1320 on 20 June. At 1600 on 24 June
Adjutant sets course 267 deg. [approximately due west] for Lyttelton: wind is force 7 to force
8 [moderate to fresh gale] with corresponding sea. The mines are clear for laying and the
ship ready to scuttle herself. It is a dark night. Godley Head light comes into sight at 2130;
later, also the Christchurch aircraft homing beacons. They are all burning peacefully. A searchlight at Godley Head directed towards Baleine Point bars the main approach to the harbour.
At 2400 [midnight], when the Adjutant is three miles off Godley Head, the light is kept
dead ahead. On 25 June, between 0007 and 0122, the ten mines are laid according to plan at a
depth of 16.5 to 22 metres [54 to 72 feet], the ship steaming at seven knots. There is no enemy
opposition. The Adjutant then withdraws on course 50 deg. [approximately north-east]. After
0200, this is altered to 70 deg. [approximately east-north-east] and speed increased to ten knots.
Shortly afterwards, the lights of a steamer coming in from the south-east are seen. At daybreak,
the Adjutant is about sixty miles off the coast. The high snow-covered mountains can be seen
clearly; and as the sun rises, it might well be Bodensee [Lake of Constance].
‘On the way to Wellington, the second of my objectives, I decided to keep only sixty miles
off the coast,’ said Lieutenant Karsten, who was in charge of the minelaying, in his report.
‘I want to lay the mines at Wellington tonight before the harbour is warned—and, so far,
Lyttelton has not reported anything. If, however, I proceed at a safe distance of 150 to 200 miles
off the coast, I shall not get there today. The same arrangements hold for Wellington as for
Lyttelton, except that it will be more difficult, as Wellington is better defended. Another factor
in forcing me to take this course is my engine. The knocking of the big-end bearing of the
high-pressure piston is getting progressively worse. I made a chart of the operation in relation
to the engine. I shall reach Wellington, but whether I shall get away again is a different matter.
However, my orders read “Lay mines at Wellington” and I shall carry them out.
‘The vessel has been proceeding at seven knots since 1615 to avoid arriving in position too
early. Minelaying is to begin at 2330. The night is dark; there is a light north-westerly breeze,
force 3; the sea is calm to slight. Baring Head light comes in sight at 2100 and the one at
Pencarrow at 2200. “Stand by for action.” Here again as at Lyttelton, everything is lit up
peacefully. The harbour is barred by two searchlights, located between Palmer Head and
Pencarrow Head. One acts as a constant barrier and the other sweeps the approach sector at
irregular intervals, ending up at three patrol boats with masthead lights, lying to port of the
Adjutant as she approaches. Minefield is to be laid at full speed (14 knots) and not at seven
knots as arranged. Get-away to be covered by a smoke screen. Events developed as follows:
2312Challenge from Baring Head. Adjutant does not reply. Steams through at full speed
on course 12 deg. [north by east]. Baring Head makes morse signal to searchlight which,
however, sweeps right over Adjutant four times.2316Order to lay mines, although initial position has not yet been reached.2320When laying fourth mine, Adjutant is picked up by a searchlight.2321Smoke made. The fifth and sixth mines are laid on the run in, the remaining four under
cover of the smoke screen, after turning back, and on a slightly different course from the
one intended.2328Last mine laid. Depth of mines between 26 and 33 metres [85 to 108 feet].2330Smoke stopped. Course set for Baring Head. The searchlight continues to sweep the
smoke screen which now separates Adjutant from the patrol boats. Shortly after passing
Baring Head, the vessel turns landwards and so becomes obscured from the searchlights.’
Lieutenant Karsten describes ‘the measures taken by the enemy after the laying of the smoke
screen’ as follows:
‘In the meantime, three searchlights are switched on. One blocks the approach from its
position to Palmer Head; the second from the searchlight position to Pencarrow Head; and
the third to the south-west. There are three M.T.B.’s [patrol boats] and one minesweeper
between the searchlight and Pencarrow Head and one M.T.B. between the searchlight and
Palmer Head. One small M.T.B. type of vessel was making black smoke. All the ships were
burning navigation lights. The patrol vessels had moved into the beam of the centre searchlight and lay burning masthead lights; they maintained morse communication with the signal
station on Beacon Hill.’
After the Adjutant had rounded Baring Head, ‘all speed is made to get away from the coast.
At 0100 on 26 June, the alarm is over. Adjutant sets course 90 deg. [east] at 0130 and proceeds
at 12 knots. At 0440 a halt had to be made because of engine trouble. At this stage the ship is
about seventy miles from Wellington. Considerable W/T traffic can be heard between New
Zealand airfields and naval bases. We can expect an organised search. During the day, the
vessel proceeds with her engine knocking badly. An unsuccessful attempt is made, during the
night of 27 June, to eliminate the trouble. The rest of the voyage has to be made under emergency sail, or using medium and low pressure cylinders; consequently the maximum possible
speed is eight to nine knots…. Ship 45 comes in sight at 0730 on 1 July. The Adjutant is sunk
at 41 deg. 36 min. South, 173 deg. 07 min. West [north-east of the Chatham Islands].’
In his assessment of the Adjutant’s minelaying operation, Rear-Admiral Eyssen, commanding
officer of the Komet remarked that ‘at Wellington, all the depths exceeded twenty metres, but a
large number of ships of over 10,000 tons put in there, and as this port is very favourably situated
in relation to the magnetic zone (Value “—570”) the mines, if they work at all, should, according
to the data available, also detonate satisfactorily with vessels of 5000 to 7000 tons. I do not think
the Adjutant was seen during the operation, in spite of the searchlight activity.’ A late entry in the
war diary of the Komet stated that ‘no news of any sort was ever obtained about losses of shipping
brought about by the Adjutant minefields.’ In the distribution of awards, the Iron Cross, First
Class, was awarded to Lieutenant Karsten, ‘in recognition of the minelaying operation’ and to
Lieutenant-Commander Hemmer, ‘in recognition of his former service as a member of the crew
of the Pinguin and latterly of his command of the Adjutant.’
At that time, HMNZS Achilles was escorting homeward-bound liners from, various New
Zealand ports to dispersal points east of the Chatham Islands and must have been close to the
German ships. The Komet then steamed away along the Panama Canal route, and on 14 July 1941,
south of the Tubuai. Group, she refuelled from the Anneliese Essberger, 5173 tons.
In the focal area of the Galapagos Islands, on 14 August, the Komet sank the motor-ship
Australind, 5020 tons, a well-known New Zealand trader, on passage from Adelaide to England.
The ship was shelled ruthlessly when she transmitted a distress signal. Her master and two
engineers were killed and forty-two of the ship’s company made prisoners. The Australind was
the first ship sunk by the Komet for eight months. On 17 August the raider captured the Dutch
motor-vessel Kota Nopan, 7322 tons, which, being loaded with tin, coffee, tea and spices, was
retained as a prize. Two days later, the British India steamer Devon, 9036 tons, formerly of the
Federal Line, on passage from Liverpool to New Zealand, was sunk in the same area and her crew
taken prisoner.
Her presence having been revealed by the distress signals of her victims, the Komet retraced
her course to the south-west. She passed close by Pitcairn Island and on 20 September met the
raider Atlantis and the supply ship Munsterland in the area west of Rapa Island. The Atlantis had
entered the Pacific after a cruise of eighteen months in the Indian and Atlantic Oceans, where she
had sunk or captured twenty ships totalling 137,000 tons. Ten days before meeting the Komet, the
Atlantis had captured the Norwegian motor-ship Silvaplana, 4793 tons, in a position about 800
miles north-east of the Kermadec Islands. This ship was sent away in charge of a prize crew
and arrived at Bordeaux in November. After her meeting with the Komet, the Atlantis returned to
the Atlantic on her way back to Germany. She was intercepted and sunk by HMS Devonshire,
north-west of Ascension Island, on 22 November 1941.
Raiders’ Long Cruises End
AT the end of September 1941, the Komet also started on her homeward journey via Cape
Horn. On 17 October she parted company with her prize, the Kota Nopan, which arrived
at Bordeaux a month later. Near the Azores the Komet was met by two U-boats which escorted
her to Cape Finisterre; then she closely hugged the European coastline all the way to Hamburg,
where she arrived on 30 November after a cruise of 515 days, during which she had travelled
86,988 miles. In October 1942, having started on a second cruise, the Komet was sunk by British
destroyers off Cape de La Hague, in the English Channel.
As was mentioned earlier, the raider Orion, after leaving Emirau Island, had gone north to the
Caroline Islands, where she arrived on 31 December 1940, and found the Regensburg and the
tanker Ole Jacob from Japan awaiting her. Captain Weyher, fearing that the secrecy of his island
bases had been compromised, decided to go still farther north. On 5 January 1941 the German
motor-ship Ermland, 6528 tons, arrived and 183 prisoners from seven ships were transferred to
her. Two days later the Orion sailed from Lamotrek, followed by the Ole Jacob and the Ermland.
On the 9th the Ermland parted company and left for Europe via Cape Horn. She took on
board 148 prisoners from another German ship in the South Atlantic, and arrived at Bordeaux
on 3 April.
The Orion and her tanker arrived on 12 January at Maug, the most northerly but one of the
Marianas Islands, and carried on the overhaul of her engines and boilers. The Regensburg arrived on
18 January with fresh water from Japan, and on 1 February the Munsterland came in with stores
and a Japanese seaplane to replace the German aircraft which was unserviceable. Orders were
received from Berlin that the Orion was to operate in the Indian Ocean, and on 6 February she
sailed from Maug in company with the Ole Jacob. The ships passed through Bougainville Channel,
in the Solomon Islands, during the night of 15 February. It was Captain Weyher’s intention to sail
south through the Coral Sea and the Tasman, but in the afternoon of 16 February the ships were
seen by a flying-boat which circled the Orion and then reported by wireless to Port Moresby.
The ships separated during the night and the Orion steamed eastward to the Santa Cruz Islands,
from which she passed down between the New Hebrides and Fiji. On 25 February the Orion
refuelled from the Ole Jacob in a position about 180 miles north-east of the Kermadec Islands.
Thereafter the ships steamed in company across the trade routes east of New Zealand, but not a
single vessel was seen. They passed west of Chatham Islands on 2 March 1941 and rounded New
Zealand to the south of Stewart Island three days later.
For the next three months the Orion cruised unsuccessfully in the Indian Ocean, the only non-German merchant ships sighted being neutrals—a Vichy French vessel and an American. During
much of that time she employed the Ole Jacob as a reconnaissance vessel, and for a short period
kept the supply ship Alstertor in company for the same purpose. The raider’s aircraft also made
thirty-eight reconnaissance flights.
In the morning of 18 May, when the Orion had just crossed the Equator north-east of the
Seychelles Islands, her aircraft returned from a flight with the alarming report that a heavy cruiser
had been sighted on an intercepting course about forty-five miles away. The Orion at once altered
course away to the south-east at her utmost speed of 13 knots. Two hours later, smoke was seen to
the northward, but in half an hour it had disappeared. The cruiser was probably HMS Cornwall,
which, ten days earlier, had intercepted and sunk the raider Pinguin about 200 miles farther north.
For some time the oil-fuel supply had been a matter of concern to the raiders. It had been hoped
to refill the tanks of the Ole Jacob from the tanker Ketty Brovig, which had been captured on
2 February 1941 by the Atlantis and placed in charge of a prize crew. But, on 4 March, the Ketty
Brovig and the supply ship Coburg had been intercepted and sunk by HMAS Canberra and HMNZS
Leander. The Germans did not learn of this loss until after the sinking of the Pinguin.
The Orion now received orders to leave the Indian Ocean. She refuelled from the Ole Jacob
for the last time on 3 June and the empty tanker was sent away, arriving at Bordeaux on 19 July.
The Orion rounded the Cape of Good Hope on 20 June. Two expected supply ships, one a tanker,
had been sunk in the Atlantic on 4–5 June by HMS London, and the homeward-bound Alstertor was
scuttled when intercepted by British destroyers on 23 June. The Orion, therefore, was compelled
to load 500 tons of fuel from the raider Atlantis, which was met on 1 July about 300 miles north of
Tristan da Cunha.
The Orion crossed the Equator on 25 July and four days later intercepted her last victim, the
British steamer Chaucer, 5792 tons, which was attacked by gunfire and torpedoes. Ten torpedoes
were discharged, but all failed to detonate. The ship was finally sunk by gunfire, her crew of
forty-eight, of whom eighteen were wounded, being taken prisoner. The Chaucer was the only
ship sunk by the raider in the period of nearly nine months since she was off Nauru Island.
On 16–17 August the Orion met the U-boats, U.75 and U.205, west of the Azores and was
escorted by them to Bordeaux, where she arrived a week later after a cruise of 510 days, during
which she had steamed 112,337 miles. For his exploits Captain Kurt Weyher was complimented
by the Fuehrer, awarded the Knight’s Insignia of the Iron Cross, and promoted Rear-Admiral.
In the course of their cruises, which covered a period of nineteen months, the Orion and the
Komet accounted for seventeen ships totalling 114,118 tons, of which all but two were sunk or
captured in the Pacific. One ship was captured in the Pacific by the Atlantis, and three more were
sunk and one badly damaged by the Pinguin’s mines on the Australian coast. Only four ships
were sunk by the Orion and the Komet in New Zealand waters over a period of about six months.
The Turakina and the Rangitane were the only refrigerated cargo ships lost to the raiders at a
time when such vessels were leaving New Zealand at the rate of eight or nine a month and a
similar number were arriving to load. Another refrigerated cargo steamer, outward-bound,
the Devon, was sunk by the Komet a day’s steam from Balboa. In view of the fact that the raiders
systematically patrolled the Panama route, the loss of only three such vessels (one of them in the
Tasman Sea) is a remarkable proof of the protective value of the evasive routeing of merchant
shipping. In the event, the operations caused no check to the regular flow of the Dominion’s
overseas trade; but, after the sinking of the Rangitane, HMNZ Ships Achilles and Monowai were
employed for the next twelve months in escorting refrigerated cargo ships from their ports of
departure until they were well clear of New Zealand waters.
THE AUTHOR, Sydney David Waters, is a New Zealand journalist who has
specialised in naval and merchant shipping affairs. He is the author of two
histories of the New Zealand Shipping Company, Clipper Ship to Motor-liner
and Ordeal by Sea, and of Pamir: the story of a Sailing Ship. He served as a gunner
in the ist NZEF during the First World War.
Moored CONTACT mine (left) is the type laid by the German raider Orion.
Anchored at pre-determined depth it is fired by contact with projecting horns.
Antenna mine is detonated by contact with antenna.
FREE mines drift, creep, or float, according to type. Oscillating mines are fitted
with a hydrostatic switch which is operated by water pressure as the mine rises
or sinks.
GROUND mines are detonated by the action of the magnetic field, by the noise
of a ship, or by the displacement of water. The German raider Adjutant laid
magnetic ground mines close to the entrances of Wellington and Lyttelton
harbours.
Acknowledgments
THIS NARRATIVE is based on Admiralty documents, New Zealand Naval
records, and German official reports. The diagram of shipping losses was drawn
by Roy Stock and the maps by L. D. McCormick. The ship silhouettes and other
plans are from official handbooks. The photographs come from various collections
which are stated where they are known:
Inside Cover T. W. Collins
Page 14 (top) Commander R. E. Washbourn, RN
page 14(bottom) The Weekly News, Auckland
page 15 (top) T. W. Collins
page 15 (bottom) Department of Internal Affairs, John Pascoe
page 17 (bottom) Alexander Turnbull Library
page 18 (top) New Zealand Shipping Company
page 18 (bottom), page 19, page 20 (top and bottom) A. T. Cox
page 20 (centre), Lee Hill
cover photograph A New Zealand field ambulance
WOUNDED IN BATTLEJ. B. McKINNEYWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1950
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Diary of a Corporal in 26 NZ Battalion:
ON the night of 19 December 1944 at 9 o’clock, 6 NZ Infantry Brigade and 43 Gurkha Infantry Brigade launched an attack under a heavy barrage and threw the enemy back to the line of the Senio River, Northern Italy. Much ground was taken after heavy fighting and over 200 prisoners were captured at a cost to 2 NZ Division of about 20 killed and 80 wounded.
War Diary of Director of Medical Services, 2nd NZEF, 20 December 1944
‘My section’s job on the night of 19–20 December was to cover a party of sappers
who were minesweeping a road which ran along the axis of 6 Infantry Brigade’s advance.
Just after midnight, I went ahead with the officer in charge of the sweepers to inspect
the road and we found two demolitions which completely blocked it.
‘It was while the two of us were between the demolitions that the enemy began to
cover the road with mortar and gun fire. The officer and I dived into a deep ditch and
lay there waiting for the shelling to finish. I was thinking about getting up to move on
when I experienced a sensation in my legs not unlike being hit on both heels with sledgehammers.
‘I had an idea I had been hit, but was not sure until I felt down with my hand and
found my battle-dress trousers very warm and sticky from the blood that was oozing out.
I called to the officer to let him know that I had been hit and tried to get out of my
equipment to make it easier to get at the first field dressing in my pocket.
‘My officer had reached me by then. He had a very hard job getting at the wound for a
start, not having a pocket-knife and being forced to lie on his stomach to avoid being hit
also. At last he managed to rip the leg of my trousers and bandaged my first field dressing
over the wound. My leg was just like a log of wood by then and I had no control over it
at all. The officer then left me to go back and get someone to carry me out for medical
attention. Instead of feeling scared, as I and most others used to feel when making an
attack, I then felt quite happy and lay flat out in the wet ditch and went to sleep. The
two soldiers who came for me did not have a stretcher and started to carry me sitting
on their clasped hands. I fainted almost straight away and do not know how I reached
the floor of the house where I awoke. The thing that I remember most vividly was the
intense cold. My leg was aching painfully and I was very thirsty. A regimental stretcher-bearer from 25 NZ Battalion came into the house and he gave me an injection of morphia.
The dose was not powerful enough to send me to sleep and did not seem to lessen the
pain in my leg a great deal.
‘Communication had somehow been made with the Battalion RAP
Regimental Aid Post
and a Bren-gun
carrier was promised as soon as it could get through to take me back to a medical officer.
A hold-up had been caused by a road demolition which a bulldozer had to fill in before
any motor traffic could get through. All the fields on either side of the roads were heavily
sown with anti-personnel mines, thus making it very risky for stretcher-bearers to travel
across country.
‘The carrier came at last and I was put on board. All I remember of that journey was
the bumping, the cold, and the moaning of a fellow-patient. I awoke once more when
the carrier stopped and found we were outside our Battalion RAP. Here I waited my
turn to be treated.’
Stretcher-Bearers
Throughout the war the regimental stretcher-bearers, by the promptness with which they
brought the wounded back to medical aid, were able to save many lives. Officially called battalion
medical orderlies, they were infantrymen trained in battle first aid, who went into the attack
carrying only a stretcher and a bag of surgical dressings. They were not members of the Medical
Corps, but they wore Red Cross brassards and were entitled to protection under the Geneva
Convention. The subsequent success of the treatment of wounded in medical units largely depended
on their efficiency. They had heavy casualties, for their duties were performed under fire. On one
occasion, for instance, a stretcher-bearer waded the ice-cold Rapido River at Cassino and carried
back across it a wounded man—all this under sniper as well as mortar and artillery fire.
Bren-gun carriers and jeeps, adapted for stretcher-carrying, were used where possible in the
later stages of the war to bring patients back to the Regimental Aid Post. The jeeps were much
preferred by the regimental medical officers. These vehicles, if possible, went as far forward as
infantry company headquarters, to which point the patients were brought by stretcher-bearers.
This innovation, by shortening the distance a patient had to be carried by hand, was an important
advance. In the forward areas the driver of the jeep had to face shelling and mortaring of roads
and crossroads; often fire might be called down by the dust raised by his jeep.
‘The RAP had been established in a deserted house and I was very pleased to see the
fire burning in the grate. The medical officer examined me and my wounds were dressed.
It was found that my left thigh was perforated, involving the femoral artery, and also a
wound below the knee was discovered. My thirst was terrific and I was overjoyed when
the medical officer gave me a hot drink of cocoa. I was marked down as seriously ill,
given a dose of morphia and placed on a jeep, which had been converted to carry
stretchers, and sent on the next stage of my journey.’
Regimental Aid Post
In a fixed position, as was common in Italy, the Regimental Aid Post was often in a partly
demolished house. During a battle the medical work at the aid post was carried on under the din of
gunfire and exploding shells; the earth shook under the continued shock of explosions.
The chain of medical services really began at the Regimental Aid Post where the medical
officer was the advanced representative of the Medical Corps. He was responsible for giving the
essentials of first aid treatment to the wounded so that they could be sent on as quickly and as
comfortably as possible. To the soldier there was some comfort and reassurance in having a qualified
doctor in attendance in the line itself, and this knowledge had its effect on a man’s morale before
and during an action.
Resuscitation measures were limited to wrapping the patient in blankets, warming him with
hot water bottles and hot drinks. Transfusions of whole blood were available only in exceptional
circumstances, but blood plasma and serum, which could be kept without refrigeration, were
often made up and used for transfusions even at the Regimental Aid Post.
Blood is a mixture of a fluid called plasma and millions of tiny red blood cells. When a man is wounded he loses whole
blood from the injured vessels and also plasma seeps into the damaged tissues. The body compensates for this by contracting the blood vessels and accelerating the rate of flow by more rapid heart action, and bleeding is stopped by
clotting. The loss of blood both produces and accentuates shock.
Blood transfusion is the mainstay of resuscitation. Whole blood is the most useful as it supplies all wants. A transfusion of plasma, which can be preserved in sealed bottles, is sufficient when bleeding is less marked. Saline and glucose
solutions are of great use in replacing fluid in patients suffering from loss of fluid alone. Refrigeration is required for the
preservation of whole blood but not for plasma, and as plasma can also be dried it is very easily transported.
Many hundreds of our wounded owe their lives to the thousands of bottles of blood, plasma, and glucose-saline
that were sent to the forward medical units. A wounded man can lose as much as six or seven pints of blood and still
be saved providing his injuries are not overwhelming.
Rapid transfer to the
Advanced Dressing Station was always the aim.
* * *
‘The jeep moved along rough roads on its journey from the RAP to the Advanced
Dressing Station and every bump was agony. We safely reached 6 NZ ADS, in a house
on the outskirts of Faenza, at half past nine in the morning. I was examined again, given
five sulphanilamide tablets, and evacuated to 4 NZ MDS, which had opened in Faenza
following the capture of that town on 16 December. The conveyance for that stage of the
journey was a motor ambulance car, which was much more comfortable than the Bren
carrier and the jeep.’
Advanced Dressing Station
The wounded, attended in transit by a medical orderly, were delivered at the Advanced
Dressing Station by New Zealand Army Service Corps drivers. Ambulance cars were the usual
means of transport. They gave a patient a smoother journey and a greater feeling of security than
an open jeep. Valuable assistance to the Field Ambulances’ own cars was often provided by drivers
and vehicles of the American Field Service. This volunteer unit was serving in the Middle East
before the United States entered the war, and it was associated with the New Zealand Division
from the fateful days in the desert in 1942, the drivers cheerfully accepting the risks of the forward
areas and giving tireless and outstanding service.
The Advanced Dressing Station, at which there were normally three medical officers and sixty
men from the Field Ambulance, was usually not far from the line. The duties of the staff were to
receive battle casualties from the Regimental Aid Posts, adjust wound dressings, immobilise
fractures with splinting, relieve pain and shock and give blood transfusions to the more seriously
wounded. Even the worst cases responded magnificently to the blood transfusions. Thus resuscitated, the wounded were made comfortable for the journey to the Main Dressing Station. No
operative treatment was done at the Advanced Dressing Station except for the control of serious
bleeding and the removal of an almost severed limb. As at the Regimental Aid Post, there was a
constant urge to get the casualty to the operating centre with the utmost speed consistent with
safety.
The company forming the Advanced Dressing Station had the mobility of the nomads of the
desert. Its duties were to keep up with the brigade as it advanced, to be ready to set up a miniature
emergency hospital to admit wounded at any time, and to undertake urgent treatment, being
careful always to limit the surgical nature of its work so as to preserve the unit’s mobility. If called
upon to move again, it was able to pack up and be on the move in half an hour. If it still held
patients it might be necessary to leave a detachment to care for them until they were cleared to
the Main Dressing Station. Mobility was an essential feature of the desert campaigns, especially
when the Division engaged in its famous ‘left hooks’, and was a highlight of the final advance in
Italy from the Senio River to Trieste.
The company adapted itself to the topography of the country as well as to the needs of the
battle in setting up its dressing station. In Greece it had first used dugouts burrowed into the
hillside and concealed under canvas and cut scrub. Vehicles were parked under natural cover
some distance away. Red Crosses were not usually displayed by the medical units at this stage.
When it was established that the enemy respected the Geneva Convention, prominent Red
Crosses were painted on tents and vehicles. An Advanced Dressing Station was set up on Mount
Olympus, and in the withdrawal the wounded were treated under the leafy camouflage of olive
trees. Again, in Crete, the olive trees gave protection from the unchallenged and ever-active
Luftwaffe.
In the Western Desert, tarpaulins fixed over and around three-ton trucks formed the reception
and evacuation wards of the Advanced Dressing Station. The Italian terrain in the winter presented
difficulties and caused privations. At the Sangro one Advanced Dressing Station was set up
among thickets of bamboo, the men digging themselves and their bivouac tents into the muddy
banks of a tributary of the river, trying to shelter from the frequent heavy rainstorms which made
the days dismal and the nights cold. In the slow-moving war in Italy a night barrage would throw
the tarpaulin shelters and vehicles of the Advanced Dressing Station into a flickering silhouette,
and overhead the air would throb with the roar of outgoing shells. Inside the shelters (or in one
of the war-battered buildings which became almost indispensable in the winter of 1944 in Northern
Italy) the sterile instruments were laid out ready and the orderlies on duty waited the first casualties
from the impending attack. As the Regimental Aid Posts sent in the wounded a rush might
develop; at times the wounded would be cold and exhausted, urgently needing warmth and blood
transfusions to prepare them for the next stage of their journey—on to the Main Dressing Station.
‘The distance to the MDS was short and we reached it at ten o’clock. It was in a
commercial bank building in Faenza. Here I was examined once more. My pulse
registered 140 and I was placed in the resuscitation department, where I was given a blood
plasma transfusion with morphia included in the drip feed. The transfusion brought my
pulse down to 110 and I was considered fit for further evacuation, this time to the
Casualty Clearing Station. The plasma bottle was fitted on the side of the stretcher and
the transfusion continued while I was travelling.’
STRETCHER-BEARERS
Advanced Dressing Stations
At Four Main Dressing Stations
Casualty Clearing Stations
GENERAL HOSPITALS
HOSPITAL SHIPMAUNGANUI
Main Dressing Station
In Italy the Main Dressing Station for battle casualties (battle MDS) was invariably situated
near a road seething with traffic. The air of bustle on the road pervaded the dressing station too,
with its staff of at least six medical officers and up to 200 men, including the Army Service Corps
drivers and the medical orderlies. Down this road, fighting against the almost ceaseless stream of
traffic pressing towards the forward areas, came the ambulance cars.
Routes to the Main Dressing Station were, in some cases, raw, newly-formed roads hurriedly
constructed by the Engineers, or else winding Italian roads that seemed more concerned with
strangling their hills, rata-like, than providing a way for traffic. It was not unusual for ambulance
cars to arrive at the Main Dressing Station in winter with their bodywork streaked and plastered
with clay from scraping along the inner bank, either in squeezing past other vehicles on the narrow
stretches or through skidding down into the ditch at the side of the road. Over the long, dependable
summer months, the Main Dressing Station could be placed on any type of road, its location being
governed only by the evacuation routes.
The road alongside the Main Dressing Station reverberated with the noise of traffic; sometimes it was the clattering of whirling chains on road or mudguard, sometimes the hammering
roar of passing squadrons of tanks and the rumble of tank-transporters. In addition, the unit’s
lighting plant whirled for long hours with its slack, rattling roar.
At any hour of the day or night ambulances halted outside the reception centre. From them
came the walking wounded and the stretcher cases. If it was dark, the stretcher-bearers moved
with a studied shuffling between Ambulance and Reception, Reception and Resuscitation and
Theatre, Theatre and Evacuation—searching out the ground with their feet.
Every so often there was lifted from an ambulance car a patient with one arm lightly bound to a
rigid arm-rest, a part-empty transfusion bottle in the frame clamped to the stretcher, with the red
rubber giving-set running down to the needle taped in place in the bend of his elbow. Exposed
bandages on walking patients showed patches of dried or damp blood; bandaged hands or arms
were dirty and streaked with flakes of blood dried hard. Faces were grimy, with a heavy stubble of
beard. A man moving among them, unbandaged and seemingly unhurt, would perhaps be an
exhaustion case.
The wounded entered the reception centre with the air of understanding, patient waiting that
wounded men always seemed to bring with them. In contrast, the staff of the reception centre worked
with all speed to examine their new patients and classify them for treatment. All the more serious
or badly shocked cases went to the unit’s resuscitation centre with its heated room or tent. Later,
some would be moved into the operating theatre.
It was always difficult for medical officers to decide which cases should be operated on at the
Main Dressing Station and which should wait until the Casualty Clearing Station was reached.
Major surgery was best dealt with at the Casualty Clearing Station as it had better surroundings
and equipment for that purpose, and the stability that allowed serious cases, such as abdominals,
to be held till they were fit to travel to the General Hospitals. Special conditions arose, however,
such as existed at the battle of Tebaga Gap, which made it impossible to evacuate the wounded in
time for surgical attention in rear units. Under such conditions major surgery was done at the
Main Dressing Station, and extra surgical teams were provided so that all the work could be carried
out efficiently.
At other times the work was shared by the two units, both working together to allow the
maximum amount to be done in the shortest time. Priorities of operation for different types of
wounds were laid down as experience dictated. At the time of the battles to break through to the
plains of Northern Italy, first priority was given to cases of serious bleeding, mangled limbs, large
muscle and open chest wounds. During these battles wounded were operated on at the Main
Dressing Station, at the Casualty Clearing Station, at the special British head, eye, and maxillofacial hospital, and at our General Hospital at Senigallia, while some were flown to Bari to have
their first operations performed at our hospital there. The Main Dressing Station provided
resuscitation for the serious cases, giving blood transfusions if necessary, before evacuating them
to the Casualty Clearing Station.
The evacuation centre cared for a spaced and steady procession of wounded. Some were drowsy
with morphia, others relaxed with the heartening knowledge that they were within sheltering
walls after a trying ordeal and the discomfort of travelling. Some came startled and alarmed out
of the deep fogginess of anaesthesia, others answered questions obediently and from mere habit,
as though they had found something more interesting to hold their attention and had replied out
of politeness. This population was transitory, patients being sent on to the Casualty Clearing Station
as soon as they were fit to travel.
After a period as battle MDS the unit would be tired—sleep was disturbed by the internal
noises of the dressing station at work or by the external noises of war; and there was, too, the
steady drain of energy from long and intense concentration and the persistent call for quick and
precise work.
But the unit preferred to be battle MDS rather than sick MDS or in reserve. The life was more
exacting and more urgent. Constant thought and ceaseless energy saved life and limb for the
wounded: the work left a sense of satisfaction and a keen appreciation that it was a task in which
any man might take pride.
‘I was admitted to 1 NZ Mobile Casualty Clearing Station at Forli. When I was
carefully examined at seven o’clock in the evening it was found that the femoral artery
had been severed. The sack of the calf of my leg was opened widely but was bleeding
only a little. I was operated on and put to bed with my leg in an iron frame, and 15,000
units of penicillin were injected every three hours from nine o’clock on the night of 20
December to nine o’clock in the morning of 26 December. Also, injections for protection against gas-gangrene poisoning were given six-hourly from midnight on 20
December to six o’clock on 23 December.
‘In spite of all this attention my leg began to get discoloured by 23 December and
I had lost all feeling below the knee. The medical officer told me my leg would have to
be amputated or else it would most likely endanger my life. At eight o’clock that
evening I went into the operating theatre and was put under an anaesthetic. Then my
leg was amputated through the lower third of my left thigh. On Christmas Eve I had
another transfusion of two pints of blood. For several days I could feel the heat and cold
in my missing leg just as plainly as if it were still there, and that sensation wore off only
after two or three weeks.’
Casualty Clearing Station
In Forli the Casualty Clearing Station was established in a former school building where
conditions allowed more than the usual comfort. Here elaborate surgical treatment was carried
out as near to the forward areas as was practicable for tactical reasons (usually within 12 to 15 miles),
and here, too, was provided the necessary post-operative nursing until the patient was fit to be sent
farther along the route of evacuation to a General Hospital. The aim was always to reduce the
time-lag between the wounding of a soldier and his first surgical operation. On occasions wounded
were sent on to a General Hospital from the Casualty Clearing Station by air.
The Casualty Clearing Station was usually a tented hospital, specially equipped and staffed
as a mobile unit. Mobility was of prime importance as the unit had to be ready to move to a
fresh site at short notice, or it might have to set up in an open field. It was equipped to hold 300
patients, of whom about one-third could be nursed on beds and the remainder on stretchers.
During a battle a Casualty Clearing Station might handle from 200 to 500 patients in 24 hours,
with a high proportion of urgent major surgical operations. In active periods the staff was usually
supplemented by Field Surgical units, a Field Transfusion unit with its blood bank, and sometimes
by a British Mobile Laboratory as well.
As in the Main Dressing Station, the standard practice was to set up the tented wards along a
semi-circular road running from the entrance to the exit of the field. First came the reception tent,
then the pre-operation ward, with an X-ray tent attached, followed by two to four tented
operating theatres and finally some seven or eight tented wards. Each of these wards held 25 patients
on beds, or 35 on stretchers. Conveniently arranged about this group were the special departments,
medical stores and dispensary, ordnance stores, cookhouses, and mobile lighting sets for the theatres
and wards. It was possible to establish the Casualty Clearing Station, pitch tents, and equip wards
and theatres ready to function, within six hours from the time of arrival on the site.
During an action the ambulances would arrive from the Main Dressing Station in a steady
stream, one moving in to take the place of another as it pulled out, sometimes two unloading at
once. Stretcher-bearers brought the patients into the reception tent. One, perhaps, had his eyes
and head bandaged. Another might be very still, with the envelope tied to his battle dress clearly
marked ‘Abdominal’; he would be passed on immediately to the resuscitation and pre-operation
ward. Here his stretcher was placed on trestles.
Formerly a kerosene heater was placed under the stretchers and blankets were draped round the trestles, but the
application of heat as a means of resuscitation was later discarded, the room being heated sufficiently to prevent undue
chilling but no direct heat being applied to the patient.
He was stripped of his clothing, bloodstained and
mud-soiled as it was, washed and put into pyjamas. The extent of his injury was carefully estimated,
and he was listed in order of priority for operation. In the meantime, the transfusion officer injected
warmed blood so that the patient would be in the best condition to stand the operation.
When a patient was taken into one of the operating theatres the anaesthetist gave him an
injection of pentothal in the inner vein of the elbow, followed if necessary by an inhalation
anaesthetic. The surgeon would call for instruments and begin the operation. His assistant tried to
anticipate his wishes, while orderlies held limbs, attended to the steriliser, obtained swabs or
anything else demanded by the surgeon. When the excision of the wound was completed it was
treated with penicillin and one of the sulphonamide drugs. Damaged limbs were usually encased
in plaster and, the operation completed, the patient was carried to one of the tented wards. Here he
came under the care of a nursing sister and six orderlies.
The Casualty Clearing Station had on its staff eight nursing sisters of the New Zealand Army
Nursing Service who lived and moved with the unit. They provided the high standard of nursing
necessary in serious post-operative cases, especially with abdominal wounds. Their presence alone
so soon after a soldier had been wounded had a seemingly magical influence on his recovery.
As a surgical centre in the form of a well-found hospital unit within a short distance of the
fighting line, the Casualty Clearing Station was a vital link in the chain of medical services. The
work of the surgeons was greatly helped by blood transfusion and by two great life-saving discoveries, the sulphonamide drugs and penicillin, which gave the wounded soldier of the Second
World War a much better chance of survival than in the First World War. Speed in evacuation,
care in handling, constant supervision and correct treatment during the first few fateful hours from
the time a soldier was wounded until he was operated on at the Casualty Clearing Station meant,
in many cases, the difference between life and death, or between complete recovery and chronic
invalidism.
* * *
‘On Boxing Day I was on the road again—this time in an ambulance of the NZ
Motor Ambulance Convoy section—to 1 NZ General Hospital on the sea-coast at
Senigallia, seventy miles away. The atmosphere in the General Hospital was a great
help to morale and I felt 100 per cent better as soon as I was between the sheets. However,
I had no sooner settled down than a medical officer came and after examination prescribed
another two bottles of blood for me. I did not like having the blood transfusion but I
always felt much better and stronger afterwards.
‘December the 28th saw me back in the operating theatre again, and this time my leg
was stitched up and two rubber tubes were inserted in my stump. I then started another
course of penicillin injections, which were no doubt the direct cause of my stump healing
so quickly, but I was not sorry when the sister said that the course was finished.
‘Here I must put in a good word for the nursing sisters I found in the New Zealand
hospitals. They were an excellent group and I always had a feeling of safety and security
when they were around. The treatment and attention I received at 1 NZ General
Hospital was thorough and good all the time, and no praise is high enough for the nursing
staffs—both sisters and voluntary aids.’
General Hospital
At Senigallia 1 NZ General Hospital was established in what had been an Italian children’s
health camp; up till a few months previously it had been used as a German military hospital.
The buildings, though insufficient for a hospital, enabled many of the amenities of a large civilian
hospital to be supplied. Water and electricity were laid on, amenities which had not always been
available in the hospitals in Egypt.
The central building had lent itself to conversion to the needs of the administrative, laboratory,
X-ray and other departments. It also provided some of the wards. A walk beneath a vine-covered
pergola ended at a two-storeyed building used as the surgical block. This block showed more
window than wall on all sides and was admirably suited for a hospital building. All other accommodation was provided by tents. New Zealand engineers had worked to provide access roads and
other conveniences, while Italian labour had been employed on inside alterations.
The main highway passed the entrance to the hospital, and there was the continual noise of
transport moving up to the front line and the droning of aircraft overhead. During the last few
weeks of summer and in the early autumn, the staff had enjoyed living in tents by the sea, but when
the sea breezes turned to boisterous gales, and heavy rain saturated the ground underfoot, and snow
a week before Christmas left its aftermath of slush, it was another story. Nissen huts were being
erected all over the hospital area to replace tents as wards and living quarters.
From the date it opened on this site, early in September 1944, the hospital had been busy with
an inrush of patients. The staff always had its unremitting round of duties. To be a good orderly
a man needed to be a jack-of-all-trades. For ten hours a day he dealt with recalcitrant primus
stoves and kerosene heaters; he acted as a transport mule in the hospital area, carried large bundles
of soiled clothing to the linen store, collected the lotions from the dispensary or medical store,
brought rations of soap, kerosene, and methylated spirits from the ordnance store, went to the
main kitchen for morning and afternoon tea for the patients, carried stretcher patients to operating
theatre or X-ray department, and was always at the beck and call of sisters and patients. In between
times he managed to obtain on the side many needful extras for the wards.
Voluntary aids now attended to many duties which had fallen to the orderly in pre-1942 days.
The nurses made beds, took temperatures, washed patients, worked in the operating theatre and
special-diet kitchens, delivered meals, swept and cleaned wards, and helped in the ward kitchens.
Sisters were in charge of the wards of 80 to 100 beds, carrying out professional nursing duties
as in civilian life. They co-operated with the medical officers in the treatment of patients, keeping a
watchful eye on each man’s progress, maintaining discipline, but always trying to keep their
charges contented and comfortable.
When the First Echelon went overseas in January 1940, eighteen sisters of the New Zealand
Army Nursing Service sailed with it—a small band of women in a trim uniform of grey and
scarlet. On the staffs of the New Zealand military General Hospitals in the Middle East and the
Pacific were many more sisters. They, with their reinforcements, brought the total who served
overseas to 602, all of them volunteers. By May 1940 more than 1200 nurses from New Zealand
hospitals had offered themselves for overseas service.
A sister’s service was seldom dramatic or spectacular. Hers was the life of the hospital unit in
which she served, sharing its difficulties and problems, its joys and honours. The standard of
treatment and service given to each patient was equal to that of any modern hospital in New
Zealand, but the difficulties overcome could be known only by those who had worked long hours
to establish and maintain that standard.
No sister in a civilian ward, filled with all modern appliances for the patients’ well-being, ever
viewed her surroundings with more pride than did a sister of the New Zealand Army Nursing
Service who, with the help of her ward staff and walking patients, fashioned furniture from
wooden boxes, discarded tins, and other waste material. Many times a sister’s thoughts, as she
stoked a copper fire or tinkered with a temperamental primus that at a critical moment refused
to do anything but gush a sooty smoke-screen, must have turned to the hospital she had left, where
the gleaming faucets at a touch would pour forth gallons of boiling water and where the behaviour
of the steam sterilisers never gave a moment’s worry. Nor, as she endeavoured to work in a duty
room that also served as the doctor’s office, dispensary, linen room, and perhaps sterilising room as
well, could she be blamed if at times she thought with longing of the hospital at home, where
there was a room and a place for everything. No, in a military hospital it was no press-button life,
but for the sisters who watched their units become efficient hospitals, it was a life that had its
rewards.
The medical officers were qualified doctors; many were recognised experts in specialised
branches of medicine and surgery. Upon them rested the responsibility for the conduct of the
hospital, and their science and skill paved the way for the recovery of so many men to full health
and strength. The General Hospitals admitted an annual total of sick and wounded equal to the
numerical strength of the 2nd NZEF. The greater proportion were sick, but during the war there
were over 16,000 wounded and an almost equal number accidentally injured—all making demands
on the surgeons. Throughout the war there was a steady advance in the technique of surgical
treatment and the use of drugs, and a surgeon had always to keep abreast of the latest curative
developments and apply them as occasion arose.
* * *
‘On 7 January 1945 some of us moved out of 1 NZ General Hospital on our way to
3 NZ General Hospital, 300 miles farther down the Adriatic coast at Bari. We travelled
by a British hospital ship, staffed by English men and women of the RAMC.
Royal Army Medical Corps
We were
treated very well by the Tommies during our short trip with them.
‘Bari was reached next morning, and we travelled the short distance to 3 NZ General
Hospital by ambulance. We got into bed just in time for lunch. By this time my appetite
was returning. This hospital was one of a group situated in what had been planned as an
Italian Polyclinic. The medical treatment was first-class as expected. Facilities were as
good as those in any civilian hospital. Just a few days before my arrival the hospital had
admitted its 40,000th patient. I was one of 900 patients there.’
The British, Indian, South African, and New Zealand hospitals were accommodated in a very
extensive group of buildings at Bari, designed as a medical school and hospital centre for the whole
of Southern Italy. In November 1943, 3 NZ General Hospital took over part of one block from a
British Casualty Clearing Station. This was ready for use, but the main block allotted to the New
Zealanders was only a framework with unfinished floors and walls, and with very few glazed
windows. Many of the casements were bricked up and there were no fittings for water and
sanitation. Demobilised and undisciplined Italian troops were in possession and the building was
in a filthy state. A transformation into a well-equipped hospital provided with all the essentials
of modern cleanliness and sanitation was effected.
Third NZ General Hospital had come from Tripoli, where it had been a tented hospital
clustered round an old fort. There, fittings from a sunken hospital ship in the harbour had provided
extra equipment: the capacity of New Zealanders to improvise and adapt had produced first-class
hospitals in all situations.
* * *
‘On 15 January I tried to use crutches but my good leg was too weak to hold me.
I was graded and placed on the list of invalids for return to New Zealand.
‘We embarked at Taranto on 20 January 1945 on the NZ Hospital Ship Maunganui
and from then onwards all was a pleasure. The treatment, food, and general atmosphere
of the Maunganui were excellent and I will always have pleasant memories of the contacts
I have experienced with members of the New Zealand Medical Services.’
Hospital Ship
Amongst the thousands of ships which entered New Zealand ports during the Second World
War, there were a few that did not have the dull grey camouflage of war. Their bright white
paintwork was relieved by a broad green band girdling the hull; on their sides were two or three
large red crosses and the flag of the International Red Cross—a red cross on a white background—
flew at the masthead. These were the hospital ships. They were completely fitted with all the
equipment necessary today for the treatment of sick and wounded. Cabin walls and fittings were
torn out to make large airy wards in which rows of neat white beds were screwed to the decks or
suspended to counter the roll of the ship. Other sections of the ship, which might have been music
rooms, smoke rooms, or lounges, were also converted to the needs of the sick and wounded.
A central feature was the operating theatre. On its walls were glass cupboards containing shelves
of surgical instruments. In other cabins were an X-ray department, a laboratory, a dispensary,
a dentist’s surgery, and a massage department. None of these lacked anything, either in supplies
or fittings. A hospital ship must be self-sufficient.
The Maunganui, a troopship of the First World War and a passenger liner between the wars,
was converted to a hospital ship at the beginning of 1941. She was a fully-equipped General
Hospital afloat, with accommodation for 365 patients. The operating block was the object of special
pride: it had been so well designed and equipped in Wellington that it was the envy of many
British hospital ships.
There was no mistaking the pleasure of the patients returning to New Zealand when they first
caught sight of the gleaming white side of the hospital ship at the port of embarkation. There were
still pleasant surprises in store for them. In the wards the beds were as good as they looked and the
walls were a restful green and cream.
The first meal on board was a revelation to the home-coming men. After an interval of one,
two, three and even more years they tasted excellently cooked New Zealand food—the best the
Dominion could produce. It had been kept in perfect condition in the ship’s freezing chambers and
included plenty of green vegetables and fruit and many delicacies—lamb, chicken, even oysters
and whitebait. No wonder that convalescence was rapid on the homeward voyage.
* * *
‘There was great excitement when we sighted the New Zealand coast in the vicinity
of Cape Farewell on the afternoon of 27 February 1945 and still greater excitement
when we sailed up the Wellington harbour next morning and berthed at Aotea Quay.
Patients lined the ship’s rails, and those whose homes were near Wellington picked out
members of their families in the crowd pressing against the barriers on the wharf and
waved and shouted. Soon we disembarked—many who had come on board as stretcher
patients were able to walk down the gangway. What a thrill it was to set foot on New
Zealand soil again (even if it was only one foot in my case) and know that we would all
soon be checked through the Casualty Clearing Hospital on the wharf, and then be
taken home by train in special hospital carriages. The chain of medical services had
brought some of us right from the front line in Northern Italy to our own homes.’
Acknowledgments
THE DIARY used in this account is that of Cpl A. A. Swanston, of 26 NZ
Battalion. For the description of medical units the author relied on miscellaneous
material in the records of the Medical History Section, War History Branch. The map
and diagram are by L. D. McCormick, and the photographs come from many
collections, which are stated where they are known:
K. G. Killoh Cover
L. V. Stewart Inside Cover
New Zealand Army Official, J. G. Brownpages 4, 7, 26 and 27
New Zealand Army Official, H. Patonpage 9 (top), page 15 (top), and page 18 (bottom)
New Zealand Army Official, G. F. Kayepage 9 (bottom), page 10, and page 11 (top, and bottom left)
New Zealand Army Official, G. R. Bullpage 11 (bottom right), page 15 (bottom), page 20 (centre
and bottom)
Dr. P. V. Gravespage 12 (top) and page 14 (top)
Army Film Photograph Unit, page 13 (top), page 16 (bottom right), and page 19 (top)
Dr. G. H. Levienpage 13 (bottom)
R. H. Blanchardpage 16 (top left)
J. B. Hardcastlepage 16 (top right)
Dr. S. L. Wilsonpage 16 (bottom left)
New Zealand Army Official, C. J. Haydenpage 17 (bottom right), and page 21
Dr. D. T. Stewartpage 18 (top)
G. Morrispage 19 (bottom)
A. R. Andersonpage 20 (top)
Department of Internal Affairs, John Pascoepage 22 (top)
F. A. Marriottpage 22 (bottom) and page 23 (bottom)
New Zealand Army Official, M. D. Eliaspage 23 (top)
The Evening Postpage 24
THE AUTHOR, J. B. McKinney, who graduated at Victoria University College
as MA in History in 1939, served in the New Zealand Medical Corps in the
Middle East and Italy from 1941 to 1945, and is at present on the staff of the
Medical History Section of the War History Branch.
the type used throughout the series is
Aldine Bembo which was revived for monotype from a rare book printed by aldus
in 1495 *the text is set in 12 point on
a body of 14 point
cover photographLeros in the Dodecanese Islands
LONG RANGE DESERT GROUP
in the MediterraneanR. L. KAYWAR HISTORY BRANCH
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRSWELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND1950
IT IS THE INTENTION of this series to present aspects of New Zealand’s
part in the Second World War which will not receive detailed treatment in the campaign
volumes and which are considered either worthy of special notice or typical of many
phases of our war experience. The series is illustrated with material which would otherwise
seldom see publication. It will also contain short accounts of operations which will be
dealt with in detail in the appropriate volumes.
H. K. KIPPENBERGER,Major-Generaleditor-in-chiefnew zealand war histories
Acknowledgments
THE SOURCES consulted in the preparation of this account were the war
diaries and official records of A (New Zealand) Squadron, LRDG, amplified by
the recollections of the officers and men who served with the unit, the despatches
of General Sir Henry Wilson and Vice-Admiral Sir Algernon Willis, Long Range
Desert Group, by W. B. K. Shaw, Dust Upon the Sea, by W. E. Benyon-Tinker,
and notes on the Aegean operations by Captain R. A. Tinker. The author is
indebted to those who responded so readily to his requests for information. The
maps are by L. D. McCormick, and the photographs come from many collections,
which are stated where they are known:
J. L. D. Davis Cover, page 14 (centre and bottom), page 15 (top and bottom), page 16, page 19 (top),
and page 20
Army Film Photograph Unitpage 13 (top and centre)
F. W. Joplingpage 13 (bottom)
R. A. Ramsaypage 14 (top) and page 15 (centre)
Imperial War Museum (London) page 17 and page 18 (bottom)
A. V. Emenypage 17 (top) and page 18 (top)
C. K. Saxtonpage 19 (bottom)
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurch new zealand
printed by whitcombe and tombs limited christchurchnew zealand
Raids Behind the Enemy Lines
THE THREE LONG-RANGE PATROLS formed in July 1940 to reconnoitre in southern
Libya and raid remote Italian outposts had developed by the end of 1941 into two squadrons
of the Long Range Desert Group, operating in support of the Eighth Army offensive in Cyrenaica.
A Squadron, LRDG, and the Special Air Service, working together in bold and skilful raids in the
rear of the Axis forces, destroyed scores of enemy aircraft on the ground. The LRDG patrols
transported the parachutists to within easy walking distance of enemy airfields, and took them
back to their base when their work was completed.
A Squadron, commanded by Major D. G. Steele1 and comprising T2, S1, and S2 patrols,
The LRDG included four New Zealand patrols (R1, R2, T1, and T2), two Guards patrols (G1 and G2), two Yeomanry patrols (Y1 and Y2), and two Southern Rhodesian patrols (S1 and S2). Each patrol consisted of an officer and
fifteen to eighteen men in five or six 30-cwt trucks. Later they were equipped with jeeps as well as trucks.
was joined by Captain A. D. Stirling’s2 SAS troops at Gialo in December 1941, shortly after a
British flying column, advancing nearly 300 miles from Giarabub, had captured the oasis from the
Italians. The first attack from this base was made by a handful of parachutists taken by S1 patrol
to Tamet, in the Sirte area, where they crept on to the landing ground at night, wrecked twenty-four aircraft with time bombs, and blew up a bomb dump. The same men returned about a week
later and destroyed another twenty-seven aircraft, while a party travelling with S2 patrol accounted
for no fewer than thirty-seven aircraft on a landing ground near Agedabia.
The parachutists taken by the New Zealand patrol (T2, led by Captain C. S. Morris3) to the
vicinity of El Agheila discovered that the airfield there was deserted. With a captured Italian lorry
leading their five patrol trucks, they then motored nine miles eastwards along the main road at
night, passing forty-seven enemy vehicles on the way, until they reached the turn-off at Marsa
Brega, a small anchorage used by enemy shipping. There they encountered twenty enemy lorries
parked alongside the road, with about sixty men standing around them. Attacking for a quarter
of an hour at very close range, the raiders killed at least fifteen of the enemy and wounded many
others, without casualty to themselves. While the fighting was in progress, the parachutists placed
time bombs on all the enemy vehicles.
The patrol then continued another ten miles along the road, which was flanked by salt marshes.
To prevent pursuit, Corporal G. C. Garven,4 who was in the last truck, laid mines in the potholes,
which caused seven explosions and probably accounted for that number of vehicles. Before
turning off to the south, the patrol cut the telephone wires and blew down many poles to disorganise traffic. Enemy aircraft searched all next day and twice passed overhead without seeing
them. Their exploits on this raid earned Morris the MC and Garven the MM.
T2 patrol next took the parachutists to raid the airfields at Nofilia and Marble Arch, west of
El Agheila. A Messerschmitt fighter, following the wheel tracks from Nofilia, strafed the patrol
from a height of only forty feet, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, and killed the paratroop officer.
Relays of Stuka dive bombers joined in the attack and bombed and strafed the patrol for six and
a half hours. When all the trucks except one were destroyed, the aircraft continued to attack the
men on the ground and machine-gunned every bush that might give them cover. The survival
of this one truck was due largely to the courage of Private C. A. Dornbush,5 who kept his machine
gun in action throughout the attacks, although the truck was hit several times and he himself was
wounded. He was awarded the MM.
The attacks ceased as it grew dark. Unable to locate the scattered crews of the destroyed
vehicles, Morris returned to Gialo with several men in the one remaining truck. Two Englishmen
and eight New Zealanders
Corporal G. C. Garven, Gunners E. C. Stutterd, E. Sanders, and T. E. Walsh, and Troopers D. M. Bassett, A. C.
Martin, F. S. Brown, and R. A. Ramsay.
were left without transport. Their entire resources were three gallons
of water in a tin, a packet of nine biscuits, an emergency ration of chocolate, and a prismatic
compass, which Trooper D. M. Bassett6 had collected from his burning vehicle while it was still
under heavy fire. They decided to walk to Augila, an oasis twenty miles from Gialo and 200 from
where they were stranded; their only alternative was to go to the road and give themselves up.
The cold of mid-winter forced the ten men to march at night and to rest during the warmer
hours of the day. Most of them were wearing sandals that soon went to pieces on the rough,
stony ground, so they bound their feet with cloth from their jackets and greatcoats. A parachutist,
who already had walked many miles in the raid on Nofilia and whose feet were almost raw, left
the party at the Marada-El Agheila track on the third day of the trek, and was not seen again.
Next day the others met four Arabs who gave them some dates and water and directed them to a
spring. Seeing what they thought were two enemy vehicles approaching, they concealed themselves, but discovered afterwards that the vehicles were those of a British reconnaissance party.
They sat around a fire that night and set off in the morning with their water-can refilled.
In their weakened condition, they found it necessary for teams of four men to carry the water in
short relays. They lit another fire at the end of the fifth day, boiled some water and made a chocolate
drink, which gave them fresh strength for they marched an estimated distance of forty miles the
following night. They were very tired on the sixth day, but the cold weather kept them moving.
Believing they were only twenty-five miles from Augila, they drank as much of the water as they
could and abandoned the rest. In the final stages of exhaustion, they staggered through a dust storm on the seventh day and reached Augila on the eighth. Arabs reported their arrival to the
LRDG at Gialo. Bassett, who navigated for the party, was awarded the DCM, and Gunner E.
Sanders,7 who also had shown bravery on previous occasions, received the MM.
By the end of December 1941, the Axis forces had retreated from Cyrenaica to defensive
positions among the salt marshes near El Agheila. The remainder of the LRDG moved forward
from Siwa, which was now too far from the front line, to join A Squadron at Gialo. Rommel’s
counter-offensive, begun on 21 January, and Eighth Army’s subsequent withdrawal, however,
soon necessitated the return of the whole unit to Siwa, where it remained until the fall of Tobruk
in June 1942.
The Road Watch
While based at Siwa the LRDG patrols ferried paratroops, commandos, and secret agents to
and from many places in enemy territory, rescued escapees from prisoner-of-war camps and the
crews of crashed aircraft, many of whom had been fed and sheltered by friendly Arabs, and watched
traffic on the Tripoli-Benghazi road, along which the enemy brought nearly all his tanks and
troop reinforcements.
The LRDG kept this road under observation day and night from 2 March until 21 July 1942.
The site of the watch was five miles to the east of Marble Arch, at a point where the road crosses
a flat plain a short distance to the north of a low plateau. The patrols found sufficient cover to make
camp and camouflage their vehicles in shallow wadis running down from the plateau. Before
dawn each day, two men went out on the plain to select a hiding-place 300 or 400 yards from the
road, where they concealed themselves as best they could on ground that was bare except for
small, scattered bushes. Equipped with field-glasses, books of vehicle silhouettes, and notebooks,
they lay full-length all day, watching the traffic on the road and recording the details of lorries,
tanks, armoured cars, guns, and troops as they passed. When it was dark they approached to within
twenty or thirty yards of the road and judged the types of vehicles by their sound and outline.
Before daylight, they returned to camp, probably without seeing the two men who relieved
them at the appointed time.
If tanks or large numbers of enemy troops were seen going towards the front, the patrol sent a
wireless message to LRDG headquarters at Siwa, so that by the time the enemy tanks or troops
were approaching Agedabia, the information would have reached General Headquarters in Cairo.
When a patrol had been relieved and was clear of enemy territory, it sent a full report of all the
traffic it had seen; this information was invaluable to General Staff Intelligence in assessing the
enemy’s strength in Cyrenaica.
There was always the risk of discovery, and occasionally the watchers had to move farther
back from the road, but they continued the task without serious interruption and without the loss
of one man. Members of Italian repair gangs working on the road wandered about without
noticing them, and Arabs who did see them did not betray them to the enemy. R1 patrol had a
miraculous escape on 21 March, when an enemy convoy of about 200 troops in twenty-seven
vehicles pulled off the road and camped for the night behind the watchers (Private F. R. Brown8
and Trooper G. C. Parkes9 Although the nearest vehicle was only 150 yards away, the two
New Zealanders, prostrate under their sheepskin coats, were not detected.
It took three patrols to do this work; while one was watching the road for a week or ten days,
another was going out from Siwa to relieve it, and a third was returning to the base. The 600-mile
route from Siwa to the site of the watch crossed the El Agheila-Marada track. The enemy must
have become suspicious of LRDG movement in this area, for when R2 patrol was returning to
Siwa in May, they saw men erecting a wire fence along the track. After that the patrols had to go
to the south of Marada, which added a hundred miles of very soft going to the journey. Even on
this route the enemy placed mines on tracks, which wrecked one truck, fortunately without
injuring the crew.
The LRDG was also required by Eighth Army to interrupt enemy supply columns on the
Tripoli-Benghazi road, a task that was incompatible with road-watching. Avoiding the sections
of the road where raids would have resulted in the discovery of the watchers, T2 patrol (commanded by Lieutenant N. P. Wilder10 operated between Agedabia and Benghazi, and G1 patrol
between Nofilia and Sirte. At first they tried to place time bombs on passing vehicles, but the
speed of the traffic made this impossible, so they then reverted to the simpler method of shooting
up transport. T2 had little success, owing to mechanical breakdowns, but G1, after being attacked
by enemy troops, made a successful raid on a transport park.
With T1 and T2 patrols under his command, Wilder later returned to the Agedabia-Benghazi
road and divided his force to ambush different localities. At midnight on 7 June, T1 patrol, with
lights shining, drove along the road and through an enemy check post at Magrun. Discovering that
they were being followed by two vehicles, they turned out their lights, pulled off the road, and
opened fire with all their weapons as soon as their pursuers drew level. They destroyed a troop-carrier and a truck loaded with troops and ammunition, and killed or wounded at least twenty of
the enemy. At the sound of the shooting, some Italians farther along the road abandoned three
lorries and a trailer heavily laden with timber and supplies. The New Zealanders also left these
vehicles blazing fiercely. T2 patrol did not operate that night because of a damaged truck, but a
few nights later, when both patrols met an enemy truck collecting troops who had been on picket
duty in the Antelat area, they set fire to the truck, killed two of the enemy, and captured six Italians.
The fall of Tobruk on 21 June 1942 and Eighth Army’s retreat to Alamein made it necessary
for the LRDG to leave Siwa. The evacuation was completed on 28 June, a few days before the
Italians occupied the oasis. Major Morris took A Squadron to Cairo for supplies and then to
Kufra, a base from which patrols continued to operate in northern Libya, while the rest of the
unit withdrew to the coast between Alamein and Alexandria and then to Faiyum, about fifty
miles to the south-west of Cairo.
The Alamein Line extended from the coast southwards to the cliffs of the Qattara Depression,
a huge basin 150 miles in length, 450 feet below sea level at its deepest point, and passable to
vehicles only where narrow ribbons of firm sand wind across its salt marshes. To penetrate behind
the Axis positions at Alamein, the patrols based at Faiyum had to go through the Depression.
Renewing their partnership with Major Stirling’s Special Air Service, they continued to attack
the enemy from the rear.
Stirling evolved an alternative to blowing up aircraft with time bombs. Equipped with jeeps,
each of which carried a driver and two gunners with twin-mounted Vickers guns, the raiding
party, firing outwards from a hollow square formation, drove slowly round the target and shot
up everything within range. Accompanied by a New Zealand patrol (Captain Wilder’s T1), the
parachutists employed this technique one night on two landing grounds at Sidi Haneish, where
they claimed twenty-five aircraft but probably destroyed many more. They were pursued after
daylight by air and ground forces, and in the confused fighting that ensued, Gunner Sanders
knocked out four enemy vehicles. The German attack was directed by a Fiesler Storch, which
circled overhead and landed from time to time to confer with the ground troops. When it touched
down near the patrol, two New Zealanders (Troopers K. E. Tippett11 and T. B. Dobson12
captured the pilot and passenger (a German doctor) and set fire to the plane.
Plans were drawn up to disrupt the enemy’s supply lines by wrecking the ports of Benghazi
and Tobruk, through which he received the bulk of his stores. Simultaneous attacks by land and
sea were to be made at Tobruk, where commandos led by Lieutenant-Colonel J. Haselden were
to seize the coastal defence guns, and troops landed from destroyers were to demolish the harbour
installations. Lieutenant-Colonel Stirling was to take a force to Benghazi to sink ships in the harbour,
and the Sudan Defence Force was to capture Gialo, to provide a base from which Stirling could
make further raids in Cyrenaica, and to secure the line of withdrawal to Kufra. LRDG patrols
were to guide the forces to their objectives at Benghazi, Tobruk, and Gialo, and were to attack
subsidiary targets; at the same time an independent LRDG force was to raid Barce.
Y1 patrol conducted Haselden’s commandos from Kufra to Tobruk, where they arrived on
13 September. In a night attack, they captured the coastal defence guns, but lost them to a garrison
that was much stronger than had been expected, and Haselden was among those killed. The seaborne attack was repulsed with the loss of two destroyers and four motor torpedo boats.
The enemy was waiting for Stirling’s parachutists at Benghazi. A strong ambush near the
suburb of Berka prevented them from reaching the port, and aircraft attacked them all next day.
With many of their vehicles destroyed, they made their way as best they could back to Kufra.
S1 and S2 patrols, under Stirling’s command for the operation, were to attack the airfields at
Benina, but in the dark were led by an Arab guide into an impassable wadi, which delayed them so
long that they had to abandon the attempt.
The action at Gialo was not planned to coincide with those at Tobruk and Benghazi, with the
result that the enemy had time to prepare. The Sudan Defence Force, accompanied by Y2 patrol,
reached the oasis in the evening of 15 September, but failed to take its objectives and was ordered
to return to Kufra after several days of constant bombing and shelling. In support of this operation,
R2 patrol (under Lieutenant J. R. Talbot13 watched the northern approaches to Gialo. When
the patrol was moving towards the oasis on 19 September, six enemy aircraft attacked with bombs,
cannon and machine-gun fire. Fighting back whenever possible, the six trucks dispersed in search
of cover and lost contact with one another. Unable to find the rest of his patrol, Talbot returned
to Kufra with two trucks that had joined Y2 patrol. The R2 wireless truck had overturned while
swerving to avoid a bomb, but was replaced on its wheels and towed until it could be put in
running order next day. All six trucks eventually reached Kufra, but with seven casualties.
Sergeant L. A. Willcox, Lance-Corporal A. D. Sadgrove, and Troopers L. A. Ellis, E. J. Dobson, and M. W. Stewart
were wounded in air attacks, Willcox and Private J. E. Gill were injured when a truck crashed over a sand dune on the
way back to Kufra, and an English signalman was injured when the wireless truck capsized.
The Barce Raid
WITH ORDERS to raid Barce town and airfield, ‘causing the maximum amount of damage
and disturbance to the enemy’, Major J. R. Easonsmith14 left Faiyum on 1 September with
T1 patrol (under Captain Wilder) and G1 patrol (under Captain J. A. L. Timpson15, a total of
forty-seven men in twelve trucks and five jeeps. The outward journey, a distance of 1155 miles,
involved crossing the Egyptian and Kalansho Sand Seas. During the first crossing, Timpson
fractured his skull and a Guards gunner injured his spine when a jeep capsized over the edge of a
razor-back dune. They were flown to Cairo from a landing ground near Big Cairn.
From the northern edge of the Kalansho Sand Sea, the patrols crossed southern Cyrenaica to
the foothills of Gebel Akhdar. Major Easonsmith took a British agent (Major V. Peniakoff) and
two Senussi spies to within a few miles of Barce, where they were to learn all they could about
the enemy before rejoining the patrols. After dark on 13 September, the raiding party drove
northwards along a road through wooded, hilly country. They were challenged at a police post
by a native sentry, who was immediately taken prisoner. A shout brought out an Italian officer,
who had to be shot. The rest of the guard, leaving twelve horses in a stable, deserted the post.
The sudden halt when challenged had caused two trucks to collide, one of them the truck carrying
T1 patrol’s Breda gun, and as both vehicles were then unfit to go into action, they were stripped
and left at the side of the road.
Peniakoff was waiting at Sidi Selim, but his two Arabs, who may not have had time, had not
returned. The medical officer (Captain R. P. Lawson16 was left at this rendezvous with the Ti
wireless truck to act as a rallying point after the raid. The patrols then drove on to the main road to
Barce, where they met two small tanks. Not sure whether the approaching vehicles contained
friends or foes, the enemy troops held their fire until the leading jeep was level. The LRDG then
opened fire with all weapons and raced through unscathed.
The patrols separated at the entrance to the town, which they entered at midnight, Ti to
attack the airfield and Gi the barracks. Captain Wilder led the New Zealanders in their four
trucks and a jeep on to the airfield, where they set fire to a petrol dump and a tanker and trailer,
which lit up the whole scene, and threw grenades through the windows of the mess building.
Driving round the landing ground in single file, they fired incendiary ammunition at each aircraft
in turn. Corporal M. Craw,17 who was in the last truck, placed bombs on the planes that were not
already burning and wrecked ten of them. The patrol claimed to have destroyed twenty aircraft
and to have damaged another dozen, but the Italians later told a prisoner of war that they lost
thirty-five. Although the enemy was shooting wildly from practically every angle and vantage point,
the patrol spent an hour on the airfield without casualty. The burning aircraft lit up the whole town.
Expecting the narrow road by which they had reached the airfield to be blocked, Ti patrol
drove out down the main street, but encountered very heavy fire from Italian armoured fighting
vehicles. Fortunately several tanks that were blocking the way were firing a little too high. The
leading truck, driven by Captain Wilder, with Troopers D. S. Parker18 and H. R. T. Holland19
at the guns, charged the nearest tank at full speed, crashed it against the next, and cleared a passage.
Wilder and Parker attempted to immobilise the tanks by tossing grenades under them, and,
although Parker was severely wounded, they transferred from their damaged truck to the jeep,
which was following close behind. Holland was seized by Italians before he could get away, and
Lance-Corporal A. H. C. Nutt,20 who had left the jeep to go to the assistance of the men in the
truck, was also missing. Dazzled by tracer that Wilder was firing, the driver of the jeep (Trooper
P. J. Burke21) steered into a kerb at a street corner. The jeep overturned, pinning the crew underneath, Wilder and Parker both unconscious and Burke injured. Private J. L. D. Davis’s22 truck
stopped to extricate the three men, who were revived before they reached the rendezvous.
Two men from another truck, Corporal Tippett and Trooper Dobson, put the tank Wilder had
rammed completely out of action by climbing on to it and exploding grenades and bombs inside
the turret, and also immobilised another tank with machine-gun fire and by throwing a bomb
under it. Dobson was wounded in the hand. Tippett’s truck then took the wrong turning, crossed
a rubbish dump, and found a way out through a backyard to the main road.
Corporal Craw’s truck, at the rear of the patrol, stopped at Wilder’s abandoned truck, saw
nobody there, and continued along the street. Craw and his crew tried to avoid two or three
armoured cars by turning down a narrow side-street, but finding that they could not escape that
way, decided to run the gauntlet. Their truck was set on fire and crashed into a concrete air-raid
shelter. The force of the impact threw Craw into the shelter, where he was overpowered by
Italians. Trooper K. Yealands,23 who was badly wounded, and Trooper R. E. Hay,24 who stopped
to extricate him from the burning truck, were also captured. Trooper T. A. Milburn25 managed
to get clear of the town before he too fell into enemy hands.
To distract attention while the New Zealanders were raiding the airfield, and to do as much
damage as possible, the Guards patrol attacked the town barracks, where they killed and wounded
a number of men. Major Easonsmith, with two jeeps, attacked other buildings, threw grenades
among Italians in the streets, and wrecked a dozen vehicles in an unattended transport park. The
LRDG then reassembled at the rallying point and retired to the south. Ti had lost six men, two
trucks, and a jeep in Barce, and Gi had lost four men and a truck. Two of the Guardsmen later
rejoined their patrol.
Shortly before dawn on 14 September, when the two patrols were approaching the police
post to the south of Sidi Selim, enemy troops (150 Tripolitanians under three Italian officers),
who had been waiting for their return, opened fire from both sides of the road. Their marksmanship
was poor, but they succeeded in damaging a truck, which the patrols then had to tow in addition
to the two they had left near the police post the previous evening. Just south of the post, the
enemy’s fire wounded three men, including Major Peniakoff and Trooper F. W. Jopling.26
An attempt was made to get the three damaged trucks to go under their own power, but the
Tripolitanians renewed the attack before the fitters could complete their work. Easonsmith, in his
jeep, chased the enemy back two miles while the petrol and stores were removed from the damaged
vehicles and time bombs placed in them. The force then continued its withdrawal until the Guards’
wireless truck stopped with a damaged rear axle. Before it could be moved under cover, a reconnaissance plane circled overhead. Six fighters were temporarily distracted by the explosions of the
time bombs in the three abandoned trucks, but after strafing in the vicinity of these burning
vehicles, they soon reached the area where the LRDG were ill-concealed under some scattered
trees. From mid-morning until dusk, aircraft in varying numbers attacked the vehicles and men,
mostly with incendiary and explosive ammunition. Wilder and a Guardsman were wounded and
all the transport, except one truck and two jeeps, was destroyed. Captain Lawson remained on
the surviving truck to shelter a severely wounded man during the attacks, and then managed to
get most of the casualties to a safe place a mile or two away.
Jopling and nine Guardsmen began walking to Bir el Gerrari, where Gi patrol had left a
vehicle on the way northwards to Barce. Lawson set off in the truck and a jeep with six wounded
men (Wilder, Peniakoff, Parker, Dobson, Burke, and a Guardsman), a navigator (Davis), and a
driver (Private D. P. Warbrick27Easonsmith organised the remaining fourteen men into a
walking party, who took with them rations and water in the other jeep. The doctor soon had to
abandon his jeep because of a hole in the petrol tank, but his party reached Bir el Gerrari on 15
September and pushed on next day to a landing ground near the Kalansho Sand Sea, where they
found Yi patrol. In response to a wireless message, the RAF evacuated the wounded to Kufra and
later to Cairo.
When Easonsmith’s party was approaching Bir el Gerrari on 17 September, having walked
about eighty miles, they unexpectedly met S2 patrol. As the other walking party had not reached
the rendezvous, Easonsmith and the Rhodesians combed the area for three days but found only
eight men; Jopling and Guardsman Gutheridge were missing. Easonsmith later met the other
Rhodesian patrol (S1), which had with it two Guardsmen who had walked out of Barce. The
LRDG then withdrew to Kufra, arriving there during an air raid.
Although Jopling, whose leg wound had turned gangrenous, and Gutheridge, who was
exhausted, had been unable to keep up with the other eight members of their party, they were not
many miles from Bir el Gerrari when they were missed by the search parties. Believing that they
could not reach the rendezvous in time, and desperately in need of water, they turned north
towards the hills. They came to an Arab camp on the night of 20 September, and were picked up
by a party of Italians and taken back to Barce on the 25th, twelve days after the raid. Despite the
condition of Jopling’s leg, the two men had walked at least 150 miles, mostly at night and navigating
by the stars.
The raid on Barce cost the enemy many men killed and wounded, over thirty aircraft damaged
and destroyed, and a number of vehicles. It cost the LRDG six men wounded, all of whom
recovered, ten prisoners of war (seven
Four of them, Craw, Nutt, Milburn, and Hay, escaped a year later.
from T1 patrol and three from G1), several of whom were
wounded, and fourteen vehicles. Their part in the operation won Easonsmith and Wilder the
the DSO, Lawson the MC, and Craw, Tippett, and Dobson the MM. Tippett’s and Dobson’s
citations also refer to their capture of the Fiesler Storch after the Sidi Haneish raid.
The Eighth Army Advance
FOLLOWING THE DEFEAT early in September 1942 of Rommel’s final attempt to break
through the Alamein Line, Eighth Army proceeded with its preparations for an offensive.
As Faiyum would cease to be a suitable base for the LRDG when the advance started, the whole
unit was concentrated at Kufra. The battle began on 23 October and in ten days the shattered
remnants of the Axis army were in full retreat to the west. At the request of General Staff Intelligence, the LRDG re-established a watch on the Tripoli-Benghazi road, again near Marble Arch.
During the first spell of watching, carried out by Y1 patrol from 30 October to 8 November,
less than a hundred vehicles passed both ways daily. By 10 November, when R1 had relieved Y1,
the results of Eighth Army’s victory were apparent: enemy traffic streamed westwards at the
rate of 3500 vehicles a day, and the evacuation of Italian civilians with their furniture, as well as
many thousands of troops, confirmed that Rommel did not intend to return.
When it became evident that the enemy intended to withdraw from El Agheila, the watch
was transferred farther westwards to the Gheddahia-Tauorga section of the road. S1 patrol began
the first spell in this area on 13 December, and T2 took over a week later. Second-Lieutenant R. A.
Tinker,28 leaving a rear camp about thirty miles to the south-west of Gheddahia, took nine men in
two vehicles to the vicinity of Sedada. The watchers, who had great difficulty in passing on foot
through enemy camps near the road, did not long escape discovery. Three German armoured
cars attacked and occupied their forward camp on 22 December. The men who were able to
evade capture began to walk back to the rear camp, which Tinker and three others succeeded in
reaching. Tinker withdrew his patrol next day, when eight German vehicles were seen approaching
from the north. Five New Zealanders
Troopers Ellis, L. R. B. Johnstone, and J. L. Reid, and Privates C. A. Dornbush and J. M. Simonsen. Reid walked
for a week before he was captured, and later escaped from a prisoner-of-war camp in Italy.
and an Englishman were missing, but Trooper E. Ellis29
and the Englishman (Private E. C. Sturrock), walking for days with no food and little water,
made their way independently back to the British lines. They were both awarded the MM.
Long before Eighth Army began the advance from Alamein, the Intelligence branch of General
Headquarters, Middle East, had secret agents operating in Tripolitania. LRDG patrols were
required to carry these men, with their stores and their wireless sets, to a place from which they
could complete their journey by camel or on foot. In August, R1 patrol, under Captain A. I.
Guild,30 took the first party of three men from Kufra to Bir Tala, about 120 miles to the south-east of Tripoli. Three months later the same patrol, led by Captain L. H. Browne,31 repeated the
2000-mile trip to deliver fresh stores and to relieve the wireless operator, who was ill.
On the way northwards on 17 November, R1 exchanged fire with an enemy patrol between
Marada and Zella, and put two enemy vehicles out of action without loss to themselves. Next day,
when attacked at Wadi Tamet by at least fourteen enemy aircraft, they took cover in the wadi
banks and fought back with all their weapons. An officer of the Arab Legion attached to the patrol
and the New Zealand navigator (Lance-Corporal N. O’Malley32 were killed, another New
Zealander (Private M. F. Fogden33 was wounded, and two trucks were damaged beyond repair.
Browne sent a party back to Kufra with the wounded man and, although wounded himself,
carried on to Bir Tala with two trucks to complete his task.
When Rommel withdrew in December from his defensive positions at El Agheila, his retreat
was hastened by a ‘left hook’ by the New Zealand Division around his southern flank. This outflanking move involved crossing the Marada-El Agheila track, through country that had become
well known to the LRDG during the road watch. Guided by Browne’s R1 patrol, the column
reached the Bir el Merduma area, to the west of Marble Arch, in the evening of 15 December,
but was unable to prevent Rommel’s Afrika Korps from breaking out to the west. R1 then led
the Division in another outflanking movement at Nofilia on 17 December, but again the enemy
escaped.
R1 patrol’s next assignment was to reconnoitre the country beyond Wadi Tamet. Browne
was injured and a South African survey officer was killed on 22 December when their jeep struck
a mine on a landing ground near the wadi. Browne, who had served the LRDG with distinction
since the formation of the unit, was awarded the MC. With Second-Lieutenant K. F. McLauchlan34
in command, the patrol continued the reconnaissance until ambushed by two German armoured
cars near the Gheddahia-Bu Ngem track on 27 December. The wireless truck, containing three
New Zealanders
Lance-Bombardier C. O. Grimsey, Private K. C. J. Ineson, and Trooper R. D. Hayes.
and an Englishman, and a jeep carrying a South African officer and his driver,
were captured, but the rest of the patrol skilfully evaded the enemy.
While Eighth Army was driving into Tripolitania from the east, General Leclerc’s Fighting
French Forces of Chad Province moved into the Fezzan from the south. This form of Anglo-French co-operation had been planned a year earlier, when R2 patrol, led by Second-Lieutenant
C. H. B. Croucher,35 had been despatched to a French outpost in the Tibesti Mountains to act as a
wireless link between the Allies. Rommel’s counter-offensive in Cyrenaica, however, had necessitated the postponement of the French advance and the recall of R2 patrol.
As Leclerc lacked the support of fighter aircraft for his operations, LRDG patrols, including R2,
were sent to the Fezzan to destroy enemy aircraft on the landing grounds at Hon and Sebha,
but unfortunately, because of heavy rain and very difficult going, their attempts failed. Although
the French were exposed to air attack, they succeeded in capturing one Italian outpost after another,
while the LRDG blocked the enemy’s line of retreat to the north. T1 (under Captain Wilder),
Y2, and an Indian patrol
An Indian Long Range Squadron of four patrols came under the command of the LRDG in October 1942.
mined the roads, destroyed transport, killed a few Italians, and took a
number of prisoners.
Eighth Army entered Tripoli on 23 January 1943. This advance of 1400 miles in three months
had made it necessary for the LRDG to move its base from Kufra 600 miles north-westwards
to Zella, and later another 150 miles to Hon. The unit’s Heavy Section, equipped with 6-ton and
3-ton lorries, moved the base from one place to the next in a single journey. The heavy transport
was usually employed in ferrying supplies to forward dumps, or from the nearest depot to the
LRDG base—from Wadi Halfa to Kufra, from Mersa Matruh to Siwa, from Msus to Gialo,
from Nofilia to Zella, and from Misurata or Tripoli to Hon. Transporting rations, petrol, ammunition, and equipment over such great distances, created special problems for the quartermaster,
Captain D. Barrett,36 who received the MBE in recognition of his efficiency and capacity for hard
work.
Reconnaissance in Tunisia
Some weeks before the fall of Tripoli, General Sir Bernard Montgomery explained to the
commanding officer of the LRDG (Lieutenant-Colonel G. L. Prendergast37) that the patrols
would be required to reconnoitre the country in southern Tunisia through which a column
outflanking the Mareth Line would have to pass. To enable the patrols to operate so far from their
base at Hon, dumps were established near the Tunisian frontier and arrangements made with
Allied Headquarters at Algiers for supplies to be available at Tozeur, about a hundred miles to the
west of Gabes.
In January and February 1943 the LRDG and the Indian LRS explored the territory to the
south and west of the range of hills extending southwards from Matmata. They reported daily
by wireless about the going, obstacles, cover, water supply, and sites for landing grounds, and on
their return the patrol leaders conferred with Captain Browne at Headquarters New Zealand
Division, where a model was made to demonstrate possible lines of advance.
Crossing the frontier on 12 January, T1 patrol, under Captain Wilder, were the first troops of
Eighth Army to enter Tunisia. About thirty miles to the south-west of Foum Tatahouine, they
found the pass through the hills that became known to Eighth Army as Wilder’s Gap; this was on
the route followed by the New Zealand Corps two months later. Other patrols explored the
country farther to the west, T2 in the area to the south of Djebel Tebaga, between Matmata and
Chott Djerid, a huge salt marsh, and G2 in the area between the Chott and the Grand Erg Oriental,
an impassable sand sea extending into southern Algeria.
T2 patrol, under Lieutenant Tinker, and accompanied by a party of ‘Popski’s Private Army’
(Peniakoff’s Demolition Squadron), established a base camp in a wadi about twenty miles to the
south of Ksar Rhilane. Tinker and Peniakoff, each with two jeeps, then went north towards
Djebel Tebaga, through country that was found to be suitable for the passage of a force of all arms.
THE ROADWATCH
RAID ON BARCE
INTO TUNISIA
IN THE ÆGEAN
Escape
A natural corridor extended between Djebel Tebaga and the Matmata Hills towards the coast at
Gabes; this was the Tebaga Gap through which the outflanking of the Mareth Line was to
be accomplished. After avoiding German troops preparing defences near Matmata, Tinker and
Peniakoff parted to continue with their separate tasks, Peniakoff to carry out demolitions in the
Matmata area and Tinker to examine the country in the direction of Chott Djerid. On the way
back to the base camp, Tinker rejoined Peniakoff at Ksar Rhilane and learned that the camp had
been shot up by enemy aircraft. All the vehicles had been destroyed and two New Zealanders
(Lance-Corporals R. A. Ramsay38 and R. C. Davies39) had been wounded.
Everybody except Sergeant Garven, a French officer and two Arabs of the PPA, who remained
to keep a rendezvous with S2 patrol, had moved from the base camp to Ksar Rhilane, where
there was a mixed gathering of thirty-seven men: sixteen of the LRDG, thirteen of the PPA,
six French parachutists, and two SAS parachutists. The French had been following the route
taken by Stirling’s SAS troops when one of their jeeps had broken down, and Stirling had left
the other two men because of vehicle trouble. Not long afterwards Stirling and his party were
captured near Gabes.
The LRDG had two jeeps, the PPA two, and the French one, but there was not sufficient
petrol to take all five a hundred miles. With three jeeps, the wounded men, and petrol for 150
miles, Tinker set out for Sabria, an oasis near Chott Djerid, while the remainder of the men
followed on foot, with their supplies in the other two jeeps. Tinker was to send back relief for the
walkers, but if Sabria was not held by the Fighting French, he would have to go to Tozeur.
Sabria was in the hands of the Germans. An Arab guided Tinker’s party, without being detected,
past the oasis to Sidi Mazouq, where the natives cared for them. At this stage they had travelled
sixty miles and were still over a hundred from Tozeur. As there was not sufficient petrol to complete the journey around the shore of Chott Djerid, Tinker decided to cross the salt marshes by a
camel track to Nefta, a village about sixteen miles from Tozeur. Where the surface was firm
it was possible to drive at top speed, but where water seepage formed a quagmire the jeeps lurched
through muddy pools on to hard lumps of coagulated salt and sand. They were the first vehicles
ever to cross the Chott.
At Nefta, Tinker arranged by telephone for the French to supply petrol from Tozeur. He
refuelled two of his jeeps and sent them back to meet the walking party—they did not attempt to
recross the Chott—while he went to Gafsa, about sixty miles to the north-east of Tozeur, to
obtain transport from the United States Army and to report by wireless to Eighth Army. The
Americans at Gafsa, unable to help, told him to go to Tebessa, a hundred miles to the north-west,
in Algeria. Although not wholly convinced by Tinker’s story, the Americans at Tebessa lent him
two jeeps and allowed him to report to Eighth Army.
Tinker then went back to meet the walking party, whom he found near Sidi Mazouq and took
to Tozeur. The two jeeps sent from Nefta had missed the walkers, but they arrived at Tozeur a
day later, accompanied by an officer from S2 patrol. The Rhodesians had kept the rendezvous with
Garven’s party. Tinker returned the borrowed jeeps to the Americans, who had a message from
Eighth Army requesting his return by air. Leaving his patrol and attached troops in the hands of the
British First Army, the United States 2nd Corps, and the Fighting French, he flew from Tebessa
to Algiers, and from there to Tripoli, where he reported at Eighth Army to assist in the preparations
for the ‘left hook’ around Mareth. Tinker’s courageous leadership won him the MC.
The last task assigned to the LRDG by Eighth Army was the navigation of the New Zealand
Corps during the outflanking of the Mareth Line. Appropriately, the task was performed by New
Zealanders, Captain Tinker and three men from T2 patrol, in two jeeps.
The New Zealand Corps passed through Wilder’s Gap and remained at an assembly area while
the route was plotted to the north-west. A wadi with steep, rocky escarpments presented a very
difficult obstacle, but Tinker, accompanied by an officer
Captain J. A. Goodsir
of the New Zealand Engineers, found a
place where tracks could be made by machinery to get the Corps transport across. Meanwhile, the
T2 navigator (Corporal Bassett) guided a New Zealand Provost party marking the ‘Diamond
track’ along the line of advance. The Corps left the assembly area on 19 March, the day before
Eighth Army launched its frontal attack on the Mareth Line, advanced to Tebaga along the route
reconnoitred by the LRDG, and made contact with the enemy on the 21st.
Reacting to this threat to his right flank, the enemy attempted to hold the Tebaga Gap with
21 Panzer and two other divisions. General Montgomery despatched 1 Armoured Division to
reinforce the New Zealand Corps. With powerful support from the RAF, this force broke through
the gap on 26 March and left the enemy with no option but to abandon the Mareth Line. The
New Zealanders entered Gabes three days later. When the Axis forces were driven back into a
corner of Tunisia, there was no further scope for the LRDG, which therefore was released from
Eighth Army and returned to Egypt to rest and reorganise.
The war in North Africa ended with the Axis surrender on 13 May 1943. During the two and a
half years that the armies had advanced and retreated along the coast, the patrols of the LRDG,
operating behind the enemy lines, had dominated the vast inner desert. Their next undertaking
was in a different theatre of war, the Aegean Sea.
Invasion of the Dodecanese Islands
WITH THE OBJECT of containing German forces in the eastern Mediterranean and
diverting part of the enemy’s air force during the Allied invasion of Italy, and also of
taking advantage of any weakness in the enemy defences that might follow the Italian capitulation,
British forces from the Middle East occupied the Dodecanese Islands in the Aegean Sea in September 1943. The enemy’s command of the air, however, enabled him to counter-attack and regain
possession of these islands during the next two months. In the course of these operations, patrols
of the LRDG were employed as raiding and reconnaissance parties in the enemy-held islands,
and as garrison troops.
When Italy collapsed, the Germans assumed control of Crete, Rhodes, and Scarpanto. As a
preliminary step to an assault on Rhodes and to harass the extended German garrisons, the British
secured the islands of Cos, which had the only airfield, Leros, where there was a naval base, and
Samos, which would be an advanced base in the north, as well as other small islands. Reinforcements were taken without opposition by air to Cos, by destroyer to Leros, and by small local
craft to Samos and other islands.
Before going to this new theatre of war, the LRDG spent the summer of 1943 at The Cedars of
Lebanon, where the men were trained in mountain warfare. The patrols travelled long distances as
self-contained units, and received supplies dropped by the RAF under wireless direction. B (British
and Rhodesian) Squadron also trained on the Levant coast to operate from submarines, but
A Squadron, which included approximately 110 New Zealanders under the command of Major
Guild, had no opportunity for amphibious training.
A Squadron, leaving Haifa ten days after B Squadron, sailed on the Greek destroyer Queen
Olga on 21 September in convoy with three other destroyers and reached Portolago, Leros, during
an air raid the following day. Little damage was done to the port, so work was begun immediately
unloading stores and making camp at Alinda Bay, on the eastern side of the island. A few days later
the Queen Olga and HMS Intrepid were sunk at Portolago and the naval barracks were damaged
in heavy air raids.
Two A Squadron patrols were despatched from Leros on 25 September for the Cyclades,
a chain of islands off the south-east coast of the Greek mainland, to watch and report on the
movements of enemy shipping and aircraft. A party from T1 patrol went to Kithnos and M1
M1 and M2 were British patrols formed during the training period in Lebanon. M1 was under the command of
A Squadron and M2 was led by a New Zealander (Lieutenant K. H. Lazarus) in the British Army.
patrol to Giaros. In addition, a Rhodesian patrol (S1) was sent to Simi, a small island off the coast
of Turkey and about fifteen miles to the north of Rhodes, and M2 patrol to Stampalia. The
remainder of the LRDG, together with the Special Boat Squadron and some commandos, were
concentrated on the island of Calino, two or three miles to the south of Leros. On their arrival
on 25 September they received a tumultuous welcome from the Greeks, who had been oppressed
by the Italian garrison.
The enemy already had begun his air attacks on Cos, the only island from which fighter aircraft
could operate to protect the sea and land forces in the Aegean. The number of fighters that could
be based on the Cos airfield was not sufficient to ward off for long the determined attacks of a
strongly reinforced German Air Force. The enemy invaded Cos by sea and air on 3 October and,
despite the stubborn resistance of a battalion of the Durham Light Infantry, overwhelmed the
garrison next day.
The troops on Calino, six miles away, were given no warning of the invasion, and as a result
the LRDG narrowly escaped losing a patrol. Captain Tinker had set out on 28 September with a
composite patrol of twelve men to investigate some mysterious signalling to Turkey from Pserimo,
a small island midway between Calino and Cos. The signaller, who was sent back to Calino for
interrogation, was found to be a Greek in British pay as an agent.
The invasion fleet bound for Cos, including merchant ships and landing craft, escorted by
flak ships and three destroyers, arrived in a cove on the south coast of Pserimo before dawn on
3 October and began the assault on Cos half an hour later. The enemy put eighty troops ashore at
Pserimo to establish headquarters and dressing stations. They quite unexpectedly encountered
Tinker’s men, who left hurriedly for the high ground, hustled on by heavy volleys of fire from
the escort ships. Enemy patrols searched the island that day and the next, but Tinker’s party was
taken off in the late afternoon of 4 October and returned to Calino with the loss of only one man
captured.
The LRDG had been ordered to counter-attack Cos the previous night—an impossible task—
but this order was cancelled and all the troops on Calino, which was now considered untenable,
were instructed to return to Leros. Stores and troops were loaded into every available craft and a
strange fleet of little ships struggled out from Calino in the evening. They reached Leros at various
times throughout the night and, in anticipation of air attacks, unloaded and moved the stores
away from the wharves before daylight. A dive-bombing raid by fifty-five aircraft began at
5.30 a.m. and lasted four hours. An Italian gunboat and several small craft were sunk and buildings
and installations destroyed.
The garrison on Leros comprised Headquarters 234 Brigade, a battalion of the Royal Irish
Fusiliers, a company of the Royal West Kents, and the Raiding Forces (about 200 men of the
LRDG, 150 men of the SBS, and thirty commandos). The only anti-aircraft defences, 40-millimetre
Breda guns, and the five coastal-defence batteries, each of four 6-inch naval guns (off British ships),
were Italian. Five LRDG patrols were despatched to the battery positions to stiffen the morale
of the Italian allies and if necessary prevent them from turning their guns against brigade headquarters. The task of seeing that the gun crews were at their posts, and that they manned their guns,
called for tact, patience, and even force. The Italian communication system, inefficient in any case
because of the demoralisation of the signalmen, was damaged by bombing, and in the later stages
before the invasion the only communications were the LRDG wireless links.
The bombing attacks were continued every day, often by sixty or more aircraft, and the coastal
batteries were among the targets selected. The battery on Mount Marcello, in the north-west,
where Y2 patrol was stationed, was put out of action on 8 October, and the battery on Mount
Zuncona, to the east of Portolago Bay, where R1 (under Lieutenant D. J. Aitken40) was stationed,
was put out of action next day. Aitken’s patrol was then withdrawn to A Squadron headquarters.
German landing craft were seen entering the bays of Calino on 10 October, and next day the
coastal batteries shelled the enemy from Leros. The LRDG sent parties of two or three men to
Calino to gather information about enemy activity there. On one occasion a New Zealander
(Sergeant R. D. Tant41) failed to return to the rendezvous. Captured by the enemy, he was taken
from Calino to Cos, but escaped to Turkey and arrived back at Leros after being missing for a
fortnight. He was again taken prisoner, however, during the invasion of that island, by the same
company of German paratroops.
The loss of the Cos airfield was a major setback, for without air cover merchant shipping could
not enter the Aegean with the anti-aircraft guns, transport, and stores needed for the defence of
Leros and Samos, and the Navy could avoid unacceptable losses only by operating at night. It was
doubtful whether Leros and Samos could be held indefinitely without the capture of Rhodes,
a major operation for which the resources were not available in the Middle East. Nevertheless,
the Commanders-in-Chief of the three services decided to hold Leros and Samos as long as supplies
could be maintained.
Destroyers, submarines, and smaller craft brought troops, supplies, six 25-pounder guns,
twelve Bofors guns (which were strapped on submarines), jeeps and trailers. Mortars, machine
guns, ammunition, wireless equipment, and other stores were dropped by parachute. The garrison
was reinforced by 400 men of the Buffs, who were the survivors of the troops on three destroyers
sunk by mines off Calino on 24 October, and by a battalion of the King’s Own.
The King’s Own Royal Regiment
Patrols in Outlying Islands
The invasion of Leros had been expected to follow the fall of Cos, but bombing attacks on
enemy airfields in Greece, Crete, and Rhodes by Allied aircraft based in North Africa and Cyprus,
and offensive sweeps against enemy shipping in the Aegean, delayed the assault until mid-November. So that an invasion force might be anticipated and if possible intercepted, LRDG patrols were
stationed in the outlying islands astride the sea and air routes to the Dodecanese to watch the
movements of enemy shipping and aircraft. Acting on information sent by T1 patrol from
Kithnos, the Navy sank on 7 October a convoy consisting of six landing craft, an ammunition
ship, and an armed trawler. There were only ninety survivors from 2500 troops. The destruction
of this convoy prevented the enemy from making an immediate assault on Leros.
Captain C. K. Saxton42 and six men of T1 patrol were taken to Kithnos in an 18-ton caique
These small local craft were fitted with tank engines, giving them a speed of six knots, and manned by the Navy with a
crew of three. They were camouflaged with their masts down so that they could not easily be detected when lying
close inshore.
of the Levant Schooner Flotilla, which made the voyage in three stages at night and was concealed
during daylight against the shores of two intermediate islands. Kithnos was occupied by a garrison
of between fifteen and twenty Germans in charge of a permanent observation post and wireless
direction-finding station. At first it was intended that T1 should stay a fortnight, but so valuable
was the information they obtained that it was decided to leave them on the island for a month.
The enemy knew they were there, but Saxton’s men avoided discovery by changing their hiding-places, which were mostly in stock shelters, and by moving at night. Sergeant J. L. D. Davis,
who had some knowledge of their language, obtained from several of the local Greeks reliable
information about the enemy dispositions in the neighbouring islands and about shipping routes.
His conduct throughout the Aegean operations won Davis the BEM.
Kithnos was admirably situated for observing the routes from Greece to Crete and the Dodecanese Islands. T1 patrol, which kept a constant watch for shipping and aircraft, sighted a convoy
passing between Kithnos and Siros islands in the afternoon of 6 October, and reported by wireless
its size, speed, air cover, and probable route; this was the convoy sunk by the Navy off Stampalia.
The LSF caique returned with supplies and took Saxton and the wireless operator to a small island
off Seriphos to charge the wireless batteries, a noisy operation that might have betrayed them to
the enemy. While they were away, Davis, who was left in command of the observation post on
Kithnos, saw two small convoys moving at night.
After capturing Cos, the enemy consolidated his position in the Cyclades by occupying many
of the islands. Believing that they were cut off and would have to find their own way back, T1
planned to escape to Turkey by capturing a German caique or by taking a local fisherman’s boat,
but before they attempted to do this T2 patrol arrived by LSF caique to relieve them. Saxton’s
patrol, with two of the Greeks who had helped them, returned safely to Leros on 23 October.
T2 (five men under Second-Lieutenant M. W. Cross43) were disembarked at Seriphos because
that island was thought to be safer than Kithnos, which the enemy patrolled with seaplanes.
A Greek helped Cross’s party to find a suitable hiding-place in an abandoned goat-house on top
of a 300-foot cliff at the northern end of the island, from which they had a magnificent view.
The local inhabitants kept the patrol constantly informed about the movements of the enemy
garrison, reported to be between twenty and fifty strong, in the town about four miles away.
The postmaster passed the information by telephone to a monastery, and a priest sent a runner to
the New Zealanders’ hideout. T2 spent three weeks on Seriphos without being observed, although
once the enemy sailed so close inshore below their cliff that they could have dropped a stone in
the boat.
They saw only one vessel, a steamer of about 6000 tons, but when the enemy began an airlift
from Athens to Rhodes with four large flying boats escorted by seaplane-fighters, they reported
the times that the aircraft passed the island. Six Beaufighters shot down the flying boats when they
appeared one day without fighter escort. T2 was relieved by a British patrol and returned to Leros
on 9 November with three Greeks.
Seven men from R1 patrol, under Lieutenant Aitken, spent seventeen days on Naxos, one of the
largest of the Cyclades Islands, to which they were taken by motor launch. They confused the
garrison of 650 Germans, who undoubtedly knew they were on the island, by making long cross-country treks. The local inhabitants, as on the other islands, warned the patrol of the enemy’s
movements and were at times embarrassingly friendly. The patrol saw single ships but no convoys,
and reported a concentration of shipping in Naxos harbour, which was attacked by two Mitchell
bombers escorted by two Beaufighters. The RAF sank two ships, but at the cost of two aircraft
shot down. The pilot and navigator of a Beaufighter that crashed in the sea were rescued by
Greeks and taken into the town, where their wounds were dressed by a doctor and they were
hidden until the LRDG patrol could smuggle them out under the noses of the enemy. R1 took
the two airmen back to Leros, where they arrived on 6 November without casualty.
The Assault on Levita
The survivors of the enemy convoy sunk on 7 October were landed on Stampalia, where the
LRDG had M2 patrol. A small naval craft (the Hedgehog) despatched from Leros to bring back
ten prisoners of war for interrogation, called with engine trouble at Levita, about twenty miles
to the west of Calino. A party sent by motor launch to the assistance of the Hedgehog found only a
smouldering wreck and was fired on from the island. As the possession of Levita was considered
essential to the Navy, and as it would be useful as an observation post, the commander of 234
Brigade ordered the LRDG to capture the island. Major Guild and Captain Tinker urged that a
reconnaissance should be made before the assault force was landed, but permission to do this
was not granted.
It was decided to attack with forty-eight men under the command of Captain J. R. Olivey,44
the force including twenty-two from A Squadron under Lieutenant J. M. Sutherland,45 and the
remainder coming from B Squadron. Sutherland’s patrol (R2), was withdrawn from the coastal
battery on Mount Scumbardo, in southern Leros, and was joined by a few men from R1 and T2
patrols. The B Squadron party included Y2 and part of S1 patrol. In case the enemy should be
occupying both ends of Levita, B Squadron was to land to the west of the port, which is on the
south coast, and A Squadron to the east. The objective was to reach the high, central ground overlooking the port.
The landings were to be made from two motor launches in small, canvas boats, but as these
had been punctured in air attacks, the troops had to patch them with sticking-plaster before they
could practise rowing in them. The force had four infantry wireless sets for inter-communication
between the two parties and with the launches, and a larger set for communication with Leros.
When they were about to leave at dusk on 23 October, however, it was discovered that the
A Squadron set had not been ‘netted in’ with the others.
Most of the men were violently seasick before they reached Levita. It took A Squadron a long
time to float the canvas boats from the tossing launch, but they eventually got away and landed
on a very rugged coast, where the men rescued as much of their gear as they could from the rocks
and dragged it up a cliff face. Sutherland told his wireless operator to try to get in touch with
Olivey, but at no stage was he able to do so.
After disembarking the two parties, the motor launches were to shell a house thought to be
occupied by the enemy in the centre of the island. Instead of shelling this building, however, they
concentrated on an old hut on a ridge in front of A Squadron. When the shellfire ceased, Sutherland’s party moved towards the ridge and discovered nearby the burnt-out hull of the Hedgehog.
They then came under machine-gun fire from the rear, presumably from somewhere near their
landing place. This kept them pinned down on bare ground until they were able to get together
and rush the gun position, which they captured with a dozen prisoners. Trooper H. L. Mallett46
was severely wounded and died despite the efforts of the medical orderly (Private B. Steedman47)
to save him.
Although they again came under machine-gun fire, A Squadron continued to advance and
secured the ridge before daylight. They flushed the enemy out of the hut, but did not occupy it
because it was in a vulnerable position. Trooper A. J. Penhall48 was mortally wounded, but Trooper
R. G. Haddow,49 although severely wounded in the stomach, recovered as a prisoner of war.
Several other men received minor wounds.
At the first streaks of daylight, three or four seaplanes began to take off from the Levita harbour.
The New Zealanders, who overlooked the harbour from the ridge, opened fire, and for a moment
it seemed that Trooper L. G. Doel50 had put one seaplane out of action with his Bren gun, but it
moved out of range and took off after some delay. When the seaplanes came overhead and began
to strafe, the men returned the fire, but as their bullets only bounced off harmlessly they decided
not to waste ammunition.
Having met no resistance on landing, B Squadron was within 500 yards of the enemy headquarters by dawn and could hear fighting on the other side of the island. Had Sutherland been able
to make contact with Olivey by wireless, he would have advised him of his position, and B Squadron could have gone ahead without fear of firing on A Squadron. The Germans, who received
reinforcements during the day, isolated the New Zealanders on the ridge with air attacks and
machine-gun and mortar fire, while they encircled and captured most of the B Squadron party.
Having disposed of B Squadron, the enemy was then able to employ his full strength against
A Squadron, which was holding three positions on the ridge. Sutherland had with him the wireless
operator, the medical orderly, the wounded, three or four other men, and the German prisoners.
Sergeant E. J. Dobson51 was in charge of a party in a central position, armed with a Bren gun, a
Tommy gun, and some rifles, and farther away on high ground, Corporal J. E. Gill52 had the
third party. Trooper J. T. Bowler,53 who went down to the landing place for water, and a man
who attempted to deliver a message from Gill to Sutherland, were not seen again and were
presumed to have been killed. The enemy eventually overwhelmed Sutherland’s force, but Gill and
three men avoided capture for four days by hiding among some rocks. They were unable to
attract the attention of a launch that circled the island and, as they were without food and water,
had to give themselves up to the enemy.
With instructions to evacuate the force from Levita, the commanding officer of the LRDG
(Lieutenant-Colonel Easonsmith)
Easonsmith became the commanding officer of the LRDG on 17 October 1943, when Colonel Prendergast was
appointed second-in-command of the Raiding Forces in the Aegean.
arrived by launch during the night 24–25 October, but found
only Captain Olivey, the medical officer (Captain Lawson), and seven men of B Squadron at the
rendezvous. Olivey returned with Major Guild the following night to search for the missing men,
but found nobody. The LRDG lost forty men on Levita.
Easonsmith conferred with the senior officers of A and B Squadrons on 28 October about the
future of the LRDG. It was recommended that, with the exception of the patrols in the Cyclades
Islands watching for the movement of enemy invasion forces, the LRDG should return to the
Middle East to train reinforcements and reform. Major Guild left by destroyer for Egypt on 31
October to endeavour to have the LRDG withdrawn. On his arrival he learned that the New
Zealand Government had already raised the question of recalling the New Zealand Squadron, which
had been committed to an operational role in the Aegean without the Government’s knowledge,
although the usual procedure was to consult it before committing New Zealand troops to a new
theatre of war. The Commander-in-Chief, Middle East (General Sir Henry Wilson), stated that
it was impossible to replace the New Zealand Squadron at such short notice, and asked that it
remain with the LRDG until replacements could be trained. It was agreed that the squadron should
be withdrawn as soon as the tactical situation allowed.
The Battle of Leros
Only part of A Squadron was withdrawn from, Leros before the invasion began. Lieutenant
Aitken and twenty men from R1 patrol and squadron headquarters left for Palestine by destroyer
on 7 November. R2 patrol, reconstituted with eight New Zealanders and two Englishmen under
Second-Lieutenant R. F. White,54 relieved T1 at the Scumbardo coastal-defence battery position
on 8 November, and T1 moved to an olive grove on the northern side of Alinda Bay, where they
were joined by T2 when they returned from Seriphos next day.
Despite the delays imposed by the Navy and the Allied Air Force, the enemy succeeded in
assembling an invasion flotilla at Cos and Calino for the assault on Leros, which he began at dawn
on 12 November after two days’ intensified bombing. The Scumbardo coastal-defence battery
shelled a convoy at maximum range, but the batteries in the north, which allowed the invasion
force to get closer than the minimum range of their guns before opening fire, were unable to
prevent the enemy from landing. Five hundred Germans were disembarked on the north-east
coast of the island, where they gained possession of the high ground between Palma and Grifo
Bays, including Mount Vedetta, but were held throughout the day by the Buffs and patrols of
B Squadron. Another 150 troops who were landed at Pandeli Bay, to the south-east of Leros
town, after making some progress were counter-attacked by a company of the Royal Irish
Fusiliers and were pinned down on the lower slopes of Mount Appetici.
A warning had been received the previous day that German airborne troops were assembling at
Athens. In anticipation of a parachute attack, Captain Saxton’s T1 patrol and Lieutenant Cross’s T2
patrol moved inland from Alinda Bay, and were joined by a British patrol and some SBS troops
to make a force thirty-odd strong. Early in the afternoon of 12 November, thirty-five Junkers
transport planes, escorted by Stukas, seaplanes, and other types of aircraft, approached at a low
altitude from the west and dropped 500 paratroops on the narrow strip of land between Gurna and
Alinda Bays, where they were engaged immediately by the troops in the area, including the
composite LRDG-SBS group. Major Redfern, who led the LRDG in this action, was killed by a
parachutist. Fierce fighting developed around the Rachi ridge, but although temporary successes
were gained the paratroops could not be dislodged.
Throughout the battle perfect co-operation existed between the enemy air and ground forces.
Except for a brief period during the airborne invasion, the German Air Force, which flew more than
500 sorties in the day, met no anti-aircraft opposition because of the lack of ammunition.
By occupying the Gurna-Alinda isthmus, the enemy could isolate the northern sector from the
rest of the island. He reinforced the Pandeli landing during the night and had possession of Mount
Appetici by midday on 13 November. A strong counter-attack in the centre of the island drove
the enemy into a pocket between Rachi ridge and Alinda Bay, a gain that might have had a decisive
effect on the battle had not the arrival of fresh paratroops caused an unexpected reverse. Two of
the fifteen Junkers transports were shot down and a third released the troops from such a low
altitude that their parachutes could not open, but those who landed safely were able to restore
the position. Meanwhile, in the north-east, the enemy occupied Mount Clidi, where the LRDG
blew up the Italian coastal-defence guns, and Captain Olivey sent his last message at 3 p.m.,
saying ‘Germans here’.
After the failure of a night counter-attack against Appetici by a company of the King’s Own,
supported by a naval bombardment, the enemy drove southwards from that feature towards
Charing Cross. Although this thrust was held on 14 November, the Germans secured a foothold
on Meraviglia, at the top of which Fortress Headquarters was located in tunnels. The Buffs and
the LRDG patrols in the north recaptured Clidi, but the Royal Irish Fusiliers and the King’s
Own, although they took 200 prisoners and inflicted fairly heavy casualties, still were unable to
drive the enemy from Rachi ridge. The German Air Force flew more than 400 sorties, mostly
against Clidi, the positions south of Rachi, Meraviglia, and Windmill ridge (between Meraviglia
and Mount Giovanni), where the 25-pounders and Bofors guns were located. Most of the guns
were knocked out, together with their meagre supplies of ammunition.
Lieutenant White’s R2 patrol on Scumbardo directed the Italian coastal-defence battery to
shoot landwards against targets to the north of Rachi and on Appetici. The shells passed over a
ridge on Meraviglia with only about ten feet to spare, but some accurate shooting was reported
at a jetty in Alinda Bay. The battery engaged enemy positions, including a castle near Leros town,
until all its ammunition was spent on the last day of the battle.
At daybreak on 15 November the enemy forces were confined to the Rachi and Appetici
areas, except for a few men cut off on the cliffs of Clidi. Further efforts were made to capture
Rachi, but despite the help of reinforcements from the Royal West Kents, brought by the Navy
from Samos Island, little headway could be made. Undoubtedly the relentless onslaught of the
enemy air force contributed to this failure. Communications were disrupted, making control
and movement difficult, the fighting deteriorated into small skirmishes, and the troops were
showing signs of fatigue.
Lieutenant-Colonel Easonsmith, with two or three men, reconnoitred Leros town to see
whether the enemy was infiltrating around that side of Meraviglia. He found no enemy, but when
he returned to make a second reconnaissance his party was ambushed and he was killed.
The Germans launched a heavy attack on Meraviglia at first light on 16 November. All types
of aircraft, including Stukas and outmoded seaplanes, flew more than 600 sorties against the
British positions and strafed anything that moved, without a shot being fired in return except by
small arms. The ground assault, which came from the east, met stubborn resistance and seemed to
have spent itself before midday. This would have been the time to counter-attack, but the troops
at Fortress Headquarters were too few, and the disruption of communications prevented other
forces being moved up for the purpose. No doubt appreciating the helplessness of the British
situation, the enemy renewed the attack with great vigour and overran Meraviglia.
Fortress Headquarters and Headquarters LRDG destroyed their documents and wireless
equipment before withdrawing to Portolago. An attempt was made to rally all the troops in the
south of the island for a counter-attack but morale by this time was very low and the result was
a dismal failure. Organised resistance collapsed and silence descended on the island later in the
afternoon. The fortress commander ordered the surrender of Leros about 6 p.m. Troops wandered
around without knowing what to do, and the Germans made no attempt at that late hour to round
up the stragglers.
The LRDG patrols in the north were cut off from their headquarters in the south. Major the Earl
Jellicoe55 had taken command of the composite LRDG-SBS group, which was manning machine-gun posts on the northern coast, in case the enemy should land further reinforcements there.
When news of the capitulation was received about midnight, the men in the vicinity were rounded
up with the aid of two jeeps. A party of about twenty-five, including T1 and T2 patrols, took
possession of an Italian caique and small motor boat in Parteni Bay, persuaded the Italians to open
the harbour boom, and sailed to a small island north of Leros, where they hid during daylight.
They reached Bodrum next night and joined an old minesweeper, in which they made a three-day
voyage down the Turkish coast and across to Haifa.
After the surrender, most of Headquarters LRDG dispersed in the south near Mount
Patella. Colonel Prendergast, Captain Croucher, Captain Tinker, and several others, including
two men from R2 patrol, hid on Mount Tortore. The remainder of R2 escaped that night in two
parties. Lieutenant White and four men baled out a little rowing boat that had been sunk at
Serocampo Bay and made a perilous journey to join other escapees near Bodrum. Colonel Prendergast’s party remained hidden on Leros until 22 November, when they were evacuated by an
RAF air-sea rescue launch. Small groups continued to escape up to a fortnight after the surrender.
The LRDG did everything that could be expected of it during the fighting on Leros, often
setting an example to the other troops, and when the island fell the men endured many hardships
in order to escape. In the end, only two men of A Squadron were captured on Leros. This was the
last operation in which the New Zealand Squadron participated. It was disbanded on 31 December
1943 and most of its members, after a spell at the New Zealand Armoured Corps Training Depot
in Egypt, were posted as reinforcements to the Divisional Cavalry with the 2nd New Zealand
Division in Italy.
Biographical Notes
1Lt-Col D. G. Steele, OBE, m.i.d.; farmer; Rotorua; born Wellington, 22 Mar 1912; patrol commander
LRDG; commanding officer A (NZ) Sqn LRDG 1941–42; CO 22 NZ (Mot) Bn, 1944; CO 27 NZ (MG) Bn, 1944.
2Lt-Col A. D. Stirling, DSO; Scots Guards; CO Special Air Service; p.w. Jan 1943.
3Maj C. S. Morris, MC; branch manager; Christchurch; born Fairlie, 6 Apr 1905; patrol commander LRDG;
CO A (NZ) Sqn LRDG 1942; chief instructor NZ AFV School, Waiouru, 1944.
4Sgt G. C. Garven, MM; farmer; Otorohanga; born Wellington, 16 Apr 1918.
5Pte C. A. Dornbush, MM; truck driver; Mangaweka; born NZ, 16 Jun 1917; p.w. Dec 1942.
62 Lt D. M. Bassett, DCM; farmer; Rangiora; born Christchurch, 6 Feb 1914.
7Sgt E. Sanders, MM; seaman; born Christchurch, 29 Dec 1915.
8Pte F. R. Brown, MM; labourer; born Taumarunui, 11 Aug 1913; died in NZ, 23 Dec 1944.
9Tpr G. C. Parkes; labourer; born NZ, 28 May 1910.)
10Lt-Col N. P. Wilder, DSO; farmer; Waipukurau; born NZ, 29 Mar 1914; patrol commander LRDG;
CO 2 NZ Div Cav, 1944; wounded 14 Sep 1942.)
11Cpl K. E. Tippett, MM; car painter; Te Awamutu; born Lyttelton, 27 Sep 1914.
12Tpr T. B. Dobson, MM; farm labourer; Seddon; born NZ, 25 Feb 1916; wounded 14 Sep 1942.)
13Capt J. R. Talbot; storekeeper, Motueka; born South Africa, 4 Jun 1910; patrol commander LRDG; p.w. 15 Jan 1943.
14Lt-Col J. R. Easonsmith, DSO, MC; Royal Tank Regiment; patrol commander LRDG; CO LRDG 1943; killed in action, 16 Nov 1943.
15Capt J. A. L. Timpson, MC; Scots Guards; patrol commander LRDG.)
16Capt R. P. Lawson, MC; Royal Army Medical Corps; medical officer LRDG.)
17L-Sgt M. Craw, MM; farmer; Manawatu; born Auckland, 4 Oct 1915; p.w. 14 Sep 1942; escaped 13 Sep 1943.
18Sgt D. S. Parker; derrickman; Gisborne; born NZ, 24 Feb 1918; wounded 14 Sep 1942.
19Sgt H. R. T. Holland; insurance superintendent; born Wellington, 29 Mar 1910; p.w. 14 Sep 1942.
20L-Cpl A. H. C. Nutt; farmer; Motukarara; born Christchurch, 25 Aug 1911; p.w. 14 Sep 1942; escaped Sep 1943.
21Tpr P. J. Burke; taxi driver; born Gore, 4 Sep 1917; wounded 14 Sep 1942 and 25 Nov 1942.
22Sgt J. L. D. Davis, BEM; clerk; Stratford; born Taumarunui, 9 Jan 1914.
23Tpr K. Yealands; truck driver; Blenheim; born Blenheim, 16 Apr 1921; wounded and p.w. 14 Sep 1942.
24Sgt R. E. Hay; painter; Dunedin; born Dunedin, 11 Dec 1913; p.w. 14 Sep 1942; escaped Sep 1943.
25Tpr T. A. Milburn; stock agent; Port Chalmers; born Dunedin, 6 Feb 1918; p.w. 14 Sep 1942; escaped Sep 1943.
26Tpr F. W. Jopling; farm hand; Auckland; born England, 15 Apr 1913; wounded 14 Sep 1942; p.w. 25 Sep 1942.
27Cpl D. P. Warbrick; cartage contractor; Taupo; born Taupo, 8 Mar 1908.)
28Capt R. A. Tinker, MC, MM, m.i.d.; motor driver; Timaru; born NZ, 13 Apr 1913; patrol commander
LRDG; now in NZ Regular Army.
29Cpl E. Ellis, MM; shepherd; Masterton; born Temuka, 6 Jun 1913.
30Maj A. I. Guild; farming student; Christchurch; born Temuka, 19 Feb 1916; patrol commander LRDG;
CO A (NZ) Sqn LRDG 1942–43.
31Capt L. H. Browne, MC, DCM, m.i.d.; accountant; London; born England, 8 Jul 1908; patrol commander LRDG; GSO III, G (Ops), GHQ MEF, 1942; Intelligence officer LRDG 1943; wounded 11 Jan 1941,
31 Jan 1941, 18 Nov 1942, and 22 Dec 1942.
32L-Cpl N. O’Malley; shepherd; born Havelock, 9 Oct 1910; killed in action, 18 Nov 1942.)
33Sgt M. F. Fogden; farmer; Auckland; born Lower Hutt, 19 Aug 1915; wounded and p.w., Sidi Rezegh, 23 Nov 1941; released 25 Dec 1941; wounded 18 Nov 1942.)
34Capt K. F. McLauchlan, MM, m.i.d.; civil engineer; Wellington; born Invercargill, 20 Jun 1912; patrol
commander LRDG.
35Capt C. H. B. Croucher, m.i.d.; Merchant Navy; Feilding; born England, 25 Feb 1910; commissioned
British Army; patrol commander LRDG; GSO III, G (Ops), GHQ MEF, 1942; adjutant LRDG 1943; IO LRDG
1943; IO Raiding Forces 1944; IO LRDG 1944.
36Capt D. Barrett, MBE, m.i.d.; clerk; Napier; born Paeroa, 8 Dec 1909; adjutant and quartermaster LRDG.
37Col G. L. Prendergast, DSO; Royal Tank Regiment; CO LRDG 1941–43; second-in-command Raiding
Forces 1943.
38L-Cpl R. A. Ramsay, EM; farmer; Huntly; born Hamilton, 21 Sep 1917; wounded 28 Jan 1943.
39Sgt R. C. Davies; clerk; Picton; born Picton, 3 May 1915; wounded 28 Jan 1943.
40Maj D. J. Aitken, m.i.d.; slaughterman; New Plymouth; born Leeston, 11 Oct 1917; patrol commander
LRDG; J Force 1946; now in NZ Regular Army.
41Sgt R. D. Tant; clerk; Christchurch; born Christchurch, 20 Mar 1919; p.w. 16 Nov 1943.
42Maj C. K. Saxton, m.i.d.; commercial traveller; Dunedin; born Kurow, 23 May 1913; patrol commander
LRDG.
43Capt M. W. Cross, MM; farmer; Palmerston North; born Balclutha, 16 Apr 1917; patrol commander
LRDG.
44Capt J. R. Olivey, MC; Sherwood Foresters; patrol commander LRDG.
45Capt J. M. Sutherland; farmer; Waimate; born Waimate, 9 Apr 1913; patrol commander LRDG; p.w. 25 Oct 1943.
46Tpr H. L. Mallett; lorry driver; born NZ, 3 Apr 1914; died of wounds, 24 Oct 1943.
47Pte B. Steedman; labourer; Auckland; born NZ, 21 Aug 1915; p.w. 25 Oct 1943.
48Tpr A. J. Penhall; shepherd; born NZ, 14 Mar 1910; p.w. 25 Oct 1943; died of wounds while p.w., 28 Oct 1943.
49Sgt R. G. Haddow; film booker; Wellington; born NZ, 9 Jul 1921; wounded and p.w. 25 Oct 1943; J Force 1946.
50Tpr L. G. Doel; freezing works employee; North Auckland; born Whangarei, 10 Mar 1915; wounded 22 Jul 1942; p.w. 25 Oct 1943.
51Sgt E. J. Dobson; labourer; born NZ, 15 Aug 1910; wounded 19 Sep 1942; p.w. 25 Oct 1943; died while
p.w. 6 Apr 1945.
52Cpl J. E. Gill; contractor; Matamata; born NZ, 1 Jul 1912; p.w. 29 Oct 1943.
53Tpr J. T. Bowler; shepherd; born Napier, 25 Sep 1914; killed in action 24 Oct 1943.
54Capt R. F. White; farmer; Hororata; born England, 21 Mar 1910; patrol commander LRDG.
55Maj the Earl Jellicoe, DSO, MC; Coldstream Guards; CO Special Boat Squadron in the Aegean.
this was preceded by an account of the lrdg in libya in 1940 and 1941
THE AUTHOR, R. L. Kay, who is a member of the staff of the War History
Branch, was a newspaper reporter before the war and served with the 2nd NZEF
Public Relations Service in the Middle East. He graduated BA at Victoria
University College in 1948.